Stapled side-to-side anastomosis for ileostomy reversal: a simple and reproducible technique with video.

INTRODUCTION: Protective diverting ileostomy is commonly performed in rectal surgery to avoid septic complications of low colorectal anastomosis. Ileostomy closure usually occurs three months after the surgery and can be realized in two ways: hand sewn or stapled. Existing randomized studies comparing the two techniques showed no difference in terms of complications. METHODS: Our study describes the standard technique of ileostomy reversal as done in Bordeaux University Hospital in 10 steps individually illustrated and with an explicative video. We also collected data concerning the 50 last patients who underwent an ileostomy reversal in our center from June 2021 to June 2022. RESULTS: Mean duration of the ileostomy closure was 46.8 minutes, and the mean total hospital stay was 4.66 days. Five of 50 (10%) patients had a post-operative bowel obstruction, 2/50 (4%) patients had a post-operative bleeding, 1/50 (2%) patient had a wound infection, and there was no anastomotic leakage observed. CONCLUSION: Stapled side-to-side anastomosis is a rapid, simple, and reproducible technique for ileostomy reversal. There are no more complications compared to hand-sewn anastomosis. It engenders an additional cost compensated by the gain in operating time which altogether saves money.

An analysis of feasibility of robotic colectomy: post hoc analysis of a phase III randomised controlled trial.

With global expansion of robotic surgery, there is increasing interest in its application in colonic surgery. This study aimed to report the feasibility of robotic assisted colonic resection as a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) by comparing outcomes following laparoscopic and robotic colectomy. The PAROS trial was a phase III RCT that compared outcomes in low pressure (LP, 7 mmHg) and standard pressure (SP, 12 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum in elective colectomy. A post hoc analysis was performed to compare clinical and operative outcomes in laparoscopic and robotic colonic resection in a high volume colorectal surgery practice. A health economic comparison was also performed. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS StatisticsTM, version 20. 127 patients were compared [34% (n = 43) robotic, 66% (n = 84) laparoscopic]. LP pneumoperitoneum was practiced in 47% (n = 20) robotic and 50% (n = 42) laparoscopic cases. Cancer procedures were more commonly performed in the robotic group (p = 0.009). Clinical outcomes were comparable including post-operative surgical complications (p = 0.493). Operative times were longer (p = 0.005) but length of hospital stay (LOS) was one day shorter in the robotic group (p = 0.05). Conversion to SP pneumoperitoneum was required in 9.5% (n = 8) of the LP laparoscopic group compared to 2.3% (n = 1) of the LP robotic group. Surgeons reported good operative visibility in all robotic cases and 94% (n = 80) laparoscopic cases. Considering, capital investment and maintenance, instrumentation and LOS, robotic cases were €651 more expensive per case. Robotic-assisted surgery is feasible in colonic resection and may facilitate shorter LOS and the possibility to complete MIS using low pressure pneumoperitoneum.