Binocular vision adaptively suppresses delayed monocular signals.

A neutral density filter placed before one eye will produce a dichoptic imbalance in luminance, which attenuates responses to visual stimuli and lags neural signals from retina to cortex in the filtered eye. When stimuli are presented to both the filtered and unfiltered eye (i.e., binocularly), neural responses show little attenuation and no lag compared with their baseline counterpart. This suggests that binocular visual mechanisms must suppress the attenuated and delayed input from the filtered eye; however, the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Here, we used a Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP) technique to measure neural responses to monocularly and binocularly presented stimuli while observers wore an ND filter in front of their dominant eye. These data were well-described by a binocular summation model, which received the sinusoidal contrast modulation of the stimulus as input. We incorporated the influence of the ND filter with an impulse response function, which adjusted the input magnitude and phase in a biophysically plausible manner. The model captured the increase in attenuation and lag of neural signals for stimuli presented to the filtered eye as a function of filter strength, while also generating the filter phase-invariant responses from binocular presentation for EEG and psychophysical data. These results clarify how binocular visual mechanisms-specifically interocular suppression-can suppress the delayed and attenuated signals from the filtered eye and maintain normal neural signals under imbalanced luminance conditions.

Kinematics and muscle activation patterns during a maximal voluntary rate activity in healthy elderly and young adults.

BACKGROUND: Maximal voluntary rate (MVR) performance tasks can provide important age-related information to the limiting factors associated with movement and the development of fatigue. AIM: To determine whether kinematic and muscle activation patterns during an MVR task differ between young and older adults. METHODS: We continuously measured frequency, amplitude, peak velocity, index of co-contraction and median frequencies of the index finger flexors and extensors during a 20-s MVR task in 10 young and 10 older subjects. RESULTS: Index finger amplitude and peak velocity in flexion and extension were significantly lower in the older group. During the MVR, amplitude was maintained in the old (1-4 s, 53.2° ± 2.8° vs. 15-19 s, 48.6° ± 3.2°, ns) but not in the younger group (1-4 s, 64.9° ± 4.9° vs. 15-19 s, 59.4° ± 3.3°; p = 0.001). Frequency declined in the young (1-4 s, 5.2 ± 0.24 Hz vs. 15-19 s, 4.4 ± 0.25 Hz; p = 0.001) and old (1-4 s, 4.6 ± 0.17 Hz vs. 15-19 s, 4.0 ± 0.15 Hz; p = 0.01). Similarly, peak flexion velocity of the young (1-4 s, 1.77 ± 0.07 × 103 °/s vs. 15-19 s, 1.01 ± 0.07 × 103 °/s, p = 0.01) and older groups (1-4 s, 1.04 ± 0.07 × 103 °/s vs. 15-19 s, 0.78 ± 0.06 × 103 °/s; p = 0.016) as well as peak extension velocity of the young (1-4 s, 1.01 ± 0.053 × 103 °/s vs. 15-19 s, 0.78 ± 0.06 × 103 °/s, p = 0.01) and older groups (1-4 s, 0.72 ± 0.04 × 103 °/s vs. 15-19 s, 0.58 ± 0.05 × 103 °/s, p = 0.012) significantly decreased throughout the MVR. Median frequency of the flexors and extensors were maintained and were not different between groups. Only the older group experienced an increase in the index of co-contraction. CONCLUSION: The changes in kinematics over time are not a result of a decrease in pre-post test force or velocity, but rather central factors affecting movement coordination.

Short-term monocular occlusion produces changes in ocular dominance by a reciprocal modulation of interocular inhibition.

Ocular dominance can be modulated by short-term monocular deprivation. This changes the contribution that each eye makes to binocular vision, an example of adult cortical neuroplasticity. Optical imaging in primates and psychophysics in humans suggest these neuroplastic changes occur in V1. Here we use brain imaging (MEG) in normal adults to better understand the nature of these neuroplastic changes. The results suggest that short-term monocular deprivation, whether it be by an opaque or translucent patch, modulates dichoptic inhibitory interactions in a reciprocal fashion; the unpatched eye is inhibited, the patched eye is released from inhibition. These observations locate the neuroplastic changes to a level of visual processing where there are interocular inhibitory interactions prior to binocular combination and help to explain why both binocular rivalry and fusional tasks reveal them.

Latent binocular function in amblyopia.

Recently, psychophysical studies have shown that humans with amblyopia do have binocular function that is not normally revealed due to dominant suppressive interactions under normal viewing conditions. Here we use magnetoencephalography (MEG) combined with dichoptic visual stimulation to investigate the underlying binocular function in humans with amblyopia for stimuli that, because of their temporal properties, would be expected to bypass suppressive effects and to reveal any underlying binocular function. We recorded contrast response functions in visual cortical area V1 of amblyopes and normal observers using a steady state visually evoked responses (SSVER) protocol. We used stimuli that were frequency-tagged at 4Hz and 6Hz that allowed identification of the responses from each eye and were of a sufficiently high temporal frequency (>3Hz) to bypass suppression. To characterize binocular function, we compared dichoptic masking between the two eyes in normal and amblyopic participants as well as interocular phase differences in the two groups. We observed that the primary visual cortex responds less to the stimulation of the amblyopic eye compared to the fellow eye. The pattern of interaction in the amblyopic visual system however was not significantly different between the amblyopic and fellow eyes. However, the amblyopic suppressive interactions were lower than those observed in the binocular system of our normal observers. Furthermore, we identified an interocular processing delay of approximately 20ms in our amblyopic group. To conclude, when suppression is greatly reduced, such as the case with our stimulation above 3Hz, the amblyopic visual system exhibits a lack of binocular interactions.