Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(13): 327-332, 2023 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36995976

RESUMEN

Prescription stimulant use, primarily for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), has increased among adults in the United States during recent decades, while remaining stable or declining among children and adolescents (1,2). MarketScan commercial claims data were analyzed to describe trends in prescription stimulant fills before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2016-2021) by calculating annual percentages of enrollees aged 5-64 years in employer-sponsored health plans who had one or more prescription stimulant fills overall and by sex and age group. Overall, the percentage of enrollees with one or more prescription stimulant fills increased from 3.6% in 2016 to 4.1% in 2021. The percentages of females aged 15-44 years and males aged 25-44 years with prescription stimulant fills increased by more than 10% during 2020-2021. Future evaluation could determine if policy and health system reimbursement changes enacted during the pandemic contributed to the increase in stimulant prescriptions. Stimulants can offer substantial benefits for persons with ADHD, but also pose potential harms, including adverse effects, medication interactions, diversion and misuse, and overdoses. Well-established clinical guidelines exist for ADHD care, but only for children and adolescents* (3); clinical practice guidelines for adult ADHD could help adults also receive accurate diagnoses and appropriate treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , COVID-19 , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Humanos , Adulto , Niño , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Prescripciones
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(41): 1441-1446, 2021 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34648484

RESUMEN

Excessive alcohol use* is associated with disease, injury, and poor pregnancy outcomes and is responsible for approximately 95,000 deaths in the United States each year (1). Binge drinking (five or more drinks on at least one occasion for men or four or more drinks for women) is the most common and costly pattern of excessive alcohol use (2). CDC analyzed data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to estimate past 30-day binge drinking prevalence, frequency, and intensity (number of drinks per occasion), overall and by select characteristics and state. The overall unadjusted prevalence of binge drinking during the past 30 days was 16.6%, representing an estimated 38.5 million U.S. adults aged ≥18 years; prevalence was highest (26.0%) among those aged 25-34 years. The age-standardized binge drinking prevalence was higher among men (22.5%) than among women (12.6%), increased with income, and was highest among non-Hispanic White adults and adults in the Midwest Census region. State-level age-standardized binge drinking prevalence ranged from 10.5% (Utah) to 25.8% (Wisconsin). Among adults who reported binge drinking, 25.0% did so at least weekly, on average, and 25.0% consumed at least eight drinks on an occasion. To reduce binge drinking, the Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends increasing alcohol taxes and implementing strategies that strengthen regulations to reduce alcohol availability.† The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends clinicians screen adults for alcohol misuse in primary care settings and provide counseling as needed.§.


Asunto(s)
Consumo Excesivo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Subst Use Misuse ; 56(13): 1933-1940, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34353216

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Syringe service programs (SSP) increasingly serve rural areas of the United States, yet little is known about access and perceived need for their services. Objectives: This paper presents the HIV and viral hepatitis prevention, testing, and treatment, and, substance use disorder treatment and overdose prevention services offered at three SSPs and which services their clients accessed. Across the three SSPs, 45 clients (people who inject drugs [PWID]), 11 staff, and five stakeholders were interviewed. Results: Most clients (n = 34) reported accessing SSP services weekly and primarily for sterile syringes and injection-related supplies. All clients reported testing for HIV at least once, though concern for acquiring or transmitting HIV was divided between some or no concern. Most clients (n = 43) reported testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Concern for acquiring or transmitting HCV was also mixed. Vaccination for hepatitis A and/or B teetered around half (HAV: n = 23) to a third (HBV: n = 15). Most clients (n = 43) knew where to access the overdose countering medication, Narcan. Feelings about substance use treatment options varied, yet most felt not enough were available. Of note, not all assessed services were offered by the sampled SSPs. Conclusions/Importance: The findings help us understand PWIDs' rationale regarding services accessed and preference for particular services. The need for some services was not perceived by those at risk for the illness the services addressed. Discussing risk and providing tailored education is important when providing SSP services to rural residing PWIDs.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis C , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Hepatitis C/prevención & control , Humanos , Programas de Intercambio de Agujas , Jeringas , Estados Unidos
4.
Subst Abus ; 42(4): 460-465, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684025

RESUMEN

Background: Nonmedical use of prescription opioids (NUPO) is associated with heroin use and other adverse outcomes among adolescents. To inform the timing of substance use prevention activities and which substances to target, we examined age at NUPO initiation, associations between substance use initiation and current (past 30-day) NUPO, and order of NUPO initiation relative to other substances. Methods: Data from 2,834 students aged 15 or older participating in the 2017 Virginia Youth Survey, the first Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey to assess age at NUPO initiation and current NUPO, were analyzed in 2019. Students reported current NUPO and ages at initiation for cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and NUPO (categorized as 12 or younger, 13 or 14, 15 or older, or never). Associations between age at substance use initiation and current NUPO were examined using adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Overall, 12% of students reported lifetime NUPO, with 2.4%, 4.0%, and 5.6% initiating at 12 or younger, 13 or 14, and 15 or older, respectively; 5.3% reported current NUPO. Initiating cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana at each age category (compared with never) was associated with an increased prevalence of current NUPO after adjusting for demographics and initiation of other substances. Among students initiating NUPO, initiating NUPO at 12 or younger (compared with 15 or older) was associated with an increased prevalence of current NUPO after adjusting for demographics (aPR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.10-2.16), but not after further adjustment for initiation of other substances (aPR = 1.38, 95% CI = 0.97-1.97). Among students initiating NUPO, 45.4% initiated NUPO before or during the same age as other substances. Conclusions: More than 6% of students initiated NUPO at 14 or younger. Younger substance use initiation was associated with current NUPO, suggesting that some students may benefit from prevention activities during early adolescence that address multiple substances.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adolescente , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Prescripciones , Estudiantes , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(31): 1009-1014, 2020 08 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32759915

RESUMEN

Drinking alcohol during pregnancy can cause fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, including birth defects, behavioral disorders, and impaired cognitive development (1). Little is known about the co-use of other substances by females who drink during pregnancy. CDC used 2015-2018 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) to estimate the overall and trimester-specific prevalence of self-reported drinking in the past 12 months, current drinking, and binge drinking, overall and by trimester, and the co-use of other substances among pregnant females aged 12-44 years. Past drinking (12 months) was reported by 64.7% of pregnant respondents. Current drinking (at least one drink in the past 30 days) was reported by 19.6% of respondents who were in their first trimester of pregnancy and 4.7% of respondents who were in their second or third trimester. Binge drinking (consuming four or more drinks on at least one occasion in the past 30 days) was reported by 10.5% of first trimester respondents and 1.4% of second or third trimester respondents. Overall, 38.2% of pregnant respondents who reported current drinking also reported current use of one or more other substances. The substances used most with alcohol were tobacco and marijuana. Self-reported drinking prevalence was substantially lower among second or third trimester respondents than among first trimester respondents. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends alcohol use and substance use disorders screening for all females seeking obstetric-gynecologic care and counseling patients that there is no known safe level of alcohol use during pregnancy (2).


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(39): 833-838, 2019 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31581170

RESUMEN

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is transmitted primarily through parenteral exposures to infectious blood or body fluids that contain blood (e.g., via injection drug use, needle stick injuries) (1). In the last 10 years, increases in HCV infection in the general U.S. population (1) and among pregnant women (2) are attributed to a surge in injection drug use associated with the opioid crisis. Opioid use disorders among pregnant women have increased (3), and approximately 68% of pregnant women with HCV infection have opioid use disorder (4). National trends in HCV infection among pregnant women by opioid use disorder status have not been reported to date. CDC analyzed hospital discharge data from the 2000-2015 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) to determine whether HCV infection trends differ by opioid use disorder status at delivery. During this period, the national rate of HCV infection among women giving birth increased >400%, from 0.8 to 4.1 per 1,000 deliveries. Among women with opioid use disorder, rates of HCV infection increased 148%, from 87.4 to 216.9 per 1,000 deliveries, and among those without opioid use disorder, rates increased 271%, although the rates in this group were much lower, increasing from 0.7 to 2.6 per 1,000 deliveries. These findings align with prior ecological data linking hepatitis C increases with the opioid crisis (2). Treatment of opioid use disorder should include screening and referral for related conditions such as HCV infection.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(26): 583-586, 2019 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31269011

RESUMEN

During 2014-2017, CDC Emerging Infections Program surveillance data reported that the occurrence of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections associated with injection drug use doubled among persons aged 18-49 years residing in Monroe County in western New York.* Unpublished surveillance data also indicate that an increasing proportion of all Candida spp. bloodstream infections in Monroe County and invasive group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections in 15 New York counties are also occurring among persons who inject drugs. In addition, across six surveillance sites nationwide, the proportion of invasive MRSA infections that occurred in persons who inject drugs increased from 4.1% of invasive MRSA cases in 2011 to 9.2% in 2016 (1). To better understand the types and frequency of these infections and identify prevention opportunities, CDC and public health partners conducted a rapid assessment of bacterial and fungal infections among persons who inject drugs in western New York. The goals were to assess which bacterial and fungal pathogens most often cause infections in persons who inject drugs, what proportion of persons who inject use opioids, and of these, how many were offered medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder. Medication-assisted treatment, which includes use of medications such as buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone, reduces cravings and has been reported to lower the risk for overdose death and all-cause mortality in persons who use opioids (2,3). In this assessment, nearly all persons with infections who injected drugs used opioids (97%), but half of inpatients (22 of 44) and 12 of 13 patients seen only in the emergency department (ED) were not offered medication-assisted treatment. The most commonly identified pathogen was S. aureus (80%), which is frequently found on skin. Health care visits for bacterial and fungal infections associated with injection opioid use are an opportunity to treat the underlying opioid use disorder with medication-assisted treatment. Routine care for patients who continue to inject should include advice on hand hygiene and not injecting into skin that has not been cleaned or to use any equipment contaminated by reuse, saliva, soil, or water (4,5).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Micosis/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(2): 31-36, 2019 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653484

RESUMEN

Prevalence of gastroschisis, a serious birth defect of the abdominal wall resulting in some of the abdominal contents extending outside the body at birth, has been increasing worldwide (1,2). Gastroschisis requires surgical repair after birth and is associated with digestive and feeding complications during infancy, which can affect development. Recent data from 14 U.S. states indicated an increasing prevalence of gastroschisis from 1995 to 2012 (1). Young maternal age has been strongly associated with gastroschisis, but research suggests that risk factors such as smoking, genitourinary infections, and prescription opioid use also might be associated (3-5). Data from 20 population-based state surveillance programs were pooled and analyzed to assess age-specific gastroschisis prevalence during two 5-year periods, 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, and an ecologic approach was used to compare annual gastroschisis prevalence by annual opioid prescription rate categories. Gastroschisis prevalence increased only slightly (10%) from 2006-2010 to 2011-2015 (prevalence ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.1), with the highest prevalence among mothers aged <20 years. During 2006-2015, the prevalence of gastroschisis was 1.6 times higher in counties with high opioid prescription rates (5.1 per 10,000 live births; CI = 4.9-5.3) and 1.4 times higher where opioid prescription rates were medium (4.6 per 10,000 live births; CI = 4.4-4.8) compared with areas with low prescription rates (3.2 per 10,000 live births; CI = 3.1-3.4). Public health research is needed to understand factors contributing to the association between young maternal age and gastroschisis and assess the effect of prescription opioid use during pregnancy on this pregnancy outcome.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fenómenos Ecológicos y Ambientales , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/etnología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 169(7): 448-455, 2018 10 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30208405

RESUMEN

Background: More than 25 million adults in the United States have chronic pain. Chronic pain has been associated with suicidality, but previous studies primarily examined nonfatal suicidal behaviors rather than suicide deaths associated with chronic pain or the characteristics of such deaths. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of chronic pain among suicide decedents in a large multistate sample and to characterize suicide decedents with and without chronic pain. Design: Retrospective analysis of National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) data. The NVDRS links death certificate, coroner or medical examiner, and law enforcement data collected by investigators, who often interview informants who knew the decedent to gather information on precipitating circumstances surrounding the suicide. Information is abstracted by using standard coding guidance developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Setting: 18 states participating in the NVDRS. Participants: Suicide decedents with and without chronic pain who died during 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2014. Measurements: Demographic characteristics, mechanism of death, toxicology results, precipitating circumstances (mental health, substance use, interpersonal problems, life stressors), and suicide planning and intent. Results: Of 123 181 suicide decedents included in the study, 10 789 (8.8%) had evidence of chronic pain, and the percentage increased from 7.4% in 2003 to 10.2% in 2014. More than half (53.6%) of suicide decedents with chronic pain died of firearm-related injuries and 16.2% by opioid overdose. Limitation: The results probably underrepresent the true percentage of suicide decedents who had chronic pain, given the nature of the data and how they were captured. Conclusion: Chronic pain may be an important contributor to suicide. Access to quality, comprehensive pain care and adherence to clinical guidelines may help improve pain management and patient safety. Primary Funding Source: None.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Suicidio/psicología , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(31): 845-849, 2018 Aug 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30091969

RESUMEN

Opioid use by pregnant women represents a significant public health concern given the association of opioid exposure and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including preterm labor, stillbirth, neonatal abstinence syndrome, and maternal mortality (1,2). State-level actions are critical to curbing the opioid epidemic through programs and policies to reduce use of prescription opioids and illegal opioids including heroin and illicitly manufactured fentanyl, both of which contribute to the epidemic (3). Hospital discharge data from the 1999-2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were analyzed to describe U.S. national and state-specific trends in opioid use disorder documented at delivery hospitalization. Nationally, the prevalence of opioid use disorder more than quadrupled during 1999-2014 (from 1.5 per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations to 6.5; p<0.05). Increasing trends over time were observed in all 28 states with available data (p<0.05). In 2014, prevalence ranged from 0.7 in the District of Columbia (DC) to 48.6 in Vermont. Continued national, state, and provider efforts to prevent, monitor, and treat opioid use disorder among reproductive-aged and pregnant women are needed. Efforts might include improved access to data in Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, increased substance abuse screening, use of medication-assisted therapy, and substance abuse treatment referrals.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Hospitalización , Registros Médicos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(22): 625-628, 2018 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29879096

RESUMEN

In the United States, age-adjusted opioid overdose death rates increased by >200% during 1999-2015, and heroin overdose death rates increased nearly 300% during 2011-2015 (1). During 2011-2013, the rate of heroin use within the past year among U.S. residents aged ≥12 years increased 62.5% overall and 114.3% among non-Hispanic whites, compared with 2002-2004 (2). Increases in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections related to increases in injection drug use have been recently highlighted (3,4); likewise, invasive bacterial infections, including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and skin and soft tissue infections, have increased in areas where the opioid epidemic is expanding (5-7). To assess the effects of the opioid epidemic on invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections during 2005-2016, surveillance data from CDC's Emerging Infections Program (EIP) were analyzed (8). Persons who inject drugs were estimated to be 16.3 times more likely to develop invasive MRSA infections than others. The proportion of invasive MRSA cases that occurred among persons who inject drugs increased from 4.1% in 2011 to 9.2% in 2016. Infection types were frequently those associated with nonsterile injection drug use. Continued increases in nonsterile injection drug use are likely to result in increases in invasive MRSA infections, underscoring the importance of public health measures to curb the opioid epidemic.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Vigilancia de la Población , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
Pain Med ; 19(3): 511-523, 2018 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340233

RESUMEN

Objective: This study identified sociodemographic, substance use, and multiple opioid prescriber and dispenser risk factors among drug overdose decedents in Rhode Island, in response to an increase in overdose deaths (ODs) involving fentanyl. Methods: This cross-sectional investigation comprised all ODs reviewed by Rhode Island's Office of the State Medical Examiners (OSME) during January 2012 to March 2014. Data for 536 decedents were abstracted from OSME's charts, death certificates, toxicology reports, and Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) databases. Decedents whose cause of death involved illicit fentanyl (N = 69) were compared with decedents whose causes of death did not involve fentanyl (other drug decedents; N = 467). Results: Illicit-fentanyl decedents were younger than other drug decedents (P = 0.005). While more other-drug decedents than illicit fentanyl decedents had postmortem toxicological evidence of consuming heroin (31.9% vs 19.8%, P < 0.001) and various pharmaceutical substances (P = 0.002-0.027), third party reports indicated more recent heroin use among illicit fentanyl decedents (62.3% vs 45.6%, P = 0.002). Approximately 35% of decedents filled an opioid prescription within 90 days of death; of these, one-third had a mean daily dosage greater than 100 morphine milligram equivalents (MME/day). Most decedents' opioid prescriptions were filled at one to two dispensers (83.9%) and written by one to two prescribers (75.8%). Notably, 29.2% of illicit fentanyl and 10.5% of other drug decedents filled prescriptions for buprenorphine, which is used to treat opioid use disorders. Conclusions: Illicit-fentanyl deaths frequently involved other illicit drugs (e.g., cocaine, heroin). The proportion of all decedents acquiring greater than 100 MME/day prescription dosages written and/or filled by few prescribers and dispensers is concerning. To protect patients, prescribers and dispensers should review PMP records and substance abuse history prior to providing opioids.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Fentanilo/efectos adversos , Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rhode Island/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
13.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(12): 320-323, 2017 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28358791

RESUMEN

Drug overdose is a leading cause of injury death in the United States; 47,055 fatal drug overdoses were reported in 2014, a 6.5% increase from the previous year (1), driven by opioid use disorder (2,3). Methadone is an opioid prescribed for pain management and is also provided through opioid treatment programs to treat opioid use disorders. Because methadone might remain in a person's system long after the pain-relieving benefits have been exhausted, it can cause slow or shallow breathing and dangerous changes in heartbeat that might not be perceived by the patient (4,5). In December 2006, the Food and Drug Administration issued a Public Health Advisory that alerted health care professionals to reports of death and life-threatening adverse events, such as respiratory depression and cardiac arrhythmias, in patients receiving methadone (4); in January 2008, a voluntary manufacturer restriction limited distribution of the 40 mg formulation of methadone.* CDC analyzed state mortality and health care data and preferred drug list (PDL) policies to 1) compare the percentage of deaths involving methadone with the rate of prescribing methadone for pain, 2) characterize variation in methadone prescribing among payers and states, and 3) assess whether an association existed between state Medicaid reimbursement PDL policies and methadone overdose rates. The analyses found that, from 2007 to 2014, large declines in methadone-related overdose deaths occurred. Prescriptions for methadone accounted for 0.85% of all opioid prescriptions for pain in the commercially insured population and 1.1% in the Medicaid population. In addition, an association was observed between Medicaid PDLs requiring prior authorization for methadone and lower rates of methadone overdose among Medicaid enrollees. PDL policies requiring prior authorization might help to reduce the number of methadone overdoses.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid , Metadona/envenenamiento , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Política de Salud , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(26): 697-704, 2017 Jul 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28683056

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid-related overdose deaths increased sharply during 1999-2010 in the United States in parallel with increased opioid prescribing. CDC assessed changes in national-level and county-level opioid prescribing during 2006-2015. METHODS: CDC analyzed retail prescription data from QuintilesIMS to assess opioid prescribing in the United States from 2006 to 2015, including rates, amounts, dosages, and durations prescribed. CDC examined county-level prescribing patterns in 2010 and 2015. RESULTS: The amount of opioids prescribed in the United States peaked at 782 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per capita in 2010 and then decreased to 640 MME per capita in 2015. Despite significant decreases, the amount of opioids prescribed in 2015 remained approximately three times as high as in 1999 and varied substantially across the country. County-level factors associated with higher amounts of prescribed opioids include a larger percentage of non-Hispanic whites; a higher prevalence of diabetes and arthritis; micropolitan status (i.e., town/city; nonmetro); and higher unemployment and Medicaid enrollment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: Despite reductions in opioid prescribing in some parts of the country, the amount of opioids prescribed remains high relative to 1999 levels and varies substantially at the county-level. Given associations between opioid prescribing, opioid use disorder, and overdose rates, health care providers should carefully weigh the benefits and risks when prescribing opioids outside of end-of-life care, follow evidence-based guidelines, such as CDC's Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, and consider nonopioid therapy for chronic pain treatment. State and local jurisdictions can use these findings combined with Prescription Drug Monitoring Program data to identify areas with prescribing patterns that place patients at risk for opioid use disorder and overdose and to target interventions with prescribers based on opioid prescribing guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(35): 921-927, 2017 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28880853

RESUMEN

Studies have shown links between educational outcomes such as letter grades, test scores, or other measures of academic achievement, and health-related behaviors (1-4). However, as reported in a 2013 systematic review, many of these studies have used samples that are not nationally representative, and quite a few studies are now at least 2 decades old (1). To update the relevant data, CDC analyzed results from the 2015 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), a biennial, cross-sectional, school-based survey measuring health-related behaviors among U.S. students in grades 9-12. Analyses assessed relationships between academic achievement (i.e., self-reported letter grades in school) and 30 health-related behaviors (categorized as dietary behaviors, physical activity, sedentary behaviors, substance use, sexual risk behaviors, violence-related behaviors, and suicide-related behaviors) that contribute to leading causes of morbidity and mortality among adolescents in the United States (5). Logistic regression models controlling for sex, race/ethnicity, and grade in school found that students who earned mostly A's, mostly B's, or mostly C's had statistically significantly higher prevalence estimates for most protective health-related behaviors and significantly lower prevalence estimates for most health-related risk behaviors than did students with mostly D's/F's. These findings highlight the link between health-related behaviors and education outcomes, suggesting that education and public health professionals can find their respective education and health improvement goals to be mutually beneficial. Education and public health professionals might benefit from collaborating to achieve both improved education and health outcomes for youths.


Asunto(s)
Escolaridad , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Estudiantes/psicología , Adolescente , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Asunción de Riesgos , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(41): 1125-1131, 2016 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27764082

RESUMEN

Overdose deaths involving opioid pain medications are epidemic in the United States, in part because of high opioid prescribing rates and associated abuse of these drugs (1). In 2014, nearly 2 million U.S. residents either abused or were dependent on prescription opioids (2). In Massachusetts, unintentional opioid-related overdose deaths, including deaths involving heroin, increased 45% from 2012 to 2013.* In 2014, the rate of these deaths reached 20.0 per 100,000, nearly 2.5 times higher than the U.S. rate overall (3,4). On July 1, 2012, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA), the largest insurer in the state with approximately 2.8 million members,† implemented a comprehensive opioid utilization program after learning that many of its members were receiving new prescriptions with a >30-day supply of opioids. The 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain recommends avoiding opioids as a first-line therapy for chronic pain and limiting quantities when initiating opioids for acute pain (5). CDC analyzed BCBSMA prescription claims data for the period 2011-2015 to assess the effect of the new utilization program on opioid prescribing rates. During the first 3 years after policy implementation, the average monthly prescribing rate for opioids decreased almost 15%, from 34 per 1,000 members to 29. The percentage of BCBSMA members per month with current opioid prescriptions also declined. The temporal association between implementation of the program and statistically significant declines in both prescribing rates and proportion of members using opioids suggests that the BCBSMA initiative played a role in reducing the use of prescription opioids among its members. Public and private insurers in the United States could benefit from developing their own best practices for prescription opioid utilization that ensure accessible pain care, while reducing the risk for dependence and abuse associated with these drugs.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Política Organizacional , Sector Privado/organización & administración , Humanos , Massachusetts , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
17.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(26): 719-25, 2015 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26158353

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heroin use and overdose deaths have increased significantly in the United States. Assessing trends in heroin use among demographic and particular substance-using groups can inform prevention efforts. METHODS: FDA and CDC analyzed data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and National Vital Statistics System reported during 2002-2013. Trends in heroin use among demographic and substance using groups were compared for 2002-2004, 2005-2007, 2008-2010, and 2011-2013. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify characteristics associated with heroin abuse or dependence. RESULTS: Annual average rates of past-year heroin use increased from 1.6 per 1,000 persons aged ≥ 12 years in 2002-2004 to 2.6 per 1,000 in 2011-2013. Rates of heroin abuse or dependence were strongly positively correlated with rates of heroin-related overdose deaths over time. For the combined data years 2011-2013, the odds of past-year heroin abuse or dependence were highest among those with past-year cocaine or opioid pain reliever abuse or dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Heroin use has increased significantly across most demographic groups. The increase in heroin abuse or dependence parallels the increase in heroin-related overdose deaths. Heroin use is occurring in the context of broader poly-substance use. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: Further implementation of a comprehensive response that targets the wider range of demographic groups using heroin and addresses the key risk factors for heroin abuse and dependence is needed. Specific response needs include reducing inappropriate prescribing and use of opioids through early identification of persons demonstrating problematic use, stronger prescription drug monitoring programs, and other clinical measures; improving access to, and insurance coverage for, evidence-based substance abuse treatment, including medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorders; and expanding overdose recognition and response training and access to naloxone to treat opioid pain reliever and heroin overdoses.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Dependencia de Heroína/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
18.
J Opioid Manag ; 20(4): 319-328, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39321052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The opioid overdose epidemic has resulted in hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths in the United States (US). One indication for opioids is herpes zoster (HZ)-a common painful condition with an estimated 1 million cases occurring annually in the US. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize prescription opioid claims and trends among patients with HZ who were previously opioid naive. DESIGN: We used a cohort study involving three insurance claims databases in the US. We included all beneficiaries 18-64 years (commercial and Medicaid) and beneficiaries 65 years and older (Medicare) who were diagnosed with incident HZ during 2007-2021. We determined the proportion of opioid-naive patients with HZ who filled an opioid prescription within 30 days and 180 days following HZ diagnosis. We also examined trends over the study period, proportion receiving moderate, high dosages (50-89 morphine milligram equivalent [MME], and ≥90 MME per day), and long-term receipt. RESULTS: Among all three insurance databases, 2,595,837 patients had an incident episode of HZ and were opioid naive during the prior 6 months. Within 30 days following HZ, 623,515 (24 percent) filled a prescription for an opioid. The percentage with an opioid claim declined during 2007-2021 for all groups; 65 percent for commercially insured patients, 51 percent for Medicaid-insured patients, and 60 percent for Medicare-insured patients. Approximately 8-15 percent of all beneficiaries received moderate and 2-6 percent received high dosage opioids. Long-term prescription opioid use of at least 6 months was found in 7-12 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing trends in judicious opioid prescribing as well as use of recommended HZ vaccines may decrease opioid prescriptions for HZ.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Medicaid , Medicare , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias
19.
J Pain ; : 104667, 2024 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39271034

