Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir Plus Daclatasvir for Treatment of HCV-Associated Cryoglobulinemia Vasculitis.

Circulating mixed cryoglobulins are detected in 40%-60% of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and overt cryoglobulinemia vasculitis (CryoVas) develops in approximately 15% of patients. Remission of vasculitis has been associated with viral clearance, but few studies have reported the effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral drugs in these patients. We performed an open-label, prospective, multicenter study of the effectiveness and tolerance of an all-oral, interferon- and ribavirin-free regimen of sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir in patients with HCV-associated CryoVas. Forty-one consecutive patients with active HCV-associated CryoVas (median age, 56 y; 53.6% women) were recruited from hospitals in Paris, France, from 2014 through 2016. They received sofosbuvir (400 mg/day) plus daclatasvir (60 mg/day) for 12 weeks (n = 32) or 24 weeks (n = 9), and were evaluated every 4 weeks until week 24 and at week 36. Blood samples were analyzed for complete blood count, serum chemistry profile, level of alanine aminotransferase, rheumatoid factor activity, C4 fraction of complement, and cryoglobulin; peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated for flow cytometry analysis. Thirty-seven patients (90.2%) had a complete clinical response (defined by improvement of all the affected organs involved at baseline and no clinical relapse) after a median time of 12 weeks of therapy; all had a sustained virologic response (no detectable serum HCV RNA 12 weeks after the end of antiviral therapy). Patients' mean cryoglobulin level decreased from 0.56 ± 0.18 at baseline to 0.21 ± 0.14 g/L at week 36, and no cryoglobulin was detected in 50% of patients at this time point. After antiviral therapy, patients had increased numbers of T-regulatory cells, IgM+CD21-/low-memory B cells, CD4+CXCR5+ interleukin 21+ cells, and T-helper 17 cells, compared with before therapy. After a median follow-up period of 26 months (interquartile range, 20-30 mo), no patients had a serious adverse event or relapse of vasculitis.

Ustekinumab for Behçet's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in the treatment of oral ulcers (OU) in patients with Behçet's disease (BD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study including 14 patients [median age of 39 (34; 41) years, with 71% of men] fulfilling criteria of the International Study Group for BD and with active OU resistant to colchicine. Patients received ustekinumab 90 mg (n = 11) or 45 mg (n = 3) subcutaneously at inclusion, at week 4, and every 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete response (CR), defined as no oral ulcer, at week 12. RESULTS: At week 12, 64% were in CR, 21% in partial response and 14% non-responders. The median number of OU decreased from 2 [2; 4] to 1 [0; 1.25] (p = 0.0005) at week 12. Mean change from baseline to week 12 of Behçet's syndrome activity score (BSAS) was 22.8 ± 0.3 (p = 0.01). The median daily corticosteroids dose decreased from 12.5 (10; 16.3) to 5 [5; 10] mg/day (p = 0.02). Three patients reported headaches, leading to discontinuation of ustekinumab in one case. After a median follow-up of 7 [3; 12] months, 10 (71%) patients were still receiving ustekinumab and four (28%) experienced a relapse. Decreased levels of circulating IL-17 and IL-12 [median [IQR]; 3.9 [1.6; 10.6] vs. 29.2 [25.2; 42.7] pg/ml, and 29.4 [23.1; 33.3] vs. 56.1 [51.1; 64.4] pg/ml, p = 0.008 for both] were observed under ustekinumab, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab seems to be efficient and safe for patient with BD and refractory OU although relapses are frequent.

Characteristics and Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have emerged about the higher risk of fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in cancer patients. In this article, we review the experience of a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A prospective registry was set up at Institut Curie at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. All cancer patients with suspected or proven COVID-19 were entered and actively followed for 28 days. RESULTS: Among 9842 patients treated at Institut Curie between March 13 and May 1, 2020, 141 (1.4%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, based on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing and/or computerized tomography scan. In line with our case mix, breast cancer (40.4%) was the most common tumor type, followed by hematological and lung malignancies. Patients with active cancer therapy or/and advanced cancer accounted for 87.9% and 68.9% of patients, respectively. At diagnosis, 78.7% of patients had COVID-19-related symptoms, with an extent of lung parenchyma involvement inferior to 50% in 95.8% of patients. Blood count variations and C-reactive protein elevation were the most common laboratory abnormalities. Antibiotics and antiviral agents were administered in 48.2% and 6.4% of patients, respectively. At the time of analysis, 26 patients (18.4%) have died from COVID-19, and 100 (70.9%) were cured. Independent prognostic factors at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis associated with death or intensive care unit admission were extent of COVID-19 pneumonia and decreased O2 saturation. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 incidence and presentation in cancer patients appear to be very similar to those in the general population. The outcome of COVID-19 is primarily driven by the initial severity of infection rather than patient or cancer characteristics.