Morphometric analysis of the second through fifth metacarpal through posteroanterior X-Rays.

Over the past 10 years, metacarpal fractures have had an annual incidence of 13.6 per 10,000 individuals. Literature has not reviewed anatomical variations through radiographic imaging, which may play a role in reducing postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to use radiographic imaging to provide a detailed anatomy of the second through fifth metacarpals. This retrospective study measured length, neck width, narrowest body width, and narrowest medullary canal width of the second through fifth metacarpals through the use of posteroanterior X-rays. Patients who were ≥18 years and received hand radiographs from January 2015 to July 2019 were included in this study. Those with acute injury or fracture of the metacarpal were excluded. Five hundred and seventy-two metacarpals were included in this study, with 143 metacarpals measured each for the second through fifth metacarpal. The second metacarpal had the largest measured length, neck width, and narrowest body width at 68.72, 12.34, and 8.74 mm, respectively. The fifth metacarpal had the greatest average medullary canal width at 4.15 mm. This is the largest study in literature to comprehensively examine the anatomical variation of the second through fifth metacarpals. The second metacarpal had greatest dimensions except for canal width, which was the fifth metacarpal. Men almost consistently had greater metacarpal size when compared to women, and age was associated with second and third metacarpal canal width. The increased knowledge of metacarpal anatomy may potentially lay the foundation of further improvement of metacarpal implants and potentially reduce postoperative complications. Clin. Anat., 33:1014-1018, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Inter-relationships of Metacarpals 1 to 5, Regarding Their Length, Metaphyseal Midshaft Width, Articular Surface Area of Head and Base, Age, and Sex: A Cadaveric Study.

Background: Metacarpal factures are common, comprising up to 50% of hand fractures. More work is needed to further our understanding of metacarpal anatomy to improve fixation techniques and reduce postoperative complications following surgical implants. The purpose of this anatomic study was to evaluate the length, midshaft metaphyseal width, and area of the articular surface of the head (AH) and base (AB) of metacarpals 1 to 5. Methods: This prospective study assessed measures from 17 cadavers at 1 institution's anatomy lab. The anatomic dimensions of the metacarpals in both the right and left hands were measured. Epidemiological data including sex and age at death were also collected. Results: In all, 29 hands were dissected for metacarpal anatomic measurements, for a total of 145 metacarpals. The second metacarpal was longest, at 69.58 mm. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of sex overall, with greater metacarpal dimensions in men. Increasing age was associated with decreasing dimensions, except for AH of metacarpal 1 (F = 3.43, P = .02) and AB of metacarpal 1 (F = 11.54, P < .001) and 4 (F = 4.21, P = .01). Multiple metacarpal dimensions were also significantly correlated with each other. Conclusion: Our data reveal further information regarding metacarpal dimensions of length, midshaft width, and AH and AB. The results allow for potential to improve surgical management through improving metacarpal implants, developing an optimal plate and screw design, techniques to better accommodate anatomical differences based on age and sex, reducing postoperative complications and improving the standard of care.