Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Proteins ; 88(8): 1050-1054, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994784

RESUMEN

We report docking performance on the six targets of Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI) rounds 39-45 that involved heteromeric protein-protein interactions and had the solved structures released since the rounds were held. Our general strategy involved protein-protein docking using ZDOCK, reranking using IRAD, and structural refinement using Rosetta. In addition, we made extensive use of experimental data to guide our docking runs. All the experimental information at the amino-acid level proved correct. However, for two targets, we also used protein-complex structures as templates for modeling interfaces. These resulted in incorrect predictions, presumably due to the low sequence identity between the targets and templates. Albeit a small number of targets, the performance described here compared somewhat less favorably with our previous CAPRI reports, which may be due to the CAPRI targets being increasingly challenging.


Asunto(s)
Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Péptidos/química , Proteínas/química , Programas Informáticos , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Sitios de Unión , Humanos , Ligandos , Péptidos/metabolismo , Unión Proteica , Conformación Proteica en Hélice alfa , Conformación Proteica en Lámina beta , Dominios y Motivos de Interacción de Proteínas , Mapeo de Interacción de Proteínas , Multimerización de Proteína , Proteínas/metabolismo , Proyectos de Investigación , Homología Estructural de Proteína
2.
Proteins ; 85(3): 408-416, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27718275

RESUMEN

We report the performance of our protein-protein docking pipeline, including the ZDOCK rigid-body docking algorithm, on 19 targets in CAPRI rounds 28-34. Following the docking step, we reranked the ZDOCK predictions using the IRAD scoring function, pruned redundant predictions, performed energy landscape analysis, and utilized our interface prediction approach RCF. In addition, we applied constraints to the search space based on biological information that we culled from the literature, which increased the chance of making a correct prediction. For all but two targets we were able to find and apply biological information and we found the information to be highly accurate, indicating that effective incorporation of biological information is an important component for protein-protein docking. Proteins 2017; 85:408-416. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Biología Computacional/métodos , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular/métodos , Proteínas/química , Benchmarking , Sitios de Unión , Análisis por Conglomerados , Bases de Datos de Proteínas , Unión Proteica , Conformación Proteica , Mapeo de Interacción de Proteínas , Proyectos de Investigación , Programas Informáticos , Homología Estructural de Proteína , Termodinámica
3.
Proteins ; 84 Suppl 1: 323-48, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27122118

RESUMEN

We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein-protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact-sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology-built subunit models and the smaller pair-wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):323-348. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Biología Computacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Estadísticos , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Simulación de Dinámica Molecular , Proteínas/química , Programas Informáticos , Algoritmos , Secuencias de Aminoácidos , Bacterias/química , Sitios de Unión , Biología Computacional/métodos , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Internet , Unión Proteica , Conformación Proteica en Hélice alfa , Conformación Proteica en Lámina beta , Pliegue de Proteína , Dominios y Motivos de Interacción de Proteínas , Multimerización de Proteína , Estructura Terciaria de Proteína , Homología de Secuencia de Aminoácido , Termodinámica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA