Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Future Oncol ; 18(40): 4457-4464, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36946237

RESUMEN

Despite the positive results obtained by first-line chemoimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only a few second-line options are available after disease progression. Combi-TED is a phase II international study that will assess the efficacy of Tedopi®, a cancer vaccine, combined with either docetaxel or nivolumab and compared with docetaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC after chemoimmunotherapy. The study, currently in the recruitment phase, will assess 1-year overall survival (primary end point), patient's progression-free survival and overall response rate, as well as the correlation of efficacy with several tumor or blood biomarkers. The results will hopefully provide more information on Tedopi combinational treatment compared with current standard of care in NSCLC patients who fail first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04884282 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Patients with lung cancer that has spread to other parts of the body are usually treated with a combination of chemotherapy and drugs that stimulate the immune system to kill cancer cells, which is referred to as immunotherapy. If after receiving these drugs the cancer still gets worse, patients have only a few treatment options left and are usually treated with chemotherapy only. Researchers will study if a new medicine called Tedopi®, a vaccine that specifically attacks cancer cells, used together with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, will work better then chemotherapy alone for these patients. The study will monitor how long patients will live after treatment, for how long they will live without their disease getting worse and how many patients will improve after treatment. Moreover, researchers will study if patients present specific features, such as certain molecules in their tumor cells or blood cells, that may indicate that they respond better to certain treatments.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Nivolumab , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos
2.
Future Oncol ; 14(13s): 61-72, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29989453

RESUMEN

New therapeutic options in non-small-cell lung cancer have been available through a great in-depth and genomic research, improving preclinical disease patterns and identifying the specific toxicity of target therapy. The multidisciplinary approach, increasingly practiced among clinicians, researchers, pharmaceutical companies and ethics committees has allowed the emergence of a new generation of translational clinical trials and the adoption of new technologies (e.g., point-of-care sequencing), then speeding up the development and trade of these new drugs. Consequently, there is a long list of therapeutic candidates that need to be efficiently evaluated early in the context of Phase I clinical trials. In this review, we discuss some of the key developments and novelties in the main histological groups.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Animales , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional
3.
Lung Cancer ; 140: 71-79, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31884129

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Molecular diagnostics and care of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are continuously evolving. Few data document the current strategies to manage advanced NSCLC patients beyond progression in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Be-TeaM is an Italian multi-center observational study conducted on consecutive EGFR-mutated stage IV NSCLC patients, progressed during/after a first-line EGFR-TKI. It consists of a retrospective phase, from first-line EGFR-TKI therapy start until study entry (i.e. beginning of the diagnostic process), and a prospective phase, until treatment choice or for 3 months if no therapy was prescribed. Primary objective was to describe the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches adopted after progression in a real-world setting. RESULTS: Of 308 patients enrolled in 63 centers from July 2017 to June 2018, 289 were included in the analysis. In first line, 53.3 % received gefitinib, 32.5 % afatinib and 14.2 % erlotinib. The testing rate (i.e. rate of all patients undergone any biopsy -liquid and/or tissue- for the T790 M detection) was 90.7 %, with liquid biopsy being the most frequently executed. Of 262 biopsied patients, 64.5 % underwent only 1 liquid biopsy, 10.7 % only 1 tissue biopsy and 18.3 % >1 biopsy, both liquid and solid in 85.4 %. The T790M positivity rate was 45.3 %; of 166 patients undergone only a liquid biopsy and tested for the mutation, 39.8 % were T790M+ and 60.2 % T790M-/undetermined. By the observation end, 87.9 % patients had a post-progression treatment chosen, osimertinib being the most frequent among the T790M+. CONCLUSION: Be-TeaM provides the first snapshot of current practices for the management of NSCLC patients beyond progression in Italy; in clinical practice, assessing the T790M status is not always feasible.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/genética , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/patología , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
4.
J Thorac Oncol ; 14(7): 1255-1265, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30851442

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In an earlier report of the ASCEND-8 study (open-label, phase I, three-arm study, treatment-naive patients and pre-treated patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC), it was shown that ceritinib 450 mg with food had comparable exposure and better gastrointestinal tolerability than 750-mg fasted. METHODS: Here, we report efficacy and updated safety data from primary efficacy analysis of the ASCEND-8 study. Key secondary endpoints were overall response rate and duration of response, assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. RESULTS: In total, 306 patients were randomized to ceritinib 450-mg fed (n = 108) or 600-mg fed (n = 87) or 750-mg fasted (n = 111), of which 304 patients were included in safety analysis and 198 treatment-naive patients (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase [ALK]-positive by immunohistochemistry) were included in the efficacy analysis (450-mg fed [n = 73], 600-mg fed [n = 51], and 750-mg fasted [n = 74]). The BIRC-assessed overall response rate was 78.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.9-86.9), 72.5% (95% CI: 58.3-84.1), and 75.7% (95% CI: 64.3-84.9), respectively; and the median duration of response (months) by BIRC was not estimable (NE) (95% CI: 11.2-NE), 20.7 (95% CI: 15.8-NE), and 15.4 (95% CI: 8.3-NE), respectively. Based on the safety analysis (n = 304), the 450-mg fed arm showed the highest median relative dose intensity (100% versus 78.5% versus 83.7%), lowest proportion of patients with dose reductions (24.1% versus 65.1% versus 60.9%), and lowest proportion of patients with gastrointestinal toxicities (75.9% versus 82.6% versus 91.8%). CONCLUSION: Ceritinib at a dose of 450 mg with food compared to 750-mg fasted showed consistent efficacy and less gastrointestinal toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico/genética , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ayuno , Alimentos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/genética , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reordenamiento Génico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Adulto Joven
5.
Transl Cancer Res ; 8(Suppl 1): S16-S22, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35117061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the field of oncological assistance, nowadays we have to deal with a complex scenario where patients got used to obtain a huge amount of information through internet or social media and to apply them in performing their health-related decisions. This landscape requires that clinicians become able to handle therapeutical approaches and adequate skills in communication tools to satisfy the current needs. Our project aimed to build a communication model based on clinical oncologists' real experiences in order to find a simple way to share with patients all the innovative therapeutical opportunities today available in lung cancer. The final goal is to design a flexible and personalized model adaptable to clinician's personal characteristics and to the specific patient he is facing. We applied both traditional educational tools and innovative techniques in order to make the results effective and applicable to support peer learning. METHODS: The first step consisted in a Board synthesized the definition of the diagnostic process, the identification of treatment strategies and any potential communication barrier clinicians may face dealing with patients. The second step consisted in teamwork including a theoretical part and a training part. In the third step we produce five training videos and video interviews regarding communication praxis and a "Small communication manual". The last step consisted in the publication of the produced material on website and its diffusion through the social media. RESULTS: In medicine, the universal application of a single model of communication does not represent the optimal solution. By contrary, the availability of simple and practical suggestions to improve the communicative style could allow clinicians to abandon stereotyped formulas identically repurposed to all patients. The "from bottom to top" training, starting from real-life to take advantage of the clinician's experience, give the clinicians the possibility to meditate about their own communicative style and to train in the context of a protected environment. Applying these rules, we design an effective communication model, based on healthcare humanization, which could represent a fundamental support for the patient in order to be gently driven by the clinician to the most appropriate therapeutical choice, balancing efficacy and quality of life. The relational training may improve the quality of clinician-patient communication and could be widespread to other clinicians through the media. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the innovative therapeutical options available, particularly for lung cancer patients, and the increasing access of health-related information through internet or social media the clinician-patient communication has become crucial to support the achievement of the most appropriate therapeutical choice for the patient, facing the intricate illness experience. Building a shareable and easy-to-apply communication model represents a challenge aimed to help clinicians and including technology not as a threat, but as a positive tool.

6.
Clin Cancer Res ; 25(24): 7312-7319, 2019 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31416808

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: MET-deregulated NSCLC represents an urgent clinical need because of unfavorable prognosis and lack of specific therapies. Although recent studies have suggested a potential role for crizotinib in patients harboring MET amplification or exon 14 mutations, no conclusive data are currently available. This study aimed at investigating activity of crizotinib in patients harboring MET or ROS1 alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC and evidence of ROS1 rearrangements (cohort A) or MET deregulation (amplification, ratio MET/CEP7 >2.2 or MET exon 14 mutations, cohort B) were treated with crizotinib 250 mg twice daily orally. The coprimary endpoint was objective response rate in the two cohorts. RESULTS: From December 2014 to March 2017, 505 patients were screened and a total of 52 patients (26 patients per cohort) were enrolled onto the study. At data cutoff of September 2017, in cohort A, objective response rate was 65%, and median progression-free survival and overall survival were 22.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.2-30.3] and not reached, respectively. In cohort B, objective response rate was 27%, median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.0-5.8), and overall survival was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.5). No difference in any clinical endpoint was observed between MET-amplified and exon 14-mutated patients. No response was observed among the 5 patients with cooccurrence of a second gene alteration. No unexpected toxicity was observed in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib induces response in a fraction of MET-deregulated NSCLC. Additional studies and innovative therapies are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Crizotinib/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Reordenamiento Génico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-met/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-met/antagonistas & inhibidores , Terapia Recuperativa , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
J Thorac Oncol ; 12(9): 1357-1367, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28729021

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ceritinib, 750 mg fasted, is approved for treatment of patients with ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK)-rearranged (ALK-positive) NSCLC previously treated with crizotinib. Part 1 of the ASCEND-8 study determined whether administering ceritinib, 450 mg or 600 mg, with a low-fat meal may enhance gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability versus 750 mg fasted in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC while maintaining similar exposure. METHODS: ASCEND-8 is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 1 study. Part 1 investigated the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of ceritinib, 450 mg or 600 mg, taken with a low-fat meal versus 750 mg fasted in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who were either treatment naive or pretreated with chemotherapy and/or crizotinib. Part 2 will assess efficacy and safety of ceritinib in treatment-naive patients. RESULTS: As of June 16, 2016, 137 patients were randomized (450 mg fed [n = 44], 600 mg fed [n = 47], and 750 mg fasted [n = 46]); 135 patients received ceritinib. Median follow-up duration was 4.14 months. At steady state, relative to 750 mg fasted, 450 mg with food demonstrated comparable PK as assessed by maximum (peak) concentration of drug in plasma and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours, whereas 600 mg with food demonstrated approximately 25% higher PK. Relative to 750 mg fasted, 450 mg with food was associated with a lower proportion of patients with GI toxicities, mostly grade 1 (diarrhea [43.2%], nausea [29.5%], and vomiting [18.2%]); there were no grade 3 or 4 events, study drug discontinuations, or serious AEs due to GI toxicities. CONCLUSION: Ceritinib, 450 mg with food, had similar exposure and a more favorable GI safety profile than ceritinib, 750 mg in fasted patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/efectos de los fármacos , Sulfonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Ayuno , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Sulfonas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonas/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA