Sunitinib malate in previously untreated, nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer patients over the age of 70 years: results of a Phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Some elderly patients may have reduced tolerance the standard therapy (chemotherapy doublets) for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sunitinib malate (S), an oral, multitargeted kinase inhibitor, shows promise as 2nd-line NSCLC treatment. This study explored the safety/efficacy of S in elderly patients with previously untreated NSCLC. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: disease control rate (DCR) at six-weeks. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: overall response (OR, CR+PR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), one-yr survival, quality of life (QOL), and safety. TREATMENT: S 37.5 mg daily/42-day cycle until PD or intolerable toxicity. Key inclusion: chemo-naïve stage IIIB/IV NSCLC (nonsquamous histology); ECOG PS=0-1; ≥ 70 years; normal organ function. Exclusion: hemoptysis, anticoagulation, or clotting diathesis. Other standard S-specific criteria applied. RESULTS: 63 patients enrolled/60 treated. DEMOGRAPHICS: 51 % male, 95 % white, median age 78 years (range, 70-88), 73 % ECOG=1, 97 % Stage IV, 83 % adenocarcinoma, 44 % prior surgery, 19 % prior radiation. With a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-16), DCR=63 %, OR=7 % (0 CR, 4 PR). Median follow-up=5.8 months (all; 15.9 months survivors), median PFS =3.0 months (range, <1-25.1), median TTP=4.5 months (range, <1-25.1), and 1-year survival=26.4 % [95 % CI: 15.9, 38.2]. QOL declined initially, but improved over time. TREATMENT-related adverse events included: fatigue (48.3 %); diarrhea (38.3 %); thrombocytopenia (33.3 %), anorexia (26.7 %), mucositis (25.0 %); nausea (25.0 %), dysgeusia (20.0 %), and neutropenia (20.0 %). Conclusions The study met its primary endpoint. S produced acceptable DCR and QOL improved; however, OR was disappointing (7 %) and toxicity was greater than expected. A biomarker to identify patients more likely to benefit from S is needed.

Results of a phase 2 study of bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent lymphoma.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of single-agent bortezomib in indolent B-cell lymphoma that had relapsed from or was refractory to rituximab. Sixty patients enrolled: 59 were treated with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles; responders could receive 4 additional cycles; maintenance was optional. Fifty-three evaluable patients completed more than 2 cycles. The median age was 70 years, 53% female, Ann Arbor stage III-IIIE (28%) and IV (65%); 43 patients (72%) had more than 2 prior regimens; and 6 patients went on to maintenance. Overall responses are as follows: 1 complete response (1.9%), 3 unconfirmed complete response (5.7%), 3 partial response (5.7%), 34 stable disease (64.2%), and 12 progressive disease (22.6%). Median time to response = 2.2 months (range, 1.2-5.3 months); duration of response = 7.9 months (2.8-21.3 months); 1-year survival was 73% and 2-year survival was 58%; median survival = 27.7 months (range, 1.4-30.9 months); median progression-free survival = 5.1 months (range, 0.2-27.7 months), median time to progression = 5.1 months (range, 0.2-27.7 months), and median event-free survival = 1.8 months (range, 0.2-27.7 months). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events included: thrombocytopenia (20%), fatigue (10%), neutropenia (8.5%), and neuropathy and diarrhea (6.8% each). This study demonstrates that bortezomib has modest activity against marginal zone and follicular lymphoma; it has the potential for combination with other agents in low-grade lymphomas. Maintenance therapy should be explored further.

A phase II open-label trial of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma who have undergone an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant and failed to achieve a complete response.

BACKGROUND: A majority of multiple myeloma (MM) patients fail to achieve complete response (CR) to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT); effective options following autologous transplantation are needed. Bortezomib (B) is active against MM. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of B following high-dose melphalan therapy and PBSCT. Methods Fifty patients enrolled (48 evaluable) and 49 were treated (safety population). TREATMENT: 4 cycles B 1.3 mg/m(2) Days 1, 4, 8, and 11/21-days; 4 additional cycles were permitted for stable or responding patients. Results Median age was 55 years (range, 38-73), 68% male, 64% ECOG PS = 0, 44% Durie-Salmon Stage IIIA prior to induction, 42% had symptomatic IgG MM; 74% had prior single transplant (26% tandem). Responses post-transplant: 70% PRs, 18% MRs. A median of 4 cycles (range, 2-8) of B were administered. Responses: CR 8%, uCR 2%, PR 23%, uPR 19%, MR 10%, and no change 35%; median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 6.2 months (range, 1.0-19.4). Three deaths occurred (n = 1 sepsis, n = 2 disease progression). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities included: thrombocytopenia, neuropathy (14%, each); asthenia, neutropenia (10%, each); and nausea (4%). Twelve patients (24%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity and 30 patients (60%) completed the study; 20 patients started new treatment (median 5.8 months [range, 1.5-20.3]). CONCLUSIONS: The study closed early due to widespread availability of B, and the lack of B-naïve patients. Bortezomib monotherapy after melphalan and autologous PBSCT was feasible, safe and well-tolerated (toxicities were manageable), but failed to produce the hypothesized response rates.

A Phase III trial of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab vs. pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies comparing pentostatin (P), cyclophosphamide (C), and rituximab (R) (PCR) to fludarabine plus C+R (FCR) suggest similar efficacy with fewer infectious complications with PCR. We compared FCR and PCR in previously-untreated or minimally-treated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). TREATMENT: FCR (F 20 mg/m(2) Days 1-5, C 600 mg/m(2) Day 1, R 375 mg/m(2) Day 1) (28-day cycles) or PCR (P 4 mg/m(2) Day 1, C 600 mg/m(2) Day 1, R 375 mg/m(2) Day 1) (21-day cycles). Dose 1 of R: 100 mg/m(2) was given on Day 8 Cycle 1 and the remainder on Day 9; in subsequent cycles the entire dose was given on Day 1. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to each group (N = 184). Groups were balanced; ~20% had received prior chemotherapy. The infection rate (FCR/PCR) was 31%/36%, the infective event rate was 38%/45%; 30 (35%)/37 (44%) patients were hospitalized; total hospitalization days was 271/404. 12 (14%)/6 (7%) patients achieved complete remissions (CR); the overall response rate (ORR) including CR+nodular PR (nPR)+PR was 59%/49%. Grade 3-4 treatment related AEs: neutropenia (69%/57%), leukopenia (34%/17%), thrombocytopenia (13%/6%). Grade 3-4 infections: febrile neutropenia (8%/6%), fever (2%/6%), infection (1%/3%), urinary tract infection (1%/0%), pneumonia (3%/1%), and sepsis (1%/2%); 5 deaths (1 FCR/4 PCR) were treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: PCR and FCR have significant activity in CLL and can be given safely in the community setting despite significant toxicity. ORRs were lower than expected; the CR rate was higher (NS) with FCR. This trial did not demonstrate a lower infection rate with PCR.

Gemcitabine plus enzastaurin or single-agent gemcitabine in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a phase II, randomized, noncomparative study.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine (G) is standard therapy for pancreatic cancer. Enzastaurin (E) inhibits PKCß and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways with a dose-dependent effect on growth of pancreatic carcinoma xenografts. Data suggest that the GE combination may improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives assessed progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and relationships between biomarker expression and clinical outcomes. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to GE or G treatment; GE arm: E 500 mg p.o. daily; loading-dose (1200 mg; Day 1 Cycle 1 only) and G 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. Days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles; G arm: G as in GE. Biomarker expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Randomization totaled 130 patients (GE = 86, G = 44); 121 patients were treated (GE = 82, G = 39). GE/G median OS was 5.6/5.1 months; median PFS was 3.4/3.0 months. GE responses: 1 complete response (CR, 1.2%), 6 partial response (PR, 7.4%), and 33 stable disease (SD, 40.7%); disease control rate (DCR=CR+PR+SD, 49.4%). G responses: 2 PR (5.3%) and 16 SD (42.1%); DCR (47.4%). No QOL differences were noted between arms. GE/G Grade 3-4 toxicities included: neutropenia (18.3%/28.2%); thrombocytopenia (14.6%/25.6%); and fatigue (11.0%/7.7%). No statistically significant relationships between biomarker expression and outcomes were observed. However, patients with low expression of cytoplasmic pGSK-3ß trended toward greater OS with GE treatment. CONCLUSIONS: OS, PFS, QOL, and RR were comparable between arms. Adding E to G did not increase hematologic toxicities. GE does not warrant further investigation in unselected pancreatic cancer patients.

Results of two Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Studies (Ascending Single-dose and Multiple-dose Studies) to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered LX9211 in Healthy Participants.

PURPOSE: For neuropathic pain, current therapies do not provide relief for most patients; less than half achieve a 50% pain reduction. Current analgesics have adverse effects. We present 2 Phase I studies of LX9211, a new small-molecule AP2-associated kinase 1 inhibitor with preclinical effectiveness in pain relief. METHODS: Both randomized, placebo-controlled studies' primary objectives evaluated the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of oral LX9211. In the single-ascending dose (SAD) study, single, oral, liquid doses of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 80, 120, 160, 200, and 300 mg of LX9211 or placebo were administered in the fasted state and 40 mg in a fed group. In the multiple-ascending dose (MAD) study, a loading dose was administered on day 1 and maintenance doses were administered daily on days 2 to 14. The treatment groups were designated as: 25/2.5, 50/5.0, 100/10, 150/15, and 200/20 mg. The secondary objectives included ECG evaluation. FINDINGS: The SAD study enrolled 96 participants 19 to 61 years of age (86.5% male) in 12 cohorts (2:6 placebo:LX9211), and the MAD study enrolled 50 participants 20 to 63 years of age (78% male) in 5 cohorts (2:8 placebo:LX9211). Both studies had a good LX9211 safety profile. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild, except for moderate nausea and vomiting reported in 1 participant in the SAD 300-mg cohort. All TEAEs were considered recovered or resolved, except for blurred vision (n = 1 in the SAD 300-mg group), which was ongoing at the last visit. One participant in the MAD study (50/5 mg group) discontinued participation in the study early because of TEAEs (angioedema, dermatitis allergic, and urticaria). Headache, dizziness, constipation, and nausea were the most common TEAEs. In the SAD study, 4 participants in the 200-mg cohort developed headache approximately 24 hours after dosing, lasting 24 to 48 hours. Only 1 required treatment (acetaminophen). No notable ECG changes from baseline were found in either study. After both single- and multiple-dose administration, plasma exposure of LX9211 was approximately dose proportional. Steady-state LX9211 plasma concentrations were rapidly attained and maintained by a dosing regimen of a loading dose, followed by daily maintenance doses (1/10 the loading dose). No accumulation was as seen after multiple dosing. IMPLICATIONS: These studies found that LX9211 was safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. These findings suggest it is appropriate to take LX9211 forward into Phase II studies of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and postherpetic neuralgia. LX9211 has received fast track designation by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine/carboplatin (plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive disease) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and carboplatin have significant preclinical synergy, and both provide synergistic antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) when used in combination with trastuzumab. The gemcitabine/ cisplatin combination is highly active in MBC with response rates (RRs) of approximately 50% in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients and up to 80% in untreated subjects. This phase II trial studied the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/carboplatin with or without trastuzumab in patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified into 3 groups: group 1, HER2-positive; group 2, HER2-negative and taxane- naive/remote (no taxanes within past 2 years); and group 3, HER2-negative and previous taxane therapy. Included were women aged > or = 18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined measurable MBC; HER2-negative or HER2 (3+) by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization positive. All cycles were repeated every 14 days. On day 1, gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 over 30 minutes was administered followed by carboplatin area under the curve of 2.5. Group 1 also received trastuzumab 8 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle followed by 4 mg/kg for every 2 weeks thereafter. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were registered (50, 51, and 49 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The overall RRs were 64%, 27%, and 32%, respectively, with median time to progression of 7.2, 5.5, and 4.4 months, respectively. Overall, grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (45%), leukopenia (17%), and thrombocytopenia (7%). Alopecia was infrequent: grade 1 (34%) and grade 2 (3%), and there was no significant cardiac toxicity. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine/carboplatin/trastuzumab is highly active in patients with HER2-positive MBC. Gemcitabine/carboplatin is active in patients with HER2-negative MBC independent of previous taxane therapy. Gemcitabine/carboplatin with or without trastuzumab administered every 2 weeks is associated with a low frequency of serious toxicity.

Results of a phase II trial of cetuximab plus capecitabine/irinotecan as first-line therapy for patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: XELIRI (capecitabine/irinotecan) is effective and well tolerated in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Cetuximab is active in mCRC alone or with chemotherapy. This study evaluated cetuximab plus XELIRI in first-line treatment of mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects had histologically confirmed unresectable colorectal adenocarcinoma (with T4 lesions) after preoperative chemoradiation and/or metastases. Treatment was capecitabine 1700 mg/m2 (850 mg/m2 orally twice a day on days 1-14 for 3 weeks), irinotecan 200 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) on day 1 every 3 weeks, and weekly cetuximab (initially 400 mg/m2 I.V. [120 minutes], subsequently 250 mg/m2 [30 minutes]). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (N = 70): 43 men (61%); median age, 61.5 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 = 66%/34%; 94% adenocarcinoma. Previous therapy: surgery (91%), chemotherapy (14%), or radiation therapy (7%). Responses (patients completing > or = 2 cycles): complete response (5.7%), partial response (37.7%), stable disease (43.4%), and progressive disease (PD; 13.2%); 16 patients discontinued early (n = 4 allergic reaction, n = 2 withdrew consent, n = 2 death, and n = 8 other adverse events [AEs]). The overall per-protocol response rate was 43.4% (34% intent to treat [ITT]; disease control rate, 86.8%; 69% ITT). The median time to progression was 8.1 months (range, < 1-27.0 months), and the median time to response was 1.6 months (range, 1.1-8.4 months). The median survival was 20.5 months, and 45.7% of patients remain alive. Of the 38 deaths, 84% were because of PD. No death was treatment related. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs included diarrhea, neutropenia, and nausea/vomiting; 32% of patients required dose reductions. All patients are off the study primarily because of PD (34.3%) or AEs (40.0%). CONCLUSION: In summary, XELIRI plus cetuximab is a promising regimen that merits further study for first-line mCRC.

Cancer of the pancreas: are we making progress? A review of studies in the US Oncology Research Network.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. In 2008, approximately 37,680 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 34,290 will die of this disease. METHODS: The authors reviewed the literature on treatment of pancreatic cancer with an emphasis on studies conducted in the US Oncology Research (USOR) Network. RESULTS: Although much research has been conducted to develop improved systemic therapies of pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine as a single agent remains the current standard of care. Combinations with other chemotherapeutic drugs or biological agents have resulted in limited improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite aggressive efforts to improve treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer, limited progress has been made. It is hoped that new studies being planned and conducted will improve outcomes for patients with this disease.

Phase II trial of sunitinib for the therapy of progressive metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer after previous docetaxel chemotherapy.

Effective options are lacking for progressive castration-refractory prostate cancer (CRPC) after conventional chemotherapy. Sunitinib is an orally administered multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved multinationally for renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. A phase II trial was conducted to examine the efficacy and toxicities of sunitinib in metastatic CRPC progressing after 1-2 previous chemotherapy regimens including docetaxel. The primary objective was clinical progression-free survival (PFS) with a 12-week PFS > or = 30% assumed to be of interest. Secondary objectives included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, modulation of PSA kinetics, objective response, quality of life, pain, survival, and toxicities. Sunitinib 50 mg daily was administered orally on days 1-28 of each 6-week cycle. Patients were treated to a maximum of 8 cycles or until clinically progressive disease or intolerable toxicity.

Phase II study of azacitidine to restore responsiveness of prostate cancer to hormonal therapy.

Epigenetic alterations, including methylation of key tumor suppressor genes, may play a role in the progression of prostate cancer to a castration-refractory state. Azacitidine, an agent approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes, appears to exert its antineoplastic effects partly by hypomethylating DNA that leads to the reversal of gene silencing. It is hypothesized that the addition of azacitidine to complete androgen blockade may restore the responsiveness of progressive prostate cancer to hormonal therapy. A phase II trial was designed to evaluate the activity of azacitidine to primarily modulate PSA kinetics, with supportive secondary clinical endpoints. Correlative studies will be performed to detect the biologic activity of azacitidine (increased fetal hemoglobin, plasma DNA methylation) and examine any association with anti-tumor clinical activity.

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel/estramustine/carboplatin in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this phase II study was to determine the response rate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer given paclitaxel/estramustine/carboplatin for weeks 1, 2, and 3 of a 4-week cycle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients were registered into the trial. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve of 2 were administered intravenously on days 2, 9, and 16, and oral estramustine 280 mg 3 times daily was given on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 for 6 cycles. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, and 2 was 46%, 41%, and 13%, respectively, and median age was 70 years (range, 53-82 years), with 58 patients (69%) aged > 65 years. The majority of patients (83%) were white. Fifteen patients (18%) had received previous chemotherapy, 61 patients (73%) had undergone previous surgery, and 51 patients (61%) had received previous external-beam radiation therapy. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed a > or = 50% prostate-specific antigen decrease rate of 61%. Median survival was 15.3 months. The most frequent grade > or = 3 toxicities included fatigue (11%), nausea (10%), neutropenia (9%), anemia (6%), and vomiting (6%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel/estramustine/carboplatin administered in a weekly regimen is highly effective in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer and can be administered with reasonable safety in an outpatient setting.

Phase II trial of docetaxel/capecitabine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is the most active single agent in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Because of the preclinical and clinical evidence of synergy of capecitabine and docetaxel, it was hypothesized that this combination would be active and tolerable in HRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m2 intravenously over 60 minutes on day 1 of each 21-day cycle and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 administered orally twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled at 43 US Oncology sites. The median age was 69.3 years (range, 48-86 years); 86% were white, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0 and 1 were 49% and 51% respectively. Sixty-nine (90%) patients were evaluated for prostate-specific antigen response. RESULTS: Overall, 41% of patients had a decreased prostate specific antigen level > or = 50%. There were 4 complete responses (6%), 24 partial responses (35%), 29 incidences of stable disease (43%), and 11 incidences of progressive disease (16%). Nine patients has stable disease > or = 6 months and the clinical benefit rate was 54%. The median time to response was 1.5 months (range, 1-16.9 months). The estimated survival at 12 and 24 months (range, < 1-27 months). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (22%), hand-foot syndrome (17%), fatigue (11%), and nausea (11%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel/capcitabine is an active and tolerable combination in HRPC. Toxicity was acceptable and anticipated. Response rate and survival are comparable with other docetaxel combinations.

Phase II study of low-dose docetaxel/estramustine in elderly patients or patients aged 18-74 years with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy is often poorly tolerated in elderly patients or patients with poor performance status. This trial was designed to determine whether low-dose weekly docetaxel/estramustine was efficacious with acceptable toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dexamethasone was administered as premedication. Subjects received docetaxel 25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 2, 9, and 16 and estramustine 140 mg orally twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17. Cycles were 28 days. Participants received < or = 6 cycles unless progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Fifty-eight subjects were enrolled at 31 sites in the US Oncology Network. Median age was 78 years (range, 64-92 years); performance status scores (0, 1, 2, and 3) were 36%, 38%, 24%, and 2%, respectively; 55 subjects received > or = 1 cycle of treatment; and 4 participants were nonevaluable because they completed < 2 cycles. Among the 56 treated subjects, 38 (68%) had a decreased prostate-specific antigen level (> or = 50% compared with baseline level and maintained for 4 weeks). There were 40 subjects with measurable tumor(s). Responses, assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, were 1 complete response (2.5%), 7 partial responses (17.5%), 26 stable diseases (65%), and 6 progressive diseases (15%). At 1 year, 17% of participants were progression free; median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (range, 1-14.5 months); estimated 1-year survival was 65%. There were no grade 4 treatment-related events. Grade 3 treatment-related events included fatigue/asthenia (11%) and arrhythmia, dehydration, cerebral ischemia, thrombocytopenia, and dyspnea (4% each). There was 1 treatment-related death (acute respiratory distress syndrome). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that elderly men with advanced-stage prostate cancer tolerate this regimen, with significant responses and prolonged progression-free survival. These patients should not be excluded from chemotherapeutic interventions based on age alone.

Patient-reported Symptom Experiences in Patients With Carcinoid Syndrome After Participation in a Study of Telotristat Etiprate: A Qualitative Interview Approach.

PURPOSE: Telotristat etiprate, a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, was previously evaluated in a Phase II randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with carcinoid syndrome (CS) and diarrhea not adequately controlled by octreotide. The objective of the current study was to characterize the symptom experiences of patients participating in that trial. METHODS: Consenting patients participated in one-on-one, qualitative interviews focused on eliciting symptoms they had experienced in association with their CS diagnosis and recollection of symptom changes they experienced while participating in the Phase II trial. FINDINGS: Among the 23 patients who participated in the previous 4-week dose-escalation study, 16 were eligible for interviews and 11 participated in the present study. The median time from study completion to the interview was 31 months; 4 of 11 patients were receiving telotristat etiprate in a follow-up, open-label trial at the time of interview. All of the patients (100%) described diarrhea as a symptom of CS, with effects on the emotional, social, and physical aspects of their lives. Improvement in diarrhea during the study was described by 82% of participants, and was very impactful in several patients. Results led to the design and implementation of a larger interview program in Phase III and helped to establish a definition of clinically meaningful change for the clinical development program. IMPLICATIONS: The diarrhea associated with CS can have a large impact on daily lives, and patient interviews can characterize and capture clinically meaningful improvements with treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00853047.

Results of a phase II multicenter trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of platinum based combination chemotherapy but efficacy is limited and treatment can be toxic. This trial evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel and gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Other endpoints were 1-year survival, median survival, median duration of response, median disease-free progression, safety, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with advanced NSCLC were treated. Patients received docetaxel (1 per week, 36 mg/m(2)) weeks 1-6 and gemcitabine (1 per week, 900 mg/m(2)) weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5. Each 8-week cycle was repeated for a total of three cycles. Patients completed quality of life surveys (FACT-L) before each cycle. RESULTS: The median age was 68.5 years; 74% were >60 years old. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of response, 10 patients had a partial response (20%) and five patients had stable disease (10%). The 1-year survival was 32%; median survival for all patients was 6.9 months (range, <1-26.2) and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (range, <1-25.5). Toxicities (> grade 3) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, GI disorders (nausea, vomiting, dehydration, diarrhea, stomach pain), and asthenia; 10 patients experienced hematological toxicities that were > grade 3. Quality of life decreased during the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the nonplatinum doublet (docetaxel + gemcitabine) given on a weekly schedule for advanced NSCLC had efficacy similar to that reported with other regimens and was well tolerated. Therefore, this non-platinum based regimen appears promising and warrants further evaluation.

Results of a phase II open-label study of capecitabine in combination with irinotecan as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Between July 2001 and September 2002, 49 eligible patients were enrolled in an open-label phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with capecitabine/irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1-14 and irinotecan (240 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Patients enrolled had a median age of 64.5 years, and 6% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2. Fifty-seven percent of patients were male. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were evaluable for response. There was 1 complete response (2%), 18 partial responses (43%), 20 cases of stable disease (48%), and 3 cases of disease progression (7%), for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI, 30%-60%). The median duration of response was 5.7 months (range, 2.5-II.3 months). Median survival was 13.4 months (range, 1.2-28.8 months) and median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (range, 1.2-17.5 months). At 1 year, the estimated survival rate was 54% and the estimated progression-free survival rate was II%. The median number of cycles received was 6 (range, 1-18 cycles), and most patients (80%) required a dose modification because of diarrhea, nausea, and/or neutropenia. Grade 1/2 hand-foot syndrome occurred in 8 patients (16%). Grade 3/4 toxicities experienced by > or = 5% of patients included diarrhea (20%), neutropenia (12%), dehydration (10%), nausea (10%), anemia (6%), fatigue (6%), pain (6%), and vomiting (6%). CONCLUSIONS: First-line capecitabine/ irinotecan is an active combination for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and feasible for use in the community-based setting. Despite significant toxicity with the regimen, the treatment was manageable with dose reduction or delay and should be investigated in phase III trials.

Results of a phase II multicenter trial of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or chemotherapy-refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.

This study's objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or chemotherapy-refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. Eight of the first 10 patients received intravenous gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Two patients withdrew consent before treatment. Because of toxicity, the remaining 19 patients received 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Of the 29 treated patients, 16 (55.2%) were male, the median age was 43 years (range, 20.9-77.3), and 89.7% of them were white. Twelve patients (41.4%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0, 14 (48.3%) had a PS of 1, and 3 (10.3%) had a PS of 2. All patients had >/= 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Eighteen patients (62%) had a relapse following bone marrow transplantation. Of 27 evaluable patients, 6 (22%) had partial response, 14 (52%) had stable disease, and 7 (26%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression for all patients was 6.4 months (range, 1.1-21.9). The median survival for all patients was 26.9 months (range, < 1-28.4). All patients have discontinued treatment because of disease progression or relapse. Grade >/= 3 toxicity occurred in 14 patients (48.3%): thrombocytopenia (33.3%), neutropenia (29.6%), anemia (7.4%), increased alanine aminotransferase, reduced cardiac function, and fever (3.7% for each event). This study confirms the activity of gemcitabine in relapsed and highly refractory HL. Dose and schedule may be modified in the future to optimize responses. As gemcitabine is active in highly refractory/relapsed HL, future studies should consider incorporating gemcitabine in combination regimens as first-line therapy for patients with high-risk HL.

Results of a phase II multicenter trial of pentostatin and rituximab in patients with low grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an effective and minimally toxic regimen.

This study explored the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of pentostatin and rituximab, effective single agents in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Sixty patients with previously treated low-grade NHL were enrolled. Except for day 1, both drugs were administered weekly for 4 weeks, with week 5 off. During week 1 (day 1) only rituximab was given; subsequent weekly treatments included both drugs. Patients received a minimum of 2 five-week cycles in order to be evaluable for efficacy. Responses were evaluated on week 5 of cycle 2. If partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) responses were noted, 2 additional cycles were administered. Final evaluations were done on week 5 of cycle 4. Of 60 patients, 58.3% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0, and 41.7% had PS of 1; 31.7% and 51.7% had stage III or stage IV disease, respectively. Histology included follicular center, follicular, grade I (45%), II (21.7%), III (1.7%), and small lymphocytic (31.7%). Seventeen patients had prior chemotherapy, but no patients had received prior pentostatin or rituximab. Median age was 60.3 years (range, 32.5-84.7 years). Among 57 evaluable patients, 77% responded (22.3% complete response [CR], 3.5% unconfirmed CR, 35.1% PR, and 10.5% unconfirmed PR); 19.3% had SD, and 8.8% progressive disease (PD). Response rate among previously untreated patients was 83% versus 63% in previously treated patients. Median duration of response was 11 months (range, 2.3-22.2 months); median time to progression was 15 months (range, < 1-25 months). Neutropenia was the only adverse event experienced by >/= 10% of patients. Six deaths were caused by PD, and one death each was caused by acute respiratory distress, possibly related respiratory failure, and cardiac toxicity. These results suggest the combination of pentostatin/rituximab is well tolerated and active in low-grade lymphoma.

Effects of LX4211, a dual sodium-dependent glucose cotransporters 1 and 2 inhibitor, on postprandial glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide 1, and peptide tyrosine tyrosine in a dose-timing study in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: LX4211 is a first-in-class dual inhibitor of sodium-dependent glucose cotransporters 1 and 2 (SGLT1 and SGLT2). SGLT1 is the primary transporter for glucose absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, and SGLT2 is the primary transporter for glucose reabsorption in the kidney. SGLT1 inhibition reduces postprandial glucose (PPG) levels and increases the release of gastrointestinal peptides such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY), whereas SGLT2 inhibition results in increased urinary glucose excretion (UGE). OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated how timing of dose relative to meals changes the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of LX4211 treatment, including effects on UGE, fasting plasma glucose, PPG, insulin, total and active GLP-1, and PYY. The safety and tolerability of LX4211 in healthy subjects were also assessed. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study to determine the PD effects of LX4211 dose timing relative to meals in 12 healthy subjects. Blood and urine were collected for the analysis of PD variables. RESULTS: Twelve healthy subjects 30 to 51 years of age were enrolled and treated. Treatment with LX4211 resulted in significant elevation of total and active GLP-1, and PYY while significantly decreasing PPG levels relative to placebo, likely by reducing SGLT1-mediated intestinal glucose absorption. Comparisons performed among the dosing schedules indicated that dosing immediately before breakfast maximized the PD effects of LX4211 on both SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibition. The comparative results suggested distinct SGLT1 effects on GLP-1, PYY, glucose, and insulin, which were separate from SGLT2-mediated effects, indicating that SGLT1 inhibition with LX4211 may be clinically meaningful. All treatments were well tolerated with no evidence of diarrhea with LX4211 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study indicates that dosing of LX4211 immediately before breakfast maximized the PD effects of both SGLT1 and SGLT 2 inhibition and provided a convenient dosing schedule for future trials. LX4211 was safe and well tolerated and, due to its SGLT1 inhibition, produced strong PPG reductions and low UGE relative to selective SGLT2 inhibitors. LX4211 may provide a promising new therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The potential long-term clinical benefits and safety of LX4211 treatment will need to be confirmed in large clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01334242.