Early postoperative cognitive dysfunction and blood pressure during coronary artery bypass graft operation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between change in blood pressure during coronary artery bypass graft operations and early cognitive dysfunction. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Quaternary care facility. Patients Fifteen patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft operations who were at high risk for postoperative stroke. Preoperative and intraoperative mean arterial pressures (MAPs) were measured in all patients. Intervention A subset of patients underwent preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Main Outcome Measure Change in cognitive performance, using the Mini-Mental State Examination and other simple cognitive tests. RESULTS: A drop in MAP (preoperatively to intraoperatively) predicted a decrease in Mini-Mental State Examination score. When change in MAP was dichotomized (after excluding an outlier), subjects with a small decrease improved on the Mini-Mental State Examination by 1 point, whereas those with a large drop in MAP worsened by 1.4 points (P = .04). CONCLUSION: A drop in MAP from a preoperative baseline may put patients at risk for early cognitive dysfunction after a coronary artery bypass graft operation.

Stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery: an update.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As a result of advances in surgical, anesthetic, and medical management, cardiac surgery can now be performed on older, sicker patients, some of whom have had prior cardiac interventions. As surgical mortality has declined in recent years, attention has focused on the complications of stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Patients with preexisting cerebrovascular disease are at increased risk for these untoward neurological outcomes, which are associated with longer lengths of hospital stay, higher costs, and greater mortality. The mechanisms underlying these neurological events may include microemboli and hypoperfusion during surgery, and postoperative atrial fibrillation. Predictive models, based on information available before surgery, allow identification of these "high risk" patients. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing the degree of functionally significant vascular disease of the brain before surgery should be an essential part of the preoperative evaluation, particularly when modifications in surgical technique or novel neuroprotective agents are being evaluated.

Watershed strokes after cardiac surgery: diagnosis, etiology, and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Watershed strokes are more prevalent after cardiac surgery than in other stroke populations, but their mechanism in this setting is not understood. We investigated the role of intraoperative blood pressure in the development of watershed strokes and used MRI to evaluate diagnosis and outcomes associated with this stroke subtype. METHODS: From 1998 to 2003 we studied 98 patients with clinical stroke after cardiac surgery who underwent MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging. We used logistic regression to explore the relationship between mean arterial pressure and watershed infarcts, between watershed infarcts and outcome, and chi(2) analyses to compare detection by MRI versus CT of watershed infarcts. RESULTS: Bilateral watershed infarcts were present on 48% of MRIs and 22% of CTs (P<0.0001). Perioperative stroke patients with bilateral watershed infarcts, compared with those with other infarct patterns, were 17.3 times more likely to die, 12.5 and 6.2 times more likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility and to acute rehabilitation, respectively, than to be discharged home (P=0.0004). Patients with a decrease in mean arterial pressure of at least 10 mm Hg (intraoperative compared with preoperative) were 4.1 times more likely to have bilateral watershed infarcts than other infarct patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral watershed infarcts after cardiac surgery are most reliably detected by diffusion-weighted imaging MRI and are associated with poor short-term outcome, compared with other infarct types. The mechanism may include an intraoperative drop in blood pressure from a patient's baseline. These findings have implications for future clinical practice and research.

Cognitive and neurobehavioral dysfunction after cardiac bypass procedures.

From a cognitive standpoint, CABG as currently practiced appears to be safe for the great majority of patients, but transient changes involving memory, executive functions, and motor speed may still occur in a subset of patients during the first few days to weeks after CABG. The etiology most likely is multifactorial and includes a synergistic effect of microemboli, hypo-perfusion, and other variables associated with major surgery. Older age and degree of pre-existing cerebrovascular disease have been identified as important risk factors. The short-term cognitive changes appear to be reversible by 3 months after surgery for most patients. Late cognitive decline after CABG,occurring between 1 and 5 years after the surgery, has been well documented,but controlled studies demonstrating that this decline is specifically attributable to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass itself rather than to progression of underlying cerebrovascular disease or other age-related changes are pending.

Encephalopathy and stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting: incidence, consequences, and prediction.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to perioperative stroke, much less attention has been paid to those with evidence of diffuse brain encephalopathy, presenting as delirium, confusion, coma, and seizures in the immediate postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, consequences, and predictive factors for encephalopathy and stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: In a prospective evaluation of 2711 patients operated on between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2000, preoperative risk factors were obtained before surgery and postoperative outcomes, encephalopathy and stroke, were determined on a daily basis. All strokes were confirmed by neurologic consultation and, in most instances, by imaging. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for these outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of encephalopathy was 6.9% and of stroke, 2.7%. For patients without either of these outcomes, the average length of stay in the hospital was 6.6 days and the mortality was 1.4%. In contrast, patients with encephalopathy had a length of stay of 15.2 days and a mortality of 7.5%, and those with stroke, a length of stay of 17.5 days and a mortality of 22.0%. Predictive models were developed for encephalopathy involving 5 preoperative factors (age, past stroke, carotid bruit, hypertension, and diabetes) and 1 perioperative factor (time on cardiopulmonary bypass). The model for stroke involved only 3 preoperative risk factors (past stroke, hypertension, and diabetes). CONCLUSIONS: Encephalopathy or stroke is associated with significant increases in length of stay and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients at higher risk for these outcomes can be identified before surgery.

Impact of single clamp versus double clamp technique on neurologic outcome.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic disease of the aorta has been identified as a risk factor for neurologic complications following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) due to the use of aortic clamping and manipulation. We reviewed a change from double clamp to single clamp technique to determine its impact on neurologic outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated CABG by a single surgeon were identified as having double clamp technique (DCT) (aortic cross clamp + sidebiting clamp) or single clamp technique (SCT) (aortic cross clamp only). Data were collected by study personnel and clinicians to determine stroke and neurologic injury (confusion, delirium, seizure, altered mental status, and agitation) outcomes for 461 patients. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two patients had DCT and 189 patients had SCT performed. There were no differences in mean age, previous stroke, hypertension, or diabetes. Intraoperatively, patients with SCT had shorter bypass times (115 minutes vs 128 minutes, p = 0.001), longer aortic cross clamp time (89 minutes vs 80 minutes, p = 0.001), fewer coronary grafts (2.8 vs 3.1, p = 0.001), and had higher mean arterial blood pressure on cardiopulmonary bypass (76 mm Hg vs 69 mm Hg, p = 0.001). Postoperatively, the SCT group had fewer strokes (1.1% vs 2.9%, NS), and neurologic injuries (3.2% vs 9.6%, p = 0.008). By multivariate analysis, the factors that were related to neurologic injury were DCT (p = 0.04), age (p = 0.001), and number of coronary grafts (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This experience suggests that the use of the SCT may be important in reducing neurologic injury following CABG.

Cognitive changes with coronary artery disease: a prospective study of coronary artery bypass graft patients and nonsurgical controls.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is well recognized, but previous investigations have been limited by lack of an appropriate control group. We compared changes in cognitive performance at 3 and 12 months after CABG with those in a control group of patients with comparable risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) who had not undergone surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing CABG (n = 140) and demographically similar nonsurgical control subjects with CAD (n = 92) completed baseline neuropsychological assessment and were followed prospectively at 3 and 12 months. Cognitive function was evaluated with a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing the cognitive domains of attention, language, verbal and visual memory, visuoconstruction, executive function, and psychomotor and motor speed. RESULTS: The CABG patients who were tested in their hospital rooms before surgery had lower scores for timed tests; however, after adjustment for demographic variables and testing location there were no statistically significant differences between the CABG and nonsurgical control subjects in baseline neuropsychological test performance. Both groups improved from baseline to 3 months; the only statistically significant group difference was a greater improvement in the CABG group with regard to verbal memory. At 12 months there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective longitudinal neuropsychological performance of patients with CABG did not differ from that of comparable nonsurgical control subjects with CAD at 3 months or 1 year after base line examination. This suggests that the previously reported cognitive decline during the early postoperative period after CABG is transient and reversible. Continued follow-up will determine whether a specific "late decline" occurs in CABG patients but not in nonsurgical control subjects with similar risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Quantitative methods for tracking cognitive change 3 years after coronary artery bypass surgery.

The analysis and interpretation of change in cognitive function test scores after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) present considerable statistical challenges. Application of hierarchical linear statistical models can estimate the effects of a surgical intervention on the time course of multiple biomarkers. We use an "analyze then summarize" approach whereby we estimate the intervention effects separately for each cognitive test and then pool them, taking appropriate account of their statistical correlations. The model accounts for dropouts at follow-up, the chance of which may be related to past cognitive score, by implicitly imputing the missing data from individuals' past scores and group patterns. We apply this approach to a study of the effects of CABG on the time course of cognitive function as measured by 16 separate neuropsychological test scores, clustered into 8 cognitive domains. The study includes measurements on 140 CABG patients and 92 nonsurgical controls at baseline, and at 3, 12, and 36 months. Our "analyze then summarize" method allows us to identify differences between the treatment groups in individual tests as well as in aggregate measures. It takes into account the correlation structure of the data and thereby produces more precise results than summarizing before analyzing. The methods used have application to a wide range of intervention studies in which multiple biomarkers are followed over time to quantify health effects. Software to implement the methods in the R statistical package is available from the authors at http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/sbarry/software/ATSrcode.pdf.

Cognitive outcomes three years after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery and nonsurgical controls.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated with both early and late postoperative cognitive decline, but interpretation of previous studies has been limited by lack of appropriate control groups. We compared changes in cognitive performance from baseline to 3 years in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with those of a control group of patients with known risk factors for coronary artery disease but without surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 140) and a demographically similar nonsurgical control group with coronary artery disease (n = 92) completed baseline neuropsychological assessment and were followed up prospectively at 3, 12, and 36 months. Cognitive performance was assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests, measuring the cognitive domains of attention, language, verbal and visual memory, visuospatial, executive function, and psychomotor and motor speed. The statistical analyses were performed in two ways: using data from all tested individuals, and using a model imputing missing observations for individuals lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Both the coronary artery bypass grafting and nonsurgical control groups improved from baseline to 1 year, with additional improvement between 1 and 3 years for some cognitive tests. The coronary artery bypass grafting group had statistically significantly greater improvement than the nonsurgical controls for some subtests, and had a comparable longitudinal course for the remainder of the subtests. Both study groups had a trend toward nonsignificant decline at 3 years on some measures, but the overall differences between groups over time were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective longitudinal neuropsychological performance of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting did not differ from that of a comparable nonsurgical control group of patients with coronary artery disease at 1 or 3 years after baseline examination. This finding suggests that previously reported late cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting may not be specific to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, but may also occur in patients with similar risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Determining the utility of temporary pacing wires after coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires are used routinely after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and can cause rare, catastrophic complications. This study's purpose was to identify patient characteristics predicting the need for pacing after CABG surgery with the potential to limit their utilization. METHODS: This prospective observational study involved 290 consecutive patients undergoing CABG at our institution from August 2000 to January 2001. Sixty-eight patients were excluded for the following reasons: off-pump CABG, preoperative pacemaker, no pacing wire placement, or incomplete follow-up. Among the remaining 222 patients, the incidence of pacing during the postoperative period was recorded. Univariate and independent multivariate predictors for postoperative pacing were determined using medical records, the Johns Hopkins Hospital cardiac surgery database and the Society of Thoracic Surgery database. RESULTS: In the postoperative period, 19 of 222 patients (8.6%) required pacing. Univariate analysis identified age, cardiomegaly, preoperative antiarrhythmic therapy, diabetes mellitus, preoperative arrhythmia, inotropic agents leaving the operating room, and pacing initialized at the separation from cardiopulmonary bypass as predictors of the need for postoperative pacing. Only diabetes mellitus, preoperative arrhythmia, and pacing utilized to separate from bypass were found to be significant on multivariate analysis. Using this model, if we exclude the patients with any of these three risk factors, only 2.6% of them would have required pacing. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients require temporary epicardial pacing after routine CABG. This study identified specific predictors for postoperative pacing requirements and provides criteria for the selective use of epicardial pacing wires after CABG.

Encephalopathy and Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Both stroke and encephalopathy are associated with significantly longer lengths of stay in the hospital and with significantly higher rates of mortality. Those at risk for either stroke or encephalopathy, or both of these adverse outcomes after surgery, can be identified prior to surgery using information available to physicians. For those at higher risk for these outcomes, we suggest the following: 1) An imaging study of the brain, performed prior to surgery, may indicate the degree of cerebrovascular disease. At present we do not have this information on most patients. 2) The status of arteriosclerotic disease of the aorta should be determined prior to surgery or at the time of surgery. 3) For those with significant aortic and cerebrovascular disease, alternatives to the conventional ways of performing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) should be considered. These alternatives include percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, off-pump surgery, and CABG using filters or inputs from the pump that selectively protect the brain.

Self-reported memory symptoms with coronary artery disease: a prospective study of CABG patients and nonsurgical controls.

OBJECTIVE: Subjective memory complaints are common after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but previous studies have concluded that such symptoms are more closely associated with depressed mood than objective cognitive dysfunction. We compared the incidence of self-reported memory symptoms at 3 and 12 months after CABG with that of a control group of patients with comparable risk factors for coronary artery disease but without surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing CABG (n = 140) and a demographically similar nonsurgical control group with coronary artery disease (n = 92) were followed prospectively at 3 and 12 months. At each follow-up time, participants were asked about changes since the previous evaluation in areas of memory, calculations, reading, and personality. A Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ) and self-report measure of symptoms of depression (CES-D) were also completed. RESULTS: The frequency of self-reported changes in memory, personality, and reading at 3 months was significantly higher among CABG patients than among nonsurgical controls. By contrast, there were no differences in the frequency of self-reported symptoms relating to calculations or overall rating of functional status. After adjustment for a measure of depression (CES-D rating score), the risk for self-reported memory changes remained nearly 5 times higher among the CABG patients than among control subjects. The relative risk of developing new self-reported memory symptoms between 3 and 12 months was 2.5 times higher among CABG patients than among nonsurgical controls (CI 1.24-5.02), and the overall prevalence of memory symptoms at 12 months was also higher among CABG patients (39%) than controls (14%). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of self-reported memory symptoms 3 and 12 months after baseline is significantly higher among CABG patients than control patients with comparable risk factors for coronary and cerebrovascular disease. These differences could not be accounted for by symptoms of depression. The self-reported cognitive symptoms appear to be relatively specific for memory and may reflect aspects of memory functioning that are not captured by traditional measures of new verbal learning and memory. The etiology of these self-reported memory symptoms remains unclear, but our findings, as well as those of others, may implicate factors other than cardiopulmonary bypass itself.

Mandatory versus selective preoperative carotid screening: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis is a risk factor for perioperative stroke in coronary artery bypass (CAB) surgery. Although both selective and nonselective methods of preoperative carotid screening have been advocated, it is unclear which approach is most clinically efficacious. METHODS: Hospital records for 1421 consecutive CAB patients from January 2000 through April 2002 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed across selected parameters to identify risk factors for significant carotid stenosis (> or = 70%). Patients were retrospectively stratified into high- or low-risk groups based on risk factors common to carotid stenosis and perioperative stroke. The prevalence of carotid stenosis, surgical management, and perioperative stroke rates were determined for each group. RESULTS: One-thousand one-hundred thirty-eight patients out of 1421 patients (80.1%) underwent preoperative carotid screening. The prevalence of significant carotid stenosis was 13.4%. Univariate risk factors for stenosis included an age of more than 65 years, peripheral vascular disease, prior cerebrovascular accident, history of cerebrovascular disease, left main coronary disease, carotid bruit, female gender, and hypertension. Carotid stenosis was a risk factor for stroke, neurologic injury, in-hospital mortality, and longer hospitalization. Prevalence of carotid stenosis was greater in high-risk patients (17.8%, N = 708) versus low-risk patients (6.1%, N = 426). Concomitant or staged carotid endarterectomy (CEA)/CAB was more commonly performed in the high-risk group (5.8% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). All nine patients with significant carotid stenosis who suffered perioperative strokes were in the high-risk group (9 out of 708 vs 0 out of 426, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, selectively screening only patients with either an age of more than 65, carotid bruit, or cerebrovascular disease would have reduced the screening load by nearly 40% with negligible impact on surgical management or neurologic outcomes.