Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 30(4): 483-9, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25472506

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Latinos have lower rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and later stage diagnosis than Whites, which may be partially explained by physician communication factors. OBJECTIVE: We assessed associations between patient-reported physician counseling regarding CRC screening and receipt of CRC screening among Latino primary care patients. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: The participants of this study were Latino primary care patients 50 years of age or older, with one or more visits during the preceding year. MAIN MEASURES: We developed patient-reported measures to assess whether physicians provided explanations of CRC risks and tests, elicited patients' barriers to CRC screening, were responsive to patients' concerns about screening, and encouraged patients to be screened. Outcomes were patient reports of receipt of endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within recommended guidelines. KEY RESULTS: Of 817 eligible patients contacted, 505 (62 %) completed the survey; mean age was 61 years (SD 8.4), 69 % were women, and 53 % had less than high school education. Forty-six percent reported obtaining endoscopy (with or without FOBT), 13 % reported FOBT only, and 41 % reported no CRC screening. In bivariate analyses, physician explanations, elicitation of barriers, responsiveness to concerns, and greater encouragement for screening were associated with receipt of endoscopy (p < 0.001), and explanations (p < 0.05) and encouragement (p < 0.001) were associated with FOBT. Adjusting for covariates, physician explanations (OR = 1.27; 95 % CI 1.03, 1.58) and greater physician encouragement (OR = 6.74; 95 % CI 3.57, 12.72) were associated with endoscopy; patients reporting quite a bit/a lot of physician encouragement had six times higher odds of obtaining the FOBT as those reporting none/a little encouragement (OR = 6.54; 95 % CI 2.76, 15.48). CONCLUSIONS: Among primarily lower-socioeconomic status Latino patients, the degree to which patients perceived that physicians encouraged CRC screening was more strongly associated with screening than with providing risk information, eliciting barriers, and responding to their concerns about screening.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etnología , Consejo Dirigido/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Hispánicos o Latinos/etnología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Health Expect ; 15(1): 63-77, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21223467

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported measures of clinicians' cultural sensitivity are important to assess comprehensively quality of care among ethnically diverse patients and may help address persistent health inequities. OBJECTIVE: Create a patient-reported, multidimensional survey of clinicians' cultural sensitivity to cultural factors affecting quality of care. DESIGN: Using a comprehensive conceptual framework, items were written and field-tested in a cross-sectional telephone survey. Multitrait scaling and factor analyses were used to develop measures. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Latino patients age ≥50 from primary care practices in California. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Thirty-five items hypothesized to assess clinicians' sensitivity. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Validity and reliability of cultural sensitivity measures. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 35 items measuring 14 constructs were retained. Eleven measures assessed sensitivity issues relevant to all participants: complementary and alternative medicine, mind-body connections, causal attributions, preventive care, family involvement, modesty, prescription medications, spirituality, physician discrimination due to education, physician discrimination due to race/ethnicity and staff discrimination due to race/ethnicity. Three measures were group specific: two to limited English proficient patients (sensitivity to language needs and discrimination due to language) and one to immigrants (sensitivity to immigrant status). Twelve multi-item scales demonstrated adequate reliability (alpha ≥0.68 except for Spanish discrimination due to education) and evidence of construct validity (item-scale correlations for all scales >0.40 except for sensitivity to immigrant status). Two single-item measures demonstrated sufficient construct validity to retain for further development. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Clinicians' Cultural Sensitivity Survey can be used to assess the quality of care of older Latino patients.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Cultural , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/instrumentación , Hispánicos o Latinos , Satisfacción del Paciente/etnología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Anciano , California , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA