Telemedicine impact on post-stroke outpatient follow-up in an academic healthcare network during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The expansion of telemedicine associated with the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced outpatient medical care. The objective of our study was to determine the impact of telemedicine on post-acute stroke clinic follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the impact of telemedicine in Emory Healthcare, an academic healthcare system of comprehensive and primary stroke centers in Atlanta, Georgia, on post-hospital stroke clinic follow-up. We compared the frequency of 90-day follow-up in a centralized subspecialty stroke clinic among patients hospitalized before the local COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2019- February 28, 2020), during (March 1- April 30, 2020) and after telemedicine implementation (May 1- December 31, 2020). A comparison was made across hospitals less than 1 mile, 10 miles, and 25 miles from the stroke clinic. RESULTS: Of 1096 ischemic stroke patients discharged home or to a rehab facility during the study period, 342 (31%) had follow-up in the Emory Stroke Clinic (comprehensive stroke center 46%, primary stroke center 10 miles away 18%, primary stroke center 25 miles away 14%). Overall, 90-day follow-up increased from 19% to 41% after telemedicine implementation (p<0.001) with telemedicine appointments amounting for up to 28% of all follow-up visits. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with teleneurology follow-up (vs no follow-up) included discharge from the comprehensive stroke center, thrombectomy treatment, private insurance, private transport to the hospital, NIHSS 0-5 and history of dyslipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Despite telemedicine implementation at an academic healthcare network successfully increasing post-stroke discharge follow-up in a centralized subspecialty stroke clinic, the majority of patients did not complete 90-day follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale Implementation of an Urban County Severity-Based Stroke Triage Protocol: Impact and Outcomes on a Comprehensive Stroke Center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Screening scales are recommended to assist field-based triage of acute stroke patients to designated stroke centers. Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale (CPSS) is a commonly used prehospital stroke screening tool and has been validated to identify large vessel occlusion (LVO). This study addresses the impact of county-based CPSS implementation to triage suspected LVO patients to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dekalb County in Atlanta, Georgia, implemented CPSS-based protocol with score of 3 and last seen normal time < 24 h mandating transfer to the nearest CSC if the added bypass time was <15 min. Frequency of stroke codes, LVO, IV-tPA use, and thrombectomy treatment were compared six months before and after protocol change (November 1, 2020). RESULTS: During the study period, 907 stroke patients presented to the CSC by EMS, including 289 (32%) with CPSS score 3. There was an increase in monthly ischemic stroke volume (pre-16 ± 2 vs.19 ± 3 p = 0.03), LVO (pre-4.3 ± 1.7 vs. post-7.0 ± 2.4; p = 0.03), EVT (pre-15% vs. post-30%; p = 0.001), without significant increase in stroke mimic volume or delay in mean time from last seen normal to IV-tPA (pre-165 ± 66, post-158 ± 49 min; p = 0.35). CPSS score 3 was associated with increased likelihood of LVO diagnosis (OR 8.5, 95% CI 5.0-14.4; p = 0.001) and decreased the likelihood of stroke mimics (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: CPSS is a quick, easy to implement, and reliable prehospital severity scale for EMS to triage LVO to CSC without delaying IV-tPA treatment or significantly increasing stroke mimics.

Presenting Symptoms and Dysphagia Screen Predict Outcome in Mild and Rapidly Improving Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.

OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on which patients not treated with intravenous (IV) tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) due to mild and rapidly improving stroke symptoms (MaRISS) have unfavorable outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients not treated with IV tPA due to MaRISS from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 were identified as part of the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with a lower likelihood of favorable outcome, defined as discharge to home. RESULTS: There were 1614 AIS patients who did not receive IV tPA due to MaRISS (median National Institutes of Health stroke scale [NIHSS] 1], of which 305 (19%) did not have a favorable outcome. Factors associated with lower likelihood of favorable outcome included Medicare insurance status (odds ratio [OR]: .53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .34-.84), arrival by emergency medical services (OR: .46, 95% CI: .29-.73), increasing NIHSS score (per unit OR: .89, 95% CI: .84-.93), weakness as the presenting symptom (OR: .50, 95% CI: .30-.84), and a failed dysphagia screen (OR: .43, 95% CI: .23-.80). During the study period, <1% of patients presenting to participating hospitals with MaRISS within the eligible time window received IV tPA. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics, presenting symptoms, and response to dysphagia screen identify a subgroup of patients who are more likely to have an unfavorable outcome. Whether IV tPA treatment can improve the outcome in this subgroup of patients needs to be evaluated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.