RESUMEN
Combination chemotherapy must strike a difficult balance between safety and efficacy. Current regimens suffer from poor therapeutic impact because drugs are given at their maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which compounds the toxicity risk and exposes tumors to non-optimal drug ratios. A modular framework has been developed that selectively delivers drug combinations at synergistic ratios via tumor-targeting aptamers for effective low-dose treatment. A nucleolin-recognizing aptamer was coupled to peptide scaffolds laden with precise ratios of doxorubicin (DOX) and camptothecin (CPT). This construct had an extremely low IC50 (31.9â nm) against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells inâ vitro, and exhibited inâ vivo efficacy at micro-dose injections (500 and 350â µg kg-1 dose-1 of DOX and CPT, respectively) that are 20-30-fold lower than their previously-reported MTDs. This approach represents a generalizable strategy for the safe and consistent delivery of combination drugs in oncology.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Aptámeros de Nucleótidos/química , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos/química , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/química , Camptotecina/química , Línea Celular , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Doxorrubicina/química , Ensayos de Selección de Medicamentos Antitumorales , Humanos , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Estructura Molecular , Neoplasias/patologíaRESUMEN
Obeldesivir (ODV, GS-5245) is an orally administered prodrug of the parent nucleoside of remdesivir (RDV) and is presently in phase 3 trials for COVID-19 treatment. In this work, we show that ODV and its circulating parent nucleoside metabolite, GS-441524, have similar in vitro antiviral activity against filoviruses, including Marburg virus, Ebola virus, and Sudan virus (SUDV). We also report that once-daily oral ODV treatment of cynomolgus monkeys for 10 days beginning 24 hours after SUDV exposure confers 100% protection against lethal infection. Transcriptomics data show that ODV treatment delayed the onset of inflammation and correlated with antigen presentation and lymphocyte activation. Our results offer promise for the further development of ODV to control outbreaks of filovirus disease more rapidly.
Asunto(s)
Alanina , Antivirales , Ebolavirus , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola , Nucleósidos , Profármacos , Animales , Administración Oral , Ebolavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/tratamiento farmacológico , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Macaca fascicularis , Nucleósidos/administración & dosificación , Nucleósidos/farmacología , Adenosina Monofosfato/administración & dosificación , Adenosina Monofosfato/farmacología , Alanina/administración & dosificación , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/farmacología , Profármacos/administración & dosificación , Profármacos/farmacología , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Measles is a systemic disease initiated in the respiratory tract with widespread measles virus (MeV) infection of lymphoid tissue. Mortality can be substantial, but no licensed antiviral therapy is available. We evaluated both post-exposure prophylaxis and treatment with remdesivir, a broad-spectrum antiviral, using a well-characterized rhesus macaque model of measles. Animals were treated with intravenous remdesivir for 12 days beginning either 3 days after intratracheal infection (post-exposure prophylaxis, PEP) or 11 days after infection at the onset of disease (late treatment, LT). As PEP, remdesivir lowered levels of viral RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, but RNA rebounded at the end of the treatment period and infectious virus was continuously recoverable. MeV RNA was cleared more rapidly from lymphoid tissue, was variably detected in the respiratory tract, and not detected in urine. PEP did not improve clinical disease nor lymphopenia and reduced the antibody response to infection. In contrast, LT had little effect on levels of viral RNA or the antibody response but also did not decrease clinical disease. Therefore, remdesivir transiently suppressed expression of viral RNA and limited dissemination when provided as PEP, but virus was not cleared and resumed replication without improvement in the clinical disease parameters evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Leucocitos Mononucleares , Sarampión , Animales , Macaca mulatta/genética , Profilaxis Posexposición , Sarampión/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarampión/prevención & control , Virus del Sarampión/genética , ARN ViralRESUMEN
Remdesivir is a nucleotide prodrug with preclinical efficacy against lethal Nipah virus infection in African green monkeys when administered 1 day post inoculation (dpi) (Lo et al., 2019). Here, we determined whether remdesivir treatment was still effective when treatment administration initiation was delayed until 3 dpi. Three groups of six African green monkeys were inoculated with a lethal dose of Nipah virus, genotype Bangladesh. On 3 dpi, one group received a loading dose of 10 mg/kg remdesivir followed by daily dosing with 5 mg/kg for 11 days, one group received 10 mg/kg on 12 consecutive days, and the remaining group received an equivalent volume of vehicle solution. Remdesivir treatment initiation on 3 dpi provided partial protection from severe Nipah virus disease that was dose dependent, with 67% of animals in the high dose group surviving the challenge. However, remdesivir treatment did not prevent clinical disease, and surviving animals showed histologic lesions in the brain. Thus, early administration seems critical for effective remdesivir treatment during Nipah virus infection.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Henipavirus , Virus Nipah , Animales , Chlorocebus aethiops , Infecciones por Henipavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Henipavirus/prevención & control , Encéfalo , Adenosina Monofosfato/farmacología , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Alanina/farmacología , Alanina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Remdesivir 1 is an phosphoramidate prodrug that releases the monophosphate of nucleoside GS-441524 (2) into lung cells, thereby forming the bioactive triphosphate 2-NTP. 2-NTP, an analog of ATP, inhibits the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase replication and transcription of viral RNA. Strong clinical results for 1 have prompted interest in oral approaches to generate 2-NTP. Here, we describe the discovery of a 5'-isobutyryl ester prodrug of 2 (GS-5245, Obeldesivir, 3) that has low cellular cytotoxicity and 3-7-fold improved oral delivery of 2 in monkeys. Prodrug 3 is cleaved presystemically to provide high systemic exposures of 2 that overcome its less efficient metabolism to 2-NTP, leading to strong SARS-CoV-2 antiviral efficacy in an African green monkey infection model. Exposure-based SARS-CoV-2 efficacy relationships resulted in an estimated clinical dose of 350-400 mg twice daily. Importantly, all SARS-CoV-2 variants remain susceptible to 2, which supports development of 3 as a promising COVID-19 treatment.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Profármacos , Chlorocebus aethiops , Humanos , Animales , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Nucleósidos , Profármacos/farmacología , Profármacos/uso terapéutico , ARN Viral , Antivirales/farmacología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , FuranosRESUMEN
Yellow fever virus (YFV) continues to cause periodic outbreaks of severe disease throughout tropical regions of South America and Africa despite the availability of an effective vaccine. Despite efforts to control this virus for the last century, no antivirals have been approved for the treatment of YFV. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the broadly active antiviral compound remdesivir (RDV) in a hamster model of disease. Yellow fever (YF) disease in hamsters was prevented when treatment with RDV was initiated just prior to virus challenge, which was confirmed in a second study. Disease parameters including viremia, serum ALT and weight loss were significantly improved with RDV treatment in a dose-dependent manner. RDV was also effective when treatment was initiated as late as 4 days post-virus infection (dpi). These results demonstrate therapeutic efficacy of RDV in the treatment of YF in a relevant animal model of disease.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla , Fiebre Amarilla , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Animales , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Cricetinae , Viremia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fiebre Amarilla/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/uso terapéutico , Virus de la Fiebre AmarillaRESUMEN
A major challenge in managing acute viral infections is ameliorating disease when treatment is delayed. Previously, we reported the success of a 2-pronged mAb and antiviral remdesivir therapeutic approach to treat advanced illness in rhesus monkeys infected with Marburg virus (MARV). Here, we explored the benefit of a similar combination therapy for Sudan ebolavirus (Sudan virus; SUDV) infection. Importantly, no licensed anti-SUDV therapeutics currently exist, and infection of rhesus macaques with SUDV results in a rapid disease course similar to MARV with a mean time to death of 8.3 days. When initiation of therapy with either remdesivir or a pan-ebolavirus mAb cocktail (MBP431) was delayed until 6 days after inoculation, only 20% of macaques survived. In contrast, when remdesivir and MBP431 treatment were combined beginning 6 days after inoculation, significant protection (80%) was achieved. Our results suggest that combination therapy may be a viable treatment for patients with advanced filovirus disease that warrants further clinical testing in future outbreaks.
Asunto(s)
Ebolavirus , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola , Marburgvirus , Virosis , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/tratamiento farmacológico , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Humanos , Macaca mulattaRESUMEN
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and remdesivir, a small-molecule antiviral, are promising monotherapies for many viruses, including members of the genera Marburgvirus and Ebolavirus (family Filoviridae), and more recently, SARS-CoV-2. One of the major challenges of acute viral infections is the treatment of advanced disease. Thus, extending the window of therapeutic intervention is critical. Here, we explore the benefit of combination therapy with a mAb and remdesivir in a non-human primate model of Marburg virus (MARV) disease. While rhesus monkeys are protected against lethal infection when treatment with either a human mAb (MR186-YTE; 100%), or remdesivir (80%), is initiated 5 days post-inoculation (dpi) with MARV, no animals survive when either treatment is initiated alone beginning 6 dpi. However, by combining MR186-YTE with remdesivir beginning 6 dpi, significant protection (80%) is achieved, thereby extending the therapeutic window. These results suggest value in exploring combination therapy in patients presenting with advanced filovirus disease.
Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad del Virus de Marburg/tratamiento farmacológico , Marburgvirus/efectos de los fármacos , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Macaca mulatta , Enfermedad del Virus de Marburg/prevención & control , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Improving clinical care for individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants is a global health priority. Small-molecule antivirals like remdesivir (RDV) and biologics such as human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is not known whether combination RDV/mAb will improve outcomes over single-agent therapies or whether antibody therapies will remain efficacious against variants. Here, we show that a combination of two mAbs in clinical trials, C144 and C135, have potent antiviral effects against even when initiated 48 h after infection and have therapeutic efficacy in vivo against the B.1.351 variant of concern (VOC). Combining RDV and antibodies provided a modest improvement in outcomes compared with single agents. These data support the continued use of RDV to treat SARS-CoV-2 infections and the continued clinical development of the C144 and C135 antibody combination to treat patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Antivirales/farmacología , Humanos , Ratones , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidadRESUMEN
Improving the standard of clinical care for individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants is a global health priority. Small molecule antivirals like remdesivir (RDV) and biologics such as human monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19. However, it is not known if combination RDV/mAb will improve outcomes over single agent therapies or whether antibody therapies will remain efficacious against variants. In kinetic studies in a mouse-adapted model of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis, we show that a combination of two mAbs in clinical trials, C144 and C135, have potent antiviral effects against even when initiated 48 hours after infection. The same antibody combination was also effective in prevention and therapy against the B.1.351 variant of concern (VOC). Combining RDV and antibodies provided a modest improvement in outcomes compared to single agents. These data support the continued use of RDV to treat SARS-CoV-2 infections and support the continued clinical development of the C144 and C135 antibody combination to treat patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants.