Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adv Ther ; 41(6): 2253-2266, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619720

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Objective assessment of treatment effectiveness using real-world claims data is challenging. This study assessed treatment-free intervals (TFI) as a proxy for treatment effectiveness, and all-cause healthcare costs among adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) treated with rifaximin or eluxadoline in the USA. METHODS: Adult patients (18-64 years) with IBS-D and ≥ 1 rifaximin or eluxadoline prescription were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (10/01/2015-12/31/2021) and classified into two mutually exclusive cohorts (i.e., rifaximin and eluxadoline). Index date was the date of rifaximin or eluxadoline initiation. Entropy-balanced baseline characteristics, TFI (periods of ≥ 30 consecutive days without IBS-D treatment), and healthcare costs were reported. Healthcare costs were compared between cohorts using mean cost differences. RESULTS: There were 7094 and 2161 patients in the rifaximin and eluxadoline cohorts, respectively. After balancing, baseline characteristics (mean age 44.1 years; female 72.4%) were similar between cohorts. A higher proportion of patients treated with rifaximin achieved a TFI of ≥ 30 days (76.2% vs. 66.7%), ≥ 60 days (67.0% vs. 47.0%), ≥ 90 days (61.0% vs. 38.7%), ≥ 180 days (51.7% vs. 31.0%), and ≥ 240 days (47.7% vs. 27.9%) compared to eluxadoline. Among patients with a TFI ≥ 30 days, mean TFI durations were 8.3 and 6.0 months for the rifaximin and eluxadoline cohorts. Mean all-cause healthcare costs were lower for rifaximin vs. eluxadoline ($18,316 vs. $23,437; p = 0.008), primarily driven by pharmacy costs ($7348 vs. $10,250; p < 0.001). In a simulated health plan of one million commercially insured lives, initiating 50% of patients on rifaximin instead of eluxadoline resulted in total cost savings of $2.1 million per year or $0.18 per-member-per-month. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study suggests that TFI is a meaningful surrogate measure of treatment effectiveness in IBS-D. Patients treated with rifaximin had longer treatment-free periods and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with eluxadoline.


Asunto(s)
Diarrea , Fármacos Gastrointestinales , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Síndrome del Colon Irritable , Rifaximina , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/economía , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Rifaximina/uso terapéutico , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarrea/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/economía , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fenilalanina/uso terapéutico , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Fenilalanina/economía , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imidazoles
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA