Comparing end-of-life care of hematologic malignancy versus solid tumor patients in a tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVES: To compare end-of-life (EOL) care for solid tumor and hematologic malignancy (HM) patients. METHODS: We collected data on the last 100 consecutive deceased HM and 100 consecutive deceased solid tumor patients who died prior to June 1st 2020, treated at a single center. We compared demographic parameters, cause of death as ascertained by review of medical records by two independent investigators, and EOL quality indicators including: place of death, use of chemotherapy or targeted/biologic treatment, emergency department visits as well as hospital, inpatient hospice and Intensive Care Unit admissions and the time spent as inpatient over the last 30 days of life; mechanical ventilation and use of blood products during the last 14 days of life. RESULTS: In comparison with solid tumor patients, HM patients more commonly died from treatment complications (13% vs. 1%) and unrelated causes (16% vs. 2%, p < .001 for all comparisons). HM patients died more frequently than solid tumor patients in the intensive care unit (14% vs. 7%) and the emergency department (9% vs. 0%) and less frequently in hospice (9% vs. 15%, p = .005 for all comparisons). In the 2 weeks prior to death HM patients were more likely than solid tumor patients to undergo mechanical ventilation (14% vs. 4%, p = .013), receive blood (47% vs. 27%, p = .003) and platelet transfusions (32% vs. 7%, p < .001); however, no statistical difference was found in use of either of chemotherapy (18% vs. 13%, p = .28) or targeted treatment (10% vs. 5%, p = .16). CONCLUSIONS: HM patients were more likely than solid tumor patients to undergo aggressive measures at EOL. Rarity of HM deaths, frequently caused by complications of treatment and unrelated causes, may affect treatment choices at EOL.

Pain after laparoscopic endometriosis-specific vs. hysterectomy surgeries: A retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pain perception and analgesic use between patients who underwent endometriosis-specific laparoscopic surgery compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women diagnosed with endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic surgery from 1/2019 to 11/2022. The control group consisted of premenopausal women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, which was considered a similarly extensive surgery. Demographics, preoperative and post-operative data were compared between groups. Post-operative pain scores on a visual analogue scale (VAS) between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain) were compared between groups for each post-operative day (POD). Standard pain relief analgesia on POD 0-1 included fixed intravenous treatment with paracetamol and intramuscular diclofenac. The need for additional analgesics (morphine or dipyrone) beyond the standard pain relief protocol was compared between groups. RESULTS: Among 200 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery, 100 (50%) were in the endometriosis group and 100 (50%) in the hysterectomy group. The endometriosis group was characterized by younger age and lower parity (both, p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in mean VAS scores for each post-operative day. However, among patients who needed additional analgesics beyond the standard protocol on POD 1, a higher percentage of women in the endometriosis group used opioids rather than milder analgesics, as compared to controls (1% vs. 0.2%, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Increased post-operative morphine use was observed in patients with endometriosis following laparoscopic surgery, despite no significant difference in mean VAS scores during the post-operative days. These findings suggest that personalized pain relief protocols should be adjusted for women with endometriosis.