Image quality assessment in low-dose COVID-19 chest CT examinations.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose thoracic protocols were developed massively during the COVID-19 outbreak. PURPOSE: To study the impact on image quality (IQ) and the diagnosis reliability of COVID-19 low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: COVID-19 low-dose protocols were implemented on third- and second-generation CT scanners considering two body mass index (BMI) subgroups (<25 kg/m2 and >25 kg/m2). Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared with a Catphan phantom. Next, two radiologists retrospectively assessed IQ for 243 CT patients using a 5-point Linkert scale for general IQ and diagnostic criteria. Kappa score and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare IQ score and CTDIvol between radiologists, protocols, and scanner models. RESULTS: In vitro analysis of Catphan inserts showed in majority significantly decreased CNR for the low dose versus standard acquisition protocols on both CT scanners. However, in vivo, there was no impact on the diagnosis: sensitivity and specificity were ≥0.8 for all protocols and CT scanners. The third-generation scanner involved a significantly lower dose compared to the second-generation scanner (CTDIvol of 1.8 vs. 2.6 mGy for BMI <25 kg/m2 and 3.3 vs. 4.6 mGy for BMI >25 kg/m2). Still, the third-generation scanner showed a significantly higher IQ with the low-dose protocol compared to the second-generation scanner (30.9 vs. 28.1 for BMI <25 kg/m2 and 29.9 vs. 27.8 for BMI >25 kg/m2). Finally, the two radiologists had good global inter-reader agreement (kappa ≥0.6) for general IQ. CONCLUSION: Low-dose protocols provided sufficient IQ independently of BMI subgroups and CT models without any impact on diagnosis reliability.

Development and Evaluation of a CT Pulmonary Angiography Protocol Dedicated to Pregnant and Postpartum Women.

INTRODUCTION: This study presents and evaluates a CT pulmonary angiography protocol dedicated to pregnant women. The specific feature of this protocol is to place the region of interest (ROI) (bolus detection) in the superior vena cava. The objective is to evaluate the performances of this method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protocol uses a iodine-based contrast agent at 300mgI/mL and an injection rate of 5 to 6 mL/sec for an injection volume of 50 mL of iodine contrast agent followed by 40 mL of NaCl. The ROI is positioned on the superior vena cava, with a 100 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold, and the acquisition is performed at 100 kVp. This protocol was evaluated retrospectively on a large population (n = 105: group 1) and compared with a control group that did not benefit from this protocol (n = 55: group 2). Both groups were studied on the same device in the same center. Each examination was evaluated and classified into 3 groups: optimal, suboptimal, and noncontributory. Dose length products (DLP) values were also recorded. Statistical tests were applied to the data collected. RESULTS: The rate of noncontributory examinations increased from 43.1% for the control group to 4.8% for the new protocol group. The reference enhancement level in the pulmonary trunk is 250 UH. The mean enhancement in the pulmonary trunk of the new protocol group (332 HU (±71 HU (±71 HU)) is significantly greater than the reference value of 250 HU (P < .0001), which is not the case for control group (P = .3485 > .05), which has a mean enhancement of 239 HU (±87 HU). The control group had a mean DLP of 225 mGy.cm (±81 mGy.cm), and the new-protocol group had a mean DLP of 189 mGy.cm (±75 mGy.cm). DISCUSSION: Our noncontributory examination rate is the lowest rate described in the literature. Our protocol contradicts standard practices of placing an ROI in the pulmonary trunk for bolus detection of iodinated contrast media. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that this protocol reduces the number of noncontributory examinations while reducing the dose delivered to patients. This robust protocol is applicable to other devices and meets perfectly radiation-safety requirements and injected contrast media volume limitation.