Is a combined programme of manual therapy and exercise more effective than usual care in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain? A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a combined intervention of manual therapy and exercise (MET) versus usual care (UC), on disability, pain intensity and global perceived recovery, in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (CNP). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient care units. SUBJECTS: Sixty-four non-specific CNP patients were randomly allocated to MET (n = 32) or UC (n = 32) groups. INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the MET group received 12 sessions of mobilization and exercise, whereas the UC group received 15 sessions of usual care in physiotherapy. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was disability (Neck Disability Index). The secondary outcomes were pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) and global perceived recovery (Patient Global Impression Change). Patients were assessed at baseline, three weeks, six weeks (end of treatment) and at a three-month follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants completed the study. No significant between-group difference was observed on disability and pain intensity at baseline. A significant between-group difference was observed on disability at three-week, six-week and three-month follow-up (median (P25-P75): 6 (3.25-9.81) vs. 15.5 (11.28-20.75); P < 0.001), favouring the MET group. Regarding pain intensity, a significant between-group difference was observed at six-week and three-month follow-up (median (P25-P75): 2 (1-2.51) vs. 5 (3.33-6); P < 0.001), with superiority of effect in MET group. Concerning the global perceived recovery, a significant between-group difference was observed only at the three-month follow-up (P = 0.001), favouring the MET group. CONCLUSION: This study's findings suggest that a combination of manual therapy and exercise is more effective than usual care on disability, pain intensity and global perceived recovery.

[Assessment of Time Allocated to Pedestrian Crossing: A Contribution for a More Inclusive Lisbon]. / Avaliação do Tempo Atribuído à Travessia de Peões: Contributo para uma Lisboa Mais Inclusiva.

INTRODUCTION: With progressive ageing of the Portuguese population, it is paramount that the conditions of outdoor accessibility and safety are adapted to this age group. The aim of this study was to assess whether the time allocated to pedestrian crossing in the crosswalks with pedestrian crossing lights between Curry Cabral Hospital and local public transport is enough to allow safe passage of the elderly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 100 ambulatory care patients from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation department. All of them answered a questionnaire, the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (Portuguese version) and performed a 10-meter walk test. All crosswalks with pedestrian crossing lights between the hospital and local public transport were analyzed, in a total of 26, and the gait speed required to perform a safe crossing was calculated. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 75 years and the majority (73%) were female. The study showed that all patients could safely cross 17 (65%) crosswalks. The nine remaining crosswalks (35%) represented an obstacle to our sample. DISCUSSION: If the required gait speed as currently set in legislation for the disabled was implemented, 99% of the patients would have been able to cross the crosswalks safely. CONCLUSION: It is essential to apply the gait speed set in legislation, since non-compliance endangers elderly patients in Curry Cabral Hospital, increasing the likelihood of accidents and the feeling of insecurity on the streets.

Introdução: Com o envelhecimento progressivo da população portuguesa, é fundamental que as condições de acessibilidade e segurança na via pública estejam adaptadas a este grupo etário. O objectivo deste estudo foi avaliar se o tempo atribuído à travessia de peões nas passadeiras semaforizadas entre o Hospital de Curry Cabral e os transportes públicos locais é suficiente para permitir a travessia dos idosos em segurança.Material e Métodos: Foram avaliados 100 doentes seguidos em consulta externa no Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação. Todos responderam a um questionário, à escala de confiança no equilíbrio específica da atividade e executaram o teste de marcha de 10 metros. Foram analisadas todas as passadeiras semaforizadas dos percursos de marcha entre o hospital e os transportes públicos locais, num total de 26 e calculada a velocidade de marcha necessária para realizar a travessia das passadeiras em segurança.Resultados: A média de idade dos doentes foi de 75 anos, sendo a maioria do género feminino (73%). Concluímos que todos os doentes conseguem atravessar em segurança 17 (65%) passadeiras, representando as restantes nove (35%) um obstáculo para a nossa amostra.Discussão: Se o valor de velocidade de marcha nas passadeiras estipulado na legislação para os cidadãos com mobilidade condicionada fosse devidamente aplicado, 99% da amostra teria conseguido atravessar as passadeiras em segurança.Conclusão: É fundamental que o valor de velocidade de marcha nas passadeiras estipulado na legislação seja aplicado, pois o seu incumprimento coloca em risco os utentes idosos do Hospital de Curry Cabral, aumentando a probabilidade de acidentes e o sentimento de insegurança na via pública.