Intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes shape loco-regional PET/CT spread of locally advanced cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Data suggest an association between positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) metabolic metrics and tumor microenvironment in several malignancies, and a potential role of PET/CT to monitor response to immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between tumor loco-regional extension and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte infiltration in locally advanced cervical cancer prior to concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.The secondary objective was to assess the association between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PET/CT metabolic metrics. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and negative para-aortic extensions on PET/CT were included. Two senior nuclear medicine physicians specializing in gynecologic oncology reviewed all PET/CT exams, and extracted tumor maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis, as well as pelvic lymph node involvement. One senior gynecologic oncology pathologist assessed intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were categorized following previous studies as <1% and >1%. The cut-off for stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was chosen empirically: intermediate <60% and high >60%. RESULTS: 86 patients were included. Intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were not significantly associated with tumor metabolic metrics. Intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were not significantly associated with maximum standard uptake value (p=0.16), or metabolic tumor volume (p=0.19). Tumors with <1% intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes score were associated with a higher MRI tumor size (≥ median) (63.3% vs 39.3%, p=0.04). Patients with pelvic lymph node uptake were significantly more frequent in patients with high stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes score (≥60%) (61.5% vs 31.7%, p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Poor or absent intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were associated with more advanced disease at diagnosis and larger tumor size. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were not associated with tumor metabolic activity. Intraepithelial and stroma tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are not redundant and should be assessed separately. Further work is needed to evaluate the association between tumor metabolic profile and immune populations, including different T-cell subtypes for patient selection for immunotherapy strategies.

Outcomes of minimal residual disease at upfront debulking surgery compared with complete cytoreduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare surgical complexity, post-operative complications, and survival outcomes between patients with minimal residual disease (completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score) CC-1 at the time of primary debulking surgery and those with complete cytoreduction (CC-0) at the time of interval debulking surgery. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV) who underwent cytoreductive surgery achieving either minimal or no residual disease between January 2008 and December 2015. Patients underwent either primary or interval debulking surgery after receiving ≥3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The sub-group of patients with primary debulking surgery/CC-1 was compared with those with interval debulking surgery/CC-0. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 549 patients were included, with upfront surgery performed in 175 patients (31.9%) and 374 patients (68.1%) undergoing interval debulking surgery. After primary debulking surgery, 157/175 (89.7%) had complete cytoreduction and 18/175 (10.3%) had minimal residual disease (primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group), while after interval debulking surgery, 324/374 (86.6%) had complete cytoreduction (interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group) and 50/374 (13.4%) had minimal residual disease. The rate of patients with peritoneal cancer index >10 was 14/17 (82.4%) for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group and 129/322 (40.1%) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 (p<0.001). The rate of patients with an Aletti score of ≥8 was 11/18 (61.1%) and 132/324 (40.7%), respectively (p=0.09) and the rate of major post-operative complications was 5/18 (27.8%) and 64/324 (19.8%), respectively (p=0.38). Overall median disease-free and overall survival were 19.4 months (95% CI 18.0 to 20.6) and 56.7 months (95%CI 50.2 to 65.8), respectively. Median disease-free survival for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group was 16.7 months (95% CI 13.6 to 20.0) versus 18.2 months (95% CI 16.4 to 20.0) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group (p=0.56). Median overall survival for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group was 44.7 months (95% CI 34.3 to not reached) and 49.4 months (95% CI 46.2 to 57.3) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group (p=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary debulking surgery with minimal residual disease and those with interval debulking surgery with no residual disease had similar survival outcomes. Interval surgery should be considered when achieving absence of residual disease is challenging at upfront surgery, given the lower tumor burden found during surgery.