Antidepressants and the risk of abnormal bleeding during spinal surgery: a case­control study.

INTRODUCTION: Antidepressant medications are widely used by patients requiring spinal surgery. In spite of a generally favorable safety profile of newer antidepressants, several prior studies have suggested an association between use of serotonergic antidepressants and excessive bleeding. This study was designed to determine if there was any association between antidepressant use and the risk of excessive intraoperative blood loss during spinal surgery, and whether particular types of antidepressants were specifically associated with this increased blood loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case control study was conducted utilizing a population of 1,539 patients who underwent elective spinal fusion by a single surgeon at one medical center. Of the included patients, 213 used antidepressant medication and 1,326 patients did not use any type of antidepressant medication. Of patients taking antidepressants, 37 patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria, leaving 176 patients suitable for inclusion. The study group (176 patients) consisted of all patients who used an antidepressant medication for at least a 2-week period prior to spinal surgery. A control group of 352 patients were assembled from a random sample of 1,326 patients operated on by the same surgeon during the same time period in a two-to-one ratio with study group. Intraoperative blood loss was the primary outcome variable and was compared between the study and control group and between individuals in the study group taking serotonergic (SSRIs or SNRIs) or non-serotonergic antidepressants. Other variables, including length of hospital stay and surgical category, were also collected and analyzed separately. RESULTS: Overall, the mean blood loss (BL) for the antidepressant group was 298 cc, 23% more than the 241 cc lost by the procedure- and level-matched control group (p = 0.01). Patients taking serotonergic antidepressants also had statistically significant higher blood loss than the matched control group as a whole (334 vs. 241 cc, p = 0.015). This difference was also found in subgroups of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, lumbar instrumented fusion, or anterior/posterior lumbar fusion. Blood loss was also higher in the subgroup of patients taking bupropion (708 cc, p = 0.023) compared with the control group. The mean length of hospital stay was 33.3% greater in patients on antidepressant medications compared to patients not taking an antidepressant (mean of 4 vs. 3 days, respectively, p = 0.0001). Antidepressant medications may be associated with increased intraoperative blood loss during spinal surgery, although the magnitude of the increased blood loss may not be clinically significant in all cases. The increase was greatest in patients undergoing anterior/posterior lumbar fusions, in whom the intraoperative blood loss was 2.5 times greater than that in the matched control group. CONCLUSION: Clinicians treating patients who are planning to undergo elective spinal surgery and are on an antidepressant medication should be aware of this potential effect and should consider tapering off the serotonergic antidepressant prior to surgery.

The Use of ß-Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists in Psychiatry: A Review.

BACKGROUND: ß-Blockers (BBs) are a widely used class of medications with a number of medical indications. Their ability to suppress the adrenergic response has made them a target of investigation for treating a variety of psychiatric symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to identify evidence regarding the use of BBs for various psychiatric disorders including anxiety disorders, mood disorders, psychosis, and posttraumatic stress disorder. We also review the evidence for use for aggression and agitation and for extrapyramidal side effects of psychiatric medications. METHODS: A search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted with search terms relevant to the use of BBs for psychiatric conditions. Studies were selected based on relevance to the review objective, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Case reports were included and are clearly identified when referenced in this review. RESULTS: A total of 44 publications were included that examined the use of BBs as treatment for the following psychiatric symptoms and conditions: anxiety disorders, depression and mood disorders, acute stress disorder and postraumatic stress disorder, psychotic disorders and extrapyramidal symptoms, as well as aggression and agitation. Additionally, adverse effects and drug-drug interactions were reviewed. CONCLUSION: Well-characterized psychiatric uses of BBs include treating symptoms of performance anxiety and akathisia. Some positive evidence exists for BB therapy in other disorders such as specific phobia, panic disorder, and for aggression in patients with psychosis, acquired brain injury, or intellectual disability. Most of the evidence on the role of BBs in psychiatry is as adjunctive treatment for management of somatic symptoms rather than as monotherapy. Outside of performance anxiety and akathisia, the role of BBs in psychiatry has not been subjected to careful study, and further investigative trials are needed.

Economic Effects of Anti-Depressant Usage on Elective Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested, although not proven, that presence of concomitant psychiatric disorders may increase the inpatient costs for patients undergoing elective surgery. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that elective lumbar fusion surgery is more costly in patients with under treatment for depression. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study of 142 patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion. Of those 142 patients, 41 patients were chronically using an antidepressant medication that considered as a "study group", and 101 patients were not taking an antidepressant medication that considered as a "control group". Data was collected for this cohort regarding antidepressant usage patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index scores and cost. Costs were compared between those with a concomitant antidepressant usage and those without antidepressant usage using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Patients using antidepressants and those with no history of antidepressant usage were similar in terms of gender, age and number of operative levels. The LOS demonstrated a non-significant trend towards longer stays in those using anti-depressants. Total charges, payments, variable costs and fixed costs were all higher in the antidepressant group but none of the differences reached statistical significance. Using Total Charges as the dependent variable, gender and having psychiatric comorbidities were retained independent variables. Use of an antidepressant was independently predictive of a 36% increase in Total Charges. Antidepressant usage as an independent variable also conferred a 22% increase in cost and predictive of a 19% increase in Fixed Cost. Male gender was predictive of a 30% increase in Total Charges. CONCLUSION: This study suggests use of antidepressant in patients who undergo elective spine fusion compared with control group is associated with increasing total cost and length of hospitalization, although none of the differences reached statistical significance.

Relationship of serum prolactin with severity of drug use and treatment outcome in cocaine dependence.

RATIONALE: Alteration in serum prolactin (PRL) levels may reflect changes in central dopamine activity, which modulates the behavioral effects of cocaine. Therefore, serum PRL may have a potential role as a biological marker of drug severity and treatment outcome in cocaine dependence. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether serum PRL levels differed between cocaine-dependent (CD) subjects and controls, and whether PRL levels were associated with severity of drug use and treatment outcome in CD subjects. METHODS: Basal PRL concentrations were assayed in 141 African-American (AA) CD patients attending an outpatient treatment program and 60 AA controls. Severity of drug use was assessed using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Measures of abstinence and retention during 12 weeks of treatment and at 6-month follow-up were employed as outcome variables. RESULTS: The basal PRL (ng/ml) in CD patients (9.28+/-4.13) was significantly higher than controls (7.33+/-2.94) (t=3.77, P<0.01). At baseline, PRL was positively correlated with ASI-drug (r=0.38, P<0.01), ASI-alcohol (r=0.19, P<0.05), and ASI-psychological (r=0.25, P<0.01) composite scores, and with the quantity of cocaine use (r=0.18, P<0.05). However, PRL levels were not significantly associated with number of negative urine screens, days in treatment, number of sessions attended, dropout rate or changes in ASI scores during treatment and at follow-up. Also, basal PRL did not significantly contribute toward the variance in predicting any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Although cocaine use seems to influence PRL levels, it does not appear that PRL is a predictor of treatment outcome in cocaine dependence.

Relationship between tobacco smoking and positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

In an attempt to understand the reasons behind the high prevalence of tobacco smoking in patients with schizophrenia, the study examined whether specific symptoms of schizophrenia were associated with smoking. Standardized assessments of nicotine dependence (Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence) and psychopathology (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) were performed on 87 inpatients with schizophrenia. Nearly 76% of patients were nicotine dependent. Significant positive correlations were found between Fagerstrom scores and the total negative symptom score and scores on the negative symptom subscales of blunted affect, social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, and stereotyped thinking. Fagerstrom scores were also significantly associated with impairment in attention, orientation, thinking, and impulse control. Positive symptoms were not significantly associated with smoking. A combination of negative symptoms, duration of illness, and alcohol use optimally predicted smoking in the sample. Neurobiological mechanisms could possibly underlie some of our findings and require further investigation.