Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Phys Chem Chem Phys ; 20(37): 24263-24286, 2018 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30211409

RESUMEN

Atmospheric pressure plasmas are sources of biologically active oxygen and nitrogen species, which makes them potentially suitable for the use as biomedical devices. Here, experiments and simulations are combined to investigate the formation of the key reactive oxygen species, atomic oxygen (O) and hydroxyl radicals (OH), in a radio-frequency driven atmospheric pressure plasma jet operated in humidified helium. Vacuum ultra-violet high-resolution Fourier-transform absorption spectroscopy and ultra-violet broad-band absorption spectroscopy are used to measure absolute densities of O and OH. These densities increase with increasing H2O content in the feed gas, and approach saturation values at higher admixtures on the order of 3 × 1014 cm-3 for OH and 3 × 1013 cm-3 for O. Experimental results are used to benchmark densities obtained from zero-dimensional plasma chemical kinetics simulations, which reveal the dominant formation pathways. At low humidity content, O is formed from OH+ by proton transfer to H2O, which also initiates the formation of large cluster ions. At higher humidity content, O is created by reactions between OH radicals, and lost by recombination with OH. OH is produced mainly from H2O+ by proton transfer to H2O and by electron impact dissociation of H2O. It is lost by reactions with other OH molecules to form either H2O + O or H2O2. Formation pathways change as a function of humidity content and position in the plasma channel. The understanding of the chemical kinetics of O and OH gained in this work will help in the development of plasma tailoring strategies to optimise their densities in applications.

2.
Phys Rev Lett ; 114(12): 125002, 2015 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25860749

RESUMEN

The ionization dynamics in geometrically symmetric parallel plate capacitively coupled plasmas driven by radio frequency tailored voltage waveforms is investigated using phase resolved optical emission spectroscopy (PROES) and particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. Temporally asymmetric waveforms induce spatial asymmetries and offer control of the spatiotemporal dynamics of electron heating and associated ionization structures. Sawtooth waveforms with different rise and fall rates are employed using truncated Fourier series approximations of an ideal sawtooth. Experimental PROES results obtained in argon plasmas are compared with PIC simulations, showing excellent agreement. With waveforms comprising a fast voltage drop followed by a slower rise, the faster sheath expansion in front of the powered electrode causes strongly enhanced ionization in this region. The complementary waveform causes an analogous effect in front of the grounded electrode.

3.
Am Heart J ; 162(4): 700-707.e1, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21982663

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Registries have shown that quality of care for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often falls below the standards recommended in professional guidelines. Quality improvement (QI) is a strategy to improve standards of clinical care for patients, but the efficacy of QI for ACS has not been tested in randomized trials. METHODS: We undertook a prospective, cluster-randomized, multicenter, multinational study to evaluate the efficacy of a QI program for ACS. Participating centers collected data on consecutive admissions for non-ST-elevation ACS for 4 months before the QI intervention and 3 months after. Thirty-eight hospitals in France, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom were randomized to receive the QI program or not, 19 in each group. We measured 8 in-hospital quality indicators (risk stratification, coronary angiography, anticoagulation, ß-blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and clopidogrel loading and maintenance) before and after the intervention and compared composite changes between the QI and non-QI groups. RESULTS: A total of 2604 patients were enrolled. The absolute overall change in use of quality indicators in the QI group was 8.5% compared with 0.8% in the non-QI group (odds ratio for achieving a quality indicator in QI versus non-QI 1.66, 95% CI 1.43-1.94; P < .001). The main changes were observed in the use of risk stratification and clopidogrel loading dose. CONCLUSIONS: The QI strategy resulted in a significant improvement in the quality indicators measured. This type of QI intervention can lead to useful changes in health care practice for ACS in a wide range of settings.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Anciano , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Lancet ; 373(9670): 1190-7, 2009 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19303634

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are alternative treatments for multivessel coronary disease. Although the procedures have been compared in several randomised trials, their long-term effects on mortality in key clinical subgroups are uncertain. We undertook a collaborative analysis of data from randomised trials to assess whether the effects of the procedures on mortality are modified by patient characteristics. METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from ten randomised trials to compare the effectiveness of CABG with PCI according to patients' baseline clinical characteristics. We used stratified, random effects Cox proportional hazards models to test the effect on all-cause mortality of randomised treatment assignment and its interaction with clinical characteristics. All analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Ten participating trials provided data on 7812 patients. PCI was done with balloon angioplasty in six trials and with bare-metal stents in four trials. Over a median follow-up of 5.9 years (IQR 5.0-10.0), 575 (15%) of 3889 patients assigned to CABG died compared with 628 (16%) of 3923 patients assigned to PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-1.02; p=0.12). In patients with diabetes (CABG, n=615; PCI, n=618), mortality was substantially lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (HR 0.70, 0.56-0.87); however, mortality was similar between groups in patients without diabetes (HR 0.98, 0.86-1.12; p=0.014 for interaction). Patient age modified the effect of treatment on mortality, with hazard ratios of 1.25 (0.94-1.66) in patients younger than 55 years, 0.90 (0.75-1.09) in patients aged 55-64 years, and 0.82 (0.70-0.97) in patients 65 years and older (p=0.002 for interaction). Treatment effect was not modified by the number of diseased vessels or other baseline characteristics. INTERPRETATION: Long-term mortality is similar after CABG and PCI in most patient subgroups with multivessel coronary artery disease, so choice of treatment should depend on patient preferences for other outcomes. CABG might be a better option for patients with diabetes and patients aged 65 years or older because we found mortality to be lower in these subgroups.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Selección de Paciente , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
JAMA ; 304(8): 867-74, 2010 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20736470

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Observational studies have previously reported that elective intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion may improve outcomes following high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To date, this assertion has not been tested in a randomized trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether routine intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before PCI reduces major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE) in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and extensive coronary disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Balloon Pump-Assisted Coronary Intervention Study, a prospective, open, multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted in 17 tertiary referral cardiac centers in the United Kingdom between December 2005 and January 2009. Patients (n = 301) had severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 30%) and extensive coronary disease (Jeopardy Score > or = 8/12); those with contraindications to or class I indications for IABP therapy were excluded. INTERVENTION: Elective insertion of IABP before PCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was MACCE, defined as death, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, or further revascularization at hospital discharge (capped at 28 days). Secondary end points included all-cause mortality at 6 months, major procedural complications, bleeding, and access-site complications. RESULTS: MACCE at hospital discharge occurred in 15.2% (23/151) of the elective IABP and 16.0% (24/150) of the no planned IABP groups (P = .85; odds ratio [OR], 0.94 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.51-1.76]). All-cause mortality at 6 months was 4.6% and 7.4% in the respective groups (P = .32; OR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.24-1.62]). Fewer major procedural complications occurred with elective IABP insertion compared with no planned IABP use (1.3% vs 10.7%, P < .001; OR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.01-0.49]). Major or minor bleeding occurred in 19.2% and 11.3% (P = .06; OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 0.93-3.79]) and access-site complications in 3.3% and 0% (P = .06) of the elective and no planned IABP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elective IABP insertion did not reduce the incidence of MACCE following PCI. These results do not support a strategy of routine IABP placement before PCI in all patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and extensive coronary disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN40553718; clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00910481.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/métodos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Revascularización Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Circulation ; 118(4): 381-8, 2008 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18606919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Stent or Surgery Trial is a randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with multivessel disease. Initial results at a median follow-up of 2 years showed a survival advantage for patients randomized to CABG. This article reports survival outcome at a median follow-up of 6 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 988 (n=488 percutaneous coronary intervention, n=500 CABG) patients were randomized at 53 centers during the period from 1996 to 1999. Investigators established survival status from hospital or community medical records or national databases or by direct contact with patients and their relatives. All-cause mortality was compared with hazard ratios and confidence intervals calculated from Cox proportional hazards models. Prespecified subgroup analyses for diabetes mellitus, angina grade, and angiographic severity of coronary disease at baseline were performed with tests for interaction. At a median follow-up of 6 years, 53 patients (10.9%) died in the percutaneous coronary intervention group compared with 34 (6.8%) in the CABG group (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 2.55, P=0.022). Little evidence was found that the treatment effect on mortality differed between subgroups according to baseline angina grade (interaction test P=0.52), the severity of coronary disease (P=0.92), or diabetic status (P=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: At a median follow-up of 6 years, a continuing survival advantage was observed for patients managed with CABG, which is not consistent with results from other stent-versus-CABG studies.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/normas , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/normas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Anciano , Angina de Pecho , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
Circulation ; 118(11): 1146-54, 2008 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18725490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials that studied clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are underpowered to properly assess safety end points like death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Pooling data from randomized controlled trials increases the statistical power and allows better assessment of the treatment effect in high-risk subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a pooled analysis of 3051 patients in 4 randomized trials evaluating the relative safety and efficacy of PCI with stenting and CABG at 5 years for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. The primary end point was the composite end point of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The secondary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents, death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. We tested for heterogeneities in treatment effect in patient subgroups. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar in patients randomized to PCI with stenting versus CABG (16.7% versus 16.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.04, 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.27; P=0.69). Repeat revascularization, however, occurred significantly more frequently after PCI than CABG (29.0% versus 7.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.29; P<0.001). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in the PCI than the CABG group (39.2% versus 23.0%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.61; P<0.001). No heterogeneity of treatment effect was found in the subgroups, including diabetic patients and those presenting with 3-vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials, PCI with stenting was associated with a long-term safety profile similar to that of CABG. However, as a result of persistently lower repeat revascularization rates in the CABG patients, overall major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rates were significantly lower in the CABG group at 5 years.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/normas , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Am Heart J ; 158(6): 910-916.e2, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19958856

RESUMEN

Several observational studies have suggested that mortality and major complications after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be reduced by elective insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, to date, this assertion has never been tested in a randomized trial, and as such, international guidelines do not provide formal recommendations for IABP use in this setting. The BCIS-1 is a randomized trial that addresses the hypothesis that elective IABP insertion before high-risk PCI will reduce major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at hospital discharge or 28 days after index PCI, whichever occurs sooner. High risk is defined by the presence of severe left ventricular dysfunction as well as a large amount of myocardium at risk. Patients who are in cardiogenic shock, have a class I indication for IABP use, or have an absolute contraindication to IABP use will be excluded. Three hundred eligible patients will be randomized to receive elective IABP insertion or no planned IABP insertion. The findings of BCIS-1 are expected to define the role of balloon counterpulsation in high-risk PCI. Confirmation of the efficacy of elective IABP use may prompt review of the international guidelines, which are currently very restricted. In contrast, a neutral or adverse outcome with elective counterpulsation in these high-risk patients will allow evidence-based rationalization of the current disparity between guidelines and the frequent real-world use of elective IABP support.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos
9.
Am Heart J ; 152(6): 1153-60, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17161069

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Relative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may differ between younger and older patients. There are no data comparing the age-related CABG versus PCI outcomes in the stent era. METHODS: The SoS trial compared CABG (n = 500) and stent-assisted PCI (n = 488). The impact of treatment assignment on 1-year outcomes was evaluated by age < or = 65 years (n = 295, CABG; n = 298, PCI) and > 65 years (n = 205, CABG; n = 190, PCI). RESULTS: One-year procedural outcomes were similar between treatment groups regardless of age, with the exception of more repeat revascularizations after PCI (age < or = 65, 16.1% vs 4.8%; age > 65, 19.5% vs 3.4%; both P < .001). Six and 12-month Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores improved from baseline in both age and treatment groups. However, CABG was associated with greater improvement in physical limitation, angina frequency, and quality of life in younger patients at 6 and 12 months (12-month difference in improvement between CABG and PCI: 5.6, 4.8, and 3.9 points for 3 domains), whereas in the elderly a significant benefit of CABG observed at 6 months did not persist at 12 months (12-month difference: 0.9, 1.9, and 1.4). One-year costs were significantly higher after CABG regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCI and CABG result in similar rates in clinical outcomes irrespective of age, younger patients reported more health status benefits from CABG as compared with PCI, whereas in older patients the 2 approaches resulted in similar 1-year health status benefits.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Edad , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/epidemiología , Angina de Pecho/prevención & control , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/economía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Retratamiento , Stents/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Int J Cardiol ; 202: 7-12, 2016 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26372883

