Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Blood ; 143(22): 2332-2335, 2024 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635764

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) vs with plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (pdVWF) for patients with severe Von Willebrand disease. We found that rVWF is a cost-saving factor replacement compared with pdVWF across all willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Proteínas Recombinantes , Enfermedades de von Willebrand , Factor de von Willebrand , Humanos , Factor de von Willebrand/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/economía , Enfermedades de von Willebrand/economía , Femenino , Masculino
2.
Am J Hematol ; 98(9): E247-E250, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37401660

RESUMEN

Prophylactic emicizumab is cost-ineffective in adults with moderate or mild hemophilia A without inhibitors at current pricing. The price of prophylactic emicizumab would need to decrease by >35% to become cost-effective in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Hemofilia A , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico
3.
Eur J Haematol ; 109(5): 519-525, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35871468

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine risk factors for iv iron infusion-related reactions (IRR), and identify strategies for iron repletion after IRR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated in the classical hematology clinic at Yale Cancer Center (n = 330 consecutive patients) from 2016 to 2021, who received iv ferumoxytol (60.3%), iron sucrose (14.8%), or iron dextran (10.9%). RESULTS: The iv iron IRR was noted in 58 (17.6%) patients, 62.1% of whom had previously tolerated iv iron. The severity of IRR was mild in 22, moderate in 23, and severe in 11 patients. Most (72.4%) patients who experienced IRR tolerated a subsequent iv iron infusion. On multivariable analysis, a history of non-medication allergies was associated with greater odds of IRR (odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-3.87, p = .01). No patients with type AB blood, and few with type A blood (n = 6), had IRR; compared to type A or AB together, patients with type B (OR 5.00, 95% CI: 1.56-16.06, p = .007) or type O (OR 3.71, 95% CI: 1.44-9.55, p = .007) blood had greater odds of IRR. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a possible association of blood type with iv iron IRR; prospective studies with larger patient numbers are warranted to explore this association.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica , Óxido Ferrosoférrico , Anemia Ferropénica/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia Ferropénica/epidemiología , Dextranos/uso terapéutico , Sacarato de Óxido Férrico/efectos adversos , Óxido Ferrosoférrico/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hierro/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Am J Hematol ; 96(4): 471-479, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476420

RESUMEN

Thrombotic complications occur at high rates in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, yet the impact of intensive antithrombotic therapy on mortality is uncertain. We examined in-hospital mortality with intermediate- compared to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation, and separately with in-hospital aspirin compared to no antiplatelet therapy, in a large, retrospective study of 2785 hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients. In this analysis, we established two separate, nested cohorts of patients (a) who received intermediate- or prophylactic-dose anticoagulation ("anticoagulation cohort", N = 1624), or (b) who were not on home antiplatelet therapy and received either in-hospital aspirin or no antiplatelet therapy ("aspirin cohort", N = 1956). To minimize bias and adjust for confounding factors, we incorporated propensity score matching and multivariable regression utilizing various markers of illness severity and other patient-specific covariates, yielding treatment groups with well-balanced covariates in each cohort. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-hospital death. Among propensity score-matched patients in the anticoagulation cohort (N = 382), in a multivariable regression model, intermediate- compared to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of in-hospital death (hazard ratio 0.518 [0.308-0.872]). Among propensity-score matched patients in the aspirin cohort (N = 638), in a multivariable regression model, in-hospital aspirin compared to no antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of in-hospital death (hazard ratio 0.522 [0.336-0.812]). In this propensity score-matched, observational study of COVID-19, intermediate-dose anticoagulation and aspirin were each associated with a lower cumulative incidence of in-hospital death.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
medRxiv ; 2021 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33469595

RESUMEN

Background: Thrombotic complications occur at high rates in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, yet the impact of intensive antithrombotic therapy on mortality is uncertain. Research Question: How does in-hospital mortality compare with intermediate- versus prophylactic-dose anticoagulation, and separately with in-hospital aspirin versus no antiplatelet therapy, in treatment of COVID-19? Study Design and Methods: Using data from 2785 hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients, we established two separate, nested cohorts of patients (1) who received intermediate- or prophylactic-dose anticoagulation ("anticoagulation cohort", N = 1624), or (2) who were not on home antiplatelet therapy and received either in-hospital aspirin or no antiplatelet therapy ("aspirin cohort", N = 1956). Propensity score matching utilizing various markers of illness severity and other patient-specific covariates yielded treatment groups with well-balanced covariates in each cohort. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-hospital death. Results: Among propensity score-matched patients in the anticoagulation cohort (N = 382), in a multivariable regression model, intermediate- compared to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of in-hospital death (hazard ratio 0.518 [0.308-0.872]). Among propensity-score matched patients in the aspirin cohort (N = 638), in a multivariable regression model, in-hospital aspirin compared to no antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of in-hospital death (hazard ratio 0.522 [0.336-0.812]). Interpretation: In this propensity score-matched, observational study of COVID-19, intermediate-dose anticoagulation and aspirin were each associated with a lower cumulative incidence of in-hospital death.

6.
Lancet Haematol ; 7(8): e575-e582, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32619411

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An important feature of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pathogenesis is COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, characterised by increased thrombotic and microvascular complications. Previous studies have suggested a role for endothelial cell injury in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. To determine whether endotheliopathy is involved in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy pathogenesis, we assessed markers of endothelial cell and platelet activation in critically and non-critically ill patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19. METHODS: In this single-centre cross-sectional study, hospitalised adult (≥18 years) patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were identified in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) or a specialised non-ICU COVID-19 floor in our hospital. Asymptomatic, non-hospitalised controls were recruited as a comparator group for biomarkers that did not have a reference range. We assessed markers of endothelial cell and platelet activation, including von Willebrand Factor (VWF) antigen, soluble thrombomodulin, soluble P-selectin, and soluble CD40 ligand, as well as coagulation factors, endogenous anticoagulants, and fibrinolytic enzymes. We compared the level of each marker in ICU patients, non-ICU patients, and controls, where applicable. We assessed correlations between these laboratory results with clinical outcomes, including hospital discharge and mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to further explore the association between biochemical markers and survival. FINDINGS: 68 patients with COVID-19 were included in the study from April 13 to April 24, 2020, including 48 ICU and 20 non-ICU patients, as well as 13 non-hospitalised, asymptomatic controls. Markers of endothelial cell and platelet activation were significantly elevated in ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients, including VWF antigen (mean 565% [SD 199] in ICU patients vs 278% [133] in non-ICU patients; p<0·0001) and soluble P-selectin (15·9 ng/mL [4·8] vs 11·2 ng/mL [3·1]; p=0·0014). VWF antigen concentrations were also elevated above the normal range in 16 (80%) of 20 non-ICU patients. We found mortality to be significantly correlated with VWF antigen (r = 0·38; p=0·0022) and soluble thrombomodulin (r = 0·38; p=0·0078) among all patients. In all patients, soluble thrombomodulin concentrations greater than 3·26 ng/mL were associated with lower rates of hospital discharge (22 [88%] of 25 patients with low concentrations vs 13 [52%] of 25 patients with high concentrations; p=0·0050) and lower likelihood of survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (hazard ratio 5·9, 95% CI 1·9-18·4; p=0·0087). INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that endotheliopathy is present in COVID-19 and is likely to be associated with critical illness and death. Early identification of endotheliopathy and strategies to mitigate its progression might improve outcomes in COVID-19. FUNDING: This work was supported by a gift donation from Jack Levin to the Benign Hematology programme at Yale, and the National Institutes of Health.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/patología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Endotelio Vascular/patología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/metabolismo , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios Transversales , Endotelio Vascular/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , Pronóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
7.
Clin Cancer Res ; 11(12): 4460-8, 2005 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15958631

