Psychosocial outcomes of repeated treatment of seizure clusters with midazolam nasal spray: Results of a phase 3, open-label extension trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment satisfaction, level of anxiety, confidence about traveling with midazolam nasal spray (MDZ-NS), and health-related quality of life in patients with seizure clusters and their caregivers after repeated, intermittent use of MDZ-NS in the outpatient setting. METHODS: We analyzed the psychosocial outcome data from a phase 3, open-label extension trial (ARTEMIS-2; P261-402; NCT01529034) in patients 12 years of age and older with seizure clusters on a stable regimen of antiseizure medications. Caregivers administered MDZ-NS 5 mg when patients experienced a seizure cluster. A second dose could be given if seizures did not terminate within 10 min or recurred from 10 min to 6 h. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), the Intranasal Therapy Impact Questionnaire (ITIQ), and the Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) were self-administered by patients and/or caregivers at prespecified visits. RESULTS: Of the one hundred and seventy-five patients enrolled in ARTEMIS-2, 161 (92.0%) received ≥ 1 dose of MDZ-NS and had a post-treatment seizure-related assessment and were included in the Efficacy Evaluable Set in this analysis, with a total of 1,998 treated seizure clusters over a median duration of 16.8 months. All TSQM scales showed improvement from the baseline of the double-blind ARTEMIS-1 trial (NCT01390220) to the last visit in ARTEMIS-2, indicating greater satisfaction with MDZ-NS across all domains, with a mean change from baseline of 8.8, 6.1, 4.3, and 6.2 for effectiveness (n = 135), side effects (n = 139), convenience (n = 139), and global satisfaction (n = 138), respectively. Change from baseline in TSQM scores generally increased with repeated MDZ-NS use. In both patients and caregivers, anxiety generally lessened with repeated MDZ-NS use, with a mean improvement in ITIQ scores in patients' anxiety since receiving MDZ-NS from 2.5 (n = 138) to 3.5 (n = 145) from visit 1 to the last visit (and from 2.6 [n = 156] to 3.6 [n = 160] for caregivers), respectively. From visit 1 (screening and enrollment in ARTEMIS-2) to visit 10 (after 16 seizure cluster episodes treated with MDZ-NS), the proportions of patients and caregivers who answered "strongly agree" or "agree" for confidence about traveling with an intranasal spray remained ≥ 79% and generally increased over repeated MDZ-NS use. Small positive mean changes in SF-12v2 scores from baseline to the last visit were observed in both patients and caregivers, respectively, for the domains of physical functioning (0.9, 1.1), role-physical (2.4, 0.3), bodily pain (1.7, 0.3), general health (0.6, 1.2), and role-emotional (2.1, 0.3), and in the physical health component (1.6, 1.0). CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers perceived MDZ-NS favorably, with improvement from baseline on perceived effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction in the TSQM. This is supported by progressively lower anxiety and higher confidence levels about traveling with MDZ-NS over repeated intermittent use in the ITIQ. The positive mean changes observed in SF-12v2 scores from baseline to the last visit were small in magnitude. Limitations of this exploratory analysis include the open-label trial design and that these questionnaires have not been directly validated in epilepsy to identify clinically important changes; however, this does not mean these findings are not clinically meaningful. Overall, MDZ-NS is a socially acceptable drug device for outpatient treatment of seizure clusters that has the potential to improve quality of life and overall independence.

Relative importance of clinical outcomes and safety risks of antiseizure medication monotherapy for patients and physicians: Discrete choice experiment eliciting preferences in real-world study "VOTE".

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to elicit patients' preferences for attributes characterizing antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy options before treatment consultation, and to explore the trade-offs patients consider between treatment efficacy and risks of side effects. Further objectives were to explore how treatment consultation may affect patient preferences, to elicit physicians' preferences in selecting treatment, and to compare patient and physician preferences for treatment. METHODS: This prospective, observational study (EP0076; VOTE) included adults with focal seizures requiring a change in their ASM monotherapy. Patients completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey before and after treatment consultation. Physicians completed a similar survey after the consultation. The DCE comprised 12 choices between two hypothetical treatments defined by seven attributes. The conditional relative importance of each attribute was calculated. RESULTS: Three hundred ten patients (mean [SD] age = 46.8 [18.3] years, 52.3% female) were enrolled from eight European countries, of whom 305 completed the survey before consultation and 273 completed the survey before and after consultation. Overall, this preference study in patients who intended to receive a new ASM monotherapy suggests that patient preferences were ordered as expected, with better outcomes being preferred to worse outcomes; patients preferred a higher chance of seizure freedom, lower risk of developing clinical depression, and fewer severe adverse events; avoiding moderate-to-severe "trouble thinking clearly" was more important than avoiding any other side effect. There were qualitative differences in what patients and physicians considered to be the most important aspects of treatment for patients; compared with patients, physicians had a qualitatively stronger preference for greater chance of seizure freedom and avoiding personality changes. Patients' preference weights were qualitatively similar before and after treatment consultation. SIGNIFICANCE: For patients, seizure freedom and avoiding trouble thinking clearly were the most important treatment attributes. Physicians and patients may differ in the emphasis they place on specific attributes.

A long-term noninterventional safety study of adjunctive lacosamide therapy in patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

This noninterventional, observational, postauthorization safety study (SP0942, NCT00771927) evaluated the incidence of predefined cardiovascular- (CV) and psychiatric-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), in patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, when initiating adjunctive therapy with lacosamide or another approved antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard medical practice. Active recording of predefined TEAEs of interest took place at three-monthly recommended visits for up to 12months. Of 1004 patients who received at least one dose of adjunctive AEDs, 511 initially added lacosamide therapy, 493 added another AED, 69 were ≥65years of age, and 72 took concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients in the lacosamide cohort had a higher median frequency of partial-onset seizures (6.0 versus 3.5 per 28days) despite taking more concomitant AEDs (84.9% versus 66.9% took ≥2) at baseline. Patients who added lacosamide took a modal dose of 200mg/day over the treatment period (n=501), and 50.1% (256/511) completed 12months of treatment. Fifty-one point nine percent (256/493) of patients who added another AED completed the study, with the most commonly added AED being levetiracetam (28.4%). Four patients (0.8%) in each cohort, all <65years of age, reported predefined CV-related TEAEs. None were considered serious or led to discontinuation. One event each of sinus bradycardia (lacosamide), atrioventricular block first degree (lacosamide), and syncope (other AED) were judged to be treatment-related. Another patient in the other AED cohort reported bradycardia while taking concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Predefined psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by 21 patients (4.1%) in the lacosamide cohort and 27 patients (5.5%) in the other AED cohort. Depression was the most common to be treatment-related (7/11 and 12/18 of patients reporting treatment-related psychiatric TEAEs, respectively). Serious psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by four patients who added lacosamide (two cases of depression, two of suicide attempt) and one who added another AED (depression). Seven deaths occurred, all of which were considered unrelated/unlikely related to study medication. This thorough evaluation revealed a low incidence of predefined CV- and psychiatric-related TEAEs in patients taking adjunctive AED therapy according to standard medical practice. No specific safety concerns related to adjunctive lacosamide therapy were noted.

Effective photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses on the head and face with a novel, self-adhesive 5-aminolaevulinic acid patch.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is increasingly used for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). OBJECTIVES: To investigate both the efficacy of different application times and the safety of a novel patch (PD P 506 A) containing aminolaevulinic acid in the PDT of mild to moderate AK. METHODS: Applications of PD P 506 A for 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h were compared in a multicentre, randomized, blinded-observer, parallel-group study. After patch removal, study lesions were illuminated with red light (lambda(em) approximately 630 nm; 37 J/cm(2)). Study lesions were not pretreated (e.g. by curettage) prior to PDT. Efficacy was evaluated 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. Safety and tolerability were determined through laboratory analyses and documentation of both local reactions and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were initially enrolled. Of these, 140 patients (520 lesions) completed the study according to protocol. Eight weeks after treatment, 86% of the AK lesions (74% of the patients) treated with 4-h patch application showed complete clearance. The complete clearance rates of lesions (patients) for the 2-, 1- and 0.5-h treatment arms were 73% (47%), 72% (50%) and 51% (24%), respectively. Statistically, the 4-h application was identified as the 'best treatment'. Patients with clearance seemed to experience local reactions to a greater extent than patients without clearance. Local reactions to study treatments did not exceed the expected range. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this first clinical efficacy study suggest excellent therapeutic outcomes with a single PD P 506 A PDT with a 4-h application.

Comparison of the bioavailability and adhesiveness of different rotigotine transdermal patch formulations.

OBJECTIVE: Rotigotine transdermal patch is approved for the treatment of early and advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and moderate-to-severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS). A cold chain manufacturing and distribution process was temporarily implemented in 2008, as this reduced the crystal formation reported within patches stored at room temperature. In order to overcome the crystallization issue and meet EMA and FDA requirements, a new room temperature stable formulation was developed. The three studies reported here were conducted to determine whether the new room temperature stable patch demonstrated similar bioavailability and adhesiveness to the original and intermediate patches. METHODS: Data are reported from three cross-over studies that compared the original, cold chain and room temperature stable patch. Two open-label bioequivalence studies investigated the 2 mg/24 h dosage in healthy individuals (SP951, n = 52 [Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00881894]; SP0987, n = 50 [NCT01059903]) and a double-blind patch adhesiveness study investigated the 8 mg/24 h dosage in patients with PD (SP1066, n = 56 [NCT01338896]). RESULTS: Plasma concentration-time curves and geometric means for pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for the cold chain vs. original patch in SP951 (AUC(0-tz): 2.68 vs. 2.71 ng/mL*h; point estimate: 0.99 [90% confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 1.07]) (Cmax: 0.131 vs. 0.136 ng/mL; 0.96 [0.89, 1.04]) and for the room temperature stable vs. cold chain patch in SP0987 (AUC(0-tz): 4.51 vs. 4.87 ng/mL*h; 0.90 [0.84, 0.97]) (Cmax: 0.23 vs. 0.23 ng/mL; 0.95 [0.88, 1.02]). In both studies, 90% CIs for ratios of AUC(0-tz) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence acceptance range (0.8-1.25). In SP1066, overall median adhesiveness scores were similar for cold chain (0.5 [range: 0-4]) and room temperature stable (0 [0-4]) formulations. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated bioequivalence and indicated similar adhesiveness of the approved room temperature stable rotigotine patch with the original and cold chain patches. Potential limitations include the enrolment of healthy volunteers in the bioequivalence studies, as these individuals were likely to be younger than the general PD or RLS population.