A worldwide survey on incidence, management, and prognosis of oesophageal fistula formation following atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the POTTER-AF study.

AIMS: Oesophageal fistula represents a rare but dreadful complication of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Data on its incidence, management, and outcome are sparse. METHODS AND RESULTS: This international multicentre registry investigates the characteristics of oesophageal fistulae after treatment of atrial fibrillation by catheter ablation. A total of 553 729 catheter ablation procedures (radiofrequency: 62.9%, cryoballoon: 36.2%, other modalities: 0.9%) were performed, at 214 centres in 35 countries. In 78 centres 138 patients [0.025%, radiofrequency: 0.038%, cryoballoon: 0.0015% (P < 0.0001)] were diagnosed with an oesophageal fistula. Peri-procedural data were available for 118 patients (85.5%). Following catheter ablation, the median time to symptoms and the median time to diagnosis were 18 (7.75, 25; range: 0-60) days and 21 (15, 29.5; range: 2-63) days, respectively. The median time from symptom onset to oesophageal fistula diagnosis was 3 (1, 9; range: 0-42) days. The most common initial symptom was fever (59.3%). The diagnosis was established by chest computed tomography in 80.2% of patients. Oesophageal surgery was performed in 47.4% and direct endoscopic treatment in 19.8% and conservative treatment in 32.8% of patients. The overall mortality was 65.8%. Mortality following surgical (51.9%) or endoscopic treatment (56.5%) was significantly lower as compared to conservative management (89.5%) [odds ratio 7.463 (2.414, 23.072) P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Oesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is rare and occurs mostly with the use of radiofrequency energy rather than cryoenergy. Mortality without surgical or endoscopic intervention is exceedingly high.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Ebstein's Anomaly: A Two-Case Report.

Ebstein's anomaly (EA) is a rare congenital heart disease characterized by "atrialization" of the right ventricle, due to apical displacement of the tricuspid leaflets into the right ventricle. Patients with EA may develop all kinds of supraventricular arrhythmias requiring radiofrequency ablation. Atrial fibrillation (Afib) is a common arrhythmia in EA patients, and results in debilitating symptoms that often require surgical treatment. This is a follow-up report of 2 patients with EA undergoing radiofrequency ablation for Afib. The first patient underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and the ablation of a concomitant atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The second patient was also treated with a PVI and a redo PVI 8 months later. Both patients remain in sinus rhythm 8 months on. Radiofrequency ablation is the therapy of choice for patients with pharmacological refractory Afib, but it is not common in patients with EA.

Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter and heart failure in the elderly-results of a retrospective multi-center study.

Introduction: While in the CASTLE-AF trial, in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, interventional therapy using pulmonary vein isolation was associated with outcome improvement, data on cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) in atrial flutter (AFL) in the elderly is rare. Methods: We included 96 patients between 60 and 85 years with typical AFL and heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) treated in two medical centers. 48 patients underwent an electrophysiological study with CTIA, whereas 48 patients received rate or rhythm control and guideline-compliant heart failure therapy. Patients were followed up for 2 years, with emphasis on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiac causes. Results: Patients with CTIA showed a significant increase in LVEF after 1 (p < 0.001) and 2 years (p < 0.001) in contrast to baseline LVEF. Improvement of LVEF in the CTIA group was associated with significantly lower 2-year mortality (p = 0.003). In the multivariate regression analysis, CTIA remained the relevant factor associated with LVEF improvement (HR: 2.845 CI:95% 1.044-7.755; p = 0.041). Elderly patients (≥ 70 years) further benefited from CTIA, since they showed a significantly reduced rehospitalization (p = 0.042) and mortality rate after 2 years (p = 0.013). Conclusions: CTIA in patients with typical AFL and HFrEF/HFmrEF was associated with significant improvement of LVEF and reduced mortality rates after 2 years. Patient age should not be a primary exclusion criterion for CTIA, since patients ≥70 years also seem to benefit from intervention in terms of mortality and hospitalization.

Coronary computed tomography angiography and endocardial leads - Image quality in 320-row CT using iterative reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the presence of endocardial leads has an impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), when current technique is employed using a 320-row computed tomography and iterative reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CCTA was performed in 1641 patients, from these we identified 51 patients (study group) with endocardial leads and 51 matched partners (control group) without endocardial leads. Noise was determined in the ascending aorta and the left ventricle; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined in the left and right coronary artery. Subjective image quality was rated separately for the 15 segments of the coronary arteries by 2 radiologists. RESULTS: Current CCTA technique still shows slight impairment of objective image quality in patients with endocardial leads with inferior SNR in the aorta (median 15.04 versus 16.6; p = 0.004) and inferior SNR in the left/right coronary artery (median 15.3/13.81 versus 16.1/15.41; p = 0.013/0.002). CNR of the left/right coronary artery was also inferior (median 17.4/16.46 versus 19.26/19.24; p = 0.002/<0.001). The subjective image quality was rated significantly inferior only in segment 8 (p = 0.001) compared to the control group. Artifacts by ventricular leads were found in 65% of the patients in segment 8 with non-diagnostic rating in 9 cases (18%). Atrial leads resulted in artifacts predominantly in segment 1 (45%) with non-diagnostic rating in only 2 cases (4%). CONCLUSION: CCTA is feasible with slight restrictions for patients in the presence of implanted cardiac devices when current technique is used.