Part 6. Education for value-informed nursing practice.

With the ongoing transition to value-based health care, a strong command of foundational economic concepts, like cost and value, and the ability to thoughtfully engage in value-informed nursing practice have become essential for the future of the nursing profession. Earlier in this six-part series, we explained value-informed nursing practice, its historical, economic, and ethical foundation, its promise for an environmentally responsible, innovation-driven future health care, and why its adoption requires a reframing of some of the nursing's professional norms and behaviors. This paper concludes the series with one of the most important issues-education for value-informed nursing practice. We begin by setting forth our vision of how nursing students will learn and apply value informed nursing practice, consider challenges that nurse educators will face, and offer some suggestions for engraining value into the consciousness of the nursing profession.

Value-informed nursing practice: What is it and how to make it a reality.

Nurses make decisions about the use of costly resources in countless care delivery settings 24 hours a day. Consequently, nurses are inseparably connected to not only the quality and safety of care, but to the cost-of-care as well. This article is Part 1 of a 6-part series on value-informed nursing practice. It describes the concept of 'value-informed nursing practice'-practice that focuses not only on outcomes, but also on the cost of care-as a new way to envision nursing practice.

Value-informed nursing practice is needed to make our healthcare systems more environmentally sustainable.

In this 3rd part of our 6-part series on value-informed nursing practice-practice that focuses on both achieving desired patient outcomes and minimizing the use of costly resources to achieve these outcomes-we focus on the importance of nurses in improving environmental outcomes and reducing costly environmental waste. We also propose how nursing education needs to change to prepare the next generation of nurses to effectively address environmental problems through providing value-informed nursing practice.

Part 4: Value-informed nursing practice depends on nursing innovation.

With the adoption of value-based payments which tie reimbursement to patient outcomes and costs, days when nursing is viewed primarily as a cost to hospitals will soon be over. Already the backbone of high-quality care delivery and patient outcomes, nurses are becoming key drivers of health care organizations' financial outcomes, too. The first three articles published in this 6-part series on value-informed nursing practice-practice that considers both the outcomes and the cost of producing the outcomes-described what value-informed nursing practice means, its economic, policy, and ethical impetuses, and how value-informed nursing practice helps improve environmental sustainability of health systems. Here, in Part 4, we focus on the importance of nursing innovation in implementing value-informed nursing practice. We begin by discussing how innovation is connected to value and then examine the false dichotomy, perceived by many, between innovation and evidence-based care. Following this, we examine how health care organizations and systems can support nursing innovation, before concluding with recommendations for nursing educators.

The roles and clinical activities of registered nurses and nurse practitioners in practices caring for older adults.

BACKGROUND: Population aging and physician shortages have motivated recommendations of increased use of registered nurses in care provision; little is known about RN and NP employment in primary care and geriatric practices or service types each provide. PURPOSE: Determine current RN and NP employment frequency in practices in the U.S., identify services provided by RNs, and whether NP presence in practice is associated with the types and frequency of services provided by RNs. METHODS: National survey of 410 primary care and geriatric clinicians. FINDINGS: Only half of practices employed RNs. RNs most frequently provide teaching or education for chronic disease management. RNs provide significantly more primary care and geriatric services when practices employed a NP. DISCUSSION: Reasons for RN underuse in practices should be identified, clinical placements in such practices should increase, and NP education programs should include care models using RNs to their full scope of practice.

Top priorities for the next decade of nursing health services research.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. health care system faces increasing pressures for reform. The importance of nurses in addressing health care delivery challenges cannot be overstated. PURPOSE: To present a Nursing Health Services Research (NHSR) agenda for the 2020s. METHOD: A meeting of an interdisciplinary group of 38 health services researchers to discuss five key challenges facing health care delivery (behavioral health, primary care, maternal/neonatal outcomes, the aging population, health care spending) and identify the most pressing and feasible research questions for NHSR in the coming decade. FINDINGS: Guided by a list of inputs affecting health care delivery (health information technology, workforce, delivery systems, payment, social determinants of health), meeting participants identified 5 to 6 research questions for each challenge. Also, eight cross-cutting themes illuminating the opportunities and barriers facing NHSR emerged. DISCUSSION: The Agenda can act as a foundation for new NHSR - which is more important than ever - in the 2020s.

The Association of Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice Laws With Emergency Department Use: Evidence From Medicaid Expansion.

BACKGROUND: Overuse and inappropriate use of emergency departments (EDs) remains an important issue in health policy. After implementation of Medicaid expansion, many states experienced an increase in ED use, but the magnitude varied. Differential access to primary care might explain such variation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the increase in ED use among Medicaid enrollees following Medicaid expansion was smaller in states that allowed greater access to primary care providers by permitting nurse practitioners (NPs) to practice without physician oversight. RESEARCH DESIGN: Examining data on ED use by Medicaid beneficiaries, we estimated random effects models to examine changes in ED visits. Models for 8 different clinical conditions were estimated, with each model including a linear time trend, indicators for Medicaid expansion and for the absence of physician oversight requirements, and an interaction between these 2 indicators. RESULTS: States requiring physician oversight of NPs had a 28% increase in ED visits relative to the preexpansion period, while states allowing NP practice without physician oversight had only a 7% increase. The increase in the share of visits covered by Medicaid in no-oversight states was 40% of the size of the increase in oversight states. CONCLUSIONS: Allowing NPs to practice without physician oversight was associated with a reduction in the magnitude of increase in ED use following Medicaid expansion. States that restrict NP practice should weigh the costs of maintaining these restrictions against the potential benefits of lower ED use. States considering Medicaid expansion should also consider relaxing NP scope-of-practice laws.

Individual Nurse Productivity in Preparing Patients for Discharge Is Associated With Patient Likelihood of 30-Day Return to Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Applied to value-based health care, the economic term "individual productivity" refers to the quality of an outcome attributable through a care process to an individual clinician. This study aimed to (1) estimate and describe the discharge preparation productivities of individual acute care nurses and (2) examine the association between the discharge preparation productivity of the discharging nurse and the patient's likelihood of a 30-day return to hospital [readmission and emergency department (ED) visits]. RESEARCH DESIGN: Secondary analysis of patient-nurse data from a cluster-randomized multisite study of patient discharge readiness and readmission. Patients reported discharge readiness scores; postdischarge outcomes and other variables were extracted from electronic health records. Using the structure-process-outcomes model, we viewed patient readiness for hospital discharge as a proximal outcome of the discharge preparation process and used it to measure nurse productivity in discharge preparation. We viewed hospital return as a distal outcome sensitive to discharge preparation care. Multilevel regression analyses used a split-sample approach and adjusted for patient characteristics. SUBJECTS: A total 522 nurses and 29,986 adult (18+ y) patients discharged to home from 31 geographically diverse medical-surgical units between June 15, 2015 and November 30, 2016. MEASURES: Patient discharge readiness was measured using the 8-item short form of Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS). A 30-day hospital return was a categorical variable for an inpatient readmission or an ED visit, versus no hospital return. RESULTS: Variability in individual nurse productivity explained 9.07% of variance in patient discharge readiness scores. Nurse productivity was negatively associated with the likelihood of a readmission (-0.48 absolute percentage points, P<0.001) and an ED visit (-0.29 absolute percentage points, P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Variability in individual clinician productivity can have implications for acute care quality patient outcomes.

PICU Provider Supply and Demand: A National Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To describe physicians' and nurse practitioners' perceptions of the national and local PICU physician and other provider supply in institutions that employ PICU nurse practitioners, assess for differences in perceptions of supply, and evaluate the intent of institutions to hire additional nurse practitioners to work in PICUs. DESIGN: National, quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive study via a postal mail survey from October 2016 to January 2017. SETTING: Institutions (n = 140) identified in the 2015 American Hospital Association Annual Survey with a PICU who employ PICU nurse practitioners. SUBJECTS: PICU physician medical directors and nurse practitioners. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 119 respondents, representing 93 institutions. Responses were received from 60 PICU medical directors (43%) and 59 lead nurse practitioners (42%). More than half (58%) of all respondents reported the national supply of PICU physicians is less than demand and 61% reported the local supply of PICU providers (physicians in all stages of training, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) is less than demand. Of the respondents from institutions that self-reported a local provider shortage (n = 54), three fourths (78%) reported plans to increase the number of PICU nurse practitioners in the next 3 years and 40% were likely to expand the nurse practitioner's role in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Most PICU medical directors and lead nurse practitioners in institutions that employ PICU nurse practitioners perceived that national and local supply of providers to be less than the demand. Nurse practitioners are employed in PICUs as part of interdisciplinary models of care being used to address provider demand. The demand for more PICU nurse practitioners with expanded roles in care delivery was reported. Further evaluation of models of care and provider roles in care delivery can contribute to aligning provider supply with demand for care delivery.

How fast will the registered nurse workforce grow through 2030? Projections in nine regions of the country.

BACKGROUND: After an unprecedented increase in nursing school enrollment and graduates in the past 10 years, projected shortages of nurses have been erased at a national level. However, nursing markets are local, and an uneven distribution of health care providers of all types is a longstanding feature of health care in the United States. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand how the outlook for future registered nurse (RN) supply varies regionally across the United States. METHODS: We apply our nursing supply model to the nine U.S. Census Divisions to produce separate supply forecasts for each region. DISCUSSION: We find dramatic differences in expected future growth of the nursing workforce across U.S. regions. These range from zero expected growth in the number of RNs per capita in New England and in the Pacific regions between 2015 and 2030 to 40% growth in the East South Central region (Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky) and in the West South Central region (Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana). CONCLUSION: Assuming growth in the demand for RNs per population, some regions of the United States are expected to face shortfalls in their nursing workforce if recent trends do not change.

Role of Geography and Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice in Efforts to Expand Primary Care System Capacity: Health Reform and the Primary Care Workforce.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the geographic distribution of the overall primary care workforce that includes both physician and nonphysician clinicians--particularly in areas with restrictive nurse practitioner scope-of-practice laws and where there are relatively large numbers of uninsured. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether geographic accessibility to primary care clinicians (PCCs) differed across urban and rural areas and across states with more or less restrictive scope-of-practice laws. RESEARCH DESIGN: An observational study. SUBJECTS: 2013 Area Health Resource File (AHRF) and US Census Bureau county travel data. MEASURES: The measures included percentage of the population in low-accessibility, medium-accessibility, and high-accessibility areas; number of geographically accessible primary care physicians (PCMDs), nurse practitioners (PCNPs), and physician assistants (PCPAs) per 100,000 population; and number of uninsured per PCC. RESULTS: We found divergent patterns in the geographic accessibility of PCCs. PCMDs constituted the largest share of the workforce across all settings, but were relatively more concentrated within urban areas. Accessibility to nonphysicians was highest in rural areas: there were more accessible PCNPs per 100,000 population in rural areas of restricted scope-of-practice states (21.4) than in urban areas of full practice states (13.9). Despite having more accessible nonphysician clinicians, rural areas had the largest number of uninsured per PCC in 2012. While less restrictive scope-of-practice states had up to 40% more PCNPs in some areas, we found little evidence of differences in the share of the overall population in low-accessibility areas across scope-of-practice categorizations. CONCLUSIONS: Removing restrictive scope-of-practice laws may expand the overall capacity of the primary care workforce, but only modestly in the short run. Additional efforts are needed that recognize the locational tendencies of physicians and nonphysicains.