RESUMEN

Analyses of healthcare data can reveal utilization of treatment options that comprise a multidisciplinary approach to chronic pain management. This retrospective cohort study aimed to characterize treatments among commercially vs. Medicaid-insured adults with incident episodes of chronic pain. We used MarketScan® data to identify patients with diagnoses for conditions associated with chronic pain, assess procedure codes that align with broad categories of treatment options, and compare receipt of treatments by insurance type. Among enrollees aged ≥18 years, 4,254,818 adults with commercial insurance and 583,369 with Medicaid met continuous enrollment criteria and had no chronic pain episodes in 2017. Among patients with incident chronic pain episodes during 2018-2020, we determined the proportions receiving different categories of treatment options during the year following diagnosis. Cohen's h determined meaningful differences by insurance. Study cohorts included 1,095,358 commercial (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [13.3] years; 54.3% women) and 176,607 Medicaid adults (38.1 [12.7] years; 70.6% women) with incident chronic pain episodes during 2018-2020. More commercial than Medicaid patients received restorative therapies such as physical therapy (38.6% vs. 19.2%), complementary or integrative care such as chiropractic treatment (31.1% vs.9.0%), and two or more different types of nonmedication treatment procedures (34.1% vs.16.3%). Median days to treatments were shorter for commercial patients. Disparities in the provision, patterns and timing of treatments by insurance suggest differential access to the full range of treatment options early during the course of care and identify opportunities to align coverage and reimbursement policies with current practice guidelines. PERSPECTIVE: This analysis of medical claims for patients with incident chronic pain episodes found disparities in the provision, patterns and timing of treatments by insurance type. These results suggest differential access to evidence-based treatment options early during care and identify opportunities to align coverage and reimbursement policies with current practice guidelines.

20.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 85(1): 120-132, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252451

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) policies establish a floor price beneath which alcohol cannot be sold. The potential effectiveness of MUP policies for reducing alcohol-attributable deaths in the United States has not been quantitatively assessed. Therefore, this study estimated the effects of two hypothetical distilled spirits MUP policies on alcohol sales, consumption, and alcohol-attributable deaths in one state. METHOD: The International Model of Alcohol Harms and Policies tool was used to estimate the effects of two hypothetical MUP per standard drink policies (40-cent and 45-cent) pertaining to distilled spirits products at off-premises alcohol outlets in Michigan during 2020. Prevalence estimates on drinking patterns among Michigan adults were calculated by sex and age group. Prices per standard drink and sales of 9,747 spirits products were analyzed using National Alcohol Beverage Control Association data. Analyses accounted for other alcoholic beverage type sales using cross-price elasticities. RESULTS: Increasing the MUP of the 3.5% of spirits with the lowest prices per standard drink to 40 cents could reduce total alcohol per capita consumption in Michigan by 2.6% and prevent 232 (5.3%) alcohol-attributable deaths annually. A 45-cent MUP would affect 8.0% of the spirits and reduce total alcohol per capita consumption by 3.9%, preventing 354 (8.1%) deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Modestly increasing the prices of the lowest-priced spirits with an MUP policy in a single state could save hundreds of lives annually. This suggests that alcohol MUP policies could be an effective strategy for improving public health in the United States, consistent with the World Health Organization's recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Política Pública , Adulto , Humanos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/prevención & control , Etanol , Comercio , Costos y Análisis de Costo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA