Distal Pancreatectomy: Extent of Resection Determines Surgical Risk Categories.

BACKGROUND: Recently, subclassification of pancreatoduodenectomy in 4 differing types has been reported, because additional major vascular and multivisceral resections have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To classify distal pancreatectomy (DP) based on the extent of resection and technical difficulty and to evaluate postoperative outcomes with regards to this classification system. METHODS: All consecutive patients who had undergone DP between 2001 and 2020 in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center were included in this study. DPs were subclassified into 4 distinct categories reflecting the extent of resection and technical difficulty, including standard DP (type 1), DP with venous (type 2), multivisceral (type 3), or arterial resection (type 4). Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared among the 4 groups. RESULTS: A total of 2135 patients underwent DP. Standard DP was the most frequently performed procedure (64.8%). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 1.6%. Morbidity rates were higher in patients with additional vascular or multivisceral resections, and 90-day mortality gradually increased with the extent of resection from standard DP to DP with arterial resection (type 1: 0.7%; type 2: 1.3%; type 3: 3%; type 4: 8.7%; P <0.0001). Multivariable analysis confirmed the type of DP as an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative outcomes after DP depend on the extent of resection and correlate with the type of DP. The implementation of the 4-type classification system allows standardized reporting of surgical outcomes after DP improving comparability of future studies.

Who Do We Fail to Rescue after Pancreatoduodenectomy? Outcomes Among >4000 Procedures Expose Windows of Opportunity.

OBJECTIVE: Our investigation on in-hospital mortality after 4474 pancreatoduodenectomies aimed to identify time-dependent risks as well as windows of opportunity to rescue patients from complications. BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy is generally considered a safe procedure with a 1-10% perioperative mortality based on complexity and surgical volume. Yet, patients are susceptible for life-threatening complications particularly with extended resections. Recognition of distinct vulnerabilities over time while patients recover is required to permit focused monitoring, sophisticated resource allocation, and greatest surgical safety. METHODS: Patients who deceased in-hospital after pancreatoduodenectomy between 2003-2021 were retrieved from the institutional pancreatectomy registry and analyzed in detail with respect to their postoperative course. RESULTS: Among 4474 pancreatoduodenectomies, 156 patients deceased in-hospital (3.5%). When assessing root causes of mortality, we observed 3 different clusters of complications which were postpancreatectomy-specific (47.4%), visceral vasculature-associated (25.6%), or cardiopulmonary in origin (23.7%). The median times of root cause onset in the 3 categories were postoperative day (POD) 9, POD 4.5 ( P =0.008) and POD 3 ( P <0.001), and medians of in-hospital mortality were POD 31, POD 18 ( P =0.009) and POD 8 ( P <0.001), respectively. Intervals between root cause onset and mortality varied with medians of 23 days, 11 days ( P =0.017), and 1 days ( P <0.001). The 3 categories were similarly distributed between different types of surgical complexity. CONCLUSION: Postpancreatectomy-specific complications prompt almost half of in-hospital mortalities after pancreatoduodenectomy, with rather long intervals for interventions to prevent failure to rescue. In contrast, visceral vasculature-related events and cardiopulmonary complications dominate early in-hospital mortalities with short intervals until mortality, demanding rigorous management of such events or preoperative conditioning. These data externally validate a previous high-volume initiative and highlight distinct windows of opportunity to optimize perioperative safety.

Pancreatic Surgery in Children: Complex, Safe, and Effective.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess indications for and report outcomes of pancreatic surgery in pediatric patients. BACKGROUND: Indications for pancreatic surgery in children are rare and data on surgical outcomes after pediatric pancreatic surgery are scarce. METHODS: All children who underwent pancreatic surgery at a tertiary hospital specializing in pancreatic surgery between 2003 and 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Indications, surgical procedures, and perioperative as well as long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 73 children with a mean age of 12.8 years (range: 4 mo to 18 y) underwent pancreatic surgery during the observation period. Indications included chronic pancreatitis (n=35), pancreatic tumors (n=27), and pancreatic trauma (n=11). Distal pancreatectomy was the most frequently performed procedure (n=23), followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (n=19), duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (n=10), segmental pancreatic resection (n=7), total pancreatectomy (n=3), and others (n=11). Postoperative morbidity occurred in 25 patients (34.2%), including 7 cases (9.6%) with major complications (Clavien-Dindo≥III). There was no postoperative (90-d) mortality. The 5-year overall survival was 90.5%. The 5-year event-free survival of patients with chronic pancreatitis was 85.7%, and 69.0% for patients with pancreatic tumors. CONCLUSION: This is the largest single-center study on pediatric pancreatic surgery in a Western population. Pediatric pancreatic surgery can be performed safely. Centralization in pancreatic centers with high expertise in surgery of adult and pediatric patients is important as it both affords the benefits of pancreatic surgery experience and ensures that surgical management is adapted to the specific needs of children.

Preoperative Surgical or Endoscopic Bile Duct Drainage in Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pancreatic cancer and obstructive jaundice routinely undergo endoscopic stent placement (ES). It is well known that ES causes bacterial contamination and infectious complications after pancreatic resection. OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes and survival in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection after preoperative ES vs preoperative surgical drainage (SD) via T-tube insertion. METHODS: Patients with obstructive jaundice who underwent SD or ES from 2016 to 2022 were identified from a prospective database. Outcome analyses included microbiological bile contamination, overall morbidity and assessment of the overall complication burden using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Overall survival was investigated by Kaplan‒Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients with SD were identified and matched with 110 ES patients. After the primary intervention, ES patients experienced more complications (ES: 17.3% vs. SD: 3.6%; P=0.013). The overall complication burden after pancreatic resection was higher in ES patients than in SD patients (CCI: 27.2 vs. 19.9; P=0.022). Additionally, bacterial contamination of the bile was more frequent in ES patients compared to SD individuals (94.3% vs. 7.1%; P<0.001) with similar bacteria in 83.3% of postoperative abdominal infections in ES patients. While overall survival did not differ between the two groups, patients with postinterventional complications after ES had an impaired survival compared to those without complications (11.3 mo vs. 20.4 mo; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: SD for obstructive jaundice in resectable pancreatic cancer is associated with a lower overall complication burden. Additionally, patients with complications after ES experience worse overall survival. These findings indicate to rethink our standards of treatment of obstructive jaundice in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Distal Bile Duct Cancer: Radical (R0 > 1 mm) Resection Achieves Favorable Survival.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the outcome after resection for distal bile duct cancer (DBC) with focus on the impact of microscopic histopathological resection status R0 (>1 mm) versus R1 (≤1 mm) vs R1 (direct). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: DBC is a rare disease for which oncologic resection offers the only chance of cure. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for DBC were analyzed. Histopathological resection status was classified according to the Leeds protocol for pancreatic ductal adeno carcinoma (PDAC) (PDAC; R0 >1 mm margin clearance vs R1 ≤1 mm vs R1 direct margin involvement). RESULTS: A total of 196 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for DBC. Microscopic complete tumor clearance (R0>1 mm) was achieved in 113 patients (58%). Median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 37 months (5- and 10-year OS rate: 40% and 31%, respectively). After R0 resection, median OS increased to 78 months with a 5-year OS rate of 52%. Negative prognostic factors were age >70 years ( P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.48), intraoperative blood loss >1000 mL ( P = 0.0009, HR 1.99), pN1 and pN2 status ( P = 0.0052 and P = 0.0006, HR 2.14 and 2.62, respectively) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score >II ( P = 0.0259, HR 1.61). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest European single-center study of surgical treatment for DBC and the first to investigate the prognostic impact of the revised PDAC resection status definition in DBC. The results show that this definition is valid in DBC and that "true" R0 resection (>1 mm) is a key factor for excellent survival. In contrast to PDAC, there was no survival difference between R1 (≤1 mm) and R1 (direct).

Portal Vein Resection in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Risk of Thrombosis and Radicality Determine Survival.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of pancreatic cancer [pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)] surgery with concomitant portal vein resection (PVR), focusing on the PVR type according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). BACKGROUND: Surgery offers the only chance for cure in PDAC. PVR is often performed for borderline or locally advanced tumors. METHODS: Consecutive patients with PDAC operated between January 2006 and January 2018 were included. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and tested for survival prediction. RESULTS: Of 2265 PDAC resections, 1571 (69.4%) were standard resections and 694 (30.6%) were resections with PVR, including 149 (21.5%) tangential resections with venorrhaphy (ISGPS type 1), 21 (3.0%) resections with patch reconstruction (type 2), 491 (70.7%) end-to-end anastomoses (type 3), and 33 (4.8%) resections with graft interposition (type 4). The 90-day mortality rate was 2.6% after standard resection and 6.3% after resection with PVR ( P <0.0001). Postoperative portal vein thrombosis and pancreas-specific surgical complications most frequently occurred after PVR with graft interposition (21.2% and 48.5%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, age 70 years and above, ASA stages 3/4, increased preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, neoadjuvant treatment, total pancreatectomy, PVR, higher UICC stage, and R+ resections were significant negative prognostic factors for overall survival. Radical R0 (>1 mm) resection resulted in 23.3 months of median survival. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single-center, comparative cohort study of PVR in PDAC surgery, showing that postoperative morbidity correlates with the reconstruction type. When radical resection is achieved, thrombosis risk is outweighed by beneficial overall survival times of nearly 2 years.

Distal Pancreatectomy With En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR) for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Safe and Effective Procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine perioperative and oncologic outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac axis (DP-CAR). BACKGROUND: DP-CAR can be used in a selective group of patients to resect locally advanced pancreatic cancer involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery without arterial reconstruction by preserving retrograde blood flow via the gastroduodenal artery to the liver and stomach. METHODS: We analyzed all consecutive patients who had undergone DP-CAR between May 2003 and April 2022 at a tertiary hospital specialized in pancreatic surgery and present one of the largest single-center studies. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients underwent DP-CAR. Additional venous resection (VR) of the mesenterico-portal axis was performed in 31 patients (44%) and multivisceral resection (MVR) in 42 patients (59%). Margin-free (R0) resection was achieved in 40 patients (56%). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 8.4% for the entire patient cohort. After a cumulated experience of 16 cases, the 90-day mortality dropped to 3.6% in the following 55 patients. Extended procedures with (+) additional MVR with or without (+/-) VR resulted in higher major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIB; standard DP-CAR: 19%; DP-CAR + MVR +/- VR: 36%) and higher 90-day mortality (standard DP-CAR: 0%; DP-CAR + MVR +/- VR: 11%). Median overall survival after DP-CAR was 28 months. CONCLUSIONS: DP-CAR is a safe and effective procedure but requires experience. Frequently, surgical resection has to be extended with MVR and VR to accomplish tumor resection, which results in promising oncologic outcomes. However, extended resections were associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Celiac Axis Stenosis is an Underestimated Risk Factor for Increased Morbidity After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To assesses the prevalence and severity of CAS in patients undergoing PD/total pancreatectomy and its association with major postoperative complications after PD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CAS may increase the risk of ischemic complications after PD. However, the prevalence of CAS and its relevance to major morbidity remain unknown. METHODS: All patients with a preoperative computed tomography with arterial phase undergoing partial PD or TP between 2014 and 2017 were identified from a prospective database. CAS was assessed based on computed tomography and graded according to its severity: no stenosis (<30%), grade A (30%-<50%), grade B (50%-≤80%), and grade C (>80%). Postoperative complications were assessed and uni- and multivariable risk analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 989 patients, 273 (27.5%) had CAS: 177 (17.9%) with grade A, 83 (8.4%) with grade B, and 13 (1.3%) with grade C. Postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality occurred in 278 (28.1%) patients and 41 (4.1%) patients, respectively. CAS was associated with clinically relevant pancreatic fistula ( P =0.019), liver perfusion failure ( P =0.003), gastric ischemia ( P =0.001), clinically relevant biliary leakage ( P =0.006), and intensive care unit ( P =0.016) and hospital stay ( P =0.001). Multivariable analyses confirmed grade B and C CAS as independent risk factors for liver perfusion failure; in addition, grade C CAS was an independent risk factor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula and gastric complications. CONCLUSIONS: CAS is common in patients undergoing PD. Higher grade of CAS is associated with an increased risk for clinically relevant complications, including liver perfusion failure and postoperative pancreatic fistula. Precise radiological assessment may help to identify CAS. Future studies should investigate measures to mitigate CAS-associated risks.

Completion Pancreatectomy After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Who Needs It?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the indications for and report the outcomes of completion pancreatectomy (CPLP) in the postoperative course after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). BACKGROUND: CPLP may be considered or even inevitable for damage control after PD. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing PD between 2001 and 2019 was searched for patients who underwent CPLP in the postoperative course after PD. Baseline characteristics, perioperative details, and outcomes of CPLP patients were analyzed and specific indications for CPLP were identified. RESULTS: A total of 3953 consecutive patients underwent PD during the observation period. CPLP was performed in 120 patients (3%) after a median of 10 days following PD. The main indications for CPLP included postpancreatectomy acute necrotizing pancreatitis [n=47 (39%)] and postoperative pancreatic fistula complicated by hemorrhage [n=41 (34%)] or associated with uncontrollable leakage of the pancreatoenteric anastomosis [n=23 (19%)]. The overall 90-day mortality rate of all 3953 patients was 3.5% and 37% for patients undergoing CPLP. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that only very few patients (3%) need CPLP suggests that conservative, interventional, and organ-preserving surgical measures are the mainstay of complication management after PD. Postpancreatectomy acute necrotizing pancreatitis, uncontrollable postoperative pancreatic fistula, and fistula-associated hemorrhage are highly dangerous and represent the main indications for CPLP after PD.

Arterial Resection in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Effective After a Learning Curve.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perioperative and oncologic long-term outcomes of patients with LAPC after surgical resection at a high-volume center for pancreatic surgery. BACKGROUND: The role of surgery in LAPC with arterial involvement is controversial. METHODS: We analyzed 385 consecutive patients undergoing PAR (n = 195) or PAD (n = 190) of the encased artery for LAPC between January 1, 2003 and April 30, 2019. RESULTS: There were 183 total pancreatectomies, 113 partial pancreatoduodenectomies, 79 distal pancreatectomies, and 10 resections for tumor recurrences, including 121 multivisceral resections and 171 venous resections. Forty-three patients (11.4%) had resectable oligometastatic disease. All of the 190 patients undergoing PAD (100%) and 95 of the 195 patients undergoing PAR (48.7%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The R0 (circumferential resection margin negative) resection rate was 28%. The median hospital stay was 15 days (range: 3-236). The median survival after surgery for LAPC was 20.1 months and the overall 5-year survival rate 12.5%. In-hospital mortality was 8.8% for the entire patient cohort (n = 385). With increasing case load and growing expertise, there was a significant reduction of in-hospital mortality to 4.8% (n = 186) after 2013 (P = 0.005). The learning curve of experienced pancreatic surgeons for PAR was 15 such procedures. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that an arterial surgical approach is effective in LAPC with promising long-term survival. PAD after neoadjuvant treatment is safe. PAR is a technically demanding procedure and requires a high level of expertise.

Actual Five-year Survival After Upfront Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Who Beats the Odds?

OBJECTIVE: To determine actual five-year survival (5YS) rates associated with a strategy of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BACKGROUND: The rate of actual 5YS in PDAC remains controversial. Available data is restricted to cohorts acquired over several decades and series of resection after patient selection by neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: All patients undergoing upfront resection for resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC from 10/2001 to 12/2011 were identified from a prospective database. Actual overall survival was assessed after a follow-up of at least 5 years. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Median survival of 937 patients was 22.1 months. The actual 5YS rate was 17.0% (n = 159) including 89 (9.5%) patients without evidence of disease >5 years after resection. 5YS rates in patients with or without adjuvanttherapy were 18.8% vs. 12.2%, respectively. Tumorgrading, number of positive lymph nodes, a context of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, and vascular resections were independently associated with 5YS. Patient-related parameters and CA 19-9 levels were associated with observed survival up to 3 years, but lost relevance thereafter. The extent of lymph node involvement was the strongest predictor of 5YS. Patients with pN0R0 had a 5YS rate of 38.2%. in patients with exclusively favorable factors the observed 5YS rate was above 50%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of long-term survivors with histologically confirmed PDAC. With upfront resection and adjuvant therapy an actual overall 5YS rate of 18.8% can be expected. in favorable subgroups actual 5YS is above 50%.

Gastric Venous Congestion After Total Pancreatectomy is Frequent and Dangerous.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the role of GVC in mortality after TP. BACKGROUND: Data from a nationwide administrative database revealed that TP is associated with a 23% mortality rate in Germany. Methods: A total of 585 consecutive patients who had undergone TP (n = 514) or elective completion pancreatectomy (n = 71) between January 2015 and December 2019 were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors for GVC and 90-day mortality. Results: GVC was observed in 163 patients (27.9%) requiring partial or total gastrectomy. Splenectomy (odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.253.80, P = 0.007) and coronary vein resection (odds ratio 5.49,95% confidence interval 3.19-9.64, P < 0.001) were independently associated with GVC. The overall 90-day mortality after TP was 4.1% (24 of 585 patients), 7.4% in patients with GVC and 2.8% in those without GVC ( P = 0.014). Of the 24 patients who died after TP, 12 (50%) had GVC. CONCLUSION: GVC is a frequent albeit not well-known finding after TP, especially when splenectomy and resection of the coronary vein are performed. Adequate decision making for partial gastrectomy during TP is crucial. Insufficient gastric venous drainage after TP is life-threatening.

Pancreatic surgery with or without drainage: propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: A recent RCT has shown that routine intraoperative drain placement after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is not necessary. The aim was to confirm this in real-world conditions. METHODS: A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis of patients with and without drainage after PD or distal pancreatectomy (DP) at a high-volume centre was undertaken. Main outcomes were complications and duration of hospital stay. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assessed which factors led to intraoperative drainage after the standard was changed from drain to no drain. RESULTS: Of 377 patients who underwent PD, 266 were included in PSM analysis. No drain was associated with fewer major complications (42 (31.6 per cent) versus 62 (46.6 per cent); P = 0.017), shorter duration of hospital stay (mean(s.d.) 14.7(8.5) versus 19.6(14.9) days; P = 0.001), and required fewer interventional drain placements (8.4 versus 19.8 per cent; P = 0.013). In PSM analysis after DP (112 patients), no drainage was associated with fewer clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (9 versus 18 per cent; P = 0.016), fewer overall complications (mean(s.d.) comprehensive complication index score 15.9(15.4) versus 24.8(20.4); P = 0.012), and a shorter hospital stay (9.3(7.0) versus 13.5(9.9) days; P = 0.011). Multivisceral resection (OR 2.80, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 7.59; P = 0.034) and longer operating times (OR 1.56, 1.04 to 2.36; P = 0.034) influenced the choice to place a drain after PD. Greater blood loss was associated with drainage after DP (OR 1.14, 1.02 to 1.30; P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Standard pancreatic resections can be performed safely without drainage. Surgeons were more reluctant to omit drainage after complex pancreatic resections.

Pancreatic surgery has traditionally relied on the use of drains placed during surgery that should facilitate outflow of fluids from the operating site. This principle has recently been challenged by specially designed studies showing that patients who do not receive a drain may have fewer complications. The present study has demonstrated that these results also apply to routine clinical settings outside the constraints of surgical trials.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound drainage for the management of fluid collections after pancreas surgery.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage (EUSD) in treatment of pancreas fluid collection (PFC) after pancreas surgeries have not been evaluated systematically. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the outcomes of EUSD in patients with PFC after pancreas surgery and compare it with percutaneous drainage (PCD). METHODS: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes EUSD in treatment of PFC after pancreas surgeries, from their inception until January 2022. Two meta-analyses were performed: (A) a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of EUSD (meta-analysis A) and (B) two-arm meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of EUSD and PCD (meta-analysis B). Pooled proportion of the outcomes in meta-analysis A as well as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) in meta-analysis B was calculated to determine the technical and clinical success rates, complications rate, hospital stay, and recurrence rate. ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 610 articles, 25 of which were eligible for inclusion. Included clinical studies comprised reports on 695 patients. Twenty-five studies (477 patients) were included in meta-analysis A and eight studies (356 patients) were included in meta-analysis B. In meta-analysis A, the technical and clinical success rates of EUSD were 94% and 87%, respectively, with post-procedural complications of 14% and recurrence rates of 9%. Meta-analysis B showed comparable technical and clinical success rates as well as complications rates between EUSD and PCD. EUSD showed significantly shorter duration of hospital stay compared to that of patients treated with PCD. CONCLUSION: EUSD seems to be associated with high technical and clinical success rates, with low rates of procedure-related complications. Although EUSD leads to shorter hospital stay compared to PCD, the certainty of evidence was low in this regard.

The TRIANGLE operation for pancreatic head and body cancers: early postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the mainstay of potential cure for patients with pancreatic cancer, however, local recurrence is frequent. Previously, we have described an extended resection technique for pancreatoduodenectomy aiming at a radical resection of the nerve and lymphatic tissue between celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery and mesenteric-portal axis (TRIANGLE operation). Until now, data on postoperative outcome have not been reported, yet. METHODS: Patients who underwent either partial (PD) or total pancreatoduodenectomy (TP) applying the TRIANGLE procedure were identified. These cohorts were compared to matched historic cohorts with standard resections. RESULTS: Overall, 330 patients were analysed (PDTRIANGLE and PDSTANDARD, each n = 108; TPTRIANGLE and TPSTANDARD, each n = 57). More lymph nodes were harvested in TRIANGLE compared to standard resection (PD: 27.5 (21-35) versus 31.5 (24-40); P = 0.0187, TP: 33 (28-49) versus 44 (29-53); P = 0.3174) and the rate of tumour positive resections margins, R1(direct), dropped. Duration of operation was significantly longer and blood loss higher. Postoperative mortality and complications did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Pancreatoduodenectomy according to the TRIANGLE protocol can be performed without increased morbidity and mortality at a high-volume centre. Long-term survival and quality of life need to be investigated in prospective clinical trials with adequate sample size.

Splenorenal shunt for reconstruction of the gastric and splenic venous drainage during pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of the portal venous confluence.

BACKGROUND: Resection of the portal venous confluence is frequently necessary for radical resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. However, ligation of the splenic vein can cause serious postoperative complications such as gastric/splenic venous congestion and left-sided portal hypertension. A splenorenal shunt (SRS) can maintain gastric and splenic venous drainage and mitigate these complications. PURPOSE: This study describes the surgical technique, postoperative course, and surgical outcomes of SRS after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: Ten patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and SRS between September 2017 and April 2019 were evaluated. After resection an end-to-side anastomosis between the splenic vein and the left renal vein was performed. Postoperative shunt patency, splenic volume, and any SRS-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: The rates of short- and long-term shunt patency were 100% and 60%, respectively. No procedure-associated complications were observed. No signs of left-sided portal hypertension, such as gastrointestinal bleeding or splenomegaly, and no gastric/splenic ischemia were observed in patients after SRS. CONCLUSION: SRS is a safe and effective measure to mitigate gastric congestion and left-sided portal hypertension after pancreatoduodenectomy with compromised gastric venous drainage after resection of the portal venous confluence.

Postoperative acute pancreatitis is a serious but rare complication after distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of hyperamylasemia after distal pancreatectomy (DP) remains unclear and no internationally accepted definition of postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP) exists. The aim of this study was to characterize POAP after DP and to assess the role of serum amylase (SA) in POAP. METHODS: Outcomes of 641 patients who had undergone DP between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Postoperative SA was determined in all patients. POAP was defined based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or intraoperative findings during relaparotomy. RESULTS: An elevation of SA on postoperative day 1 (hyperamylasemiaPOD1) was found in 398 patients (62.1%). Twelve patients (1.87%) were identified with POAP. Ten patients demonstrated radiologic criteria for POAP and in two patients POAP was diagnosed during relaparotomy. Outcome of POAP patients was worse than that of patients with hyperamylasemiaPOD1 alone and that with normal SAPOD1 without POAP evidence (postoperative pancreatic fistula 50% vs 30.6% vs 18.5%; length of hospital stay 26 days vs 12 vs 11, respectively). The overall 90-day mortality of all 641 patients was 0.6%. CONCLUSION: POAP is a serious but rare complication after DP. HyperamylasemiaPOD1 is of prognostic relevance after DP, but it seems not sufficient as a single parameter to diagnose POAP.

Cavernous transformation of the portal vein in pancreatic cancer surgery-venous bypass graft first.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, several techniques have been introduced to allow safe oncologic resections of cancers of the pancreatic head. While resections of the mesenterico-portal axis became now a part of the routine treatment, patients with a cavernous transformation of the portal vein still pose a surgical challenge and are regularly deemed unresectable. OBJECTIVE: Here, we describe a technique of initial venous bypass graft placement between the superior mesenteric vein or its tributaries and the portal vein before the resection of the pancreatic head. This approach avoids uncontrollable bleeding as well as venous congestion of the intestine with a continuous hepatic perfusion and facilitates oncologic resection of pancreatic head cancers. This technique, in combination with previously published resection strategies, enables tumor resection in locally advanced pancreatic head cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Venous bypass graft first operations facilitate and enable the resection of the pancreatic head cancers in patients with a cavernous transformation of the portal vein thus rendering these patients resectable.

The TRIANGLE operation - radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single arm observational study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy is an important strategy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PDAC) as resection rates increase with modern chemotherapy regimens even in patients with arterial tumor encasement. The aim of this study is the description of technique and initial outcomes of a new type of radical and arterial-sparing resection after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced PDAC. METHODS: The surgical technique and perioperative results of a new type of operation are described, comprising radical tumor removal by sharp dissection along the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery with complete dissection of all soft tissue between both - arteries and superior mesenteric/portal vein (TRIANGLE operation). RESULTS: 15 patients underwent artery-preserving tumor removal without mortality, 7/15 patients showed postoperative complications and an R0 resection was achieved in 6/15 patients. Functional outcome was good in 11/15 patients despite the extended approach of dissection. CONCLUSION: After neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced PDAC, surgical exploration should be attempted in patients with stable disease or remission to clarify true vascular infiltration. In case of absent viable tumor, the described technique allows to perform radical surgery without arterial resection in this subgroup of patients.

Categorization of Differing Types of Total Pancreatectomy.

Importance: Comparability of morbidity and mortality rates after total pancreatectomy (TP) reported by different surgical centers is limited. Procedure-specific differences, such as the extent of resection, including additional vascular or multivisceral resections, are rarely acknowledged when postoperative outcomes are reported. Objectives: To evaluate postoperative outcomes after TP and categorize different types of TP based on the extent, complexity, and technical aspects of each procedure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center study included a retrospective cohort of 1451 patients who had undergone TP between October 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020. Each patient was assigned to 1 of the following 4 categories that reflect increasing levels of procedure-related difficulty: standard TP (type 1), TP with venous resection (type 2), TP with multivisceral resection (type 3), and TP with arterial resection (type 4). Postoperative outcomes among the groups were compared. Main Outcomes and Measures: Categorization of different types of TP based on the procedure-related difficulty and differing postoperative outcomes. Results: Of the 1451 patients who had undergone TP and were included in the analysis, 840 were men (57.9%); median age was 64.9 (IQR, 56.7-71.7) years. A total of 676 patients (46.6%) were assigned to type 1, 296 patients (20.4%) to type 2, 314 patients (21.6%) to type 3, and 165 patients (11.4%) to type 4 TP. A gradual increase in surgical morbidity was noted by TP type (type 1: 255 [37.7%], type 2: 137 [46.3%], type 3: 178 [56.7%], and type 4: 98 [59.4%]; P < .001), as was noted for median length of hospital stay (type 1: 14 [IQR, 10-19] days, type 2: 16 [IQR, 12-23] days, type 3: 17 [IQR, 13-29] days, and type 4: 18 [IQR, 13-30] days; P < .001), and 90-day mortality (type 1: 23 [3.4%], type 2: 17 [5.7%], type 3: 29 [9.2%], and type 4: 20 [12.1%]; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, type 3 (TP with multivisceral resection) and type 4 (TP with arterial resection) were independently associated with an increased 90-day mortality rate. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest there are significant differences in postoperative outcomes when the extent, complexity, and technical aspects of the procedure are considered. Classifying TP into 4 different categories may allow for better postoperative risk stratification as well as more accurate comparisons in future studies.