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse adverse events requiring or prolonging hospitalisation in the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial. BACKGROUND: Many adverse events following coronary revascularisation are non-major adverse cardiovascular events (non-MACE). Trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) have reported rates of mortality and MACE only. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparisons between PCI and CABG groups in the SOS trial were by intention to treat. For patients with non-fatal/non-MACE, number of events per 100 patient years follow-up and duration of hospital stay were assessed. Competing risk analysis was used to illustrate temporal pattern of adverse outcomes. RESULTS: During 2 y median follow up, 1 one or more adverse event occurred in 47.3% (231) of the PCI group and 53% (265) of the CABG group (p=0.086). Non-fatal/non-MACE occurred in 11.9% of the PCI group and 38.6% of the CABG group (p<0.001). Non-fatal/non-MACE per 100 patient years follow-up was 17.49 (PCI) and 35.04 (CABG), rate ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.4, p<0.001. Cumulative non-fatal/non-MACE associated hospital stays were 1387 and 3287 days in PCI and CABG groups respectively. Median duration of hospitalisation per non-fatal/non-MACE was 5 days (interquartile range 2 to 11.75 days) in the PCI group and 6 days (interquartile range 2 to 12 days) in the CABG group, p=0.245. CONCLUSIONS: CABG had lower cumulative incidence of fatal or MACE outcomes, higher cumulative incidence of non-fatal/non-MACE outcomes, and longer cumulative hospitalisation periods compared to the PCI group.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Stents/efectos adversos , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Circulation ; 108(14): 1694-700, 2003 Oct 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12975252

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Functional status and quality of life are important outcomes in the evaluation of revascularization approaches for symptomatic coronary artery disease. Few data are available regarding the comparative improvement in disease-specific health status after CABG versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the era of coronary stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac-specific health status was evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after intervention with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) in patients randomized to stent-assisted PCI (n=488) versus CABG (n=500) in the Stent or Surgery trial. Scores for physical limitation, angina frequency, and quality of life improved significantly for both treatment groups at 6 months (range of improvement from 13.6 to 34.7 points) and 12 months (14.3 to 38.2 points; all P<0.001). CABG patients had greater improvement than those assigned to PCI, although the magnitude of the difference decreased over time (difference at 6 months, 4.03 to 6.48 points; 12 months, 2.05 to 2.93 points). A component of this reduction is accounted for by PCI-arm patients who required repeat intervention. Differences between treatment groups were greatest for the 6-month angina frequency scores (difference=6.48 points; 95% CI 3.96 to 8.99). Overall, treatment satisfaction was high and did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both CABG and stent-assisted PCI dramatically improved cardiac-related health status in patients with multivessel disease at 6- and 12-month follow-up. During the first postprocedure year, patients' angina burden and physical limitations were alleviated to a greater extent with CABG.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Angina de Pecho/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Circulation ; 110(22): 3411-7, 2004 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15557380

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has been associated with a range of neurological and neuropsychological complications from stroke to cognitive problems such as memory and problem solving disturbance. However, little is known about the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on neuropsychological outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS), 988 patients were randomized in equal proportions between PCI supported by stent implantation and CABG. As a substudy of this trial, we undertook an evaluation of neurological and neuropsychological outcomes after intervention. A clinical examination and neuropsychological assessment consisting of 5 tests (Digit Span Forwards and Backwards, Visual Reproduction, Bourdon, and Block Design) were performed at baseline and 6 and 12 months after the procedure. A total of 145 patients were included in the substudy analysis: 77 in the PCI group and 68 in the CABG group. One patient in the PCI arm had a stroke. There was no significant difference between treatment groups at 6 and 12 months for any of the 5 tests. The mean change from baseline was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to demonstrate an important and significant difference in neuropsychological outcome in patients treated with different revascularization strategies. This important finding needs to be examined in further research.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Anciano , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Estenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
13.
Am Heart J ; 150(1): 175-81, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16084166

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding the impact of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) on the relative benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: The SoS trial compared patients with multivessel disease who were randomly assigned to CABG (n = 500) or stent-assisted PCI (n = 488). The impact of treatment on 1-year outcomes was compared in ACS (n = 126, CABG; n = 116, PCI) and non-ACS (n = 374, CABG; n = 372, PCI) subgroups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups within ACS and non-ACS groups, as was the 1-year composite incidence of mortality and myocardial infarction (ACS, 5.2% for PCI vs 5.6% for CABG, P = .89; non-ACS, 7.0% vs 8.3%, P = .50). The need for repeat revascularizations was higher after PCI versus CABG within each subgroup (ACS, 15.5% vs 7.1%, P = .04; non-ACS, 18.0% vs 3.2%, P < .001). At 6 and 12 months, scores on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire improved significantly in patients with and without ACS. In patients without ACS, CABG was associated with greater improvement in physical limitation, angina frequency, and quality of life at 6 and 12 months. In patients with ACS, there was only a nonsignificant slight trend toward greater improvement with CABG at 1 year. The total 1-year costs for PCI and CABG in patients without ACS were 5760 pound sterling and 8509 pound sterling (Delta = 2749 pound sterling, 95% CI 1890 pound sterling - 3409 pound sterling), and in patients with ACS, 8014 pound sterling and 10080 pound sterling (Delta = 2066 pound sterling, 95% CI -690 pound sterling to 3487 pound sterling). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with and without ACS, CABG had similar clinical outcomes, less need for repeat revascularization and higher costs compared to PCI. The benefit of CABG relative to PCI in improving patients' health status tended to be greater in patients without ACS than in patients with ACS.


Asunto(s)
Angina Inestable/terapia , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Stents , Enfermedad Aguda , Angina Inestable/economía , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/economía , Síndrome , Factores de Tiempo
14.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 130(2): 512-9, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16077421

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide a quantitative analysis of the 1-year clinical outcomes of patients with multisystem coronary artery disease who were included in recent randomized trials of percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS: An individual patient database was composed of 4 trials (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study, Stent or Surgery Trial, Argentine Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease 2, and Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study 2) that compared percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting (N = 1518) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (N = 1533). The primary clinical end point of this study was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 1 year after randomization. Secondary combined end points included the incidence of repeat revascularization at 1 year. All analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: After 1 year of follow-up, 8.7% of patients randomized to percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting versus 9.1% of patients randomized to coronary artery bypass graft surgery reached the primary clinical end point (hazard ratio 0.95 and 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.2). Repeat revascularization procedures occurred more frequently in patients allocated to percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting compared with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (18% vs 4.4%; hazard ratio 4.4 and 95% confidence interval 3.3-5.9). The percentage of patients who were free from angina was slightly lower after percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting than after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (77% vs 82%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: One year after the initial procedure, percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting and coronary artery bypass graft surgery provided a similar degree of protection against death, myocardial infarction, or stroke for patients with multisystem disease. Repeat revascularization procedures remain high after percutaneous coronary intervention, but the difference with coronary artery bypass graft surgery has narrowed in the era of stenting.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reoperación , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0135037, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26317618

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prasugrel is more effective than clopidogrel in reducing platelet aggregation in acute coronary syndromes. Data available on prasugrel reloading in clopidogrel treated patients with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) i.e. poor responders, is limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of prasugrel loading on platelet function in patients on clopidogrel and high platelet reactivity undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). PATIENTS: Patients with ACS on clopidogrel who were scheduled for PCI found to have a platelet reactivity ≥40 AUC with the Multiplate Analyzer, i.e. "poor responders" were randomised to prasugrel (60 mg loading and 10 mg maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (600 mg reloading and 150 mg maintenance dose). The primary outcome measure was proportion of patients with platelet reactivity <40 AUC 4 hours after loading with study medication, and also at one hour (secondary outcome). 44 patients were enrolled and the study was terminated early as clopidogrel use decreased sharply due to introduction of newer P2Y12 inhibitors. RESULTS: At 4 hours after study medication 100% of patients treated with prasugrel compared to 91% of those treated with clopidogrel had platelet reactivity <40 AUC (p = 0.49), while at 1 hour the proportions were 95% and 64% respectively (p = 0.02). Mean platelet reactivity at 4 and 1 hours after study medication in prasugrel and clopidogrel groups respectively were 12 versus 22 (p = 0.005) and 19 versus 34 (p = 0.01) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Routine platelet function testing identifies patients with high residual platelet reactivity ("poor responders") on clopidogrel. A strategy of prasugrel rather than clopidogrel reloading results in earlier and more sustained suppression of platelet reactivity. Future trials need to identify if this translates into clinical benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01339026.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/sangre , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Plaquetas/efectos de los fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Activación Plaquetaria , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/uso terapéutico , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Difosfato/metabolismo , Adenosina Difosfato/farmacología , Anciano , Clopidogrel , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Activación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/farmacología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/farmacología , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/farmacología , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Ticlopidina/farmacología , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Am J Cardiol ; 93(4): 404-9, 2004 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14969611

RESUMEN

Information on the relative benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for improvement of cardiac-related health status in women and how it compares with men is limited. The Stent or Surgery trial compared randomly assigned CABG and stent-assisted PCI in 206 women and 782 men with multivessel disease. We examined longitudinal changes at 6 and 12 months from baseline by gender and treatment in 3 subscales of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ): physical limitation, angina frequency, and quality of life. At the time of revascularization, women were older, more severely ill, and tended to have lower SAQ scores than men. At 6 months, SAQ scores after both procedures improved significantly in both genders, with greater improvement achieved with CABG. After adjustment for other factors, in men, CABG was associated with a 54.7% greater improvement in physical limitation compared with PCI, 31.3% greater improvement in angina frequency, and 18.3% greater improvement in quality of life. In women, these relative differences were 11.6%, 43.2%, and 39.3%, respectively. At 1 year, men continued to show greater improvement with CABG in all 3 dimensions (50.6%, 19.7%, and 15.3%, respectively), but in women the relative differences decreased substantially (1.6%, 11.1%, and 0.6%, respectively) due to a greater later improvement after PCI (p = 0.049 for the interaction among treatment, gender, and follow-up for the quality of life domain). Although CABG may be superior to PCI in men, in women, at 1 year after intervention, both procedures appear equally effective.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método de Montecarlo , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Trials ; 11: 5, 2010 Jan 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20074348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndromes, including myocardial infarction and unstable angina, are important causes of premature mortality, morbidity and hospital admissions. Acute coronary syndromes consume large amounts of health care resources, and have a major negative economic and social impact through days lost at work, support for disability, and coping with the psychological consequences of illness. Several registries have shown that evidence based treatments are under-utilised in this patient population, particularly in high-risk patients. There is evidence that systematic educational programmes can lead to improvement in the management of these patients. Since application of the results of important clinical trials and expert clinical guidelines into clinical practice leads to improved patient care and outcomes, we propose to test a quality improvement programme in a general group of hospitals in Europe. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a multi-centre cluster-randomised study in 5 European countries: France, Spain, Poland, Italy and the UK. Thirty eight hospitals will be randomised to receive a quality improvement programme or no quality improvement programme. Centres will enter data for all eligible non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to their hospital for a period of approximately 10 months onto the study database and the sample size is estimated at 2,000-4,000 patients. The primary outcome is a composite of eight measures to assess aggregate potential for improvement in the management and treatment of this patient population (risk stratification, early coronary angiography, anticoagulation, beta-blockers, statins, ACE-inhibitors, clopidogrel as a loading dose and at discharge). After the quality improvement programme, each of the eight measures will be compared between the two groups, correcting for cluster effect. DISCUSSION: If we can demonstrate important improvements in the quality of patient care as a result of a quality improvement programme, this could lead to a greater acceptance that such programmes should be incorporated into routine health training for health professionals and hospital managers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00716430.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/economía , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Angiografía Coronaria , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Europa (Continente) , Estudios de Factibilidad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Proyectos de Investigación , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Chem Phys ; 120(20): 9499-508, 2004 May 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15267961

RESUMEN

Broadband ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy has been used to determine CF(2) densities in a plasma etch reactor used for industrial wafer processing, using the CF(2) A (1)B(1)<--X (1)A(1) absorption spectrum. Attempts to fit the experimental spectra using previously published Franck-Condon factors gave poor results, and values for the higher vibrational levels of the A state [(0,v(2),0), with v(2) (')>6] from the ground state were missing; hence new values were calculated. These were computed for transitions between low-lying vibrational levels of CF(2) X (1)A(1) to vibrational levels of CF(2) A (1)B(1) (v(1) ('),v(2) ('),0) up to high values of the vibrational quantum numbers using high level ab initio calculations combined with an anharmonic Franck Condon factor method. The Franck Condon factors were used to determine the absorption cross sections of CF(2) at selected wavelengths, which in turn were used to calculate number densities from the experimental spectra. Number densities of CF(2) have been determined in different regions of the plasma, including the center of the plasma and outside the plasma volume, and CF(2) rotational temperatures and vibrational energy distributions were estimated. For absorption spectra obtained outside the confined plasma volume, the CF(2) density was determined as (0.39+/-0.08)x10(13) molecule cm(-3) and the vibrational and rotational temperatures were determined as 303 and 350 K, respectively. In the center of the plasma reactor, the CF(2) density is estimated as (3.0+/-0.6)x10(13) molecules cm(-3) with T(rot) approximately 500 K. The fitted vibrational distribution in the CF(2) ground state corresponds to two Boltzmann distributions with T(vib) approximately 300 and T(vib) approximately 1000 K, indicating that CF(2) molecules are initially produced highly vibrationally excited, but are partially relaxed in the plasma by collision.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA