RESUMEN
Repetitive exposure to antigen in chronic infection and cancer drives T cell exhaustion, limiting adaptive immunity. In contrast, aberrant, sustained T cell responses can persist over decades in human allergic disease. To understand these divergent outcomes, we employed bioinformatic, immunophenotyping and functional approaches with human diseased tissues, identifying an abundant population of type 2 helper T (TH2) cells with co-expression of TCF7 and LEF1, and features of chronic activation. These cells, which we termed TH2-multipotent progenitors (TH2-MPP) could self-renew and differentiate into cytokine-producing effector cells, regulatory T (Treg) cells and follicular helper T (TFH) cells. Single-cell T-cell-receptor lineage tracing confirmed lineage relationships between TH2-MPP, TH2 effectors, Treg cells and TFH cells. TH2-MPP persisted despite in vivo IL-4 receptor blockade, while thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) drove selective expansion of progenitor cells and rendered them insensitive to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in vitro. Together, our data identify TH2-MPP as an aberrant T cell population with the potential to sustain type 2 inflammation and support the paradigm that chronic T cell responses can be coordinated over time by progenitor cells.
Asunto(s)
Factor Nuclear 1-alfa del Hepatocito , Hipersensibilidad , Factor de Unión 1 al Potenciador Linfoide , Células Madre Multipotentes , Factor 1 de Transcripción de Linfocitos T , Células Th2 , Humanos , Factor de Unión 1 al Potenciador Linfoide/metabolismo , Factor de Unión 1 al Potenciador Linfoide/genética , Células Th2/inmunología , Factor Nuclear 1-alfa del Hepatocito/metabolismo , Factor Nuclear 1-alfa del Hepatocito/genética , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Células Madre Multipotentes/metabolismo , Células Madre Multipotentes/inmunología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/metabolismo , Diferenciación Celular , Citocinas/metabolismo , Linfopoyetina del Estroma Tímico , Animales , Células Cultivadas , RatonesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) causes nasal obstruction and olfactory dysfunction. Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is the triad of CRSwNP, asthma, and respiratory reactions to COX-1 inhibitors. Patients with AERD have elevated nasal IL-5 levels and high numbers of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), including plasma cells and plasmablasts, in their polyp tissue; in addition, their nasal polyp (NP) IgE levels are correlated with disease severity and recurrence of nasal polyposis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore differences in the transcriptomic profile, activation markers, and IL-5Rα expression and function of NP ASCs from patients with AERD and CRSwNP. METHODS: NP tissue was collected from patients with AERD and CRSwNP and digested into single-cell suspensions. NP cells were analyzed for protein expression by mass cytometry. For IL-5Rα functional studies, plasma cells were purified and cultured in vitro with or without IL-5 and analyzed by bulk RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Compared with polyp tissue from patients with CRSwNP, polyp tissue from patients with AERD contained significantly more ASCs and had increased ASC expression of IL-5Rα. ASCs from patients with AERD expressed higher protein levels of B-cell activation and regulatory markers (CD40, CD19, CD32, and CD38) and the proliferation marker Ki-67. ASCs from patients with AERD also expressed more IL5RA, IGHE, and cell cycle- and proliferation-related transcripts (CCND2, MKI67, CDC25A, and CDC25B) than did ASCs from patients with CRSwNP. Stimulation of plasma cells from patients with AERD with IL-5 induced key cell cycle genes (CCND2 and PTP4A3), whereas IL-5 stimulation of ASCs from patients with CRSwNP induced few transcriptomic changes. CONCLUSION: NP tissue ASCs from patients with AERD express higher levels of functional IL-5Rα and markers associated with cell cycling and proliferation than do ASCs from patients with aspirin-tolerant CRSwNP.
