RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). METHOD: The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective observational review of 40 consecutive patients, of a median age of 37 years (interquartile range [IQR] 32-40 years), presenting with a total of 52 symptomatic AWE nodules. All patients underwent cryoablation between January 2013 and May 2022 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that measured pain, as well as by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The pain-free survival rates were derived using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Adverse events were analyzed and graded using the classification system of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 40.5 months (IQR 26.5-47.2 months). The median VAS score before cryoablation was 8 (IQR 7-9). Complete relief of symptoms was documented in 80% (32/40) of patients at 3 months after initial cryoablation and correlated with the absence of residual endometriosis nodules on MRI. The median pain-free survival rates were 89.2% [95% CI, 70.1-96.4%] at 36 months and 76.8% [95% CI, 55.3-83.8%] after 60 months. No patient or lesion characteristics were found to be prognostic of failure. No major adverse events or side effects were reported in long term. CONCLUSION: Cryoablation safely and effectively afforded long-term pain relief for patients with AWE nodules. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: AWE cryoablation was found to be safe and effective in the long-term. KEY POINTS: ⢠Cryoablation is highly effective with 80% of patients experiencing complete relief of AWE symptoms after a single procedure. ⢠Cryoablation is safe without long-term adverse events or side effects. ⢠The median pain-free survival rates are 89.2% at 36 months and 76.8% at 60 months.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite various surgical and non-surgical strategies for abdominal wall endometriosis, the lack of definitive guidance on optimal treatment choice leads to clinical uncertainty. This review scrutinizes the safety and efficacy of abdominal wall endometriosis treatments to aid in decision-making. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from 1947 until December 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A comprehensive literature search identified studies that assessed both surgical and nonsurgical interventions, including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and microwave ablation (MWA). This review is registered in NIHR-PROSPERO (CRD 42023494969). Local tumor control (LTC), local pain relief (LPR) and adverse events (AE) were recorded. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: This review included 51 articles among 831 identified. All study designs were considered eligible for inclusion. A total of 2,674 patients are included: 2,219 patients (83%) undergoing surgery, and 455 (17%) undergoing percutaneous interventions (342 HIFU, 103 cryoablation, 1 RFA, 9 MWA). Follow-up length was 18 months in median, ranging from 1 to 235 months. Overall LTC rates ranged from 86% to 100%. Surgical interventions consistently demonstrated the highest rate of LTC with a median rate of 100%, and LPR with a median rate of 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.9-97.7). HIFU showed median LTC and LPR rates, respectively of 95.65% (95% CI, 87.7-99.9) and 76.1% (95% CI, 61.8-90.4); and cryoablation of 85.7% (95% CI, 66.0-99.9) and 79.2% (95% CI, 67.4-91.03). Minor AE were reported after surgery in 17.5% of patients (225/1284) including 15.9% (199/1284) of mesh implantation; 76.4% (239/313) after HIFU; and 8.7 % (9/103) after cryoablation. Severe AE were reported in 25 patients in the surgery group and 1 in the percutaneous group. CONCLUSION: The safety profile and efficacy of nonsurgical interventions support their clinical utility for management of abdominal wall endometriosis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of adenomyomas MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five symptomatic women who wanted to preserve their uterus and fertility underwent a single session of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of adenomyoma. Three to six 17-gauge cryoprobes were introduced percutaneously into the adenomyoma under ultrasound and laparoscopy guidance. Clinical efficacy was defined as the diminution of the Visual Analogue Scale of pain (VAS), the decrease in uterine bleeding and the improvement of quality of life assessed by the endometriosis health profile 5 (EHP-5) 12 months after treatment. Technical efficacy was defined by the reduction in volume of each treated adenomyoma on MRI. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Hysterosonography was performed at least 3 months after the procedure. RESULTS: Compared to the baseline, all symptom scores had decreased after 12 months: median VAS 8/10 (range, 5-10) to 4/10 (range, 0-7); median dyspareunia score 7/10 (range, 0-10) to 2/10 (range, 0-8); median bleeding score 335 (range, 102-920) to 76 (range, 0-88); median EHP-5 score 60/100 (range, 50-75) to 50/100 (range, 32-55). The median volume of adenomyosis decreased from 57 cm3 (range, 8-87) to 9 cm3 (range, 2-45) at 12 months. No postoperative complications occurred. Two patients had incomplete intrauterine adhesions that were easily removed hysteroscopically. CONCLUSION: Cryoablation may be a promising alternative treatment for symptomatic adenomyoma in women who want to preserve their uterus.