Frailty is an independent prognostic marker in elderly patients with myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are increasingly older. Conventional prognostic scales include chronological age but do not consider vulnerability. In elderly patients, a frail phenotype represents a better reflection of biological age. HYPOTHESIS: This study aims to determine the prevalence of frailty and its influence on patients age ≥75 years with ACS. METHODS: Patients age ≥75 years admitted due to type 1 myocardial infarction were included in 2 tertiary hospitals, and clinical data were collected prospectively. Frailty was defined at admission using the previously validated Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe Frailty Index (SHARE-FI) tool. The primary endpoint was the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial reinfarction during a follow-up of 6 months. Major bleeding (hemoglobin decrease ≥3 g/dL or transfusion needed) and readmission rates were also explored. RESULTS: A total of 234 consecutive patients were included. Frail patients (40.2%) had a higher-risk profile, based on higher age and comorbidities. On multivariate analysis, frailty was an independent predictor of the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial reinfarction (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-5.79), an independent predictor of the combination of death, nonfatal myocardial reinfarction, or major bleeding (aHR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.04), and an independent predictor of readmission (aHR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.00-3.22). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty phenotype at admission is common among elderly patients with ACS and is an independent predictor for severe adverse events. It should be considered in future risk-stratification models.

[Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. Randomized prospective study of radiofrequency ablation with irrigated catheters versus standard catheters]. / Ablación del istmo cavotricuspídeo. Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado sobre ablación mediante radiofrecuencia con catéteres irrigados frente a catéteres estándar.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: An important limitation of the ablation with standard catheter is the volume and limited depth of the lesions created. The irrigated catheters, due to a larger and deeper lesion could be useful in patients with typical atrial flutter. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the ablation procedure with an irrigated-tip catheter versus the standard catheter in this group of patients. METHODS: A total of 37 consecutive patients referred to ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for typical atrial flutter were randomized either to be performed by an standard catheter (20 patients with mean age of 62 18 years, 18 males) or an irrigated-tip catheter (17 patients with mean age 71 4 years, 13 males). RESULTS: With standard catheters, complete ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus was achieved in 18 patients (90%). With a mean of 19 15 applications. With the irrigated-tip catheters the complete ablation of the isthmus was achieved with a mean of 8 7 applications (p < 0.001). Both mean duration of the procedure (164 56 versus 70 35 minutes) and fluoroscopic time (40 16 versus 16 8 minutes) was significantly less with irrigated catheters (p < 0.001). There were no significant clinical complications during the procedure nor later on. No patient presented ischemic symptoms nor alterations on the ST segment. CONCLUSIONS: The employment of irrigated-tip catheters achieved a high success rate with safety shortening the procedure time and radiation exposure.