Intraoperative Mapping of the Sensory Root of the Trigeminal Nerve in Patients with Pontocerebellar Angle Pathology.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine the position of the 3 sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve in the preganglionic tract using intraoperative neurophysiological mapping. METHODS: We included consecutive adult patients who underwent neurosurgical treatment of cerebellopontine angle lesions. The trigeminal nerve was antidromically stimulated at 3 sites along its circumference with different stimulus intensities at a distance of ≤1 cm from the brainstem. The sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded from each main trigeminal branch (V1 [ophthalmic branch], V2 [maxillary branch], and V3 [mandibular branch]). RESULTS: We analyzed 13 patients. The stimulation points at which we obtained the greatest number of congruous and exclusive SNAPs (SNAPs only on the stimulated branch) was the stimulation point for V3 (20.7%). The stimulation intensity at which we obtained the highest number of congruent and exclusive SNAPs with the stimulated branch was 0.5 mA. CONCLUSIONS: Using our recording conditions, trigeminal stimulation is a reliable technique for mapping the V3 and V1 branches using an intensity not exceeding 0.5. However, reliable identification of the fibers of V2 is more difficult. Stimulation of the trigeminal nerve can be a reliable technique to identify the V3 and V1 branches if rhizotomy of these branches is necessary.

Is the Patient State Index a reliable parameter as guide to anaesthesiology in cranial neurosurgery? A first intraoperative study and a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Patient State Index (PSI) and Suppression Ratio (SR) are two indices calculated by quantitative analysis of EEG used to estimate the depth of anaesthesia but their validation in neurosurgery must be done. Our aim was to investigate the congruity PSI and SR with raw EEG monitoring in neurosurgery. METHODS: We included 34 patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgery. Each patient was monitored by a SedLine device (PSI and SR) and by raw EEG. To appraise the agreement between PSI, SR and EEG Suppr%, Bland-Altman analysis was used. We also correlated the PSI and SR recorded at different times during surgery to the degree of suppression of the raw EEG data by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. For a comparison with previous data we made an international literature review according to PRISMA protocol. RESULTS: At all recording times, we found that there is a strong agreement between PSI and raw EEG. We also found a significant correlation for both PSI and SR with the EEG suppression percentage (p < 0.05), but with a broad dispersion of the individual values within the confidence interval. CONCLUSION: The Masimo SedLine processed EEG monitoring system can be used as a guide in the anaesthetic management of patients during elective cranial neurosurgery, but the anaesthesiologist must be aware that previous correlations between PSI and SR with the suppression percentage may not always be valid in all individual patients. The use of an extended visual raw EEG evaluated by an expert electroencephalographer might help to provide better guidance.

Feasibility of Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potential Monitoring by Cortical Strip Electrodes in Patients During Brain Surgery: A Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVE: The role of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) monitoring during neurosurgical procedure in patient remains unclear. The purpose of our study was to determine the feasibility of intraoperative VEP recording using a strip cortical electrode during surgical resection of intracranial lesions. METHODS: In this prospective, monocentric, observational study, we enrolled consecutive patients undergoing neurosurgical procedure for intracranial lesions. After dural opening, a cortical strip was positioned on the lateral occipital surface. Flash VEPs were continuously recorded using both subdermal corkscrew electrodes and strip electrodes. An electroretinogram was also recorded to guarantee delivery of adequate flash stimuli to the retina. RESULTS: We included 10 patients affected by different intracranial lesions. Flash VEPs were recorded using subdermal corkscrew electrodes in all patients except 1 in whom they were never identified during the recording. Flash VEPs were recorded using strip electrodes in all patients and showed a polyphasic morphology with a significantly larger amplitude compared with that of flash VEPs measured using subdermal corkscrew electrodes. No patient reported worsened postoperative vision and a >50% decrease in the VEPs amplitude was never registered. CONCLUSIONS: We have reported for the first time in the literature that VEP monitoring during a neurosurgical procedure is feasible via a cortical strip located on the occipital surface. The technique demonstrated greater stability and a larger amplitude compared with recordings with scalp electrodes, facilitating identification of any changes. Studies with more patients are needed to assess the clinical reliability of the technique.

Effects of Class II-Selective Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor on Neuromuscular Function and Disease Progression in SOD1-ALS Mice.

Emerging evidence indicates that transcriptome alterations due to epigenetic deregulation concur to ALS pathogenesis. Accordingly, pan-histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors delay ALS development in mice, but these compounds failed when tested in ALS patients. Possibly, lack of selectivity toward specific classes of HDACs weakens the therapeutic effects of pan-HDAC inhibitors. Here, we tested the effects of the HDAC Class II selective inhibitor MC1568 on disease evolution, motor neuron survival as well as skeletal muscle function in SOD1G93A mice. We report that HDACs did not undergo expression changes during disease evolution in isolated motor neurons of adult mice. Conversely, increase in specific Class II HDACs (-4, -5 and -6) occurs in skeletal muscle of mice with severe neuromuscular impairment. Importantly, treatment with MC1568 causes early improvement of motor performances that vanishes at later stages of disease. Notably, motor improvement is not paralleled by reduced motor neuron degeneration but by increased skeletal muscle electrical potentials, reduced activation of mir206/FGFBP1-dependent muscle reinnervation signaling, and increased muscle expression of myogenic genes.

Proposal of a new criterion for electrodiagnosis of meralgia paresthetica by evoked potentials.

We examined 19 subjects with meralgia paresthetica (bilateral in three cases), recording bilateral somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) after stimulation of the tibial posterior nerve (TPN) and cutaneous stimulation in the region of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). We calculated the difference between TPN SSEPs and LFCN SSEPs cortical potentials, identifying a temporal parameter that we termed D(SEP). We defined D(SEP) normal values in a control group. D(SEP) evaluation showed good sensitivity and specificity (85.7% and 82.4%, respectively; accuracy, 83.3%) in discriminating affected limbs from unaffected. The main advantage of this method is to disengage from the necessity of contralateral comparison of LFCN recordings, joined with a reduction of interindividual variability of LFCN SSEPs amplitude and latency that often causes a lower sensitivity of other methods. As an interesting consideration, D(SEP) evaluation appears to mark out a possible subclinical involvement of LFCN in the asymptomatic side of patients with meralgia paresthetica.