SARS-CoV-2 in infant urine and fecal samples after in utero COVID-19 exposure.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that has and will continue to affect many pregnant women. Knowledge regarding the risk of vertical transmission is limited. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of nasopharyngeal swabs typically have been used to confirm the diagnosis among infants, but whether the virus can be detected in other biological specimens, and therefore potentially transmitted in other ways, is unknown. Positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR has been reported from feces and urine from adult patients. We hypothesize that the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in infant urine and fecal samples after prenatal COVID-19 exposure is low. METHODS: We examined the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using RT-PCR in urine and fecal samples among 42 infants born to SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers during different stages of pregnancy. RESULTS: A urine sample was collected from 39 of 42 infants and fecal samples from all 42 infants shortly after birth. Although the majority of the women had the symptomatic disease (85.6%), we were unable to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus from any infant urine or fecal samples. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in infant urine or feces after maternal infection during pregnancy, providing further evidence for low rates of perinatal transmission. IMPACT: SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the urine or feces of infants of mothers with COVID-19 during various time points in pregnancy. This study provides further evidence for low rates of perinatal transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Results help to provide guidance on perinatal care practices for infants exposed to COVID-19 in utero.

National Provider Survey: Use of Naltrexone for Pregnant Individuals with Substance Use Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: A national survey evaluated the availability of naltrexone as a treatment for alcohol use disorder and/or opioid use disorder for pregnant individuals. Provider perceptions of barriers to treatment with naltrexone during pregnancy were also examined. METHODS: Sites were selected from a national registry of naltrexone prescribers (N = 5208). A 10% sampling of sites within 150 miles of each state's capital was selected (n = 2073). Survey of 11 questions included availability of naltrexone for pregnant individuals, standard practices for treating pregnant individuals already on naltrexone, and barriers to treatment. Survey responses were summarized to identify top barriers and national trends in service availability. RESULTS: Of the 236 sites contacted, 78 (33.1%) completed the survey. There was significant geographic variation in number of available sites, with Northeast United States having the most sites. Of the 78 responding sites, only 23 (35.9%) offered naltrexone for pregnant individuals. The most common barriers to prescribing naltrexone included the following: sites without pregnant patients (15.6%), lack of national guidelines in using naltrexone for pregnant patients (14.1%), providers' discomfort with prescribing naltrexone during pregnancy due to safety concerns (9.4%), and providers' discomfort due to inexperience (4.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Accessibility of naltrexone and related care for pregnant individuals with alcohol use disorder and opioid use disorder varies greatly across the United States with numerous barriers and educational gaps identified. Additional research and resources are needed to expand naltrexone treatment access for pregnant individuals.

Buprenorphine-naloxone Versus Buprenorphine for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: Data regarding treatment outcomes with the use of buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) in pregnancy are scarce. The objective of this study is to examine the outcomes in a cohort of pregnancies treated with BUP-NX versus buprenorphine (BUP). METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study examined birthing person-infant dyads treated with BUP-NX versus BUP. The primary birthing person outcome was return to opioid use in pregnancy. The primary neonatal outcome was the need for pharmacologic treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). RESULTS: The BUP-NX and the BUP treatment groups included 33 and 73 dyads, respectively. Except for psychiatric medication use, all demographics were similar between groups. In the final regression models, neither the birthing person nor the neonatal outcomes differed. The adjusted odds ratio for return to use during pregnancy for the BUP-NX versus BUP groups was 1.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-4.76). The adjusted odds ratio for pharmacologic treatment of NOWS for the BUP-NX versus BUP groups was 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.54). Among a subgroup of persons who transitioned from BUP to BUP-NX mid-pregnancy, there was no proximate return to use or need for dose increase. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with BUP, the use of BUP-NX in pregnancy is not associated with a higher risk of return to opioid use or a higher need for pharmacological treatment for NOWS.