Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Lang Commun Disord ; 53(1): 130-143, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28741729

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Differing results regarding articulation skills in young children with cleft palate (CP) have been reported and often interpreted as a consequence of different surgical protocols. AIMS: To assess the influence of different timing of hard palate closure in a two-stage procedure on articulation skills in 3-year-olds born with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Secondary aims were to compare results with peers without CP, and to investigate if there are gender differences in articulation skills. Furthermore, burden of treatment was to be estimated in terms of secondary surgery, hearing and speech therapy. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A randomized controlled trial (RCT). Early hard palate closure (EHPC) at 12 months versus late hard palate closure (LHPC) at 36 months in a two-stage procedure was tested in a cohort of 126 Danish-speaking children born with non-syndromic UCLP. All participants had the lip and soft palate closed around 4 months of age. Audio and video recordings of a naming test were available from 113 children (32 girls and 81 boys) and were transcribed phonetically. Recordings were obtained prior to hard palate closure in the LHPC group. The main outcome measures were percentage consonants correct adjusted (PCC-A) and consonant errors from blinded assessments. Results from 36 Danish-speaking children without CP obtained previously by Willadsen in 2012 were used for comparison. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Children with EHPC produced significantly more target consonants correctly (83%) than children with LHPC (48%; p < .001). In addition, children with LHPC produced significantly more active cleft speech characteristics than children with EHPC (p < .001). Boys achieved significantly lower PCC-A scores than girls (p = .04) and produced significantly more consonant errors than girls (p = .02). No significant differences were found between groups regarding burden of treatment. The control group performed significantly better than the EHPC and LHPC groups on all compared variables.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Articulación/cirugía , Labio Leporino/cirugía , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Paladar Duro/cirugía , Trastornos de la Articulación/etiología , Trastornos de la Articulación/terapia , Lenguaje Infantil , Preescolar , Labio Leporino/complicaciones , Fisura del Paladar/complicaciones , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Logopedia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 51(1): 14-20, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Longstanding uncertainty surrounds the selection of surgical protocols for unilateral cleft lip and palate, and randomised trials have only rarely been performed. The Scandcleft Project consists of three trials commenced in 1997 involving ten centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Three groups of centres tested a newly-defined common technique for palatal repair (Arm A) against their local protocols (Arms B, C, D). Arm A was familiar to most of the surgeons in Trial 1, but not to the surgeons in the other Trials. AIM: To evaluate surgical events and complications of the 448 (293 boys, 155 girls) patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) enrolled in the three trials. METHOD: The three trials were carried out in parallel in adherence with a fully developed, ethically approved protocol. Operative time, bleeding, complications, and major dehiscence during and after both primary surgeries were recorded by the surgeon. Rates of fistula and surgery for velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) were assessed until the youngest patient of the study had reached the age of 9 years. Pearson Chi-square statistical analysis was used to compare the outcomes. RESULTS: No significant differences in bleeding, infection, anaesthetic complications or length of hospital stay between the different arms were found for Trial 1. However, in Trials 2 and 3 there were more airway problems in Arm A than with the traditional local protocols (Arms C or D). In Trial 3 fistula and VPI surgery rates were also higher in Arm A. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not provide statistical evidence that any technique is better than others, but indicate that surgery was more problematic for surgeons who were still gaining experience with an unfamiliar surgical protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29932826.


Asunto(s)
Labio Leporino/cirugía , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/etiología , Preescolar , Labio Leporino/diagnóstico , Fisura del Paladar/diagnóstico , Dinamarca , Femenino , Finlandia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Suecia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/terapia
3.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 51(1): 2-13, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218559

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Longstanding uncertainty surrounds the selection of surgical protocols for the closure of unilateral cleft lip and palate, and randomised trials have only rarely been performed. This paper is an introduction to three randomised trials of primary surgery for children born with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). It presents the protocol developed for the trials in CONSORT format, and describes the management structure that was developed to achieve the long-term engagement and commitment required to complete the project. METHOD: Ten established national or regional cleft centres participated. Lip and soft palate closure at 3-4 months, and hard palate closure at 12 months served as a common method in each trial. Trial 1 compared this with hard palate closure at 36 months. Trial 2 compared it with lip closure at 3-4 months and hard and soft palate closure at 12 months. Trial 3 compared it with lip and hard palate closure at 3-4 months and soft palate closure at 12 months. The primary outcomes were speech and dentofacial development, with a series of perioperative and longer-term secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Recruitment of 448 infants took place over a 9-year period, with 99.8% subsequent retention at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The series of reports that follow this introductory paper include comparisons at age 5 of surgical outcomes, speech outcomes, measures of dentofacial development and appearance, and parental satisfaction. The outcomes recorded and the numbers analysed for each outcome and time point are described in the series. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29932826.


Asunto(s)
Labio Leporino/cirugía , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Preescolar , Labio Leporino/diagnóstico , Labio Leporino/psicología , Fisura del Paladar/diagnóstico , Fisura del Paladar/psicología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Estética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Planificación en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA