Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
JAMA ; 320(4): 368-378, 2018 07 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30043066

RESUMEN

Importance: Early in-bed cycling and electrical muscle stimulation may improve the benefits of rehabilitation in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objective: To investigate whether early in-bed leg cycling plus electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscles added to standardized early rehabilitation would result in greater muscle strength at discharge from the ICU. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-center, randomized clinical trial enrolling critically ill adult patients at 1 ICU within an 1100-bed hospital in France. Enrollment lasted from July 2014 to June 2016 and there was a 6-month follow-up, which ended on November 24, 2016. Interventions: Patients were randomized to early in-bed leg cycling plus electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscles added to standardized early rehabilitation (n = 159) or standardized early rehabilitation alone (usual care) (n = 155). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was muscle strength at discharge from the ICU assessed by physiotherapists blinded to treatment group using the Medical Research Council grading system (score range, 0-60 points; a higher score reflects better muscle strength; minimal clinically important difference of 4 points). Secondary outcomes at ICU discharge included the number of ventilator-free days and ICU Mobility Scale score (range, 0-10; a higher score reflects better walking capability). Functional autonomy and health-related quality of life were assessed at 6 months. Results: Among 314 randomized patients, 312 (mean age, 66 years; women, 36%; receiving mechanical ventilation at study inclusion, 78%) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The median global Medical Research Council score at ICU discharge was 48 (interquartile range [IQR], 29 to 58) in the intervention group and 51 (IQR, 37 to 58) in the usual care group (median difference, -3.0 [95% CI, -7.0 to 2.8]; P = .28). The ICU Mobility Scale score at ICU discharge was 6 (IQR, 3 to 9) in both groups (median difference, 0 [95% CI, -1 to 2]; P = .52). The median number of ventilator-free days at day 28 was 21 (IQR, 6 to 25) in the intervention group and 22 (IQR, 10 to 25) in the usual care group (median difference, 1 [95% CI, -2 to 3]; P = .24). Clinically significant events occurred during mobilization sessions in 7 patients (4.4%) in the intervention group and in 9 patients (5.8%) in the usual care group. There were no significant between-group differences in the outcomes assessed at 6 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center randomized clinical trial involving patients admitted to the ICU, adding early in-bed leg cycling exercises and electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscles to a standardized early rehabilitation program did not improve global muscle strength at discharge from the ICU. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02185989.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/rehabilitación , Estimulación Eléctrica , Terapia por Ejercicio , Fuerza Muscular , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Cuádriceps/fisiología , Rehabilitación/métodos , Caminata/fisiología
2.
J Crit Care ; 24(4): 575-82, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19327324

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the potential impact of dopamine therapy on 28-day mortality in adult septic shock. METHODS: For 66 months, clinical data, medications taken before admission, doses of catecholamines used, and biological parameters were recorded prospectively in all patients admitted for septic shock. This observational study was followed by (1) post hoc multivariate analyses and (2) risk-adjusted matched cohort study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 277 patients (65 +/- 14 years; Simplified Acute Physiology Score II = 54 +/- 19, 28-day mortality = 45%; hospital mortality = 53%), 6 factors were linked to 28-day mortality, including Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (P < .0001) and the use of dopamine (P = .043). In a pair-matched cohort of 132 patients, we observed a higher mortality with dopamine (28-day mortality of 62% vs 41%, respectively; P = .006). Dopamine remained linked to day 28 mortality by conditional logistic analysis (odds ratio = 6.2 [1.5-25]). A strong interaction between essential hypertension and dopamine was found, associated to 81% 28-day mortality in patients having both conditions. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort study, dopamine use was linked to mortality as compared to other vasopressor therapies, particularly in patients with essential hypertension. Future randomized studies attempting to compare dopamine with other therapies in septic shock should pay attention to patients with essential hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , APACHE , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Choque Séptico/complicaciones
3.
Crit Care Med ; 33(11): 2471-8, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16276168

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of intrahospital transport of critically ill ventilated patients on the acquisition of ventilator-associated pneumonia. DESIGN: An exposed/unexposed matched cohort study. SETTING: An 18-bed adult medical-surgical intensive care unit in a 1,100-bed regional and teaching hospital in France. PATIENTS: From January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2002, 118 of 228 ventilated patients transported out of the intensive care unit (exposed patients) were matched with 118 unexposed patients selected among 295 ventilated patients who did not undergo intrahospital transport. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The matching process was conducted according to six criteria: duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of antibiotherapy, indication for ventilatory support, age, probability of death, and surgical procedures or not during intensive care unit stay. The rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (as defined by usual clinical and biological criteria plus positive culture of bronchoscopy directed catheter) acquisition between exposed and unexposed patients were compared by univariate analysis and then by multivariate analysis (conditional logistic regression and Cox's proportional-hazards model) to account for potential confounding factors. The ventilator-associated pneumonia rate was 26% in exposed patients compared with 10% in the matched unexposed patients. Using conditional logistic regression, two factors were independently associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia: intrahospital transport (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.7) and the need for reintubation. Using Cox's model, three independent risk factors were identified: the need for reintubation, enteral nutrition, and intrahospital transport (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.7). The intensive care unit mortality rate was similar (p > .1) in exposed (35%) and unexposed patients (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Intrahospital transport appears to be a significant risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, the respective roles of intrahospital transport and of the cause that leads clinicians to transport patients (mainly for radiographic examinations) are difficult to dissociate even after multiple statistical adjustments. When intrahospital transport is needed, very cautious measures must be taken before and during intrahospital transport to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. In addition, in the few days after intrahospital transport, intensive search for ventilator-associated pneumonia is justified.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Pacientes , Neumonía/etiología , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Francia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Crit Care Med ; 32(4): 998-1003, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15071392

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the obesity-related mortality rate in an intensive care unit. DESIGN: An exposed/unexposed matched cohort study. SETTING: An 18-bed adult medical-surgical intensive care unit in a 1,100-bed regional and teaching hospital in France. PATIENTS: From January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2001, 170 mechanically ventilated exposed patients (obese patients with body mass index of >30 kg/m) were matched with 170 mechanically ventilated unexposed patients (with ideal body mass index of 18.5-24.9 kg/m). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The matching process was conducted according to eight criteria: cause of admission, indication for ventilatory support, immunologic status, cardiac status, probability of death (+/-5%), age (+/-7 yrs), gender, and acquisition of severe events appearing within 24 hrs before admission (defined as resuscitated cardiac arrest, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or septic shock). The mortality rate between exposed and unexposed patients was compared by univariate analysis and then was adjusted for other possible confounding factors by multivariate analysis, using conditional logistic regression. The matching process was successful for 1,360 of 1,360 criteria. Obesity was significantly associated with intensive care unit mortality (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.6). Obesity-related excess mortality was verified mainly for the youngest patients (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-6.1) and for the patients with a probability of intensive care unit death of 11-50% (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.5). This excess mortality rate could be explained by the higher risk of intensive care unit acquired complications among obese patients than among the unexposed ones (odds ratio, 4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-11.8). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is an independent risk factor for intensive care unit death and should be regarded as a severe comorbidity in such units.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Francia , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Oportunidad Relativa , Probabilidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA