Pre-implementation planning to enhance integration of HIV and behavioral health care services at two Ryan White-funded HIV care centers.

Behavioral health conditions are disproportionately experienced by people living with Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), including young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Left unaddressed, these symptoms can adversely impact HIV care outcomes. Improving the integration of behavioral health and HIV care services has been proposed as a strategy to address this challenge. To conduct a pre-implementation study exploring barriers and facilitators to improving HIV and behavioral health care integration at two HIV clinics in Atlanta, Georgia. We conducted a mixed-methods study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Sixty (60) HIV care providers, behavioral health care providers, and social service providers participated in cross-sectional surveys, and a subset of survey participants (15) also participated in a qualitative in-depth interview to explore CFIR constructs in greater depth. We focused on Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, and Inner Setting as the most relevant CFIR domains. Within each of these domains, we identified both facilitators and barriers to improving HIV and behavioral care integration in the two clinics. Participants agreed that enhancing integration would provide a relative advantage over current practice, would address young Black GBMSM and other patient needs, and would be compatible with the organizational mission. However, they also expressed concerns about complexity, resource availability, and priority relative to other clinic initiatives. Participants were enthusiastic about improving care integration but also invoked practical challenges to translating this idea into practice. Future research should test specific implementation strategies and their potential effectiveness for improving the integration of behavioral health and HIV care, as a strategy for improving well-being among young Black GBMSM and other people living with HIV.

People living with Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), including young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, often experience challenges related to behavioral health. We did a study to explore barriers and facilitators to improving the integration of behavioral health and HIV services at two HIV clinics in Atlanta, Georgia. Our study included interviews and surveys with sixty care providers. Participants shared that improving care integration was a good idea and would address patients' needs. However, they also expressed concerns about challenges that might get in the way of integrating care effectively. Future research should test different ways of improving care integration in these types of settings.

A qualitative analysis examining intersectional stigma among young adults living with HIV in Atlanta, Georgia.

HIV-related stigma is a barrier to engagement in care for young adults living with HIV. Other intersecting forms of stigma (e.g., racism, sexism, homophobia), may worsen HIV-related stigma and impact engagement in care. From November 2020 to February 2021, we conducted 20 in-depth qualitative interviews among young adults living with HIV attending a large, comprehensive HIV care center in Atlanta, Georgia. Semi-structured interview guides based on Earnshaw and Chaudoir's HIV Stigma Framework and the theory of intersectionality facilitated discussion around experiences with various forms of stigma and its possible influence on healthcare engagement. Using the social-ecological model, we used thematic analysis to contextualize how young adults living with HIV experienced intersectional stigma and enacted, anticipated, and internalized HIV stigma in both healthcare and non-healthcare settings. Most participants identified as male, Black/African American, and gay. Participants described stigma at intrapersonal, interpersonal, clinic, and community levels. Intrapersonal stigma was associated with delayed care seeking, isolation, and fear of disclosure. Interpersonal stigma included discrimination from family and friends and avoidance of close relationships to elude disclosure. At the clinic level, stigma included negative experiences with staff in HIV and non-HIV healthcare settings, which contributed to decreased engagement in care. Stigma in the community included differential treatment from employers, community leaders, and religious community and was associated with feelings of helplessness related to current societal inequalities. Coping/motivating mechanisms for stigma included prioritizing health, eliciting support from the medical care team and peers. Our findings show different intersecting stigmas are barriers to healthcare at multiple levels for young adults living with HIV, potentially exacerbating existing health and social disparities. To improve engagement in care among young adults living with HIV, future interventions should address the different mechanisms of stigma at community, clinic, interpersonal and intrapersonal levels by enhancing social support and improving healthcare structural competency.

Preferences of Young Black Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Regarding Integration of HIV and Mental Health Care Services.

Optimization of mental health service use is critical to HIV care engagement among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YB-GBMSM). Clinic-level interventions to integrate HIV and mental health services have been proposed; however, patient perspectives on such care models are often lacking. We conducted a mixed-methods study consisting of surveys (N = 100) and qualitative in-depth interviews (n = 15) with YB-GBMSM recruited from two Ryan White-funded HIV clinics in Atlanta, Georgia. Most participants (70%) agreed that integration of HIV and mental health services was beneficial to them. Thirty-six percent (36%) desired a higher level of integration than what they perceived was currently available in their clinic setting, 51% believed their clinic was already optimally integrated, and 13% preferred less integration. In the qualitative interviews, participants discussed their support for potential integration strategies such as training HIV providers to prescribe antidepressants, closer in-clinic proximity of HIV and mental health providers, and use of patient navigators to help patients access mental health care and remind them of appointments. Perceived benefits of care integration included easier access to mental health services, enhanced overall well-being, and improved HIV care engagement. In summary, YB-GBMSM were supportive of integrating HIV and mental health services, with varying individual preferences regarding the degree and operationalization of this integration. Improving integration of mental health and HIV services, and tailoring modes of service delivery to individual preferences, has the potential to improve both general well-being and HIV care engagement in this high priority population.