Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 26(7): 785-791, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28370596

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) from patients with severe asthma can be used to identify allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) cases. METHODS: This cross-sectional feasibility study was conducted in adults with active and severe asthma registered with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. A set of keywords flagged terms potentially indicative of ABPA in free-text comments of patients' EMRs to produce a grid on the basis of keywords' hit or miss. The grid was examined for occurrence and concurrence of keywords to discern patterns of concurrence potentially indicative of an underlying diagnosis of ABPA. RESULTS: The analyses included 3 653 169 free-text items from 21 054 patients. In total, 52 patients (0.25%) had at least one mention of 'ABPA' in their medical record; 67% of these patients also had a mention of 'aspergillus/aspergillosis', 54% of 'bronchiectasis', 42% of 'itraconazole' and 62% of 'IgE'. The term 'aspergillus/aspergillosis' occurred with a proportion of 1.84% (N = 387); 9% of these patients also had a mention of 'ABPA', and the remaining 91% were potential additional cases of ABPA. From the observed concurrence of keywords, we were able to devise a potential algorithm to identify cases with varying degrees of specificity. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that analysis of free text within asthmatic patients' EMRs may be used to identify potential cases of ABPA. This could be an efficient approach to identify rare conditions and to quantify their potential burden. © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica/diagnóstico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Enfermedades Raras/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 14: 291, 2014 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24884845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, there has been sustained interest and efforts to develop a S. aureus vaccine. There is a need to better evaluate the potential public health impact of S. aureus vaccination, particularly given that preventative measures exist to reduce infection. To our knowledge, there is no previous work to assess the potential of a S. aureus vaccine to yield additional MRSA infection reduction in a hospital setting, on top of other preventative measures that already proved efficient. METHODS: The main objectives were to propose a versatile simulation framework for assessing potential added benefits of a hypothetical S. Aureus vaccine in conjunction with other preventative measures, and to illustrate possibilities in a given hospital setting. To this end, we employed a recently published dynamic transmission modelling framework that we further adapted and expanded to include a hypothetical S. aureus vaccination component in order to estimate potential benefits of vaccinating patients prior to hospital admission. RESULTS: Model-based projections indicate that even with other hygiene prevention measures in place, vaccination of patients prior to hospital admission has the potential to provide additional reduction of MRSA infection. Vaccine coverage and vaccine efficacy are key factors that would ultimately impact the magnitude of this reduction. For example, in an average case scenario with 50% decolonization, 50% screening and 50% hygiene compliance level in place, S. aureus vaccination with 25% vaccine coverage, 75% vaccine efficacy against infection, and 0% vaccine efficacy against colonization, may lead to 12% model-projected additional reduction in MRSA infection prevalence due to vaccination, while this reduction could reach 37% for vaccination with 75% vaccine coverage and 75% vaccine efficacy against infection in the same average case scenario. CONCLUSIONS: S. aureus vaccination could potentially provide additional reduction of MRSA infection in a hospital setting, on top of reductions from hygiene prevention measures. The magnitude of such additional reductions can vary significantly depending on the level of hygiene prevention measures in place, as well as key vaccine factors such as coverage and efficacy. Identifying appropriate combinations of preventative measures may lead to optimal strategies to effectively reduce MRSA infection in hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Teóricos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Estafilocócicas/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus/inmunología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad , Salud Pública , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Estafilocócicas/administración & dosificación , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidad , Vacunación
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 14: 296, 2014 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24889406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and its role in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) accentuated the role of SA-SSTIs in hospitalizations. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Census Bureau data to quantify population-based incidence and associated cost for SA-SSTI hospitalizations. RESULTS: SA-SSTI associated hospitalizations increased 123% from 160,811 to 358,212 between 2001 and 2009, and they represented an increasing share of SA- hospitalizations (39% to 51%). SA-SSTI incidence (per 100,000 people) doubled from 57 in 2001 to 117 in 2009 (p<0.01). A significant increase was observed in all age groups. Adults aged 75+ years and children 0-17 years experienced the lowest (27%) and highest (305%) incidence increase, respectively. However, the oldest age group still had the highest SA-SSTI hospitalization incidence across all study years. Total annual cost of SA-SSTI hospitalizations also increased and peaked in 2008 at $4.84 billion, a 44% increase from 2001. In 2009, the average associated cost of a SA-SSTI hospitalization was $11,622 (SE=$200). CONCLUSION: There has been an increase in the incidence and associated cost of SA-SSTI hospitalizations in U.S.A. between 2001 and 2009, with the highest incidence increase seen in children 0-17 years. However, the greatest burden was still seen in the population over 75 years. By 2009, SSTI diagnoses were present in about half of all SA-hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/economía , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Nature ; 452(7187): 633-7, 2008 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18385738

RESUMEN

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with over one million cases annually. To identify genetic factors that modify disease risk, we conducted a genome-wide association study by analysing 317,139 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 1,989 lung cancer cases and 2,625 controls from six central European countries. We identified a locus in chromosome region 15q25 that was strongly associated with lung cancer (P = 9 x 10(-10)). This locus was replicated in five separate lung cancer studies comprising an additional 2,513 lung cancer cases and 4,752 controls (P = 5 x 10(-20) overall), and it was found to account for 14% (attributable risk) of lung cancer cases. Statistically similar risks were observed irrespective of smoking status or propensity to smoke tobacco. The association region contains several genes, including three that encode nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits (CHRNA5, CHRNA3 and CHRNB4). Such subunits are expressed in neurons and other tissues, in particular alveolar epithelial cells, pulmonary neuroendocrine cells and lung cancer cell lines, and they bind to N'-nitrosonornicotine and potential lung carcinogens. A non-synonymous variant of CHRNA5 that induces an amino acid substitution (D398N) at a highly conserved site in the second intracellular loop of the protein is among the markers with the strongest disease associations. Our results provide compelling evidence of a locus at 15q25 predisposing to lung cancer, and reinforce interest in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as potential disease candidates and chemopreventative targets.


Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Par 15/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Subunidades de Proteína/genética , Receptores Nicotínicos/genética , Europa (Continente) , Genotipo , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética
5.
Ann Intern Med ; 157(4): 242-50, 2012 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22910935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: External validation of existing lung cancer risk prediction models is limited. Using such models in clinical practice to guide the referral of patients for computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer depends on external validation and evidence of predicted clinical benefit. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the discrimination of the Liverpool Lung Project (LLP) risk model and demonstrate its predicted benefit for stratifying patients for CT screening by using data from 3 independent studies from Europe and North America. DESIGN: Case-control and prospective cohort study. SETTING: Europe and North America. PATIENTS: Participants in the European Early Lung Cancer (EUELC) and Harvard case-control studies and the LLP population-based prospective cohort (LLPC) study. MEASUREMENTS: 5-year absolute risks for lung cancer predicted by the LLP model. RESULTS: The LLP risk model had good discrimination in both the Harvard (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.78]) and the LLPC (AUC, 0.82 [CI, 0.80 to 0.85]) studies and modest discrimination in the EUELC (AUC, 0.67 [CI, 0.64 to 0.69]) study. The decision utility analysis, which incorporates the harms and benefit of using a risk model to make clinical decisions, indicates that the LLP risk model performed better than smoking duration or family history alone in stratifying high-risk patients for lung cancer CT screening. LIMITATIONS: The model cannot assess whether including other risk factors, such as lung function or genetic markers, would improve accuracy. Lack of information on asbestos exposure in the LLPC limited the ability to validate the complete LLP risk model. CONCLUSION: Validation of the LLP risk model in 3 independent external data sets demonstrated good discrimination and evidence of predicted benefits for stratifying patients for lung cancer CT screening. Further studies are needed to prospectively evaluate model performance and evaluate the optimal population risk thresholds for initiating lung cancer screening.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Modelos Estadísticos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Int J Cancer ; 131(5): 1210-9, 2012 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22052329

RESUMEN

Lung cancer is mainly caused by smoking, but the quantitative relations between smoking and histologic subtypes of lung cancer remain inconclusive. By using one of the largest lung cancer datasets ever assembled, we explored the impact of smoking on risks of the major cell types of lung cancer. This pooled analysis included 13,169 cases and 16,010 controls from Europe and Canada. Studies with population controls comprised 66.5% of the subjects. Adenocarcinoma (AdCa) was the most prevalent subtype in never smokers and in women. Squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) predominated in male smokers. Age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with logistic regression. ORs were elevated for all metrics of exposure to cigarette smoke and were higher for SqCC and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) than for AdCa. Current male smokers with an average daily dose of >30 cigarettes had ORs of 103.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 74.8-143.2) for SqCC, 111.3 (95% CI: 69.8-177.5) for SCLC and 21.9 (95% CI: 16.6-29.0) for AdCa. In women, the corresponding ORs were 62.7 (95% CI: 31.5-124.6), 108.6 (95% CI: 50.7-232.8) and 16.8 (95% CI: 9.2-30.6), respectively. Although ORs started to decline soon after quitting, they did not fully return to the baseline risk of never smokers even 35 years after cessation. The major result that smoking exerted a steeper risk gradient on SqCC and SCLC than on AdCa is in line with previous population data and biological understanding of lung cancer development.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Riesgo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Epidemiol ; 175(7): 706-14, 2012 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22343633

RESUMEN

Occupation as a welder has been associated with a 25%-40% increase in lung cancer risk. This study aims to elucidate to what extent confounding by smoking and asbestos drives this association and to evaluate the role of welding-related exposures such as chromium. The study included 2,197 male incident lung cancer cases and 2,295 controls from Romania, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and the United Kingdom from 1998 to 2001. Information on risk factors was collected through face-to-face interviews. Experts assessed exposure to 70 agents, and risk estimates were adjusted for smoking and occupational exposures. Occupation as a welder/flame cutter (prevalence controls: 3.7%) was associated with an odds ratio of 1.36 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.86) after adjustment for smoking and occupational exposures including asbestos. An odds ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.38) was found for welding fumes (prevalence controls: 22.8%), increasing to 1.38 for more than 25 exposure years (95% CI: 1.09, 1.75). A duration-response association was also observed for mild steel welding without chromium exposure. In this population, occupational exposure to welding fumes accounted for approximately 4% of lung cancer cases, to which both stainless and mild steel welding contributed equally. Given that welding remains a common task for many workers, exposure to welding fumes represents an important risk factor for lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Soldadura/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , República Checa/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hungría/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Oportunidad Relativa , Polonia/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Rumanía/epidemiología , Federación de Rusia/epidemiología , Eslovaquia/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
8.
Thorax ; 67(2): 111-6, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21856697

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Organic dust is a complex mixture of particulate matter from microbial, plant or animal origin. Occupations with exposure to animal products have been associated with an increased lung cancer risk, while exposure to microbial components (eg, endotoxin) has been associated with a decreased risk. To date there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of the possible association between occupational organic dust exposure (and its specific constituents) and lung cancer risk in the general population. METHODS: The SYNERGY project has pooled information on lifetime working and smoking from 13 300 lung cancer cases and 16 273 controls from 11 case-control studies conducted in Europe and Canada. A newly developed general population job-exposure matrix (assigning no, low or high exposure to organic dust, endotoxin, and contact with animals or fresh animal products) was applied to determine level of exposure. ORs for lung cancer were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, study, cigarette pack-years, time since quitting smoking, and ever employment in occupations with established lung cancer risk. RESULTS: Occupational organic dust exposure was associated with increased lung cancer risk. The second to the fourth quartile of cumulative exposure showed significant risk estimates ranging from 1.12 to 1.24 in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.001). This association remained in the highest quartile after restricting analyses to subjects without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. No association was observed between lung cancer and exposure to endotoxin or contact with animals or animal products. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure to organic dust was associated with increased lung cancer risk in this large pooled case-control study.


Asunto(s)
Polvo/análisis , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología
9.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 183(7): 941-8, 2011 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21037020

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Diesel motor exhaust is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as probably carcinogenic to humans. The epidemiologic evidence is evaluated as limited because most studies lack adequate control for potential confounders and only a few studies have reported on exposure-response relationships. OBJECTIVES: Investigate lung cancer risk associated with occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust, while controlling for potential confounders. METHODS: The SYNERGY project pooled information on lifetime work histories and tobacco smoking from 13,304 cases and 16,282 controls from 11 case-control studies conducted in Europe and Canada. A general population job exposure matrix based on ISCO-68 occupational codes, assigning no, low, or high exposure to diesel motor exhaust, was applied to determine level of exposure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Odds ratios of lung cancer and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, study, ever-employment in an occupation with established lung cancer risk, cigarette pack-years, and time-since-quitting smoking. Cumulative diesel exposure was associated with an increased lung cancer risk highest quartile versus unexposed (odds ratio 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.43), and a significant exposure-response relationship (P value < 0.01). Corresponding effect estimates were similar in workers never employed in occupations with established lung cancer risk, and in women and never-smokers, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a consistent association between occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust and increased risk of lung cancer. This association is unlikely explained by bias or confounding, which we addressed by adjusted models and subgroup analyses.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidad , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Intervalos de Confianza , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Oportunidad Relativa , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Distribución por Sexo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Cancer Causes Control ; 22(12): 1669-80, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21960145

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To study the association between occupational exposure to metals including chromium, cadmium, nickel, and arsenic compounds, within a population-based study design, while adjusting for confounding factors. METHODS: A population-based lung cancer case-control study in Central/Eastern Europe and UK was conducted in 1998-2003, including 2,853 cases and 3,104 controls. Exposure to 70 occupational agents was assessed by local expert-teams for all subjects. Odds ratios (OR) for exposure to dust and fumes/mist of chromium, nickel, cadmium, arsenic, as well as inorganic pigment dust and inorganic acid mist, were adjusting for smoking, age, center, sex, and exposure to other occupational agents including the metals under study. RESULTS: Exposure to arsenic (prevalence = 1.4%) was associated with an increased lung cancer risk ((OR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (95% CI):1.05-2.58). For chromium dust (prevalence = 4.8%, OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.95-1.65), a linear upward trend for duration and cumulative exposure was observed. A weak association was observed for exposure to cadmium fumes (prevalence = 1.8%, OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.77-1.82), which was strongest for the highest category of cumulative exposure (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.07-3.90). No increased risk was observed for inorganic acid mist, inorganic pigment dust, or nickel, after adjustment for other metals. An independent effect of nickel cannot be excluded, due to its collinearity with chromium exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposure to metals is an important risk factor for lung cancer. Although the strongest risk was observed for arsenic, exposure to chromium dust was most important in terms of attributable risk due to its high prevalence.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Metales/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 68(2): 148-53, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20871102

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Retrospective exposure assessment remains a problematic aspect of population-based case-control studies. Different methods have been developed, including case-by-case expert assessment and job-exposure matrices (JEM). The present analyses compare exposure prevalence and risk estimates derived by different exposure assessment methods. METHODS: In the context of a case-control study conducted in seven European countries, exposure was estimated for asbestos, diesel motor emissions (DME) and crystalline silica, using three different assessment methods. First, experts assigned exposures to all reported jobs on a case-by-case basis. Second, a population-specific JEM (PSJEM) was developed using the expert assessments of controls only, and re-applied to all study subjects. Third, an independent general population JEM (GPJEM) was created by occupational exposure experts not involved in the original study, and applied to study subjects. Results from these methods were compared. RESULTS: There was poor to fair agreement in assigned exposure between expert assessment and the GPJEM (kappas: asbestos 0.17; DME 0.48; silica 0.38). Exposure prevalence was significantly heterogeneous (p<0.01) between countries for all three agents and assessment methods. For asbestos and DME, significant country heterogeneity in risk estimates was observed when using expert assessment. When applying the GPJEM, the heterogeneity in risk estimates for asbestos and, to some extent, silica diminished. CONCLUSIONS: It has been previously advocated that the expert assessment approach to assign exposures based on detailed questionnaire responses provides more accurate exposure estimates than JEM-based results. However, current results demonstrated little, if any, advantage of case-by-case assessment when compared to a JEM approach.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Anciano , Amianto/toxicidad , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Dióxido de Silicio/toxicidad , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidad
12.
Cancer Causes Control ; 21(7): 1091-104, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20306329

RESUMEN

Lung cancer is the most common neoplastic disease in Eastern and Central Europe. The role of hereditary factors in lung carcinogenesis is not fully understood. Family history (FH) of lung cancer and other tobacco-related cancers might be a strong predictor of the lung cancer risk. We investigated family history of cancer among first-degree relatives of 2,861 patients with lung cancer and 3,118 controls from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, and United Kingdom within the IARC Multicenter Case-Control Study. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were calculated using logistic regression, adjusting for age, gender, study center, education, tobacco smoking, and number of first-degree relatives. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of 41 studies on FH of cancer and lung cancer risk. Positive FH of lung cancer increased risk of lung cancer with OR of 1.63 (95%CI: 1.31-2.01), and having two or more affected relatives with lung cancer further increased the risk of lung cancer with OR 3.60 (95%CI: 1.56-8.31). Among subjects aged less than 50, the OR for FH of lung cancer was 2.08 (95%CI: 1.18-3.63). The associations were generally stronger for squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma subtypes. Heterogeneity in results was not found with respect to smoking status and gender. A significant association was not observed for FH of other smoking-related tumors. The results of meta-analysis were consistent with that of our study with regard to young onset, non-smokers and histology. FH of lung cancer is a predictor of an increased risk of lung cancer, especially in subjects aged less than 50.


Asunto(s)
Familia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , República Checa/epidemiología , Salud de la Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Hungría/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Rumanía/epidemiología , Federación de Rusia/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Eslovaquia/epidemiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
13.
Occup Environ Med ; 67(2): 98-103, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19773276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer incidence in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) is among the highest in the world, and the role of occupational exposures has not been adequately studied in these countries. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the contribution of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) to lung cancer in CEE. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia and Slovakia, as well as the United Kingdom (UK) between 1998 and 2002. Occupational and socio-demographic information was collected through interviews from 2861 newly diagnosed lung cancer cases and 2936 population or hospital controls. Industrial hygiene experts in each country evaluated exposure to 70 occupational agents, whereof 15 mixtures containing PAH. ORs of lung cancer were calculated after adjusting for other occupational exposures and tobacco smoking. RESULTS: The OR for ever exposure to PAH in the CEE countries was 0.93 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.14). The ORs for the highest category of cumulative exposure, duration of exposure and intensity of exposure were 1.13 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.58), 1.02 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.57) and 1.11 (95% CI 0.60 to 2.05), respectively. The OR for ever PAH exposure in the UK was 1.97 (95% CI 1.16 to 3.35). CONCLUSION: Occupational PAH exposure does not appear to substantially contribute to the burden of lung cancer in CEE. The apparently stronger effect observed in the UK may be due to high exposure levels and a joint effect with asbestos.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/toxicidad , Adulto , Anciano , Amianto/toxicidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología
14.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 107(4): 806-816, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31725899

RESUMEN

Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard to investigate efficacy and safety of new treatments. In certain settings, however, randomizing patients to control may be difficult for ethical or feasibility reasons. Borrowing strength using relevant individual patient data on control from external trials or real-world data (RWD) sources may then allow us to reduce, or even eliminate, the concurrent control group. Naive direct use of external control data is not valid due to differences in patient characteristics and other confounding factors. Instead, we suggest the rigorous application of meta-analytic and propensity score methods to use external controls in a principled way. We illustrate these methods with two case studies: (i) a single-arm trial in a rare cancer disease, using propensity score matching to construct an external control from RWD; (ii) a randomized trial in children with multiple sclerosis, borrowing strength from past trials using a Bayesian meta-analytic approach.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Puntaje de Propensión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Determinación de Punto Final/métodos , Determinación de Punto Final/tendencias , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología
15.
Carcinogenesis ; 30(12): 2047-52, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875696

RESUMEN

Genetic variations in phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway may affect critical cellular functions and increase an individual's cancer risk. We systematically evaluate 231 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 19 genes in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway as predictors of bladder cancer risk. In individual SNP analysis, four SNPs in regulatory associated protein of mTOR (RAPTOR) remained significant after correcting for multiple testing: rs11653499 [odds ratio (OR): 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-2.60, P = 0.002], rs7211818 (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.35-3.36, P = 0.001), rs7212142 (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.19-2.07, P = 0.002) and rs9674559 (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.31-3.21, P = 0.002), among which rs7211818 and rs9674559 are within the same haplotype block. In haplotype analysis, compared with the most common haplotypes, haplotype containing the rs7212142 wild-type allele showed a protective effect of bladder cancer (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.97). In contrast, the haplotype containing the rs7211818 variant allele showed a 1.32-fold elevated bladder cancer risk (95% CI: 1.09-1.60). In combined analysis of three independent significant RAPTOR SNPs (rs11653499, rs7211818 and rs7212142), a significant trend was observed for increased risk with an increase in the number of unfavorable genotypes (P for trend <0.001). Compared with the subjects without any of the unfavorable genotypes, those carrying all three unfavorable genotypes showed a 2.22-fold (95% CI: 1.33-3.71) increased bladder cancer risk. This is the first study to evaluate the role of germ line genetic variations in PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway as cancer susceptibility factors that will help us identify high-risk individuals for bladder cancer.


Asunto(s)
Variación Genética , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Proteínas Quinasas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/genética , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Genotipo , Haplotipos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/metabolismo , Riesgo , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR
16.
Int J Cancer ; 124(1): 81-7, 2009 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18823011

RESUMEN

LINE-1 and Alu elements are non-LTR retrotransposons, constituting together over 30% of the human genome and they are frequently hypomethylated in human tumors. A relationship between global hypomethylation and genomic instability has been shown, however, there is little evidence to suggest active role for hypomethylation-mediated reactivation of retroelements in human cancer. In our study, we examined by Pyrosequencing the methylation levels of LINE-1 and Alu sequences in 48 primary nonsmall cell carcinomas and their paired adjacent tissues. We demonstrate a significant reduction of the methylation levels of both elements (p = 7.7 x 10(-14) and 9.6 x 10(-7), respectively). The methylation indices of the 2 elements correlated (p = 0.006), suggesting a possible common mechanism for their methylation maintenance. Genomic instability was measured utilizing 11 fluorescent microsatellite markers located on lung cancer hot-spot regions such as 3p, 5q 9p, 13q and 17p. Hypomethylation of both transposable elements was associated with increased genomic instability (LINE, p = 7.1 x 10(-5); Alu, p = 0.008). The reduction of the methylation index of LINE-1 and Alu following treatment of 3 lung cell lines with 5-aza-2'-deoxycitidine, consistently resulted in increased expression of both elements. Our study demonstrates the strong link between hypomethylation of transposable elements with genomic instability in non-small cell lung cancer and provides early evidence for a potential active role of these elements in lung neoplasia. As demethylating agents are now entering lung cancer trials, it is imperative to gain a greater insight into the potential reactivation of silent retrotransposons in order to advance for the clinical utilization of epigenetics in cancer therapy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Metilación de ADN , Inestabilidad Genómica , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Retroelementos/genética , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Elementos Alu , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Genoma Humano , Humanos , Elementos de Nucleótido Esparcido Largo/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
17.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 18(3): 801-7, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19240244

RESUMEN

We conducted a case-control analysis, a family-based population analysis, and a meta-analysis to assess the role of family history of cancer and kidney cancer in association with the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 325 cases and 329 controls were identified from an ongoing case-control study of RCC. Study variables were assessed through 45-minute structured face-to-face interviews. In the case-control analysis, a family history of any cancer (in first-degree relatives) was associated with a nonsignificant 1.2-fold increase in RCC risk [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.8-1.6]. The risk increased to 1.7 and became significant when the relative was a sibling (95% CI, 1.1-2.5). A family history of kidney cancer (kidney cancer in first-degree relatives) was associated with a 4.3-fold significantly increased risk of RCC (95% CI, 1.6-11.9). The cases reported a total of 2,536 first-degree relatives of which 21 (0.8%) had kidney cancer, and the controls reported a total of 2,333 first-degree relatives of which 5 (0.2%) had kidney cancer (P=0.003). In the family-based population analysis, a family history of kidney cancer was associated with a 2.8-fold increased risk of RCC (95% CI, 1.0-7.8). The meta-analysis further confirmed this significant association with a 2.2-fold increased risk of RCC (95% CI, 1.6-2.9). To our knowledge, this is the first study to use three analytic strategies to investigate the association between a family history of kidney cancer and risk of RCC, and the first systematic evaluation of the relative risk for developing RCC associated with family history.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Texas/epidemiología
18.
BMC Cancer ; 9: 443, 2009 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20003537

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty remains about urinary bladder cancer (UBC) risk for many occupations. Here, we investigate the association between occupation, industry and UBC. METHODS: Lifetime occupational history was collected by in-person interview for 604 newly diagnosed UBC patients and 604 cancer-free controls. Each job title was assigned a two-digit industry code and a three-digit occupation code. Odds ratios (ORs) for UBC associated with ever being employed in an industry or occupation were calculated by unconditional logistic regression adjusting for age, gender and smoking status. We also examined UBC risk by duration of employment (>0 to <10, >or=10 years) in industry or occupation. RESULTS: Significantly increased risk of UBC was observed among waiters and bartenders (OR 2.87; 95% CI 1.05 to 7.72) and occupations related to medicine and health (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.21 to 3.92), agricultural production, livestock and animal specialties (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.49), electrical assembly, installation and repair (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.65), communications (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.00 to 3.01), and health services (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.44). For these occupations we also observed a significant excess risk of UBC for long-term work (i.e. >or=10 years), with the exception of waiters and bartenders. Employment for 10 years or more was associated with increased risk of UBC in general farmers (OR 9.58; 95% CI 2.18 to 42.05), agricultural production of crops (OR 3.36; 95% CI 1.10 to 10.27), occupations related to bench working (OR 4.76; 95% CI 1.74 to 13.01), agricultural, fishery, forestry & related (OR 4.58; 95% CI 1.97 to 10.65), transportation equipment (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.03 to 6.97), and structural work (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.95). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of increased risk of UBC for occupations that were previously reported as at-risk. Workers in several occupation and industry groups have a significantly higher risk of UBC, particularly when duration of employment is 10 years or more.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/etiología , Industrias , Ocupaciones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiología , Anciano , Carcinoma/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología
19.
Cent Eur J Public Health ; 17(3): 115-21, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20020599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Social inequalities have been shown to contribute to the risk of lung cancer in industrialized countries, but it is unclear whether they also play a role in former socialist countries of Europe. METHODS: A case-control study involving 3,403 cases and 3,670 controls was conducted in Central European countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia), Russia, and in the UK. Indicators of socioeconomic status, including education and white/blue collar occupation based on lifetime occupations were analysed as indicators of risk factors for lung cancer development, after adjustment for tobacco smoking and exposure to occupational carcinogens. RESULTS: Both indicators of socioeconomic status: low education and blue collar occupations were found as significant risk factors for lung cancer in men. The odds ratio of lung cancer for blue collar occupations compared to white collar occupations was 1.37 (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.62), that for low education compared to high education (analysis restricted to Central European countries) was 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.77). No such effects were observed in women. CONCLUSIONS: The confirmation of the significant inverse association between the indicators of socioeconomic status and lung cancer risk in men may serve as a strong incentive for adoption of occupational and public health measures in lung cancer prevention.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Fumar/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Escolaridad , Europa Oriental/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
20.
Cancer Res ; 67(17): 8406-11, 2007 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17804757

RESUMEN

DNA pooling in combination with high-throughput sequencing was done as a part of the Sequenom-Genefinder project. In the pilot study, we tested 83,715 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), located primarily in gene-based regions, to identify polymorphic susceptibility variants for lung cancer. For this pilot study, 369 male cases and 287 controls of both sexes (white Europeans of Southern German origin) were analyzed. The study identified a candidate region in 22q12.2 that contained numerous SNPs showing significant case-control differences and that coincides with a region that was shown previously to be frequently deleted in lung cancer cell lines. The candidate region overlies the seizure 6-like (SEZ6L) gene. The pilot study identified a polymorphic Met430Ile substitution in the SEZ6L gene (SNP rs663048) as the top candidate for a variant modulating risk of lung cancer. Two replication studies were conducted to assess the association of SNP rs663048 with lung cancer risk. The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center study included 289 cases and 291 controls matched for gender, age, and smoking status. The Liverpool Lung Project (a United Kingdom study) included 248 cases and 233 controls. Both replication studies showed an association of the rs663048 with lung cancer risk. The homozygotes for the variant allele had more than a 3-fold risk compared with the wild-type homozygotes [combined odds ratio (OR), 3.32; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.81-7.21]. Heterozygotes also had a significantly elevated risk of lung cancer from the combined replication studies with an OR of 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.59). The effect remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, and pack-years of tobacco smoke. We also compared expression of SEZ6L in normal human bronchial epithelial cells (n = 7), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n = 52), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC; n = 22) cell lines by using Affymetrix HG-U133A and HG-U133B GeneChips. We found that the average expression level of SEZ6L in NSCLC cell lines was almost two times higher and in SCLC cell lines more than six times higher when compared with normal lung epithelial cell lines. Using the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database, we found a approximately 2-fold elevated and statistically significant (P = 0.004) level of SEZ6L expression in tumor samples compared with normal lung tissues. In conclusion, the results of these studies representing 906 cases compared with 811 controls indicate a role of the SEZ6L Met430Ile polymorphic variant in increasing lung cancer risk.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA