The Role of the Transverse Arch in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

BACKGROUND: The transverse arch (TA) has recently been shown to significantly increase the intrinsic stiffness of the midfoot when coupled with the medial longitudinal arch (MLA). Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex deformity that ultimately results in a loss of stiffness and collapse of the MLA. The role of the TA has not been investigated in patients diagnosed with this disorder using weightbearing CT (WBCT). Therefore, this study aims to answer the following questions: (1) Is the curvature of the TA decreased in PCFD? (2) Where within the midfoot does TA curvature flattening happen in PCFD? METHODS: A retrospective review of weightbearing CT images was conducted for 32 PCFD and 32 control feet. The TA curvature was assessed both indirectly using previously described methods and directly using a novel measurement termed the transverse arch plantar (TAP) angle that assesses the angle formed between the first, second, and fifth metatarsals in the coronal plane. Location of TA collapse was also assessed in the coronal plane. RESULTS: The TAP angle was significantly higher in PCFD (mean 115.2 degrees, SD 10.7) than in the control group (mean 100.8 degrees, SD 7.9) (P < .001). No difference was found using the calculated normalized TA curvature between PCFD (mean 17.1, SD 4.8) and controls (mean 18.3, SD 4.0) (P = .266). Location of collapse along the TA in PCFD was most significant at the second metatarsal and medial cuneiform. CONCLUSION: The TA is more collapsed in PCFD compared to controls. This collapse was most substantial between the plantar medial cuneiform and the plantar second metatarsal. This may represent a location of uncoupling of the TA and MLA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case control.

Normal Values for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Space With and Without Subject-Driven External Rotation Stress.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (DTFS) injury can be challenging, especially in cases of subtle instability that may be masked on 2-dimensional conventional radiographs. Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) has recently emerged as a useful diagnostic tool allowing direct assessment of distal tibiofibular area widening. The purpose of the current study was to examine and report normal threshold values for DTFS area measurements in a cohort of healthy volunteers, assessing the ankles in natural weightbearing position and under subject-driven external rotation stress. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 25 healthy volunteers without a history of DTFS injury or high ankle sprain, previous foot and ankle surgery, or current ankle pain. Subjects with any prior ankle injuries were excluded. Study participants underwent bilateral standing nonstress and external rotation stress WBCT scans. The DTFS area (mm2) was semiautomatically quantified on axial-plane WBCT images 1 cm proximal to the apex of the talar dome using validated software. Syndesmosis area values were compared between "unstressed" and "stressed" ankles, as well as left and right ankles. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t tests/Wilcoxon analysis with statistical significance defined as P <.05. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 50 ankles in 25 patients (12 males, 48%) with a mean age of 28.7 ± 9.3 years. In the unstressed ankle, the mean pooled DTFS area was determined to be 103.8 + 20.8 mm2. The mean syndesmosis area of unstressed left ankles (104.2 + 19.5 mm2) was similar to unstressed right ankles (109.2 + 17.2 mm2) in the cohort (P = .117). With external rotation stress, the DTFS area of left ankles (mean difference -0.304 mm2, CI -12.1 to 11.5; P = .082), right ankles (mean difference -5.5 mm2, CI 16.7-5.7; P = .132), and all ankles (mean difference -2.9 mm2, CI -10.8 to 5.1; P = .324) remained similar. CONCLUSION: This study presents normal values and range for DTFS area calculation. In uninjured ankles with expected intact ligaments, subject-driven external rotation stress did not result in significant widening of the DTFS space as imaged on with WBCT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, cross-sectional study.

Quantification of First Metatarsal Joint Surface Interactions in Hallux Rigidus Using Distance and Coverage Mapping: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Weightbearing cone-beam computed tomography (WBCT) has proven useful for analysis of structural changes of the foot and ankle when compared to conventional radiographs. WBCT allows for extraction of distance and coverage mapping metrics, which may provide novel insight into hallux rigidus (HR). This study retrospectively assessed HR joint space using distance and coverage mapping in a case-control study. METHODS: WBCT images of the foot and ankle for 20 symptomatic HR and 20 control patients were obtained. Three-dimensional models were created and analyzed using a custom semiautomatic measurement algorithm. Distance and coverage mapping metrics for the first metatarsophalangeal and metatarsosesamoid joints were extracted from the models and compared between cohorts. Relationships between these metrics and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, a patient-reported outcome of pain, were assessed in HR patients. RESULTS: Overall first metatarsophalangeal joint space narrowing was noted in HR patients when compared to controls by an average of 11.8% (P = .02). However, no significant changes in the overall coverage of the joint were noted. Decreased joint space width and increased surface-to-surface coverage were only and particularly observed at the plantar medial quadrant of the first metatarsal head in HR patients relative to controls. VAS score was significantly but weakly correlated with dorsolateral quadrant coverage (R2 = 0.26, P = .03). CONCLUSION: Distance and coverage mapping serve as a complementary option to current techniques of quantifying HR changes. These metrics can expand the scope of future work investigating joint articulation changes in HR.

Relationship Between Obesity and Medial Longitudinal Arch Bowing.

BACKGROUND: There have been reports about the association between obesity and the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of foot. The purpose of this study is to investigate the change of various parameters related to the MLA according to obesity classification severity by the World Health Organization using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT). METHODS: WBCT data of the noninvolved side of patients presenting with unilateral foot and ankle problems or healthy candidates from September 2014 to October 2022 were extracted from a single referral hospital. Forty-four cases in each of 5 obesity classes were selected sequentially. Two orthopaedic surgeons measured foot and ankle offset, forefoot arch angle (FAA), hindfoot moment arm, percentage of uncoverage of the middle facet of the subtalar joint, talonavicular angle (TNA), navicular-medial cuneiform angle, medial cuneiform-first metatarsal angle, talus-first metatarsal angle (TMT1A), first tarsometatarsal subluxation (TMT1S), talonavicular coverage angle, navicular floor distance (NFD), and NFD per height. Positive values indicate plantar collapse. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. One-way analysis of variance tests were performed for parametric data with equal variances, and Welch's test for unequal variances. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for nonparametric data. Post hoc analysis was performed for statistically significant parameters. Correlation analysis between body mass index (BMI) and 12 parameters were performed using Pearson test. RESULTS: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were excellent, except for TMT1S. The TNA and TMT1A showed a statistically significant difference. FAA (r = -0.2), TNA (r = 0.182), TMT1A (r = 0.296), and NFD (r = -0.173) showed a statistically significant correlation with BMI. CONCLUSION: In nonsymptomatic feet, we found that the talonavicular joint, as measured by the TNA, to be influenced by obesity classification. Obesity and increased BMI was associated with a negative influence on the MLA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Effect of Peritalar Subluxation Correction for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Peritalar subluxation (PTS) is part of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). This study aimed to evaluate initial deformity correction and PTS optimization in PCFD patients with flexible hindfoot deformity undergoing hindfoot joint-sparing surgical procedures and its relationship with improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at latest follow-up. We hypothesized that significant deformity/PTS correction would be observed postoperatively, positively correlating with improved PROMs. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed with 26 flexible PCFD patients undergoing hindfoot joint-sparing reconstructive procedures, mean age 47.1 years (range, 18-77). We assessed weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) overall deformity (foot and ankle offset [FAO]) and PTS markers (distance and coverage maps) at 3 months, as well as PROMs at final follow-up. A multivariate regression model assessed the influence of initial deformity correction and PTS optimization in patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 19.9 months (6-39), and the average number of procedures performed was 4.8 (2-8). FAO improved from 9.4% (8.4-10.9) to 1.9% (1.1-3.6) postoperatively (P < .0001). Mean coverage improved by 69.6% (P = .012), 12.1% (P = .0343) and 5.2% (P = .0074) in, respectively, the anterior, middle, and posterior facets, whereas the sinus tarsi coverage decreased by an average 57.1% (P < .0001) postoperatively. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes were noted for all scores assessed (P < .03). The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that improvement in both FAO and PTS measurements significantly influenced the assessed PROMs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant improvements in the overall 3D deformity, PTS markers, and PROMs following hindfoot joint-sparing surgical treatment in patients with flexible PCFD. More importantly, initial 3D deformity correction and improvement in subtalar joint coverage and extraarticular impingement have been shown to influence PROMs significantly and positively. Addressing these variables should be considered as goals when treating PCFD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Coronal Plane Rotation of the Medial Column in Hallux Valgus: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported an increase in pronation of the first metatarsal (M1) head relative to the ground in hallux valgus (HV) patients compared to controls. Still, the origin and location of this hyperpronation along the medial column is unknown. Recent studies showed that presence of progressive collapsing foot deformities (PCFDs), which is a condition frequently associated with HV, can strongly influence the medial column coronal plane alignment. The objective of this study was to assess the coronal rotation of the medial column bones in HV feet, HV feet with radiologic markers of PCFD, and controls. We hypothesized that hyperpronation in HV will originate from a combination of M1 intrinsic torsion and first tarsometatarsal joint malposition. METHODS: The same cohort of 36 HV and 20 controls matched on age, gender, and body mass index was used. Previously, a validation of the measurements was carried out through a cadaveric study. Using these metrics, we assessed the coronal plane rotation of the navicular, medial cuneiform, and the M1 at its base and head with respect to the ground using weightbearing CT images. We measured the Meary angle and the calcaneal moment arm in our 36 HV subjects. We subdivided our cohort into an HV group and a potential PCFD HV group according to these measurements. Comparisons on medial column bones coronal rotation were performed between HV, PCFD HV, and control groups. RESULTS: Twenty-two HV cases were included in the HV group and 14 in the PCFD HV group. Both groups presented an increase in pronation of the first metatarsal head relative to the ground when compared to the control group (P < .001). Comparing HV and controls showed an 8.3 degrees increase in pronation of M1 intrinsic torsion (P < .001) and a 4.7 degrees pronated malposition of the first tarsometatarsal joint (P = .02) in HV. A 9.7 degrees supinated malposition of the first naviculocuneiform joint (P < .001) was also observed in HV. Comparing PCFD HV and controls showed a significant increase in pronation of the navicular (respectively, 17.2 ± 5.4 and 12.3 ± 3.4 degrees, P = .007) and a 5.5 degrees increase in pronation of M1 intrinsic torsion (P = .02) in PCFD HV, without malposition of the first tarsometatarsal and naviculocuneiform joints. CONCLUSION: Hyperpronation of the M1 head relative to the ground originated from both increases in pronation of M1 intrinsic torsion and first tarsometatarsal joint malposition in HV, although partially counterbalanced by a supinated malposition of the first naviculocuneiform joint. On the other hand, PCFD HV patients showed a generalized pronated position throughout the medial column from the navicular to the M1 head and may be related to the midfoot and hindfoot deformities frequently present in PCFD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.