Use of proton pump inhibitors in adults in France: a nationwide drug utilization study.

PURPOSE: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs are approved for the management of gastric acid-related diseases, mainly treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-related gastrointestinal complications and prevention in at-risk patients, Helicobacter pylori eradication, and treatment of ulcers. PPIs are one of the most commonly prescribed drug class worldwide, and off-label use is widespread. The aim of this study was to describe outpatient PPI use of the whole adult population in France, based on the French National Health Data System (SNDS). METHODS: All individuals aged 18 years or older, with at least one dispensing for PPI between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015, were identified as PPI users. PPI users were considered as new users if they received no dispensing for PPI in the prior year. New users were followed until treatment discontinuation or up to 1 year, whichever occurred first. Characteristics of new users and of their PPI treatment were described, overall and separately by treatment indication. RESULTS: In total, 15,388,419 PPI users were identified in 2015 (57.0% women; mean age 57.0 years), accounting for 29.8% of the French adult population. Of them, 7,399,303 were new PPI users; mean treatment duration was 40.9 days, and 4.1% received a continuous PPI therapy lasting more than 6 months (10.2% among new users > 65 years versus 2.4% among those 18-65 years). For 53.5% of new users, indication for PPI therapy was a co-prescription with NSAID; in this indication, the large majority of patients (79.7%) had no measurable risk factor supporting a systematic prophylactic co-prescription of PPI. A proportion of 32.4% of new users did not have any identified comedication or inpatient diagnosis supporting an indication for PPI therapy; among them, only a small proportion (7.3% overall, and 8.4% of patients aged > 65 years) underwent a procedure investigating the digestive tract at the time of PPI initiation. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest PPI overuse in France, not always in line with the French guidelines. In particular, inappropriate co-prescription with NSAID was frequent. Efforts should be made to limit PPI treatment to appropriate indications and durations.

Cushing's syndrome due to interaction between ritonavir or cobicistat and corticosteroids: a case-control study in the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the frequent interaction between antiretroviral-boosting agents and corticosteroids causing Cushing's syndrome (CS) in the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study describing CS recorded in the FPVD between 1996 and 2018. Case was defined as CS occurring in people living with HIV (PLWH) and control was defined as CS in uninfected individuals. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) was defined as an interaction between corticosteroids and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Data concerning the DDI, corticosteroids involved, route of administration and seriousness of the CS were described. RESULTS: Among the 139 instances of CS identified, 34/35 cases (97%) had DDIs (31 with ritonavir and 3 with cobicistat) and 7/104 controls (7%) had DDIs (6 with itraconazole and 1 with verapamil). The main corticosteroid involved was inhaled fluticasone (28/35, 80%) among the cases and oral prednisone (38/104, 37%) among the controls. More CS cases (30/35, 86%) than CS controls (62/104, 60%) were serious (OR = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.4-14.4; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Antiretroviral-boosting agents were responsible for one out of four iatrogenic CS cases in a French national database. Prescribers should be aware of the risk of potentially serious DDIs between antiretroviral-boosting agents and corticosteroids, including single-tablet regimens containing cobicistat.

Dramatic Increase of Amoxicillin-Induced Crystal Nephropathy Found in a Cohort Study of French Pharmacovigilance Centers.

An increase in amoxicillin-induced crystal nephropathy (AICN) incidence has been recently suggested. The aims of this study were to investigate the trend of AICN incidence through Paris' regional centers of pharmacovigilance (Paris RCPVs) and better describe this rare adverse drug reaction. Forty-five AICN cases were identified between 1985 and 2016. All cases, except one, were reported since 2010. Amoxicillin (AMX) was administered intravenously (65 [interquartile range {IQR}, 43 to 110] mg/kg of body weight/day) in all patients, either for treating infection (n = 15) or as surgical prophylaxis (n = 30). Delay between AMX administration and AICN onset was 1 (IQR, 1 to 3) day; 30, 4, and 11 patients developed KDIGO stage 1, 2, and 3 acute kidney injury, respectively. Delay between AICN onset and kidney function recovery was 4 (IQR, 2 to 6) days. Precipitating factors were identified in only one-third of cases. Twelve patients required intensive care unit admission, and 8 needed renal replacement therapy. Neither chronic kidney disease nor death was observed. We confirmed the recent and dramatic increase of AICN in the Paris RCPVs since 2010. The absence of precipitating factors in the majority of cases and the onset of AICN in apparent routine indications, such as surgical prophylaxis, are alarming and justify a high vigilance from all AMX prescribers.

Isoniazid-induced recurrent pancreatitis.

CONTEXT: Drug induced pancreatitis are rare but potentially serious. Thus, drug withdrawal is warranted. CASE REPORT: A 79-year-old woman who was treated with antituberculosis therapy for 5 weeks was admitted to our unit for pancreatitis. Usual etiologies of pancreatitis were eliminated. Because of vomiting, antituberculosis therapy was withdrawn and symptoms disappeared. Eight days later, the same treatment was reintroduced and the patient presented recurrent pancreatitis; thus, treatment was withheld again followed by disappearance of clinical and biological abnormalities. Two days later, a treatment without isoniazid was reintroduced and no recurrence of symptoms was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We have experienced a case of isoniazid induced pancreatitis. This is a rare cause of pancreatitis but potentially fatal thus recognition of drug induced pancreatitis and definitive withdrawal of the drug is required.

Acute pancreatitis in the course of meprobamate poisoning.

CONTEXT: We report a case of massive poisoning with meprobamate leading to acute pancreatitis. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old patient with a history of schizophrenia and multiple suicide attempts was admitted to the intensive care unit for severe poisoning with meprobamate (voluntary ingestion of 60 g). On admission, the patient was deeply comatose with low blood pressure and hypothermia. Laboratory analysis revealed leukocytosis and high lipase and amylase serum levels. There was no eosinophilia. Abdominal computed tomography showed pancreatitis grade A. The patient was intubated and ventilated, and intravenous dopamine was infused. The patient regained consciousness and was extubated five days later. Improvement in pancreatic tests was noted several days later. The outcome was favorable. DISCUSSION: According to the Naranjo probability scale, meprobamate-induced acute pancreatitis was probable. Acute pancreatitis in meprobamate poisoning is exceptional. The pathogenesis of pancreatitis-induced meprobamate poisoning may be explained by two mechanisms: stimulation of pancreatic secretion secondary to cholinergic activation and pancreatic ductal hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: The signs of severe meprobamate toxicity are numerous including cardiovascular and central nervous symptoms. Acute pancreatitis should also be added as a possible manifestation of meprobamate poisoning.

Imatinib mesylate-induced acute hepatitis in a patient treated for gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

We report the first case of hepatocellular injury occurring in a patient treated for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) with imatinib mesylate, with two positive rechallenges including one with 2.5% of the current therapeutic dosage. The patient could be treated later with sunitinib without liver toxicity. Grade 3-4 liver toxicity could occur in one out of 40 treated patients with imatinib for GIST, and fatalities have been reported. Regular monitoring of liver function tests is essential in patients treated with imatinib.

[Acute colitis closely following the beginning of celecoxib treatment]. / Colite aiguë apparue dans les jours suivant le début d'un traitement par célécoxib.

Selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 have less gastroduodenal toxicity than non selective anti-inflammatory drugs. However, there is little information on their effect on the distal gut. A 91 year old woman presented with acute diarrhoea 5 weeks after beginning celecoxib treatment. Laboratory results showed an inflammatory syndrome and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) to 13 N. Endoscopic examination of the colon showed diffuse erythematous lesions of the sigmoid and of part of the right colon. No aetiology has been found for colitis or hepatitis. Diarrhea and blood test anomalies disappeared one week after celecoxib was stopped. The role of celecoxib in the etiology of colitis was considered plausible but not for liver damage. This report and a few other cases in the literature suggest that cyclooxygenase-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug inhibitor toxicity should be investigated in case of unexplained acute colitis.

Etifoxine-induced acute hepatitis: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: Etifoxine is approved for the treatment of psychosomatic manifestations of anxiety. Several cases of acute hepatitis have been recently notified to the French pharmacovigilance centres. Our aim was to review all relevant cases of etifoxine hepatitis. METHODS: All cases of liver disorders involving etifoxine and reported since November 1995 were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database. Only cases with suggestive chronological events, no other drug-related or non-drug causes, and sufficient information, were included. RESULTS: Of the 30 selected cases, 18 were retained for further analysis. The median duration of treatment before the onset of symptoms was 18 days (11 to 61 days). The results of liver tests evidenced cytolytic hepatitis in 15 cases and mixed-type hepatitis in 3. One patient also exposed to lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide developed a fulminant hepatitis that required liver transplantation and six other patients had biological signs of severity. Except for the transplanted patient, 15 patients fully recovered within 3 months, and two clearly improved (further outcome unknown) after etifoxine withdrawal. CONCLUSION: One previously published case and our series confirm that etifoxine can cause acute liver injury with a possibly severe outcome. This adverse effect is not mentioned in the summary of the product characteristics.

Benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients depends on PI used in HAART regimen--ANRS 111 trial.

As a result of high inter-patient variability, and efficacy-concentration and toxicity-concentration relationships, optimization of HIV-protease inhibitor (PI) doses based on plasma concentrations could be beneficial. During a 48-week open prospective non-randomized interventional study of 115 protease inhibitor-naïve patients initiating an indinavir/ritonavir- or lopinavir/ritonavir-, or nelfinavir-containing therapy, protease inhibitor dose was modified when plasma trough concentrations (C(trough)) at weeks 2, 8, 16 and 24 were outside predefined optimal concentration ranges. Failure of the strategy was defined as the proportions of patients with HIV-RNA above 200 copies/mL from weeks 24 to 48 and/or experiencing grades 2, 3 or 4 PI-related adverse events during the study; proportion of patients with last C(trough) measurement outside the concentration range was determined at each visit. Virological failure and/or occurrence of adverse event were observed in 37/94 assessable patients (39%; 95% CI: 29.4-50.0). In the on-treatment analysis, failure of the strategy was noted in 16% of indinavir/r- or lopinavir/r-treated patients (8/51; 95% CI: 7.0-28.6; virological failure: 2; adverse event: 6) but in 44% of nelfinavir-treated patients (11/25; 95% CI: 24.4-65.1; virological failure: 10; adverse event: 1); C(trough) concentrations outside the range were less frequent at the last measurement than at W2 (41% vs. 66%; P < 0.05), with proportions of 35% for indinavir/r- or lopinavir/r-treated patients, but 57% for nelfinavir-treated patients. The proposed strategy of therapeutic drug monitoring may be beneficial to indinavir/r- and lopinavir/r-treated patients, but failed to move concentrations into the predefined range and to produce the expected virological success for nelfinavir-treated patients.

Zoledronic Acid and renal toxicity: data from French adverse effect reporting database.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid-associated renal impairment leading to renal failure has been recently reported in a cohort of US patients. However, the presence of such toxicity in other populations has not yet been determined. OBJECTIVE: To analyze French cases of zoledronic acid-associated nephrotoxicity. METHODS: We evaluated available cases with acute deterioration of renal function associated with zoledronic acid therapy drawn from the French Adverse Event Reporting System database until July 1, 2004. RESULTS: We identified 4 men and 3 women between the ages of 52 and 70 years, with multiple myeloma or different types of metastatic cancer, who had experienced renal impairment during zoledronic acid therapy. Four patients developed de novo acute renal failure, while the other 3 patients experienced acute deterioration of preexisting chronic renal failure. Renal failure occurred after various durations of zoledronic acid therapy (1-120 days). Three patients completely recovered and one partially recovered their previous renal function after discontinuation of zoledronic acid, but renal impairment was associated with a fatal outcome in 2 cases; the outcome of the other case was unknown. Our data confirm the previously reported risk factors for zoledronic acid-associated nephrotoxicity such as advanced cancer, multiple myeloma, preexisting renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, and concomitant use of nephrotoxic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: These cases emphasize the need for regular monitoring of renal function during zoledronic acid treatment, with particular attention to patients with preexisting impaired renal function.