RESUMEN
LINE-1 retrotransposons are sequences capable of copying themselves to new genomic loci via an RNA intermediate. New studies implicate LINE-1 in a range of diseases, especially in the context of aging, but without an accurate understanding of where and when LINE-1 is expressed, a full accounting of its role in health and disease is not possible. We therefore developed a method-5' scL1seq-that makes use of a widely available library preparation method (10x Genomics 5' single cell RNA-seq) to measure LINE-1 expression in tens of thousands of single cells. We recapitulated the known pattern of LINE-1 expression in tumors-present in cancer cells, absent from immune cells-and identified hitherto undescribed LINE-1 expression in human epithelial cells and mouse hippocampal neurons. In both cases, we saw a modest increase with age, supporting recent research connecting LINE-1 to age related diseases.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Retroelementos , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Retroelementos/genética , Análisis de Expresión Génica de una Sola Célula , Elementos de Nucleótido Esparcido Largo/genética , NeuronasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale. RESULTS: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited access to dermatologic care may pose an obstacle to the early detection and intervention of cutaneous malignancies. The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in skin cancer diagnosis may alleviate potential care gaps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to offer an in-depth exploration of published AI algorithms trained on dermoscopic and macroscopic clinical images for the diagnosis of melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). METHODS: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review was conducted on peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2023. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among the 232 studies in this review, the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI for tumor detection averaged 90%, 87%, and 91%, respectively. Model performance improved with time. Despite seemingly impressive performance, the paucity of external validation and limited representation of cSCC and skin of color in the data sets limits the generalizability of the current models. In addition, dermatologists coauthored only 12.9% of all studies included in the review. Moving forward, it is imperative to prioritize robustness in data reporting, inclusivity in data collection, and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the development of equitable and effective AI tools.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Impaired immunity may drive the increased incidence and aggression of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in patients with hematologic malignancy; however, precise mechanisms and prognostic biomarkers remain undefined. CD73 maintains elevated immunosuppressive adenosine levels and is associated with poor prognosis in several tumor microenvironments. OBJECTIVE: Identify poor outcome biomarkers in patients with cSCC and hematologic malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Differentially expressed genes in tumors from patients with hematologic malignancy experiencing good (n = 8) versus poor (n = 7) outcomes were identified by NanoString analysis. Results were validated at the protein level using CD73 immunohistochemistry in cSCC patients with (n = 38) and without (n = 29) hematologic malignancy. RESULTS: Forty-eight genes were differentially expressed in tumors from patients with hematologic malignancy experiencing good versus poor outcomes. CD73 gene expression was >2-fold higher in patients with poor versus good outcomes or normal skin. Significantly increased CD73 protein levels were observed in cSCC tumors with poor versus good outcomes from patients with hematologic malignancies (p < .01), whereas no differences were noted in tumors with poor versus good outcomes from patients without hematologic malignancies (p = .49). CONCLUSION: CD73 is highly expressed in poor prognosis cSCC from patients with hematologic malignancy and may represent a useful biomarker and potential therapeutic target.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (vSCC) is a rare tumor with a good prognosis when treated at a localized stage. However, once regional/distant metastasis occurs, vSCC can be rapidly fatal. Thus, it is important to identify tumor prognostic features so that high-risk cases can be prioritized for further diagnostic workup and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of regional/distant metastasis at presentation and sentinel lymph node status for vSCC based on histopathologic characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 15,188 adult vSCC cases from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2012 to 2019. RESULTS: We provide specific estimates of the risk of clinically positive nodes and metastatic disease at presentation and sentinel lymph node positivity according to tumor size, moderate/poor tumor differentiation, and lymph-vascular invasion. These histopathologic factors were all significantly associated with the tested clinical outcomes in a multivariable analysis. Moderate (hazard ratio, 1.190; P < .001) and poor differentiation (hazard ratio, 1.204; P < .001) and lymph-vascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.465; P < .001) were also associated with significantly poorer overall survival. LIMITATIONS: Data on disease-specific survival not available in the data set. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the association of the histopathologic characteristics of vSCC with clinically important outcomes. These data may provide individualized information when discussing diagnostic/treatment recommendations, particularly regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy. These data may also guide future staging and risk stratification efforts for vSCC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lymphocyte activation-gene 3 (LAG-3) is an emerging next-generation immune checkpoint molecule. We aim to define the expression pattern of LAG-3 in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) as a first step to understand the role of LAG-3 in cSCC prognosis and therapy. OBJECTIVE: To define the expression pattern of LAG-3 in cSCC as a first step to understand the role of LAG-3 in cSCC prognosis and therapy. METHODS: To test whether LAG-3 is expressed on cSCC infiltrating lymphocytes, we isolated CD8 + T lymphocytes from three SCC tumors using flow cytometry and performed single-cell RNA sequencing for LAG-3 and programmed cell death protein -1 (PD-1). In addition, we evaluated LAG-3 mRNA expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue using NanoString technology. RESULTS: Single-cell RNA sequencing showed that LAG-3 is expressed more than PD-1 in CD8 + tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (50.8% vs 35.2%, respectively). Quantifying LAG-3 mRNA expression showed that compared with normal skin, LAG-3 mRNA is approximately 8 fold higher in immunocompetent associated SCC tumors and approximately 2 fold higher in transplant associated SCC tumors ( p -values <.05). In addition, LAG-3 mRNA was expressed 7.2 fold higher in T2a SCC tumors compared with normal skin ( p -value <.05). CONCLUSION: Lymphocyte activation-gene 3 is expressed on SCC infiltrating T lymphocytes at a higher percentage than PD-1. In addition, LAG-3 mRNA expression is significantly higher in SCC tumors. Ongoing studies will be performed to define its role as an immune-related biomarker and as a therapeutic target.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/genética , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vulvar melanoma is a rare malignancy with frequent recurrence and poor prognosis. National guidelines recommend wide local excision of these tumors with allowances for narrower margins for anatomic and functional limitations, which are common on specialty sites. There is presently a lack of data of margin positivity after standard excision of vulvar melanomas. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the rate of positive margins after standard excision of vulvar melanomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of surgically excised vulvar melanomas from the NCDB diagnosed from 2004 to 2019. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2,226 cases. Across surgical approaches and tumor stages, 17.2% (Standard Error [SE]: 0.8%) of cases had positive surgical margins. Among tumor stages, T4 tumors were most commonly excised with positive margins (22.9%, SE: 1.5%). On multivariable survival analysis, excision with positive margins was associated with significantly poorer survival (Hazard Ratio 1.299, p = .015). CONCLUSION: We find that positive margin rates after standard excision of vulvar malignancies are higher than for other specialty site melanomas. Our data suggest that use of surgical approaches with complete margin assessment may improve local control and functional outcomes for patients with vulvar melanoma as they have for patients with other specialty site melanomas.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Neoplasias de la Vulva , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vulva/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vulva/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Melanoma/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is recommended to excise adnexal neoplasms with standard local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), although many occur on high-risk sites such as the head and neck (H&N) and exhibit subclinical extension. Minimal evidence exists on the efficacy of standard excisions for these tumors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of positive surgical margins after standard excision of adnexal tumors. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of cutaneous adnexal malignancies from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019. RESULTS: The authors identified a total of 4,402 cases treated with standard excision. Tumors on the H&N were approximately twice as likely as those on the trunk and extremities (T&E) to be excised with positive margins (odds ratio 2.146, p < .001), with the highest estimated rate for eccrine adenocarcinoma (12.1%, SE: 2.3%). The subtype with the highest positive margin rate on the T&E was microcystic adnexal carcinoma (8.0%, SE: 2.9). Positive margins were associated with poorer overall survival on multivariable survival analysis (hazard ratio 1.299, p = .015). CONCLUSION: The authors present subtype- and site-specific positive margin rates for adnexal tumors treated with standard excision, which suggest that tumors on the H&N and some T&E subtypes, should be considered for MMS.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Cabeza , ExtremidadesRESUMEN
Nasal reconstruction has important functional and cosmetic considerations, as proper repair of nasal defects is necessary to maintain function of the nasal airway and to recreate the normal appearance of this central facial structure. Cheek advancement flaps provide matched, mobile, and highly vascularized tissue for the reconstruction of nasal defects, allowing for the concealment of incisions within natural creases in a one-stage approach. However, cheek advancement flaps are often underutilized for nasal reconstruction because of their difficulty in restoring nasal contour. We describe reconstruction of 19 nasal dorsal and sidewall defects 0.8 to 3 cm in size. We incorporated a periosteal anchoring suture to maintain/restore nasal contour and additionally removed a half standing cone inferior to the defect to prevent encroachment of the nasal ala or alar crease. All patients were evaluated at least 3 months postoperatively. In all patients, we were able to restore concavity of the nasofacial sulcus, preserve the biconvex nasal tips, prevent alar flaring and retraction, and conserve the alar groove. All patients had excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes. We believe this modified cheek advancement flap provides functionally and aesthetically superior results and can be considered as a first-line approach for repair of nasal dorsal and sidewall defects in subselected patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Nasales , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Mejilla/cirugía , Neoplasias Nasales/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Nariz/cirugíaRESUMEN
It is well known that solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have a 65- to 100-fold increase in the risk of developing skin cancer, namely, nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) such as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). In addition, these patients are also at increased risk for development of melanoma as well as other less common cutaneous malignancies (Merkel's cell carcinoma, Kaposi's sarcoma). SOTRs with NMSC (namely cSCC) are also at significantly increased risk of poor clinical outcomes including local recurrence, nodal and distant metastasis, and disease-specific death relative to patients who are not immunosuppressed. Increased surveillance and monitoring in patients at risk of aggressive disease and poor outcomes who are on immunosuppression is essential in patients with lung transplants given the high degree of immunosuppression. Increased awareness of risks, treatments, and management allows for improved outcomes in these patients. This article will provide an overview of the risk factors for the development of cutaneous malignancies in organ transplant recipients as well as a detailed discussion of various immunosuppressant and prophylactic medications used in this patient population that contribute to the risk of developing cutaneous malignancies, with an emphasis on NMSC (cSCC and BCC) in lung transplant recipients. Finally, this article includes a discussion on the clinical and dermatologic management of this high-risk immunosuppressed population including a review of topical and systemic agents for field therapy of actinic damage and chemoprevention of keratinocyte carcinomas. In addition, indications for additional treatment and preventive measures such as adjuvant radiation treatment after surgical management of cutaneous malignancies and potential modification of immunosuppressive medication regimens are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Trasplante de Pulmón , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/etiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiología , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Opioid overprescribing is a major contributor to the opioid crisis. The lack of procedure-specific guidelines contributes to the vast differences in prescribing practices. OBJECTIVE: To create opioid-prescribing consensus guidelines for common dermatologic procedures. METHODS: We used a 4-step modified Delphi method to conduct a systematic discussion among a panel of dermatologists in the fields of general dermatology, dermatologic surgery, and cosmetics/phlebology to develop opioid prescribing guidelines for some of the most common dermatologic procedural scenarios. Guidelines were developed for opioid-naive patients undergoing routine procedures. Opioid tablets were defined as oxycodone 5-mg oral equivalents. RESULTS: Postoperative pain after most uncomplicated procedures (76%) can be adequately managed with acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen. Group consensus identified no specific dermatologic scenario that routinely requires more than 15 oxycodone 5-mg oral equivalents to manage postoperative pain. Group consensus found that 23% of the procedural scenarios routinely require 1 to 10 opioid tablets, and only 1 routinely requires 1 to 15 opioid tablets. LIMITATIONS: These recommendations are based on expert consensus in lieu of quality evidence-based outcomes research. These recommendations must be individualized to accommodate patients' comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure-specific opioid prescribing guidelines may serve as a foundation to produce effective and responsible postoperative pain management strategies after dermatologic interventions.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dermatología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
There have been several significant advances in cancer treatment in the last decade that are applicable to the treatment of melanoma and advanced nonmelanoma skin cancers. Among these are the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed death legand-1 (PDL-1) axis, as well as targeted inhibitors of the BRAF/MEK signaling cascade in melanoma, and the hedgehog signaling pathway in basal cell carcinoma (BCC). These immune-based and targeted therapies have dramatically changed the treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic melanoma, Merkel's cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and BCC. In this article, we will briefly review the currently approved targeted and immunotherapy-based treatments for locally advanced and metastatic melanoma, Merkel's cell carcinoma, and cSCC and discuss various combinations of approved therapies, as well as emerging therapeutic candidates that are currently in clinical trials, including novel checkpoint inhibitors in development, intratumoral oncolytic agents (viral and nonviral), and various immune-based therapies such as toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, adoptive T-cell therapy, T-cell costimulation, and innate immune cell therapy. For advanced BCC, we will discuss trials investigating the currently approved smoothened (SMO) inhibitors for neoadjuvant use, emerging SMO inhibitors in development, topical SMO inhibitors, alternative targets in the hedgehog signaling pathway, and the use of anti-PD-1 agents for advanced BCC both alone and in combination with SMO inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Proteínas Hedgehog , HumanosRESUMEN
The International Immunosuppression and Transplant Skin Cancer Collaborative (ITSCC) is an organization of more than 500 physicians and scientists focused on the treatment of cutaneous malignancies following solid organ transplantation and in other forms of immunosuppression. It is well known that solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have an approximate 100-fold increase in the risk of developing skin cancer with consensus guidelines recommending these patients be managed as high risk for local recurrence and metastasis associated with poor outcomes. In September 2018, ITSCC and its European counterpart, the Skin Care in Organ Transplant Patients-Europe (SCOPE), held their biennial scientific retreat in Essex, MA to discuss novel findings in the pathogenesis of cutaneous malignancy including new treatment and prevention strategies in this at-risk population for significant morbidity and mortality from their cutaneous disease. This meeting report is a summary of the novel findings discussed.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Cuidados de la Piel/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Congresos como Asunto , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Agencias Internacionales , Pronóstico , Informe de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapiaRESUMEN
Skin cancer is the most common malignancy affecting solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), and SOTR experience increased skin cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. There are no formal multidisciplinary guidelines for skin cancer screening after transplant, and current practices are widely variable. We conducted three rounds of Delphi method surveys with a panel of 84 U.S. dermatologists and transplant physicians to establish skin cancer screening recommendations for SOTR. The transplant team should risk stratify SOTR for screening, and dermatologists should perform skin cancer screening by full-body skin examination. SOTR with a history of skin cancer should continue regular follow-up with dermatology for skin cancer surveillance. High-risk transplant patients include thoracic organ recipients, SOTR age 50 and above, and male SOTR. High-risk Caucasian patients should be screened within 2 years after transplant, all Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic, and high-risk African American patients should be screened within 5 years after transplant. No consensus was reached regarding screening for low-risk African American SOTR. We propose a standardized approach to skin cancer screening in SOTR based on multidisciplinary expert consensus. These guidelines prioritize and emphasize the need for screening for SOTR at greatest risk for skin cancer.
Asunto(s)
Técnica Delphi , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Consenso , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Receptores de Trasplantes , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Staging systems for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) include Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, eighth edition (AJCC-8). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare AJCC-8 and BWH staging systems for CSCC in immunosuppressed patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of immunosuppressed patients diagnosed with primary CSCC from 2012 to 2016. The main end point was any poor outcome (PO), which included local recurrence, nodal metastasis, and disease-specific death. RESULTS: Fifty-eight immunosuppressed patients had 263 CSCCs. Fifty percent of tumors were AJCC-8 T1, 44.7% T2, and 4.8% T3. Fifty percent of tumors were BWH T1, 48.5% T2a, 1.3% T2b, and 0.4% T3. Risk of PO for AJCC-8 was 1.7%, 8.8%, and 36.4% for T1, T2, and T3, respectively (p < .01). Risk of PO for BWH was 1.8%, 9.9%, 33.3%, and 100.0% for T1, T2a, T2b, and T3, respectively (p < .01). Thirty-six percent of AJCC-8 T3/T4 tumors had POs compared with 5.1% in low T1/T2 stages (p = .002). Fifty percent of BWH T2b/T3 tumors had POs compared with 5.3% in low T1/T2a stages (p = .01). CONCLUSION: AJCC-8 and BWH staging systems stratify CSCC with similar distinctiveness, homogeneity, and monotonicity for immunosuppressed patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células de Merkel , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/patología , Cirugía de Mohs , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Melanoma/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of skin cancers has evolved with the development of Mohs micrographic surgery and a greater emphasis on surgical training within dermatology. It is unclear whether these changes have translated into innovations and contributions to the reconstructive literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess contributions from each medical specialty to the cutaneous head and neck oncologic reconstructive literature. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the head and neck reconstructive literature from 2000 through 2015 based on a priori search terms relating to suture technique, linear closure, advancement, rotation, transposition and interpolation flaps, and identified the specialty of the senior authors. RESULTS: The authors identified 74,871 articles, of which 1,319 were relevant. Under suture technique articles, the senior authors were primarily dermatologists (58.2%) and plastic surgeons (20.3%). Under linear closure, the authors were dermatologists (48.1%), plastic surgeons (22.2%), and otolaryngologists (20.4%). Under advancement and rotation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (40.5%, 38.9%), dermatologists (38.1%, 34.2%), and otolaryngologists (14.4%, 21.6%). Under transposition and interpolation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (47.3%, 39.4%), dermatologists (32.3%, 27.0%), and otolaryngologists (15.3%, 23.4%). CONCLUSION: The primary specialties contributing to the cutaneous head and neck reconstructive literature are plastic surgery, dermatology, and otolaryngology.