Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epilepsia ; 56(3): 489-98, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25684325

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Drugs with a novel mechanism of action are needed to reduce the number of people with epilepsy that are refractory to treatment. Increasing attention is paid to neuropeptide systems and several anticonvulsant neuropeptides have already been described, such as galanin, ghrelin, and neuropeptide Y (NPY). Many others, however, have not been investigated for their ability to affect epileptic seizures. In this study, the potential anticonvulsant activities of three members of the RF-amide neuropeptide family, neuropeptide FF (NPFF), prolactin-releasing peptide (PrRP), and kisspeptin (Kp) and other receptor ligands (NPFF1/2 R, GPR10, and GRP54, respectively) were tested in the motor cortex stimulation model. METHODS: A train of pulses with increasing intensity (0-10 mA over 150 s, 50 Hz, pulse width 2 msec) was delivered to the motor cortex of rats. The threshold intensity for eliciting a motor response (i.e., motor threshold) was determined through behavioral observation and used as a measure for cortical excitability. The threshold was determined before, during, and after the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of various NPFF1/2 R, GPR10, and GPR54 receptor ligands. RESULTS: NPFF and PrRP significantly increased the motor threshold by a maximum of 143 ± 27 and 83 ± 13 µA, respectively, for the doses of 1 nmol/h (p < 0.05). The increase of motor threshold by NPFF and PrRP was prevented by pretreatment and co-treatment with the NPFF1/2 R antagonist RF9. Pretreatment with a selective NPFF1 R antagonist also prevented the threshold increase induced by NPFF. Kp did not increase motor threshold. SIGNIFICANCE: Intracerebroventricular infusion of NPFF or PrRP decreases cortical excitability in rats through activation of NPFFRs. Furthermore, the NPFF1 R is required for the NPFF-induced decrease in cortical excitability.


Asunto(s)
Corteza Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Oligopéptidos/farmacología , Hormona Liberadora de Prolactina/farmacología , Receptores de Neuropéptido/metabolismo , Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Adamantano/farmacología , Animales , Dipéptidos/farmacología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Estimulación Eléctrica , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Corteza Motora/fisiología , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Kisspeptina-1 , Receptores de Neuropéptido/agonistas , Receptores de Neuropéptido/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Neuropharmacology ; 95: 415-23, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25963417

RESUMEN

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a well established anticonvulsant and first-in-class antiepileptic neuropeptide. In this study, the controversial role of NPY1 receptors in epilepsy was reassessed by testing two highly selective NPY1 receptor ligands and a mixed NPY1/NPFF receptor antagonist BIBP3226 in a rat model for limbic seizures. While BIBP3226 significantly attenuated the pilocarpine-induced seizures, neither of the highly selective NPY1 receptor ligands altered the seizure severity. Administration of the NPFF1/NPFF2 receptor antagonist RF9 also significantly attenuated limbic seizure activity. To further prove the involvement of NPFF receptors in these seizure-modulating effects, low and high affinity antagonists for the NPFF receptors were tested. We observed that the low affinity ligand failed to exhibit anticonvulsant properties while the two high affinity ligands significantly attenuated the seizures. Continuous NPFF1 receptor agonist administration also inhibited limbic seizures whereas bolus administration of the NPFF1 receptor agonist was without effect. This suggests that continuous agonist perfusion could result in NPFF1 receptor desensitization and mimic NPFF1 receptor antagonist administration. Our data unveil for the first time the involvement of the NPFF system in the management of limbic seizures.


Asunto(s)
Sistema Límbico/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Límbico/metabolismo , Receptores de Neuropéptido/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Neuropéptido/metabolismo , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/metabolismo , Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Adamantano/farmacología , Animales , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacología , Arginina/análogos & derivados , Arginina/farmacología , Células CHO , Cricetulus , Dipéptidos/farmacología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Masculino , Pilocarpina , Ratas Wistar , Receptores de Neuropéptido/agonistas , Receptores de Neuropéptido/genética , Receptores de Neuropéptido Y/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Neuropéptido Y/genética , Receptores de Neuropéptido Y/metabolismo
3.
Int J Neural Syst ; 24(2): 1430005, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24475897

RESUMEN

Neurostimulation is a promising treatment for refractory epilepsy. We studied the effect of cortical stimulation with different parameters in the rat motor cortex stimulation model. High intensity simulation (threshold for motor response--100 µA), high frequency (130 Hz) stimulation during 1 h decreased cortical excitability, irrespective of the interpulse interval used (fixed or Poisson distributed). Low intensity (10 µA) and/or low frequency (5 Hz) stimulation had no effect. Cortical stimulation appears promising for the treatment of neocortical epilepsy if frequency and intensity are high enough.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Corteza Motora/fisiología , Animales , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Electrodos Implantados , Potenciales Evocados Motores , Masculino , Distribución de Poisson , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA