How to do left atrial late gadolinium enhancement: a review.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of left atrial late gadolinium enhancement is a powerful clinical and research tool. Fibrosis burden has been shown to predict the success of pulmonary vein isolation, post-ablation reoccurrence, and major adverse cardiovascular events such as stroke. OVERVIEW: The standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging protocols 2020 update describes the key components of the examination. This review is a more in-depth guide, geared toward building left atrial late gadolinium enhancement imaging from the ground up. The standard protocol consists of the following: localization, pulmonary vein magnetic resonance angiography, cardiac cines, left ventricular, and atrial late gadolinium enhancement. We also review typical segmentation and post-processing techniques, as well as discuss pitfalls, limitations, and potential future innovations in this area. CONCLUSIONS: With sufficient experience and optimized protocols, left atrial late gadolinium enhancement imaging is a strong addition to the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging repertoire.

Stress Cardiomyopathy Caused by Diving: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Stress cardiomyopathy is characterized by transient myocardial dysfunction that mimics a myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. The onset is frequently triggered by an acute illness or intense physical or emotional stress. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 47-year-old woman who was brought to the emergency department with acute onset shortness of breath while scuba diving. She was found to have acute pulmonary edema radiographically. Her troponins were noted to be positive. Initial echocardiogram showed basal hypokinesis with hyperkinesis of apex. She was treated with noninvasive ventilation and intravenous diuretic therapy and her symptoms significantly improved. She subsequently underwent cardiac catheterization which revealed nonobstructive coronary artery disease. An exercise stress echocardiogram was performed 2 days later that revealed resolution of the wall motion abnormality and no ischemia at high levels of exercise. A diagnosis of reverse stress (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy was made based on Mayo Clinic Diagnostic criteria. ​WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case brings to light the risk of stress cardiomyopathy in divers. The diagnosis should be considered in patients presenting with acute pulmonary edema during diving.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a significant vascular disease found in 4% to 8% of the screening population. If ruptured, its mortality rate is between 75% and 90%, and it accounts for up to 5% of sudden deaths in the United States. Therefore, screening of AAA while asymptomatic has been a crucial portion of preventive health care worldwide. Ultrasound of the abdominal aorta is the primary imaging modality for screening of AAA recommended for asymptomatic adults regardless of their family history or smoking history. Alternatively, duplex ultrasound and CT abdomen and pelvis without contrast may be appropriate for screening. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Coffee and tea: perks for health and longevity?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tea and coffee, after water, are the most commonly consumed beverages in the world and are the top sources of caffeine and antioxidant polyphenols in the American diet. The purpose of this review is to assess the health effects of chronic tea and/or coffee consumption. RECENT FINDINGS: Tea consumption, especially green tea, is associated with significantly reduced risks for stroke, diabetes and depression, and improved levels of glucose, cholesterol, abdominal obesity and blood pressure. Habitual coffee consumption in large epidemiological studies is associated with reduced mortality, both for all-cause and cardiovascular deaths. In addition, coffee intake is associated with risks of heart failure, stroke, diabetes mellitus and some cancers in an inverse dose-dependent fashion. Surprisingly, coffee is associated with neutral to reduced risks for both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. However, caffeine at high doses can increase anxiety, insomnia, calcium loss and possibly the risk of fractures. SUMMARY: Coffee and tea can generally be recommended as health-promoting additions to an adult diet. Adequate dietary calcium intake may be particularly important for tea and coffee drinkers.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass, Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: 2023 Update.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as abnormal dilation of the infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter to 3.0 cm or greater. The natural history of AAA consists of progressive expansion and potential rupture. Although most AAAs are clinically silent, a pulsatile abdominal mass identified on physical examination may indicate the presence of an AAA. When an AAA is suspected, an imaging study is essential to confirm the diagnosis. This document reviews the relative appropriateness of various imaging procedures for the initial evaluation of suspected AAA. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Clinical factors associated with left ventricular ejection fraction disparity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing multimodality imaging.

Drug and device therapy for heart failure is increasingly determined based on left ventricular ejection fraction. Significant disparity frequently exists between echocardiographic and nuclear scintigraphic techniques, even when testing is performed nearly simultaneously in clinically stable patients. In 119 patients with left ventricular dysfunction who underwent both echocardiography and stress testing with nuclear imaging within seven days (but with significant disparity in reported left ventricular ejection fraction), we identified four clinical variables which were associated with left ventricular ejection fraction difference. These clinical variables included atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, severe mitral regurgitation and paced rhythm.

Alcohol and cardiovascular health: the dose makes the poison or the remedy.

Habitual light to moderate alcohol intake (up to 1 drink per day for women and 1 or 2 drinks per day for men) is associated with decreased risks for total mortality, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and stroke. However, higher levels of alcohol consumption are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Indeed, behind only smoking and obesity, excessive alcohol consumption is the third leading cause of premature death in the United States. Heavy alcohol use (1) is one of the most common causes of reversible hypertension, (2) accounts for about one-third of all cases of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, (3) is a frequent cause of atrial fibrillation, and (4) markedly increases risks of stroke-both ischemic and hemorrhagic. The risk-to-benefit ratio of drinking appears higher in younger individuals, who also have higher rates of excessive or binge drinking and more frequently have adverse consequences of acute intoxication (for example, accidents, violence, and social strife). In fact, among males aged 15 to 59 years, alcohol abuse is the leading risk factor for premature death. Of the various drinking patterns, daily low- to moderate-dose alcohol intake, ideally red wine before or during the evening meal, is associated with the strongest reduction in adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Health care professionals should not recommend alcohol to nondrinkers because of the paucity of randomized outcome data and the potential for problem drinking even among individuals at apparently low risk. The findings in this review were based on a literature search of PubMed for the 15-year period 1997 through 2012 using the search terms alcohol, ethanol, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, stroke, and mortality. Studies were considered if they were deemed to be of high quality, objective, and methodologically sound.

Neutralizing the adverse prognosis of coronary artery calcium.

OBJECTIVES: To report and compare the outcomes and survival of patients with abnormal computed tomography-derived coronary artery calcium (CT-CAC) scores undergoing aggressive medical treatment at a cardiac prevention clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 849 patients with intermediate risk based on the Framingham risk score and an abnormal CT-CAC score who were aggressively treated in a preventive cardiology risk factor modification program from June 23, 2000, to September 1, 2012. The primary outcome was a composite end point of myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, revascularization, and cardiovascular death. The effect of the CT-CAC subgroup on major adverse coronary heart disease events (MACEs) was evaluated by calculating hazard ratios with Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wonder database was used to identify age- and sex-matched controls from the general population of Kansas and Missouri. RESULTS: The mean age of the study patients was 65.4 years (58.4% men [496]). The median follow-up was 58 months, and the mean CT-CAC score was 336 Agatston units. Thirty-four patients (4.0%) reached the primary end point, including 4 deaths. The adjusted 10-year mortality rates were similar in the study group and control group (9.3 vs 10.6; P=.80). After adjustment, a CT-CAC score greater than 400 Agatston units correlated with a higher risk of MACEs (hazard ratio, 3.55; P=.01). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that intermediate-risk patients with abnormal CT-CAC scores when treated with intensive risk factor reduction have lower rates of MACEs than predicted by the Framingham risk score and the presence of coronary artery calcium.

Effects of habitual coffee consumption on cardiometabolic disease, cardiovascular health, and all-cause mortality.

Coffee, after water, is the most widely consumed beverage in the United States, and is the principal source of caffeine intake among adults. The biological effects of coffee may be substantial and are not limited to the actions of caffeine. Coffee is a complex beverage containing hundreds of biologically active compounds, and the health effects of chronic coffee intake are wide ranging. From a cardiovascular (CV) standpoint, coffee consumption may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, as well as other conditions associated with CV risk such as obesity and depression; but it may adversely affect lipid profiles depending on how the beverage is prepared. Regardless, a growing body of data suggests that habitual coffee consumption is neutral to beneficial regarding the risks of a variety of adverse CV outcomes including coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, and stroke. Moreover, large epidemiological studies suggest that regular coffee drinkers have reduced risks of mortality, both CV and all-cause. The potential benefits also include protection against neurodegenerative diseases, improved asthma control, and lower risk of select gastrointestinal diseases. A daily intake of ∼2 to 3 cups of coffee appears to be safe and is associated with neutral to beneficial effects for most of the studied health outcomes. However, most of the data on coffee's health effects are based on observational data, with very few randomized, controlled studies, and association does not prove causation. Additionally, the possible advantages of regular coffee consumption have to be weighed against potential risks (which are mostly related to its high caffeine content) including anxiety, insomnia, tremulousness, and palpitations, as well as bone loss and possibly increased risk of fractures.

Meta-analysis of effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) have a very high risk for major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. Previous studies have shown that traditional oral diabetic medications, despite lowering blood glucose levels, generally do not improve CV outcomes. The safety of some oral hypoglycemic medications has been questioned. We aimed to evaluate the CV safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, a novel class of oral diabetic medications, by performing a meta-analysis of DPP4 inhibitors for type 2 DM. A search of electronic databases of published and unpublished literature (until September 30, 2011) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials of ≥24 weeks that compared DPP4 inhibitors to other oral diabetic medications. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed and random effects to determine risk ratio (RR) for adverse CV events with DPP4 inhibitor monotherapy compared to other oral diabetic medications or to placebo. Eighteen randomized met our inclusion criteria, comprising 4,998 patients who were randomized to DPP4 inhibitors and 3,546 to a comparator, with a median duration of therapy of 46.4 weeks. In pooled analysis, the RR of any adverse CV event with a DPP4 inhibitor was 0.48 (0.31 to 0.75, p = 0.001), and the RR for nonfatal myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome was 0.40 (0.18 to 0.88, p = 0.02). In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides evidence that DPP4 inhibitors are safe from a CV standpoint and may possibly decrease risk of adverse CV events.