Asunto(s)
Asma Inducida por Aspirina , Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Pólipos Nasales/metabolismo , Interleucina-5 , Rinitis/metabolismo , Asma Inducida por Aspirina/metabolismo , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Células Productoras de Anticuerpos/metabolismo , Sinusitis/metabolismo , Proliferación Celular , Proteínas de Neoplasias , Proteínas Tirosina FosfatasasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delays in hospital presentation limit access to acute stroke treatments. While prior research has focused on patient-level factors, broader ecological and social determinants have not been well studied. We aimed to create a geospatial map of prehospital delay and examine the role of community-level social vulnerability. METHODS: We studied patients with ischemic stroke who arrived by emergency medical services in 2015 to 2017 from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. The primary outcome was time to hospital arrival after stroke (in minutes), beginning at last known well in most cases. Using Geographic Information System mapping, we displayed the geography of delay. We then used Cox proportional hazard models to study the relationship between community-level factors and arrival time (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] <1.0 indicate delay). The primary exposure was the social vulnerability index (SVI), a metric of social vulnerability for every ZIP Code Tabulation Area ranging from 0.0 to 1.0. RESULTS: Of 750â 336 patients, 149â 145 met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 73 years, and 51% were female. The median time to hospital arrival was 140 minutes (Q1: 60 minutes, Q3: 458 minutes). The geospatial map revealed that many zones of delay overlapped with socially vulnerable areas (https://harvard-cga.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=08f6e885c71b457f83cefc71013bcaa7). Cox models (aHR, 95% CI) confirmed that higher SVI, including quartiles 3 (aHR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]) and 4 (aHR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]), was associated with delay. Patients from SVI quartile 4 neighborhoods arrived 15.6 minutes [15-16.2] slower than patients from SVI quartile 1. Specific SVI themes associated with delay were a community's socioeconomic status (aHR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.74-0.85]) and housing type and transportation (aHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.84-0.94]). CONCLUSIONS: This map of acute stroke presentation times shows areas with a high incidence of delay. Increased social vulnerability characterizes these areas. Such places should be systematically targeted to improve population-level stroke presentation times.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Sistema de Registros , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the past, patients were only diagnosed with cancer because they had symptoms. Now, because of screening and incidental detection, some patients are diagnosed with cancer when they are asymptomatic. While this shift is typically viewed as desirable, it has produced an unfortunate side-effect: it is now possible to be diagnosed with a cancer not destined to cause symptoms or death-a phenomenon labeled as overdiagnosis. CONTENT: We begin with a brief introduction to the heterogeneity of cancer progression: at one extreme, some cancers are already systemic by the time they are detectable; at the other, some grow extremely slowly or even regress. The ensuing sections describe the evidence that the pursuit of earlier detection has led to overdiagnosis. Although rarely confirmed in an individual, overdiagnosis is readily identifiable in a long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of screening. Furthermore, 2 population signatures for overdiagnosis exist: (a) rising incidence coupled with stable mortality and (b) rising early-stage incidence coupled with stable late-stage incidence. Finally, we review the misleading feedback produced by overdiagnosis-such as rising 5-year survival rates and more cancer survivors. This feedback is erroneously interpreted as reinforcing the value of early detection, encourages more screening/incidental detection and, ironically, promotes more overdiagnosis. SUMMARY: Overdiagnosis is an unintended consequence of the desire to detect cancer early. Given the evolving understanding that tumor biology and host response are more relevant to prognosis than early vs late diagnosis, it is time to challenge the assertion that early diagnosis is always the best approach to curing cancer.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Sobrediagnóstico , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/etiología , Pronóstico , Tamizaje MasivoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Climate change has been identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the greatest existing threat to human health. Given the direct exposure of the upper aerodigestive system to pollutants, patients in otolaryngology are at high risk for increased disease burden in the setting of climate change and worsening air quality. Given this and the environmental impact of surgical care, it is essential for surgeons to understand their role in addressing climate health through quality-driven clinical initiatives, education, advocacy, and research. METHODS: A state-of-the-art review was performed of the existing literature on the otolaryngologic health impacts of climate change and environmental sustainability efforts in surgery with specific attention to studies in otolaryngology - head and neck surgery. FINDINGS: Climate variables including heat and air pollution are associated with increased incidence of allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis and head and neck cancer. A number of studies have shown that sustainability initiatives in otolaryngology are safe and provide direct cost benefit. CONCLUSION: Surgeons have the opportunity to lead on climate health and sustainability to address the public health burden of climate change.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a type 2 (T2) inflammatory disease associated with an increased number of airway basal cells (BCs). Recent studies have identified transcriptionally distinct BCs, but the molecular pathways that support or inhibit human BC proliferation and differentiation are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the role of T2 cytokines in regulating airway BCs. METHODS: Single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing of sinus and lung airway epithelial cells was analyzed. Human sinus BCs were stimulated with IL-4 and IL-13 in the presence and absence of inhibitors of IL-4R signaling. Confocal analysis of human sinus tissue and murine airway was performed. Murine BC subsets were sorted for RNA sequencing and functional assays. Fate labeling was performed in a murine model of tracheal injury and regeneration. RESULTS: Two subsets of BCs were found in human and murine respiratory mucosa distinguished by the expression of basal cell adhesion molecule (BCAM). BCAM expression identifies airway stem cells among P63+KRT5+NGFR+ BCs. In the sinonasal mucosa, BCAMhi BCs expressing TSLP, IL33, CCL26, and the canonical BC transcription factor TP63 are increased in patients with CRSwNP. In cultured BCs, IL-4/IL-13 increases the expression of BCAM and TP63 through an insulin receptor substrate-dependent signaling pathway that is increased in CRSwNP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings establish BCAM as a marker of airway stem cells among the BC pool and demonstrate that airway epithelial remodeling in T2 inflammation extends beyond goblet cell metaplasia to the support of a BC stem state poised to perpetuate inflammation.
