RESUMEN
Importance: Although the effectiveness of intracameral antibiotics to prevent postoperative endophthalmitis is described, selective use of antibiotics combined with 1% povidone iodine disinfection might be equally effective and could lead to cost reduction and avoidance of unnecessary use of antibiotics. Objective: To compare the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis when 1% povidone iodine disinfection is applied in combination with selective intracameral antibiotics with the incidence after routine use of intracameral antibiotics in combination with 5% povidone iodine. Design, Setting, and Participant: This was a retrospective cohort study using incidence data from the ongoing endophthalmitis register of the Rotterdam Eye Hospital, a specialized hospital providing both secondary and tertiary ophthalmological care, when intracameral antibiotics were used only during cataract procedures with occurrence of a posterior capsular tear in comparison with results from cohorts described in the literature where routine antibiotics were used. All patients who had cataract (phacoemulsification) surgery at the Rotterdam Eye Hospital between 1993 and 2022 were included. No cataract surgical procedures combined with other intraocular procedures were included. Exposure: Povidone iodine disinfection and intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery either routinely or only in case of posterior capsular tears. Main Outcome and Measure: Postoperative endophthalmitis incidence. Results: Postoperative endophthalmitis incidence after 56â¯598 cataract (phacoemulsification) surgical procedures in the Rotterdam Eye Hospital between 2016 and 2022 was 0.000 (95% CI, 0.000-0.000). A PubMed literature search until September 2023 with respect to the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after routine antibiotic prophylaxis yielded 37 publications with an overall postoperative endophthalmitis incidence of 0.000 (95% CI, 0.000-0.000). Conclusions and Relevance: No difference was observed between the postoperative endophthalmitis incidence during the last 7 years in the Rotterdam Eye Hospital and the overall postoperative endophthalmitis incidence after routine intracameral antibiotics prophylaxis as described in the literature. Disinfection with 1% povidone iodine in combination with selective antibiotic prophylaxis may be equally effective as routine antibiotic use and 5% povidone iodine.
Asunto(s)
Cámara Anterior , Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Endoftalmitis , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo , Povidona Yodada , Humanos , Endoftalmitis/prevención & control , Endoftalmitis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Masculino , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/prevención & control , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Femenino , Cámara Anterior/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Facoemulsificación/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes after repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for technical failure (TF) and secondary graft failure (SGF). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 49 eyes that underwent repeat DMEK either for TF (ie, persistent graft detachment, n = 24) or for SGF (ie, late endothelial graft failure, n = 25). Surgery indications for primary DMEK were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD, 80%) and bullous keratopathy (BK, 20%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal backscattering, pachymetry, and graft survival. Outcomes were compared with an age-matched control group of 49 primary DMEK eyes. RESULTS: Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA improved from 0.92 ± 0.6 before to 0.20 ± 0.3 at 1 year after repeat DMEK with better outcomes for eyes with TF than those with SGF (P = 0.046). Donor ECD decreased from 2618 ± 171 cells/mm2 before to 1247 ± 422 cells/mm2 at 1 year postoperatively, with no difference between technical TF and SGF eyes (P > 0.05). One-year BCVA and ECD outcomes were better in the control group than in the repeat DMEK group (P < 0.05). Five-year graft survival probability after repeat DMEK was better for TF than for SGF eyes (100% vs. 75%, P = 0.010) and better for eyes with FECD than BK as primary indication for surgery (92% vs. 65%, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat DMEK gives acceptable clinical outcomes especially when performed for TF in the early period after primary DMEK. Long-term graft survival probability after repeat DMEK is comparable to primary DMEK for FECD eyes, whereas BK eyes may show an elevated risk to develop graft failure again.