Timing of radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP): long-term outcomes in the RADICALS-RT trial (NCT00541047).

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been uncertain. RADICALS-RT compared efficacy and safety of adjuvant RT versus an observation policy with salvage RT for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RADICALS-RT was a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with ≥1 risk factor (pT3/4, Gleason 7-10, positive margins, preoperative PSA≥10 ng/ml) for recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to adjuvant RT ('Adjuvant-RT') or an observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure ('Salvage-RT') defined as PSA≥0.1 ng/ml or three consecutive rises. Stratification factors were Gleason score, margin status, planned RT schedule (52.5 Gy/20 fractions or 66 Gy/33 fractions) and treatment centre. The primary outcome measure was freedom-from-distant-metastasis (FFDM), designed with 80% power to detect an improvement from 90% with Salvage-RT (control) to 95% at 10 years with Adjuvant-RT. Secondary outcome measures were biochemical progression-free survival, freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy, safety and patient-reported outcomes. Standard survival analysis methods were used; hazard ratio (HR)<1 favours Adjuvant-RT. RESULTS: Between October 2007 and December 2016, 1396 participants from UK, Denmark, Canada and Ireland were randomised: 699 Salvage-RT, 697 Adjuvant-RT. Allocated groups were balanced with a median age of 65 years. Ninety-three percent (649/697) Adjuvant-RT reported RT within 6 months after randomisation; 39% (270/699) Salvage-RT reported RT during follow-up. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. With 80 distant metastasis events, 10-year FFDM was 93% for Adjuvant-RT and 90% for Salvage-RT: HR=0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.07, P=0.095]. Of 109 deaths, 17 were due to prostate cancer. Overall survival was not improved (HR=0.980, 95% CI 0.667-1.440, P=0.917). Adjuvant-RT reported worse urinary and faecal incontinence 1 year after randomisation (P=0.001); faecal incontinence remained significant after 10 years (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Long-term results from RADICALS-RT confirm adjuvant RT after radical prostatectomy increases the risk of urinary and bowel morbidity, but does not meaningfully improve disease control. An observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure should be the current standard after radical prostatectomy. TRIAL IDENTIFICATION: RADICALS, RADICALS-RT, ISRCTN40814031, NCT00541047.

Plasma osteopontin as a biomarker of prostate cancer aggression: relationship to risk category and treatment response.

BACKGROUND: High plasma osteopontin (OPN) has been linked to tumour hypoxia, metastasis, and poor prognosis. This study aims to assess whether plasma osteopontin was a biomarker of increasing progression within prostate cancer (PCa) prognostic groups and whether it reflected treatment response to local and systemic therapies. METHODS: Baseline OPN was determined in men with localised (n=199), locally recurrent (n=9) and castrate-resistant, metastatic PCa (CRPC-MET; n=37). Receiver-operating curves (ROC) were generated to describe the accuracy of OPN for distinguishing between localised risk groups or localised vs metastatic disease. We also measured OPN pre- and posttreatment, following radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), androgen deprivation (AD) or taxane-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: The CRPC-MET patients had increased baseline values (mean 219; 56-513 ng ml(-1); P<0.0001) compared with the localised, non-metastatic group (mean 72; 12-438 ng ml(-1)). The area under the ROC to differentiate localised vs metastatic disease was improved when OPN was added to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (0.943-0.969). Osteopontin neither distinguished high-risk PCa from other localised PCa nor correlated with serum PSA at baseline. Osteopontin levels reduced in low-risk patients after radical prostatectomy (P=0.005) and in CRPC-MET patients after chemotherapy (P=0.027), but not after EBRT or AD. CONCLUSION: Plasma OPN is as good as PSA at predicting treatment response in CRPC-MET patients after chemotherapy. Our data do not support the use of plasma OPN as a biomarker of increasing tumour burden within localised PCa.

Topotecan and cyclophosphamide in adults with relapsed sarcoma.

UNLABELLED: Background. The combination of topotecan and cyclophosphamide (TC) has activity in pediatric patients with recurrent sarcoma, especially Ewing's sarcoma (EWS). We sought to determine the toxicity of and response to TC in adults with recurrent sarcoma. Patients and Methods. Adults treated with TC from 2005 to 2010 were reviewed who received T = topotecan at 0.75 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-5) and C = cyclophosphamide at 250 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-5) every 21 days. Results. Fifteen patients, median age 31 years (range 17.5-56) had nonpleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS, n = 6), EWS, n = 5, synovial sarcoma (SS, n = 2) leiomyosarcoma (LMS, n = 1), and desmoplastic small round cell tumour (DSRCT, n = 1). Median time to progression was 2.5 months (range 1.6-13.0). Partial responses were seen in 2/6 RMS and 1/2 SS. Stable disease was seen in 2/5 EWS, 1/2 SS and 1 DSRCT. The most common reason for stopping treatment was progressive disease 12/15, (80%). Hematologic toxicity was common; 7 (47%) patients required blood product transfusion, 5 (33%) patients had fever/neutropenia. At median follow-up time of 7.7 months, all but 1 patient had died of disease. CONCLUSION: TC combination is tolerable but has only modest activity in adults with recurrent sarcoma. Other regimens deserve exploration for this high-risk group of patients.