Asunto(s)
Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Receptor de Insulina/metabolismo , Interleucina-13/metabolismo , Interleucina-4/metabolismo , Inflamación/metabolismo , Sinusitis/metabolismo , Células Epiteliales/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Enfermedad Crónica , Pólipos Nasales/metabolismo , Rinitis/metabolismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between a change in household support during the Covid-19 pandemic and surgeon stress. BACKGROUND: The hours and unpredictability of surgical practice often necessitate the employment of household extenders (eg, child caregivers) to maintain a safe home environment for surgeons and their families. The Covid-19 pandemic destabilized these relationships and provided an opportunity to reflect on the role that household extenders play in a surgical household. METHODS: A multi-institutional telephone survey of surgeons practicing at five geographically diverse academic institutions was conducted (May 15, 2020-June 5, 2020). Surgeons were classified by change in household extenders (HE) during the pandemic (decrease, increase, no change, or none). The primary outcome was self-reported surgeon stress level. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the relationship between change in HE and surgeon stress, adjusting for training and relationship status, the presence of pets and children in the household, and study site. RESULTS: The majority (182, 54.3%) of surgeons employed HE before the pandemic; 121 (36.1%) reported a decrease in HE during the pandemic, 9 (2.7%) reported an increase, and 52 (15.5%) reported no change. Stress scores varied significantly by change in HE group ( P = 0.016). After controlling for potential confounders, having an increase in HE was associated with a higher stress score (+1.55 points) than having no decrease in HE (P = 0.033), and having a decrease in HE was associated with a higher stress score (+0.96 points) than having no decrease ( P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Household extenders play a vital and complex role in enabling the healthcare workforce to care of the population. Surgeons who experienced a change in household extenders reported the highest stress levels. We suggest that health systems should proactively support surgeons by supporting the household extender workforce.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cirujanos , Niño , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Autoinforme , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between SAO workforce and mortality from emergent surgical and obstetric conditions within US HR Rs. BACKGROUND: SAO workforce per capita has been identified as a core metric of surgical capacity by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, but its utility has not been assessed at the subnational level for a high-income country. METHODS: The number of practicing surgeons, anesthesiologists, and obstetricians per capita was estimated for all HRRs using the US Health Resources & Services Administration Area Health Resource File Database. Deaths due to emergent general surgical and obstetric conditions were determined from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database. We utilized B-spline quantile regression to model the relationship between SAO workforce and emergent surgical mortality at different quantiles of mortality and calculated the expected change in mortality associated with increases in SAO workforce. RESULTS: The median SAO workforce across all HRRs was 74.2 per 100,000 population (interquartile range 33.3-241.0). All HRRs met the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery lower target of 20 SAO per 100,000, and 97.7% met the upper target of 40 per 100,000. Nearly 2.8 million Americans lived in HRRs with fewer than 40 SAO per 100,000. Increases in SAO workforce were associated with decreases in surgical mortality in HRRs with high mortality, with minimal additional decreases in mortality above 60 to 80 SAO per 100,000. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing SAO workforce capacity may reduce emergent surgical and obstetric mortality in regions with high surgical mortality but diminishing returns may be seen above 60 to 80 SAO per 100,000. Trial Registration: N/A.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesiología , Cirujanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Recursos Humanos , AnestesiólogosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To understand the surgeon's perceived value of PROMs in 5 different surgical subspecialties. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PROMs are validated questionnaires that assess the symptoms, function, and quality of life from the patient's perspective. Despite the increasing support for use of PROMs in the literature, there is limited uptake amongst surgeons. Furthermore, there is insufficient understanding of the surgeons' perceived value of PROMs. The aim of this study is to understand how surgeons perceive value in PROMs. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study to understand the perceived value of PROMs from the perspective of surgeons in various subspecialties. Per convenience sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 surgeons from 5 subspecialties across 3 academic medical centers. The surgical subspecialties included bariatric surgery, breast oncologic surgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, and rhinology. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and evaluated with thematic analysis. RESULTS: Surgeons endorsed that PROMs can be used to enhance clinical management, counsel patients in the preoperative and postoperative settings, and elicit sensitive information from patients that otherwise may go undetected. Obstacles to PROMs use include failure to generate actionable data, implementation obstacles, and inappropriate use of PROMs as a performance metric, with concerns regarding inadequate risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing an effective PROMs program requires an understanding of the surgeon's perspective of PROMs. Despite obstacles, different subspecialty surgeons find PROMs to be valuable in different settings, depending on the specialty and clinical context.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Cirujanos/psicología , Humanos , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic in the United States has underscored the need to understand health care in a regional context. However, there are multiple definitions of health care regions available for conducting geospatial analyses. In this study, we compare the novel Pittsburgh Atlas, which defined regions for emergency care, with the existing definitions of regions, counties, and the Dartmouth Atlas, with respect to nonemergent acute medical conditions using pneumonia admissions. METHODS: We identified patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia or a primary admitting diagnosis of sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's State Inpatient Databases. We calculated the percentage of region concordant care, the localization index, and market share for 3 definitions of health care regions (the Pittsburgh Atlas, Dartmouth Atlas, and counties). We used logistic regression identified predictors of region concordant care. RESULTS: We identified 1,582,287 patients who met the inclusion criteria. We found that the Pittsburgh Atlas and Dartmouth Atlas definitions of regions performed similarly with respect to both localization index (92.0 [interquartile range 87.9 to 95.7] versus 90.3 [interquartile range 81.4 to 94.5]) and market share (8.5 [interquartile range 5.1 to 13.6] versus 9.4 [interquartile range 6.7 to 14.1]). Both atlases outperformed the localization index (67.5 [interquartile range 49.9 to 83.9]) and market share (20.0% [interquartile range 11.4 to 31.4]) of the counties. Within a given referral region, the demographic factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and the level of severity, affected concordance rates between residential and hospital regions. CONCLUSION: Because the Pittsburgh Atlas also has the benefit of respecting state and county boundaries, the use of this definition may have improved policy applicability without sacrificing accuracy in defining health care regions for acute medical conditions.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neumonía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between surgeon gender and stress during the Covid-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND: Although female surgeons face difficulties integrating work and home in the best of times, the Covid-19 pandemic has presented new challenges. The implications for the female surgical workforce are unknown. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multi-center telephone survey study of surgeons was conducted across 5 academic institutions (May 15-June 5, 2020). The primary outcome was maximum stress level, measured using the validated Stress Numerical Rating Scale-11. Mixed-effects generalized linear models were used to estimate the relationship between surgeon stress level and gender. RESULTS: Of 529 surgeons contacted, 337 surgeons responded and 335 surveys were complete (response rate 63.7%). The majority of female respondents were housestaff (58.1%), and the majority of male respondents were faculty (56.8%) (P = 0.008). A greater proportion of male surgeons (50.3%) than female surgeons (36.8%) had children ≤18âyears (P = 0.015). The mean maximum stress level for female surgeons was 7.51 (SD 1.49) and for male surgeons was 6.71 (SD 2.15) (P < 0.001). After adjusting for the presence of children and training status, female gender was associated with a significantly higher maximum stress level (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings that women experienced more stress than men during the Covid-19 pandemic, regardless of parental status, suggest that there is more to the gendered differences in the stress experience of the pandemic than the added demands of childcare. Deliberate interventions are needed to promote and support the female surgical workforce during the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Cirujanos/psicología , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Pandemias , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the stress levels and experience of academic surgeons by training status (eg, housestaff or faculty). BACKGROUND: Covid-19 has uniquely challenged and changed the United States healthcare system. A better understanding of the surgeon experience is necessary to inform proactive workforce management and support. METHODS: A multi-institutional, cross-sectional telephone survey of surgeons was conducted across 5 academic medical centers from May 15 to June 5, 2020. The exposure of interest was training status. The primary outcome was maximum stress level, measured using the validated Stress Numerical Rating Scale-11 (range 0-10). RESULTS: A total of 335 surveys were completed (49.3% housestaff, 50.7% faculty; response rate 63.7%). The mean maximum stress level of faculty was 7.21 (SD 1.81) and of housestaff was 6.86 (SD 2.06) (P = 0.102). Mean stress levels at the time of the survey trended lower amongst housestaff (4.17, SD 1.89) than faculty (4.56, SD 2.15) (P = 0.076). More housestaff (63.6%) than faculty (40.0%) reported exposure to individuals with Covid-19 (P < 0.001). Subjects reported inadequate personal protective equipment in approximately a third of professional exposures, with no difference by training status (P = 0.557). CONCLUSIONS: During the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic, the personal and professional experiences of housestaff and faculty differed, in part due to a difference in exposure as well as non-work-related stressors. Workforce safety, including adequate personal protective equipment, expanded benefits (eg, emergency childcare), and deliberate staffing models may help to alleviate the stress associated with disease resurgence or future disasters.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Docentes Médicos/psicología , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Cuerpo Médico/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Equipo de Protección Personal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective surgeries, including oncologic surgeries, were delayed. Little prospective data existed to guide practice, and professional surgical societies issued recommendations grounded mainly in common sense and expert consensus, such as medical therapy for early-stage breast and prostate cancer patients. To understand the patient experience of delay in cancer surgery during the pandemic, we interviewed breast and prostate cancer patients whose surgeries were delayed due to the pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with early-stage breast or prostate cancer who suffered surgical postponement at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) were invited to participate. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 21 breast and prostate cancer patients. Interviews were transcribed, and qualitative analysis using ground-theory approach was performed. RESULTS: Most patients reported significant distress due to cancer and COVID. Key themes that emerged included the lack of surprise and acceptance of the surgical delays but endorsed persistent cancer- and delay-related worries. Satisfaction with patient-physician communication and the availability of a delay strategy were key factors in patients' acceptance of the situation; perceived lack of communication prompted a few patients to seek care elsewhere. DISCUSSION: The clinical effect of delay in cancer surgery will take years to fully understand, but there are immediate steps that can be taken to improve the patient experience of delays in care, including elicitation of individual patient perspectives and ongoing communication. More work is needed to understand the wider experiences of patients, especially minority, socioeconomically disadvantaged, and uninsured patients, who encounter delays in oncologic care.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
The year 2020 marks the 10th anniversary of the signing of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Perhaps the greatest overhaul of the US health care system in the past 50 y, the ACA sought to expand access to care, improve quality, and reduce health care costs. Over the past decade, there have been a number of challenges and changes to the law, which remains in evolution. While the ACA's policies were not intended to specifically target surgical care, surgical patients, surgeons, and the health systems within which they function have all been greatly affected. This article aims to provide a brief overview of the impact of the ACA on surgical patients in reference to its tripartite aim of improving access, improving quality, and reducing costs.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/historia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Historia del Siglo XXI , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendencias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Incertidumbre , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Language barriers can limit access to care for patients with a non-English primary language (NEPL). The objective of this study was to define the association between primary language and emergency versus elective surgery among diverticulitis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients from the 2009-2014 New Jersey State Inpatient Database. Patients were included if they had primary language data and underwent a partial colon resection for diverticulitis. Primary language was dichotomized into NEPL versus English primary language (EPL). The primary outcome was surgical admission type - urgent/emergent (referred to as "emergency") versus elective. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 9,453 patients underwent surgery for diverticulitis, of which 592 (6.3%) had NEPL. Among NEPL patients, 300 (51%) had Spanish as primary language and 292 (49%) had another non-Spanish primary language. Patients with NEPL and EPL were similar in age (median age 58 versus 59 years; P = 0.54) and sex (52% versus 53% female; P = 0.45). Patients with NEPL were less likely to have commercial insurance (45% versus 59%; P <0.001). On multivariable analysis, compared to patients with EPL, NEPL was associated with increased odds of emergency surgery for diverticulitis (OR 1.35; 95% Confidence Interval 1.13-1.62; P = 0.001) CONCLUSION: Patients with NEPL have higher odds of emergency versus elective surgery for diverticulitis compared to patients with EPL. Further research is needed to examine differences in referral pathways, patient-provider communication, and health literacy that may hinder access to elective surgery in patients with diverticulitis.
Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis , Lenguaje , Adulto , Colectomía , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surgical outcomes and healthcare utilization have been shown to vary based on patient insurance status. We analyzed whether patients' insurance affects case urgency for and readmission after craniotomy for meningioma resection, using benign meningioma as a model system to minimize confounding from the disease-related characteristics of other neurosurgical pathologies. METHODS: We analyzed 90-day readmission for patients who underwent resection of a benign meningioma in the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2014-2015. RESULTS: A total of 9783 meningioma patients with private insurance (46%), Medicare (39%), Medicaid (10%), self-pay (2%), or another scheme (3%) were analyzed. 72% of all cases were elective; with 78% of cases in privately insured patients being elective compared to 71% of Medicare (p > 0.05), 59% of Medicaid patients (OR 2.3, p < 0.001), and 49% of self-pay patients (OR 3.4, p < 0.001). Medicare (OR 1.5, p = 0.002) and Medicaid (OR 1.4, p = 0.035) were both associated with higher likelihood of 90-day readmission compared to private insurance. In comparison, 30-day analyses did not unveil this discrepancy between Medicaid and privately insured, highlighting the merit for longer-term outcomes analyses in value-based care. Patients readmitted within 30 days versus those with later readmissions possessed different characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with private insurance coverage, Medicaid and self-pay patients were significantly more likely to undergo non-elective resection of benign meningioma. Medicaid and Medicare insurance were associated with a higher likelihood of 90-day readmission; only Medicare was significant at 30 days. Both 30 and 90-day outcomes merit consideration given differences in readmitted populations.
Asunto(s)
Craneotomía/economía , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Meningioma/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Craneotomía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Neoplasias Meníngeas/economía , Neoplasias Meníngeas/patología , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/patología , Meningioma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although comorbidities play an essential role in risk adjustment and outcomes measurement, there is little consensus regarding the best source of this data. The aim of this study was to identify general patient-reported morbidity instruments and their measurement properties. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using multiple electronic databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science) from inception to March 2018. Articles focusing primarily on the development or subsequent validation of a patient-reported morbidity instrument were included. After including relevant articles, the measurement properties of each morbidity instrument were extracted by 2 investigators for narrative synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 1005 articles were screened, of which 34 eligible articles were ultimately included. The most widely assessed instruments were the Self-Reported Charlson Comorbidity Index (n = 7), the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (n = 3), and the Disease Burden Morbidity Assessment (n = 3). The most commonly included conditions were diabetes, hypertension, and myocardial infarction. Studies demonstrated substantial variability in item-level reliability versus the gold standard medical record review (κ range 0.66-0.86), meaning that the accuracy of the self-reported comorbidity data is dependent on the selected morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The Self-Reported Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire were the most frequently cited instruments. Significant variability was observed in reliability per comorbid condition of patient-reported morbidity questionnaires. Further research is needed to determine whether patient-reported morbidity data should be used to bolster medical records data or serve as a stand-alone entity when risk adjusting observational outcomes data.
Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Morbilidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate sex differences in full professorship among a comprehensive, contemporary cohort of US academic surgeons. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous work demonstrates that women are less likely than men to be full professors in academic medicine, and in certain surgical subspecialties. Whether sex differences in academic rank exist across all surgical fields, and after adjustment for confounders, is not known. METHODS: A comprehensive list of surgeons with faculty appointments at US medical schools in 2014 was obtained from Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) faculty roster and linked to a comprehensive physician database from Doximity, an online physician networking website, which contained the following data for all physicians: sex, age, years since residency, publication number (total and first/last author), clinical trials participation, National Institutes of Health grants, and surgical subspecialty. A 20% sample of 2013 Medicare payments for care was added to this dataset. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate sex differences in full professorship, adjusting for these variables and medical school-specific fixed effects. RESULTS: Among 11,549 surgeon faculty at US medical schools in 2014, 1692 (14.7%) were women. Women comprised 19.4% of assistant professors (1072/5538), 13.8% of associate professors (404/2931), and 7.0% of full professors (216/3080). After multivariable analysis, women were less likely to be full professors than men (adjusted odds ratio: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.6-0.9). CONCLUSION: Among surgical faculty at US medical schools in 2014, women were less likely than men to be full professors after adjustment for multiple factors known to impact faculty rank.