Malignancy among adult heart transplant recipients following patient-tailored dosing of anti-thymocyte globulin: a retrospective, nested case-control study of individualized dosing.

Post-transplant malignancy is diagnosed in approximately 18% of heart transplant patients and is a leading cause of death post-transplant. One modifiable risk factor is the type and amount of immunosuppression received. Contemporary rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) dosing strategy using T-cell-guided dosing, and its effect on malignancy in heart transplant patients is unclear. This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of heart transplant recipients receiving rATG for induction. Patients diagnosed with malignancy post-transplant were matched 1:2 to controls using a nested case-control design. The primary endpoint was to determine the relative risk of rATG exposure with the actual incidence of malignancy post-transplant. The secondary endpoint was the impact of maintenance immunosuppression on malignancy risk. Of the 126 patients included in the study, 25 developed malignancy and were matched to 50 control patients. The median cumulative rATG dose in milligrams (mg) between groups was 365 mg in malignancy cases and 480 mg in controls (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75-1.08, P = 0.28). In both the univariate and multivariable analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in malignancy risk found with any maintenance immunosuppressant. The results of this study showed that patient-tailored rATG dosing strategies may not be associated with malignancy development as previously thought.

Ideal Body Weight-Based Dosing of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin for Cost Minimization in Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Contemporary dosing strategies for rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) in kidney transplantation aim to reduce cumulative exposure, minimizing long-term adverse events. The use of ideal body weight-based dosing has been trialed, however concern for increased rejection post-transplant exists due to lower doses of rATG. Research Questions: The primary aim of this study was to compare rejection rates between rATG dosing protocols using actual body weight and ideal body weight and secondarily to evaluate cost savings following protocol implementation. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study surrounding implementation of an ideal body weight-based dosing protocol for rATG. We compared 75 kidney transplant recipients in whom rATG was dosed based on actual body weight (pre-protocol group) to 64 in whom dosing was based on ideal body weight (post-protocol group), following a nine-month washout. RESULTS: The mean cumulative rATG dose in the pre-protocol group was 6.3 mg/kg of actual body weight. When ideal body weight was used in the post-protocol group, the mean dose was 4.5 mg/kg of actual body weight. The rejection rate was 18.7% pre-protocol and 23.4% postprotocol, which did not represent a statistically significant difference (p = 0.491). The actual annual cost savings after protocol implementation exceeded $162,000, approximately $2,500 per patient. CONCLUSION: Results suggest ideal body weight-based dosing of rATG may reduce exposure and cost, without significantly impacting the risk of rejection in kidney transplant recipients. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Clinical outcomes of adults with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with the HLH-04 protocol: a retrospective analysis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare syndrome of pathologic immune activation in children that is increasingly being recognized in adults. Efficacy data for the HLH-04 protocol in adults is lacking. This study retrospectively analyzed 31 adult patients, median age 46 years, who received HLH-04 from 1/1/2004 to 5/1/2018. HLH etiology included malignancy (n = 9), autoimmune (n = 8), infection (n = 8), and idiopathic (n = 6). Eighteen patients were evaluable for response at week 4 with 7 having no response, 11 reaching partial response, and 0 reaching complete response (CR). Six patients eventually achieved CR at a median 195 days. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 35% and median OS was 3.2 months. Univariate analysis showed shorter survival for hemoglobin <9 g/dL (HR 4.29, p = 0.003), platelets <100 × 109/L (HR 4.06, p = 0.027), ANC <1 × 109/L (HR 5.24, p = 0.001), and total bilirubin >1.2 mg/dL (HR 3.30, p = 0.022). Outcomes of adults treated with HLH-04 remain dismal and newer treatment modalities are needed.

Two cases of severe neutropenia in patients on low-dose methotrexate and ceftriaxone.

PURPOSE: There are limited data on the effect of ceftriaxone on methotrexate clearance, with results of some studies indicating altered methotrexate pharmacokinetics with the administration of ceftriaxone. We describe 2 possible cases demonstrating an interaction between methotrexate and ceftriaxone, resulting in profound neutropenia. SUMMARY: The decision to continue methotrexate therapy in the setting of surgery or during treatment of an active infection continues to be a topic of debate due to perceived negative effects on the healing process. Methotrexate is typically administered at a lower dose for inflammatory arthritis than for hematologic indications, thus having less immunosuppression potential. However, if methotrexate is continued during treatment of infection, drug interactions along with effects on the healing process should be considered. Ceftriaxone is commonly considered safe for long-term therapy due to its favorable adverse effect and drug interaction profile. Ceftriaxone is partially eliminated via organic anion transporters in the kidneys, leading to potential competition with methotrexate clearance in the renal tubules. Clinicians using these drugs concurrently should be aware of the potential for development of neutropenia and monitor patients receiving this combination closely. CONCLUSION: Two patients receiving ceftriaxone therapy in the setting of a joint infection developed profound neutropenia after resuming oral methotrexate therapy for inflammatory arthritis.