Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 30(9): 1803-12, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24826951

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether blood donors (BDs), compared with non blood donors (nBDs), present significant differences in risk of illness, hospitalization and death. METHODS: All subjects included in the database of the Association of Voluntary Italian Blood Donors of Ferrara entered the study. The analysis only included residents who donated at least once. For each BD, four age- and sex-matched non-donor controls were selected from the master archive of the Province of Ferrara. Then, all hospitalizations of BDs and controls from January 2005 to December 2010 were extracted from the hospital admission and discharge database of the region. RESULTS: During the considered period, 26,140 hospital admissions in BDs and 98,685 in controls were recorded; 11,862 individual BDs and 43,138 nBDs. Compared with controls, BDs were characterized by older age, lower average number of admissions and diagnoses, Charlson comorbidity index score, shorter hospital length-of-stay (LOS), lower mortality rates and higher age at death. Age at death was significantly higher for BDs with longer duration and higher number of donations. In particular, blood donation was not related to an increased risk of malignancies. The main limitation of this study is potential selection bias (i.e. a healthy donor effect). Matching with the control population also has its limitations. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that BDs have a lower risk of hospitalization, and, more specifically, do not have an increased risk of malignancies, leukemias, lymphomas and myeloma.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad , Neoplasias/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
2.
Intern Emerg Med ; 9(3): 319-24, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23329404

RESUMEN

Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) improves survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and severe hypoxemia. Adherence to LTOT guidelines is problematic, both because efficacy has been demonstrated only in specific groups of COPD patients, and because it implies high costs. Introduces treatment high costs. The aim of our study was to examine retrospectively the adherence to LTOT guidelines in a sample of medical records of patients prescribed LTOT between January 2005 and December 2006 in two Italian university hospitals (Ferrara and Modena). Out of a total of 191 medical records of patients prescribed LTOT, only 157 had adequate clinical data considering the three main criteria for appropriateness (arterial blood gas and/or pulse oximetry measurement, oxygen administration, smoking status). Out of these 157 patients, only 73 (46.5 %) fulfilled all three criteria recommended by the guidelines. Adherence was higher for LTOT prescribed by pulmonologists compared to internists. This survey showed that the adherence to LTOT guidelines in a sample of medical records of patients prescribed LTOT is poor. Considering the high costs and the impact on the patients' quality of life of LTOT, these results suggest that the adherence should be carefully monitored.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA