Medial Head of the Gastrocnemius Tenotomy Through a Posteromedial Approach Significantly Improves Surgical Accessibility of the Tibial Plateau.

OBJECTIVES: Compare accessible area of the posterior tibial plateau through a modified posteromedial (PM) approach before and after tenotomy of the medial head gastrocnemius. We report the outcomes of 8 patients who underwent gastrocnemius tenotomy during PM approach. METHODS: A modified PM approach was performed on 10 cadaveric legs, and the surgically accessible area was outlined. Next, a medial head gastrocnemius mid substance tenotomy was completed, and the accessible area was again outlined. Tibia specimens were imaged in a micro-CT scanner to measure accessible surface area and linear distance along the joint line. In addition, 8 patients who underwent tenotomy for tibial plateau fracture had outcomes recorded. RESULTS: The modified PM approach with tenotomy provided significantly more access to the posterior plateau than without tenotomy. The modified PM approach before tenotomy allowed access to 1774 mm 2 (SD = 274) of the posterior plateau surface and 2350 mm 2 (SD = 421, P < 0.0001) with tenotomy. A linear distance of 38 mm (SD = 7) and 57 mm (SD = 7, P < 0.00001) was achieved before and after tenotomy, respectively. In the clinical series, the average knee arc of motion was 116 degrees (95-135). CONCLUSIONS: The modified PM approach with medial head gastrocnemius tenotomy significantly improves surgical access to the posterior plateau. Patients who received tenotomy have acceptable functional outcomes. This cadaveric study provides an alternative approach for treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures which may mitigate damage to neurovascular structures.

Patient Outcomes After Transolecranon Fracture-Dislocation.

INTRODUCTION: There are few small case series that discuss patient outcomes after a transolecranon fracture-dislocation, and they suggest that patients have reasonable function after injury. The purpose of this study was to describe the injury pattern and clinical outcomes of transolecranon fracture-dislocations. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, transolecranon fracture-dislocations treated at two academic level 1 trauma centers between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fracture characteristics and postsurgical complications were recorded. Radiographs were reviewed for arthrosis, and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were obtained at a minimum of 12 months after injury. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 12 to 117 months) were included. Nine patients had associated radial head fracture, 23 patients had associated coronoid fracture, four patients had ligamentous injury, and two patients had capitellum fracture. Four patients (11%) developed infection and required irrigation and débridement with intravenous antibiotics. Thirteen patients (13 of 35, 37%) developed radiographic arthrosis with most (11 of 13) having grade 2 or three changes. Patients who had associated radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, capitellum fracture, and/or ligamentous injury had significant arthrosis (10 of 24, 42%) more commonly than patients with olecranon fracture alone (1 of 11, 9%) (P = 0.05). Twenty-eight patients completed patient outcomes instrument and achieved a mean QuickDASH score of 9 (range, 0 to 59). Patients with isolated transolecranon fracture had a significantly better QuickDASH score (0.93, 0 to 4) than patients with transolecranon fracture variant with associated coronoid fracture, radial head fracture, distal humeral fracture, or ligamentous injury (11.74, 0 to 59) (P = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Patients with transolecranon fracture-dislocation had excellent return to function based on the QuickDASH outcome assessment. Patients with transolecranon fracture with associated radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, humeral condyle fracture, and/or ligamentous injury tend to have worse functional outcome than patients with simple transolecranon fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.