Cost-effectiveness of hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: An ancillary study of the PROstate fractionated irradiation trial - PROFIT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy (H-RT) compared to Conventional Radiotherapy (C-RT) for intermediate-risk prostate caner (PCa). METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial including 222 patients from six French cancer centers was conducted as an ancillary study of the international PROstate Fractionated Irradiation Trial (PROFIT). We carried-out a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the payer's perspective, with a time horizon of 48 months. Patients assigned to the H-RT arm received 6000 cGy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks, or 7800 cGy in 39 fractions over 7 to 8 weeks in the C-RT arm. Patients completed quality of life (QoL) questionnaire: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) at baseline, 24 and 48 months, which were mapped to obtain a EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) equivalent to generate Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY). We assessed differences in QALYs and costs between the two arms with Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Costs, estimated in euro (€) 2020, were combined with QALYs to estimate the Incremental Cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with non-parametric bootstrap. RESULTS: Total costs per patien were lower in the H-RT arm compared to the C-RT arm €3,062 (95 % CI: 2,368 to 3,754) versus €4,285 (95 % CI: 3,355 to 5,215), (p < 0.05). QALY were marginally higher in the H-RT arm, however this difference was not significant: 0.044 (95 % CI: - 0.016 to 0.099). CONCLUSIONS: Treating localized prostate cancer with moderate H-RT could reduce national health insurance spending. Adopting such a treatment with an updated reimbursement tariff would result in improving resource allocation in RT management.

Development of a dosimetry inter-comparison for IMRT as part of site credentialing for a TROG multi-centre clinical trial for prostate cancer.

A methodology has been developed for a dosimetry inter-comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery in Australasia. The inter-comparison is part of site credentialing for those sites participating in the prostate fractionated irradiation trial (PROFIT) for intermediate-risk prostate patients developed by the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and coordinated in Australasia by the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group. Features of the dosimetry inter-comparison design included the use of a dedicated pelvic anthropomorphic phantom, the use of a single CT data set of the phantom including contours and the use of radiochromic film as a dosimeter. Action levels for agreement between measured dose and treatment planning system dose have been proposed based on measurement uncertainty and international experience. A trial run of the dosimetry procedure at the reference centre gave results within the predefined action levels.

Clinical features, treatment, and outcome in 102 adult and pediatric patients with localized high-grade synovial sarcoma.

Background. There remains controversy on the routine use of chemotherapy in localized SS. Methods. The records of 87 adult (AP) and 15 pediatric (PP) patients with localized SS diagnosed between 1986 and 2007 at 2 centres in Toronto were reviewed. Results. Median age for AP and PP was 37.6 (range 15-76) and 14 (range 0.4-18) years, respectively. 65 (64%) patients had large tumours (>5 cm). All patients underwent en bloc surgical resection resulting in 94 (92.2%) negative and 8 (7.8%) microscopically positive surgical margins. 72 (82.8%) AP and 8 (53%) PP received radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered to 12 (13.8%) AP and 13 (87%) PP. 10 AP and 5 PP were evaluable for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with response rate of 10% and 40%, respectively. 5-year EFS and OS was 69.3 ± 4.8% and 80.3 ± 4.3%, respectively, and was similar for AP and PP, In patients with tumors >5 cm, in whom chemotherapy might be considered most appropriate, relapse occurred in 9/19 (47%) with chemotherapy, compared to 17/46 (37%) In those without. Conclusions. Patients with localized SS have a good chance of cure with surgery and RT. Evidence for a well-defined role of chemotherapy to improve survival In localized SS remains elusive.

Inter-observer variability of prostate delineation on cone beam computerised tomography images.

AIM: To determine the inter-observer variability of defining the prostate gland on cone beam computerised tomography images for the purposes of image-guided radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five genitourinary oncologists contoured the prostate gland on five cone beam computerised tomography datasets. The variations in prostate boundary delineation and consequent isocentre placement between observers were measured. Variations in volume and centre of mass were calculated. The variation in boundary definition was determined with finite element modelling. RESULTS: The average standard deviation for centre of mass displacements was small, measuring 0.7, 1.8 and 2.8mm in the left-right, anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions, respectively. The standard deviation for volume determination was 8.93 cm(3) with large variability (3.98-19.00 cm(3)). The mean difference between the computerised tomography-derived volume and the mean cone beam-derived volume was 16% (range 0-23.7%). The mean standard deviations for left-right, anterior-posterior and superior-inferior boundary displacements were, respectively, 1.8, 2.1 and 3.6 mm. The maximum deviation seen was 9.7 mm in the superior direction. CONCLUSION: Expert observers had difficulty agreeing upon the location of the prostate peri-prostatic interface on the images provided. The effect on the centre of mass determination was small, and inter-observer variability for prostate detection on cone beam computerised tomography images is not prohibitive to the use of soft tissue guidance protocols. Potential exists for significant systematic matching errors, and points to the need for rigorous therapist image recognition training and development of guidance protocols before clinical implementation of soft tissue cone beam image guidance.

Marine heat wave and multiple stressors tip bull kelp forest to sea urchin barrens.

Extreme climatic events have recently impacted marine ecosystems around the world, including foundation species such as corals and kelps. Here, we describe the rapid climate-driven catastrophic shift in 2014 from a previously robust kelp forest to unproductive large scale urchin barrens in northern California. Bull kelp canopy was reduced by >90% along more than 350 km of coastline. Twenty years of kelp ecosystem surveys reveal the timing and magnitude of events, including mass mortalities of sea stars (2013-), intense ocean warming (2014-2017), and sea urchin barrens (2015-). Multiple stressors led to the unprecedented and long-lasting decline of the kelp forest. Kelp deforestation triggered mass (80%) abalone mortality (2017) resulting in the closure in 2018 of the recreational abalone fishery worth an estimated $44 M and the collapse of the north coast commercial red sea urchin fishery (2015-) worth $3 M. Key questions remain such as the relative roles of ocean warming and sea star disease in the massive purple sea urchin population increase. Science and policy will need to partner to better understand drivers, build climate-resilient fisheries and kelp forest recovery strategies in order to restore essential kelp forest ecosystem services.

Defining the optimal treatment strategy for localized prostate cancer patients: a survey of ongoing studies at the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

The designation "clinically localized prostate cancer" comprises a group of biologically heterogeneous tumours with different growth rates and risks of relapse. Because prostate cancer is primarily a disease of older men, treatment selection must take into account the prognosis of the tumour, patient age, comorbidities, side effects of treatment, and patient preferences. Clinical trials must identify the various prognostic groups and test the appropriate treatment strategies within these subgroups.

A two isocenter IMRT technique with a controlled junction dose for long volume targets.

Most IMRT techniques have been designed to treat targets smaller than the field size of conventional linac accelerators. In order to overcome the field size restrictions in applying IMRT, we developed a two isocenter IMRT technique to treat long volume targets. The technique exploits an extended dose gradient throughout a junction region of 4-6 cm to minimize the impact of field match errors on a junction dose and manipulates the inverse planning and IMRT segments to fill in the dose gradient and achieve dose uniformity. Techniques for abutting both conventional fields with IMRT ('Static + IMRT') and IMRT fields ('IMRT + IMRT') using two separate isocenters have been developed. Five long volume sarcoma cases have been planned in Pinnacle (Philips, Madison, USA) using Elekta Synergy and Varian 2100EX linacs; two of the cases were clinically treated with this technique. Advantages were demonstrated with well-controlled junction target uniformity and tolerance to setup uncertainties. The junction target dose heterogeneity was controlled at a level of +/-5%; for 3 mm setup errors at the field edges, the junction target dose changed less than 5% and the dose sparing to organs at risk (OARs) was maintained. Film measurements confirmed the treatment planning results.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy or External Beam Radiotherapy: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of Canadian Data.

AIMS: To compare biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and overall survival for prostate cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) using a large Canadian multi-institutional database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with low risk localised prostate cancer treated with SABR, LDR or EBRT and no androgen deprivation therapy were selected. Propensity score matching was used to create two sets of matched cohorts with LDR and EBRT serving as control groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare differences in BFFS and overall survival between treatment groups. RESULTS: The pre-matched cohort contained 602 patients; the median follow-up was >5.0 years. There were no significant differences in BFFS before or after matching for SABR versus LDR but the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was lower after LDR. For the SABR versus EBRT, SABR had a BFFS trend before matching (P = 0.08), which became significant after matching (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification database, low risk prostate cancer patients receiving SABR had similar BFFS compared with patients receiving LDR but better BFFS than EBRT patients. Further comparative studies of efficacy, quality of life and economic outcomes using a broader risk of patients are warranted.

Management of stage II seminoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the results of treatment, patterns of failure, and prognostic factors for relapse in a contemporary cohort of patients with stage II seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1981 and December 1993, 99 patients (median age, 35 years) with stage II seminoma (IIA, 41; IIB, 28; IIC, 24; IID, six) were managed at our institution. Eighty were treated with radiation therapy (RT) and 19 with chemotherapy (ChT). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, the five-year overall actuarial survival was 94%, the 5-year cause-specific survival was 94%, and the 5-year relapse-free rate was 83%. Sixteen (20%) of the 80 patients treated with RT relapsed (median time to relapse, 9 months). Relapse occurred outside the irradiated area in all but two patients. Distant relapse sites included the supraclavicular fossa, bone (four patients, three with spinal cord compression), and lung/mediastinum. All 19 patients treated primarily with ChT achieved disease control and none has relapsed. The relapse rate at 5 years for patients with stage IIA to IIB was 11% (seven of 64), and 56% (nine of 16) for those with stage IIC to IID disease (P < .0001). No patient with IIC or IID disease treated with ChT relapsed as compared with 56% of patients treated with RT (0 of 14 v nine of 16, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy is highly effective in patients with stage IIA or IIB seminoma (89% were relapse free). In stage IIC or IID disease, although local control with RT is excellent, a 50% risk of distant relapse is unacceptable, and not all patients who relapse can be salvaged. Chemotherapy should clearly be the primary treatment in patients with stage IIC or IID seminoma.

Stage I testicular seminoma: results of adjuvant irradiation and surveillance.

PURPOSE: To assess the results of treatment and patterns of relapse in a contemporary group of patients with stage I testicular seminoma managed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and surveillance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1981 and December 1991, 364 patients with stage I seminoma were treated at Princess Margaret Hospital. Of these, 194 were treated with adjuvant RT (92% received a dose of 25 Gy in 20 fractions for 4 weeks) and 172 were managed by surveillance. Two patients were included in this series twice--both had postorchiectomy RT for stage I disease, developed a contralateral seminoma, and were placed on surveillance and analyzed for outcome of both primary tumors. The median follow-up period for patients treated with adjuvant RT was 8.1 years (range, 0.2 to 12), and for patients managed by surveillance, it was 4.2 years (range, 0.6 to 10.1). RESULTS: The overall 5-year actuarial survival rate for all patients was 97%, and the cause-specific survival rate was 99.7%. Only one patient died of seminoma. Of 194 patients treated with RT, 11 have relapsed, with a 5-year relapse-free rate of 94.5%. Prognostic factors for relapse included histology, tunica invasion, spermatic cord involvement, and epididymal involvement. Twenty-seven patients developed disease progression on surveillance, which resulted in a 5-year progression-free rate of 81.9%. The only factor identified to predict progression on surveillance was age at diagnosis: patients aged < or = 34 years had a 26% risk of progression at 5 years, in contrast to a 10% risk of progression in those greater than 34 years of age. CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with stage I testicular seminoma is excellent, with only one of 364 patients (0.27%) dying of disease. In our experience, both a policy of adjuvant RT and of surveillance resulted in a high probability of cure. Our surveillance experience showed that four of five patients with stage I seminoma are cured with orchiectomy alone. The benefit of adjuvant RT was reflected in a decreased relapse rate. We have identified a number of prognostic factors for relapse in patients managed with both approaches, but further study of prognostic factors is required, particularly to identify patients at high risk of disease progression on surveillance.

Function and health status outcomes in a randomized trial comparing preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Morbidity associated with wound complications may translate into disability and quality-of-life disadvantages for patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities. Functional outcome and health status of extremity STS patients randomized in a phase III trial comparing preoperative versus postoperative RT is described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety patients with extremity STS were randomized after stratification by tumor size dichotomized at 10 cm. Function and quality of life were measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (MSTS), the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at randomization, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five patients had function data. Patients treated with postoperative RT had better function with higher MSTS (25.8 v 21.3, P <.01), TESS (69.8 v 60.6, P =.01), and SF-36 bodily pain (67.7 v 58.5, P =.03) scores at 6 weeks after surgery. There were no differences at later time points. Scores on the physical function, role-physical, and general health subscales of the SF-36 were significantly lower than Canadian normative data at all time points. After treatment arm was controlled for, MSTS change scores were predicted by a lower-extremity tumor, a large resection specimen, and motor nerve sacrifice; TESS change scores were predicted by lower-extremity tumor and prior incomplete excision. When wound complication was included in the model, patients with complications had lower MSTS and TESS scores in the first 2 years after treatment. CONCLUSION: The timing of RT has minimal impact on the function of STS patients in the first year after surgery. Tumor characteristics and wound complications have a detrimental effect on patient function.

Intra-prostatic fiducial markers and concurrent androgen deprivation.

AIMS: To document the case of a man with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with external beam radiotherapy and concurrent androgen deprivation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The man, who received 79.8 Gy in 42 fractions of radiotherapy over 8.5 weeks using three intra-prostatic gold fiducial markers for on-line set-up correction, started an anti-androgen 2.5 weeks before radiotherapy, on the day of his planning computed tomography, and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on his first day of radiotherapy. RESULTS: In the sixth week of radiotherapy, the distance between the fiducial markers had diminished: superior to posterior-mid (from 19 to 11 mm), posterior-mid to inferior (from 19 to 15 mm), and superior to inferior (from 31 to 22 mm), so the patient was rescanned. Between the two planning computed tomographies, the prostate volume had decreased from 44.3 to 28.3 cm3 (-36%). Had the planned radiotherapy been delivered to the anatomy of the rescan, the dose to the rectal wall would have exceeded the planned dose-volume histogram constraints. However, with the patient set up to the fiducial markers, the dose-volume histogram constraints for the rectal wall and bladder wall were met throughout the course of radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Involution of the prostate owing to concurrent androgen deprivation may cause in-migration of implanted fiducial markers and excessive dose to the rectal wall. With concurrent androgen deprivation, daily on-line set-up correction to fiducial markers can aid in safe dose escalation.

Approaches to local salvage of soft tissue sarcoma after primary site failure.

Improvements in pretreatment evaluation and the wider application of specialized multidisciplinary care have substantially reduced the risk of local recurrence for patients with soft tissue sarcomas arising at any site, and the recurrences that are still seen are often those that are most difficult to manage effectively. The management strategy for an isolated local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma is usually similar to that used for primary disease. With appropriate pretreatment evaluation and salvage therapy that includes a multidisciplinary approach, most patients with local recurrence can expect local disease control and a good functional outcome. The development of effective management of a local recurrence is often a complex problem. The necessary decisions are influenced by the tumor location, disease extent, and previous local therapy. The need for specialized care is stressed. Patient evaluation, management strategies, and expected outcome for various clinical scenarios are discussed.

The local management of soft tissue sarcoma.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors arising from the connective tissues. STS can arise at any anatomic site, can demonstrate varied behavior and prognosis, and therefore present a formidable challenge in management. The local treatment of STS demands technical complexity in the application of diagnostic tools, including pathology and imaging, as well as treatment approaches, including surgical ablation and reconstruction, radiotherapy, and, in defined cases, chemotherapy. The understanding of the management of these lesions is profoundly dependent on the multidisciplinary setting, where experience has been gained and skills are available to increase the likelihood of a successful result. Several proven options are available for optimal local management, and the choice of approach depends on the prevailing practice and resource profile of the treating center. With modern approaches, the local control rate can be expected to be at least 90% for extremity lesions, which constitute the most common STS. The experience in other anatomic sites is less favorable as a result of a combination of late diagnosis, technically difficult access sites, and possibly less familiarity with these less common presentations. The disappointing results make it all the more important for patients to be referred to a multidisciplinary setting with experience in sarcoma management to maximize the chance of successful local outcome.

Local control of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: the experience of a multidisciplinary sarcoma group with definitive surgery and radiotherapy.

Data gathered on 62 patients with soft tissue sarcoma of an extremity, treated in entirety by an experienced multidisciplinary sarcoma group, were analysed. With a philosophy of emphasising attainment of histologically negative margins at carefully planned limb sparing surgery, combined with either pre-operative or postoperative radiation therapy, a crude local control rate of 95% (59 of 62 patients) at a minimum of 24 months follow-up was obtained. Of 9 patients with microscopically positive margins after definitive surgery, 8 had undergone maximal resection compatible with preservation of function. One of these 9 failed locally, indicating that radiation therapy is effective in eradicating microscopic disease in this tumour. The excellent local control obtained with limb-sparing surgery in this series justifies early referral of patients with these uncommon cancers to an experienced multidisciplinary unit. 26 patients (42%) failed systemically at a minimum of 24 months follow-up, and 19 (30.6%) died of their disease, confirming the need for effective systemic therapy in soft tissue sarcoma. Tumours greater than 10 cm in diameter had a greater risk of systemic relapse.