RESUMEN
AIM: To provide a comprehensive review of guidelines from various professional organisations on the work-up and management of post-prostatectomy Incontinence (PPI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The following guidelines were included in this review: European Association of Urology (EAU 2023), American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (AUA/SUFU 2019), International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI, 2018), the Canadian Urological Association (CUA, 2012) and the Urological Society of India (USI, 2018). RESULTS: In general, the guidelines concur regarding the significance of conducting a comprehensive history and physical examination for patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). However, there are variations among the guidelines concerning the recommended additional investigations. In cases of troublesome PPI, male slings are typically recommended for mild to moderate urinary incontinence (UI), while artificial urinary sphincters are preferred for moderate to severe UI, although the precise definition of this severity remains unclear. The guidelines provided by AUA/SUFU and the ICI have offered suggestions for managing complications or persistent/recurrent UI post-surgery, though some differences can be observed within these recommendations as well. CONCLUSION: This is a first of its kind review encompassing Guidelines on PPI spanning over a decade. Although guidelines share overarching principles, nuanced variations persist, posing challenges for clinicians. This compilation consolidates and highlights both the similarities and differences among guidelines, providing a comprehensive overview of PPI diagnosis and management for practitioners. It is our expectation that as more evidence emerges in this and other areas of PPI management, the guidelines will converge and address crucial patient-centric aspects.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the status of UK undergraduate urology teaching against the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Undergraduate Syllabus for Urology. Secondary objectives included evaluating the type and quantity of teaching provided, the reported performance rate of General Medical Council (GMC)-mandated urological procedures, and the proportion of undergraduates considering urology as a career. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LEARN was a national multicentre cross-sectional study. Year 2 to Year 5 medical students and FY1 doctors were invited to complete a survey between 3rd October and 20th December 2020, retrospectively assessing the urology teaching received to date. Results are reported according to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). RESULTS: 7,063/8,346 (84.6%) responses from all 39 UK medical schools were included; 1,127/7,063 (16.0%) were from Foundation Year (FY) 1 doctors, who reported that the most frequently taught topics in undergraduate training were on urinary tract infection (96.5%), acute kidney injury (95.9%) and haematuria (94.4%). The most infrequently taught topics were male urinary incontinence (59.4%), male infertility (52.4%) and erectile dysfunction (43.8%). Male and female catheterisation on patients as undergraduates was performed by 92.1% and 73.0% of FY1 doctors respectively, and 16.9% had considered a career in urology. Theory based teaching was mainly prevalent in the early years of medical school, with clinical skills teaching, and clinical placements in the later years of medical school. 20.1% of FY1 doctors reported no undergraduate clinical attachment in urology. CONCLUSION: LEARN is the largest ever evaluation of undergraduate urology teaching. In the UK, teaching seemed satisfactory as evaluated by the BAUS undergraduate syllabus. However, many students report having no clinical attachments in Urology and some newly qualified doctors report never having inserted a catheter, which is a GMC mandated requirement. We recommend a greater emphasis on undergraduate clinical exposure to urology and stricter adherence to GMC mandated procedures.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate enlargement (LUTS/BPE) can lead to significant disturbances to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pharmacological treatment of LUTS/BPE on disease specific and generic QOL measures. METHODS: Evolution was a European prospective, multicenter multi-national, observational registry collecting real-life clinical data over 2 years on the management of LUTS/BPE in primary and secondary care. This study investigated disease-specific QOL using questionnaires such as IPSS Q8, BPH Impact Index (BII) and generic QOL using questionnaires like EuroQOL Five Dimension (EQ5D) which encompassed EQ5D VAS and EQ5D health index. RESULTS: The registry enrolled 1838 BPE patients and 1246 patients were evaluable at the end of 24 months. Nearly 70% of patients in the study were previously treated with medical therapy and 17% of these had already discontinued medical treatment previously for various reasons with lack of efficacy being the most common. The mean time since diagnosis of LUTS in the previously treated group was 4.7 years (0-26 years). Medical management produced statistically significant improvement in QOL (disease specific and generic) in previously untreated patients and an insignificant change in generic QOL in previously treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: After 5-years from the onset of symptoms, LUTS/BPE patients previously treated with medication had significantly impaired QOL in patients in a manner comparable to other chronic diseases. Earlier intervention with minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIT) should be considered in LUTS/BPE patients that do not show a significant improvement in QOL with medical therapy.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To use the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAURF) registry data to determine the proportion of contemporary Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms associated with Benign Prostatic Enlargement (LUTS/BPE) patients prescribed phytotherapy, and to determine their subjective quality of life and clinical progression responses. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter multinational observational registry study, conducted over 2 years. Men ≥ 50 years seeking LUTS/BPE were divided at baseline into two cohorts, presently/recently untreated patients (PUP) commencing pharmacotherapy at baseline and presently/recently treated patients (c-PTP) continuing previously received pharmacotherapy, with 24-month follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Overall, 2175 patients were enrolled with 1838 analyzed. Of the PUP cohort (n = 575), 92 (16%) received phytotherapy and 65 (71%, n = 65/92) completed 24-month FU, with France prescribing 34% (n = 30/89) the highest proportion of phytotherapy among all LUTS/BPE medications. In the c-PTP group (n = 1263), only 69 (5%) patients were using phytotherapy, falling to n = 35/69 (51%) at 24-month FU (highest in France 20% (n = 43/210)). Though defined disease progression occurred in ≤ 20%, with only 1% proceeding to surgical intervention, in both groups, clinically meaningful improvement was lower and symptom persistence was higher in PUP but similar in the treated (c-PTP) patients on phytotherapy compared to the other LUTS/BPE medication. CONCLUSION: Low heterogeneous prescribing rates for phytotherapy were reported in both PUP and c-PTP cohorts over the 24-month FU. Although phytotherapy led to subjective improvements, healthcare practitioners should prescribe them with caution until higher quality evidence and guideline recommendations supporting its use are available.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Fitoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bladder Bowel Dysfunction (BBD) has been described in patients with Down's Syndrome (DS). Our aim was to report the incidence, demographics, presentation, complications and management of the bladder in DS patients with BBD. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines and search terms "{[(trisomy 21) OR down's syndrome]} AND [("non-neurogenic") OR voiding dysfunction]" in the search engines MEDLINE and SCOPUS. We also include a case series from two paediatric urology centres. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with BBD and DS were included. Mean age was 12 years (newborn to 21 years), the male:female ratio was 2:1. Functional constipation (90%), recurrent urinary tract infections (38%) and enuresis were common at presentation (56%), while over 56% patients required surgical intervention. Medical treatment and behavioral modification were less successful while intermittent catheterisation did not work. CONCLUSION: This study reviews the largest cohort of patients with BBD in DS. It is common with serious consequences requiring operative intervention. Usual interventions are unreliable due to poor compliance. Early identification and management protect the renal tract. Regular screening for urogenital anomalies in DS is currently not performed. We recommend a thorough history of bladder function in DS patients to identify these cases early.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Estreñimiento/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Vejiga Urinaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence of genitourinary (GU) injuries in pelvic and acetabular (P + A) fractures, to investigate associations between P + A fractures and GU injury patterns, and, as a secondary objective, to evaluate prospectively P + A fracture referrals with regard to adherence to the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) guidelines over a 12-month period. METHODS: A retrospective review of GU injuries associated with P + A fractures was performed for the period January 2006 to December 2016 in a national pelvic trauma centre in Ireland. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury and details of injuries were recorded. In addition, P + A fracture referrals were prospectively monitored in 2016 and reviewed for adherence to guidelines. RESULTS: The incidence of urological trauma in P + A fractures was 2.4% (n = 28/1 141). The median (range) patient age was 45 (19-85) years and the male to female ratio was 2.1:1. Urethral injuries occurred most frequently (n = 12, 43%), followed by bladder (n = 9, 32%), combined bladder and urethral (n = 3, 11%) and kidney (n = 4, 14%). Bladder and urethral injuries were associated with high-energy pelvic trauma. Renal injuries were associated with acetabular fractures in isolation and in combination with pelvic trauma (P = 0.01). In 2016, there were 175 P + A fracture referrals and 19 patients had suspected urotrauma (visible haematuria, n = 5; non-visible haematuria, n = 2; trauma imaging, n = 11); 9 of these 19 patients had no urological investigations performed. CONCLUSION: In P + A trauma cases GU injuries may be underreported because of inadequate evaluation and diagnostic investigations in these patients. We advocate robust, uniform and guideline-based evaluation of GU injuries in P + A trauma to avoid the significant long-term morbidities that are associated with misdiagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Sistema Urogenital/lesiones , Acetábulo/lesiones , Acetábulo/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema Urogenital/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Escroto , Masculino , Humanos , Ultrasonografía , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no evidence-based guidelines to dictate when Gallbladder Polyps (GBPs) of varying sizes should be resected. AIM: To identify factors that accurately predict malignant disease in GBP; to provide an evidence-based algorithm for management. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed using terms "gallbladder polyps" AND "polypoid lesion of gallbladder", from January 1993 and September 2013. Inclusion criteria required histopathological report or follow-up of 2 years. RTI-IB tool was used for quality analysis. Correlation with GBP size and malignant potential was analysed using Euclidean distance; a logistics mixed effects model was used for assessing independent risk factors for malignancy. RESULTS: Fifty-three articles were included in review. Data from 21 studies was pooled for analysis. Optimum size cut-off for resection of GBPs was 10 mm. Probability of malignancy is approximately zero at size <4.15 mm. Patient age >50 years, sessile and single polyps were independent risk factors for malignancy. For polyps sized 4 mm-10 mm, a risk assessment model was formulated. CONCLUSIONS: This review and analysis has provided an evidence-based algorithm for the management of GBPs. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the behaviour of polyps <10 mm, that are not at a high risk of malignancy, but may change over time.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Pólipos/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Pólipos/diagnóstico , Lesiones Precancerosas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Tarsal-carpal coalition syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited condition characterized by fusion of the carpal and tarsal bones and foot deformity. Associated pain and/or gait disturbance are the main complaints. The deformity usually consists of varying degrees of hindfoot varus and forefoot supination. The treatment of these patients is mainly aimed at symptomatic relief. We performed a published data review of this condition and discuss our findings in the context of the case of a 10-year-old female with congenital varus deformity of both feet. The tarsal-carpal coalition syndrome has been included in the spectrum of heritable disorders related to mutations in the NOG gene. Deformity management should be customized to the patient's requirements, and satisfactory results are achievable with adequate rehabilitation. It is important to remember that surgery is only necessary for symptomatic relief and that patients with tarsal-carpal coalition syndrome should be followed up over time because the condition can evolve.
Asunto(s)
Huesos del Carpo/anomalías , Deformidades Congénitas del Pie/cirugía , Deformidades Congénitas de la Mano/cirugía , Estribo/anomalías , Sinostosis/cirugía , Huesos Tarsianos/anomalías , Huesos Tarsianos/cirugía , Huesos del Carpo/cirugía , Niño , Femenino , Deformidades Congénitas del Pie/diagnóstico , Deformidades Congénitas de la Mano/diagnóstico , Humanos , Radiografía , Sinostosis/diagnóstico , Huesos Tarsianos/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Objective: The study aims to assess current international clinician attitudes, practices and barriers towards fertility assessment and preservation in patients undergoing radical inguinal orchidectomy (RIO) for testicular cancer. Materials and methods: An international online survey of urologists and urologists in training who perform RIO for testicular cancer was developed by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Sections of Andrology and Oncology and the British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST). The recruitment process used social media and the emailing lists of national urological societies. Responses were collected between 10/02/2021 and 31/05/2021 and stored using password-protected Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database software. The primary outcome was the proportion of urologists who routinely offer semen cryopreservation prior to RIO. The study was reported according to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys platform. Results: A total of 393 respondents took part in the online survey; of these, the majority were from the United Kingdom (65.9%), with the remaining international respondents (34.1%) from six different continents, which included 45 different countries. Of the respondents, 57.1% reported that they would routinely offer semen cryopreservation to all patients undergoing RIO for testicular cancer. In addition, 36.0% of urologists routinely performed pre-operative semen analysis, and 22.1% routinely performed pre-operative testicular serum hormone profile. Of the respondents, 14.4% performed expedited RIO within 48 h; 31.2% of respondents reported that they considered no delay to RIO to allow for semen cryopreservation to be acceptable. Conclusions: A significant proportion of international urologists do not offer pre-operative fertility assessment and preservation in men undergoing RIO for testicular cancer. Surgery is performed in an expedited fashion within 1 week in the majority of patients. Urologists perceive there to be a lack of access and availability to fertility services, and that delay to RIO to allow for fertility preservation is often not acceptable.
RESUMEN
Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in social media (SoMe) in health care is increasing. Benefits include personalisation of SoMe content for individual patients and identification of trends to prompt timely generation of relevant content. Data security, ethical considerations, medical accuracy, patient engagement, and regulatory compliance are issues to address for this evolving AI use.
Asunto(s)
Salud Digital , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , Inteligencia Artificial , Cooperación del Paciente , Participación del PacienteRESUMEN
WASHOUT is an international, multicentre, prospective observational study aiming to describe the management of unscheduled haematuria admissions. Preregistration can be done using the following link: https://redcap.link/WASHOUT.
Asunto(s)
Hematuria , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Hospitalización , Pacientes Internos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) aimed to develop a new subchapter on underactive bladder (UAB) in non-neurogenic men to inform health care providers of current best evidence and practice. Here, we present a summary of the UAB subchapter that is incorporated into the 2024 version of the EAU guidelines on non-neurogenic male LUTS. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted from 2002 to 2022, and articles with the highest certainty evidence were selected. A strength rating has been provided for each recommendation according to the EAU Guideline Office methodology. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Detrusor underactivity (DU) is a urodynamic diagnosis defined as a contraction of reduced strength and/or duration, resulting in prolonged bladder emptying and/or failure to achieve complete bladder emptying within a normal time span. UAB is a terminology that should be reserved for describing symptoms and clinical features related to DU. Invasive urodynamics is the only widely accepted method for diagnosing DU. In patients with persistently elevated postvoid residual (ie, >300 ml), intermittent catheterization is indicated and preferred to indwelling catheters. Alpha-adrenergic blockers are recommended before more invasive techniques, but the level of evidence is low. In men with DU and concomitant benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), benign prostatic surgery should be considered only after appropriate counseling. In men with DU and no BPO, a test phase of sacral neuromodulation may be considered. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The current text represents a summary of the new subchapter on UAB. For more detailed information, refer to the full-text version available on the EAU website (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts). PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology guidelines on underactive bladder in non-neurogenic adult men are presented here. Patients must be fully informed of all relevant options and, together with their treating physicians, decide on the most optimal management for them.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Day-case transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) is currently only performed in 18% cases across the United Kingdom. To determine 30-day readmission rate and morbidity after day-case TURBT in a district general hospital (DGH) and to report patient demographics, quality of TURBT and early recurrence rate as well as patient feedback after day-case TURBT. METHODS: A retrospective audit of day-case TURBTs over a 3-year pre-COVID19 (2017-20) was performed. We only included patients who underwent a TURBT and excluded any cystoscopy and biopsy or fulguration. A day-case TURBT pathway is in place in this centre. Feedback was obtained using hospital patient feedback forms. RESULTS: We included 77 patients who underwent TURBT in the day-case theatre, of these 5 patients required in-patient stay after the surgery. Of the remaining 72 discharged on the same day, 8 were re-admitted (11%) for Clavien-Dindo I complications. The readmission/failed discharge group had a higher rate of older patients, with higher ASA scores and longer operative times, however resection quality and tumour characteristics were not different from the day-case TURBTs. All patients reported an overall positive experience (good or very good). CONCLUSIONS: In the first of its kind audit reporting patient feedback after day-case TURBT, the data obtained can provide us and other centres adopting day-case TURBTs guidance to employ better patient selection to reduce readmission rates. Hence, day-case TURBT can be a feasible option in appropriately selected patients, with a suitable pathway in place.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales Generales , Resección Transuretral de la Vejiga , Cistectomía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patologíaRESUMEN
Interactive interventions represent a new application of social media in urology that involves multidirectional communication within a group. Such interventions have the potential to influence health behaviours in patients and the public and result in a significant impact on urological diseases.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Enfermedades Urológicas , Urología , Humanos , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for 75% of bladder cancers. It is common and costly. Cost and detriment to patient outcomes and quality of life are driven by high recurrence rates and the need for regular invasive surveillance and repeat treatments. There is evidence that the quality of the initial surgical procedure (transurethral resection of bladder tumor [TURBT]) and administration of postoperative bladder chemotherapy significantly reduce cancer recurrence rates and improve outcomes (cancer progression and mortality). There is surgeon-reported evidence that TURBT practice varies significantly across surgeons and sites. There is limited evidence from clinical trials of intravesical chemotherapy that NMIBC recurrence rate varies significantly between sites and that this cannot be accounted for by differences in patient, tumor, or adjuvant treatment factors, suggesting that how the surgery is performed may be a reason for the variation. OBJECTIVE: This study primarily aims to determine if feedback on and education about surgical quality indicators can improve performance and secondarily if this can reduce cancer recurrence rates. Planned secondary analyses aim to determine what surgeon, operative, perioperative, institutional, and patient factors are associated with better achievement of TURBT quality indicators and NMIBC recurrence rates. METHODS: This is an observational, international, multicenter study with an embedded cluster randomized trial of audit, feedback, and education. Sites will be included if they perform TURBT for NMIBC. The study has four phases: (1) site registration and usual practice survey; (2) retrospective audit; (3) randomization to audit, feedback, and education intervention or to no intervention; and (4) prospective audit. Local and national ethical and institutional approvals or exemptions will be obtained at each participating site. RESULTS: The study has 4 coprimary outcomes, which are 4 evidence-based TURBT quality indicators: a surgical performance factor (detrusor muscle resection); an adjuvant treatment factor (intravesical chemotherapy administration); and 2 documentation factors (resection completeness and tumor features). A key secondary outcome is the early cancer recurrence rate. The intervention is a web-based surgical performance feedback dashboard with educational and practical resources for TURBT quality improvement. It will include anonymous site and surgeon-level peer comparison, a performance summary, and targets. The coprimary outcomes will be analyzed at the site level while recurrence rate will be analyzed at the patient level. The study was funded in October 2020 and began data collection in April 2021. As of January 2023, there were 220 hospitals participating and over 15,000 patient records. Projected data collection end date is June 30, 2023. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to use a distributed collaborative model to deliver a site-level web-based performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of endoscopic bladder cancer surgery. The study is funded and projects to complete data collection in June 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.org NCT05154084; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05154084. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/42254.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review the in-patient (IP) management patterns and 30-day outcomes of patients admitted with macroscopic haematuria (MH) over a 1-year-period in a single-institution, aiming to clarify management for such cases in the future. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients admitted with MH in a single-institution over 1-year, excluding patients not requiring an overnight stay. A case note review was performed for patient demographics, MH investigations, and management. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were admitted with MH over a span of 1-year. 89% (107/120) were males, with an average age of 78 years (36-97 years), an average ASA of 3, mean length-of-stay (LOS) was 5 days (1-31days) and 68% (82/120) had pre-existing urological conditions. 62% (74/120) required bladder irrigation for a mean duration of 3 days (1-16days). 10% (12/120) required an emergency rigid cystoscopy and washout to manage the bleeding, of which 4% (5/12) had malignancy noted. Over 8% (10/120) patients discharged had unplanned readmissions within 30 days. The 1-year mortality for this cohort was 23% (28/120) of which 21% (6/28) died within 30 days from discharge. CONCLUSION: IP MH affects a vulnerable patient cohort. There is no specific pathway guiding the inpatient management of MH; therefore, research is required to produce standardized pathways for managing MH, considering the high-risk patient cohort, the prolonged LOS, and high 1-year mortality rate.
Asunto(s)
Hematuria , Urología , Anciano , Cistoscopía , Femenino , Hematuria/diagnóstico , Hematuria/etiología , Hematuria/terapia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The uptake and utilisation of social media (SoMe) in medicine are rapidly increasing, and several new platforms and media have come to the forefront in recent times. The European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Dissemination Committee is at the forefront of this evolution and has a multifaceted strategy with content on appropriate use of SoMe that includes a new guidelines chapter, cheat sheets to present existing guidelines, precision SoMe content, social audio, and greater patient advocacy in its content and dissemination.