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility, safety, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy of an autologous vaccine of leukocyte-derived heat shock protein 70-peptide complexes (Hsp70PC), in conjunction with imatinib mesylate, in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients had cytogenetic or molecular evidence of disease, despite treatment with imatinib mesylate for all except one patient, at the beginning of study. Hsp70PCs were purified from the leukopheresed peripheral blood mononuclear cells and were administered in eight weekly intradermal injections at 50 microg/dose without adjuvant. Clinical responses were assessed by bone marrow analysis before and after vaccinations. An IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay was used to estimate the effect of treatment on natural killer cells and T cells against CML. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated. The manufacturing of Hsp70PCs was successful and the administration was safe for all patients. Minimal or no side effects were reported. Clinical responses were seen in 13 of 20 patients as measured by cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells in metaphases and/or, when possible, the level of Bcr/Abl transcript by PCR. Immunologic responses were observed in 9 of 16 patients analyzed, characterized by an increase in the frequency of CML-specific IFN-gamma-producing cells and IFN-gamma-secreting natural killer cells in the blood. A significant correlation between clinical responses and immunologic responses was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous Hsp70PC vaccination is feasible and safe. When combined with imatinib mesylate, it is associated with immunologic and possible clinical responses against CML in chronic phase.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Benzamidas , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Citotoxicidad Inmunológica/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Proteínas de Choque Térmico/administración & dosificación , Proteínas de Choque Térmico/inmunología , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Interferón gamma/biosíntesis , Células K562 , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/inmunología , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/metabolismo , Leucocitos/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Hematol Oncol ; 3: 40, 2010 Oct 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20977755

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors have emerged as a promising class of anti-cancer drugs in both solid and hematologic malignancies. The HSP90 family includes the cytosolic HSP90 (HSP90AA1), the ER paralogue gp96 (HSP90B1) and the mitochondrial member TRAP1 (HSP90L). We evaluated the in vitro anti-tumor activity and mechanism of action of PU-H71, a novel purine scaffold HSP90 inhibitor in human multiple myeloma cell lines. METHODS: Multiple human myeloma cell lines including cells that are resistant to corticosteroids and bortezimab were treated with PU-H71, followed by analysis of cell viability, cell cycle progression and apoptosis, by flow cytometry and caspase 3 immunoblot. Induction of unfolded protein response was studied by XBP-1 s immunoblot. The role of gp96 was further assessed by small hairpin RNA knockdown of gp96 before treatment with PU-H71. RESULTS: PU-H71 has potent in vitro anti-myeloma activity in both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cell lines. PU-H71 activates the unfolded protein response and induces caspase-dependent apoptosis. The stable gp96 knockdown human myeloma cell line was found to be more resistant to PU-H71 and other HSP90 inhibitors including 17-AAG and 17-DMAG, even though these cells are more sensitive to conventional anti-myeloma drugs. CONCLUSION: We conclude that PU-H71 is a promising drug for the treatment of myeloma. Our finding further suggests that PU-H71 and the geldanamycin analogues work in part by inhibiting the endoplasmic reticulum gp96 along with the cytosolic HSP90.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Benzodioxoles/farmacología , Proteínas HSP90 de Choque Térmico/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Purinas/farmacología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Fase G1/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/fisiología , Fase S/efectos de los fármacos , Respuesta de Proteína Desplegada/efectos de los fármacos
9.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 9(5): 362-6, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12904704

RESUMEN

Central venous catheters are used frequently to care for patients with cancer and often serve as long-term venous access. Catheter-related central venous thrombosis is a serious and common complication in these patients. The incidence of this event ranges from 2 to 40%. Potential risk factors are catheter position, size of the catheter, and perhaps site of insertion. The diagnosis of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis may be difficult. Doppler ultrasound has a lower accuracy in this setting than it does in symptomatic lower extremity venous thrombosis. No clinical management studies have validated the practice of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with a negative Doppler ultrasound. The practice of prophylaxis with low-dose warfarin or low-molecular-weight heparin has been recommended, although results from recent studies have called this into question. Larger, prospective, randomized trials with a uniform population of patients or stratification of risk factors will be essential to address this issue further.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA