Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 295: 800-810, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38159336

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although substantial progress has been achieved to bring surgical care to the forefront of global health discussions, a number of low-and middle-income countries are still in the process of developing a National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP). This paper describes the initial step toward the development of the NSOAP through the creation of the Kenya National Hospital Assessment Tool (K-HAT). METHODS: A study protocol was developed by a multisectoral collaborative group that represented the pillars of surgical capacity development in Kenya. The K-HAT was adapted from two World Health Organization (WHO) tools: the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool and the Situational Analysis Tool. The survey tool was deployed on Open Data Kit, an open-source electronic encrypted database. This new locally adapted tool was pilot tested in three hospitals in Kenya and subsequently deployed in Level 4 facilities. RESULTS: Eighty-nine questions representing over 800 data points divided into six WHO Health Systems Strengthening sections comprised the K-HAT which was deployed to over 95% of Level 4 hospitals in Kenya. When compared to the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool, the K-HAT collected more detailed information. The pilot test team reported that K-HAT was easy to administer, easily understood by the respondents, and that it took approximately 1 hour to collect data from each facility. CONCLUSIONS: The K-HAT collected comprehensive information that can be used to develop Kenya's NSOAP.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesiología , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Kenia , Hospitales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud
2.
Wound Repair Regen ; 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958095

RESUMEN

Keloid disorder is a morbid and disfiguring benign fibroproliferative disease with a higher incidence in groups with darker skin pigmentation. Predicting keloidogenesis in patients is difficult with treatment primarily aimed at preventing further scar expansion and improving aesthetics without addressing their unknown underlying pathophysiology. We aimed to identify potential genetic predispositions to keloid scarring in the literature. A search was conducted on 21 August 2023, by the first and second authors independently from 1985 to August 2023 using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL. The following MeSH terms were used: 'Keloid', 'Risk' and 'Genetic'. Two researchers independently searched for studies based on titles and abstracts and screened filtered articles by reviewing full text. If no agreement could be reached, a third senior author designated whether the article should be included. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement as the basis of our organisation. Human studies with genetic analysis to determine an association of a protein or gene to keloidogenesis were selected for inclusion. Studies in languages other than English, reviews, conference articles, and book chapters were excluded. Fifty studies met inclusion criteria. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system was broadly implicated, and the DRB1*15 allele was associated with an increased risk of keloid in three separate ethnic groups. Some HLA Class I alleles were associated with keloid in one population but not in others. Additionally, polymorphisms in the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (NEDD4) signal cascade and vitamin D receptor (VDR) have been implicated in diverse groups. No current genetic test can predict keloid risk. Our review identified candidate predisposing genes, including NEDD4, VDR and components of the HLA system. Further studies in heterogeneous populations are needed to identify reliable screening targets.

3.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(1): 80-85, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38117048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neuromas substantially decrease a patient's quality of life and obstruct the use of prosthetics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the global incidence of neuroma formation in upper extremity amputees. METHODS: A literature search was performed using 3 databases: Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria for the systematic review were those studies investigating only upper extremity amputees and reported postamputation neuroma. A random-effects, inverse-variance analysis was conducted to determine the pooled proportion of neuromas within the upper extremity amputation population. Critical appraisal using the JBI Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data of each individual article were performed for the systematic review. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria collating a total of 1931 patients across 8 countries. More than three-fourth of patients are young men (77%; age range, 19-54 years) and had an amputation due to trauma. The random-effects analysis found the pooled combined proportion of neuromas to be 13% (95% confidence interval, 8%-18%). The treatment of neuroma is highly variable, with some patients receiving no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled proportion of neuroma incidence in the 1931 patients was 13%. With the known global prevalence of upper extremity amputees, this translates to nearly 3 million amputees suffering from a neuroma globally. Increasing training in preventative surgical methods could contribute to lowering this incidence and improving the outcomes of this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Amputados , Neuroma , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neuroma/epidemiología , Neuroma/etiología , Neuroma/cirugía , Extremidad Superior/cirugía
4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 2024 May 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775260

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The inverted nipple is a condition that affects approximately 10% of women and can have negative cosmetic and psychological implications. Surgical correction is a common approach to address this concern; however, this method can lead to complications, such as nipple necrosis. As comprehensive guidelines are currently lacking for postoperative nipple necrosis management, this study reports our experience in the management of postoperative nipple necrosis following initial attempt at surgical management. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted and included female patients who experienced postoperative nipple necrosis after inverted nipple correction between 2018 and 2021. Cases of recurrent nipple retraction following partial necrosis and cases of complete nipple necrosis were evaluated. Recurrent nipple retraction was managed using various inverted nipple correction techniques, while complete necrosis required a modified C-V flap for nipple reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients with a total of 42 affected nipples were included. Thirteen cases (26 nipples) experienced recurrent nipple retraction following partial necrosis, while 12 cases (16 nipples) exhibited complete necrosis. No significant predictive variables for these complications were found. Notably, all patients achieved successful healing following single-stage surgical repair. At 6 months postoperation, the treated nipples exhibited satisfactory healing and appearance and an absence of infection or papillary necrosis. Seven reconstructed nipples showed a mean loss of projection (2.7 ± 0.98) compared with only 2 nipples in the inverted nipple correction group. CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing between recurrent nipple retraction after partial necrosis and complete nipple necrosis is crucial and should be taken into consideration when managing patients following inverted nipple correction.

5.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(2): 148-155, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38198625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient education materials are commonly reported to be difficult to understand. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to use crowdsourcing to improve patient education materials at our institution. METHODS: This was a department-wide quality improvement project to increase organizational health literacy. There are 6 phases of this pilot study: (1) evaluating preexisting patient education materials, (2) evaluating online patient education materials at the society (the American Society of Plastic Surgeon) and government level (Medline Plus), (3) redesigning our patient education material and reevaluating the education material, (4) crowdsourcing to evaluate understandability of the new patient education material, (5) data analysis, and (6) incorporating crowdsourcing suggestions to the patient education material. RESULTS: Breast-related patient education materials are not easy to read at the institution level, the society level, and the government level. Our new implant-based breast reconstruction patient education material is easy to read as demonstrated by the crowdsourcing evaluation. More than 90% of the participants reported our material is "very easy to understand" or "easy to understand." The crowdsourcing process took 1.5 days, with 700 workers responding to the survey. The total cost was $9. After incorporating participants' feedback into the finalized material, the readability of the material is at the recommended reading level. The material also had the recommended length (between 400 and 800 words). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated a pathway for clinicians to efficiently obtain a large amount of feedback to improve patient education materials. Crowdsourcing is an effective tool to improve organizational health literacy.


Asunto(s)
Colaboración de las Masas , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Mama , Escolaridad
6.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(6): 667-676, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725110

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A common consideration for replantation success is the ischemia time following injury and the preservation temperature. A classic principle within the hand surgery community describes 12 hours of warm ischemia and 24 hours of cold ischemia as the upper limits for digit replantation; however, these limits are largely anecdotal and based on older studies. We aimed to compare survival data from the large body of literature to aid surgeons and all those involved in the replantation process in hopes of optimizing success rates. METHODS: The PubMed database was queried on April 4th, 2023, for articles that included data on digit replantation survival in terms of temperature of preservation and ischemia time. All primary outcomes were analyzed with the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random effects model. Secondary outcomes were pooled and analyzed using the chi-square statistic. Statistical analysis and forest plot generation were completed with RevMan 5.4 software with odds ratios calculated within a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis identified that digits preserved in cold ischemia for over 12 hours had significantly higher odds of replantation success than the amputated digits replanted with 0-12 hours of warm ischemia time ( P ≤ 0.05). The odds of survival in the early (0-6 hours) replantation group were around 40% greater than the later (6-12 hours) replantation group ( P ≤ 0.05). Secondary outcomes that were associated with higher survival rates included a clean-cut amputation, increased venous and arterial anastomosis, a repair that did not require a vein graft, and replants performed in nonsmokers ( P ≤ 0.05). DISCUSSION: Overall, these findings suggest that when predicting digit replantation success, time is of the essence when the digit has yet to be preserved in a cold environment. This benefit, however, is almost completely diminished when the amputated digit is appropriately maintained in a cold environment soon after injury. In conclusion, our results suggest that there is potential for broadening the ischemia time limits for digit replant survival outlined in the literature, particularly for digits that have been stored correctly in cold ischemia.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Traumática , Traumatismos de los Dedos , Reimplantación , Humanos , Reimplantación/métodos , Amputación Traumática/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Dedos/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Dedos/irrigación sanguínea , Dedos/cirugía , Isquemia Tibia , Isquemia Fría , Isquemia/cirugía , Temperatura
7.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4): 442-446, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38319916

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus regarding perioperative hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for gender-affirming surgery (GAS). Common concerns for continuing perioperative HRT included risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or hematoma. However, discontinuing HRT is not risk free and may cause mood swing or increased anxiety. Our study aimed to investigate current patterns of HRT before GAS worldwide. METHODS: The first stage of Delphi technique was implemented by sending a 27-item survey to all surgeons (total n = 150; 94 plastic surgeon, 35 urologist, and 21 gynecologists) of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health who perform GAS. Survey themes included the hormone type, duration, and usage of DVT prophylaxis. RESULTS: Overall survey response rate was 34% (total n = 51; 8 urologists, 35 plastic surgeons, and 8 gynecologists). The majority of surgeons are US-based (n = 39, 76%). The most common HRTs are in injection form (n = 28, 55%). The majority of surgeons do not stop HRT before GAS and do provide DVT prophylaxis to all patients <1 week after GAS. The most common procedure that surgeons discontinue HRT is feminizing bottom surgery (43%). For surgeons who discontinue HRT before GAS, there is a wide variation on discontinuation schedule. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in perioperative HRT patterns for GAS. Further research is needed to develop a data-driven consensus guideline to provide high quality of care for transgender and nonbinary patients.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Personas Transgénero , Transexualidad , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hormonas
8.
Microsurgery ; 44(2): e31143, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343010

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Institutional protocols often mandate the use of x-rays when a microneedle is lost intraoperatively. Although x-rays can reliably show a macroneedle, the benefit of x-rays in detecting microneedles in human tissues has not been established as available data on this topic are investigated in anthropometric models. The current study aims to evaluate whether x-rays can reliably detect retained microneedles in a human cadaveric model. We hypothesize that microneedles would be detected at a significantly lower rate than macroneedles by x-ray in human tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Needles ranging from 4-0 to 10-0 were placed randomly throughout a cadaveric hand and foot. Each tissue sample was x-rayed using a Fexitron X-Ray machine, taking both anteroposterior and lateral views. A total of six x-ray images were then evaluated by 11 radiologists, independently. The radiologists circled over the area where they visualized a needle. The accuracy of detecting macroneedles (size 4-0 to 7-0) was compared with that of microneedles (size 8-0 to 10-0) using a chi-square test. RESULTS: The overall detection rate for the microneedles was significantly lower than the detection rate for macroneedles (13.5% vs 88.8%, p < .01). When subcategorized between the hand and the foot, the detection rate for microneedles was also significantly lower than the rate for macroneedles (hand: 7.6% for microneedles, 93.2% for macroneedles, p < .01; foot: 19.5% for microneedles, 84.4% for macroneedles, p < .01). The detection rate, in general, significantly decreased as the sizes of needles became smaller (7-0:70.5%, 8-0:18.2%, 9-0:16.7%, 10-0:2.3%, p < .01). CONCLUSION: X-rays, while useful in detecting macroneedles, had a significantly lower rate of detecting microneedles in a cadaveric model. The routine use of x-rays for a lost microneedle may not be beneficial. Further investigation with fresh tissue and similar intraoperative x-ray systems is warranted to corroborate and support these findings.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Agujas , Humanos , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Rayos X , Cadáver
9.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; : 10556656231223596, 2024 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Many caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate experience a high level of anxiety throughout their child's medical and surgical care. We aim to evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool to mitigate these feelings and can aid clinicians in the development of robust pediatric educational materials for caregivers and families. DESIGN: Thirteen of the most common postoperative questions following cleft lip and/or palate repair were developed by an expert panel of senior Pediatric Plastic Surgeons and were posed to ChatGPT. Professional answers from the expert panel were provided and compared to responses from ChatGPT. A literature review was also conducted to generate a new support model for caregivers with children undergoing a surgical procedure. SETTING: Department of Pediatric Plastic Surgery at a metropolitan Children's Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Senior Pediatric Plastic Surgeons at a metropolitan Children's Hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was to determine the ability of ChatGPT to respond to common postoperative questions and to develop a model for AI assistance in family-centered perioperative care. RESULTS: ChatGPT had a postoperative question response accuracy rate of 69% when compared with subject matter expert responses, with its greatest errors being information errors. An extensive literature search revealed that AI can assist in multiple traditional perioperative strategies to reduce caregivers and patient anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial Intelligence can help to reduce the burden of generating patient education materials as well as support caregivers in multiple aspects and perioperative care.

10.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889745

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The intricacies of nerve regeneration following injury have prompted increased research efforts in recent years, with a primary focus on elucidating regeneration mechanisms and exploring various surgical techniques. While many experimental animals have been used for these investigations, the rat continues to remain the most widely used model due to its cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and resilience against diseases and surgical/anesthetic complications. A comprehensive evaluation of all the experimental rat models available in this context is currently lacking. METHODS: We summarize rat models of cranial nerves while furnishing descriptions of the intricacies of achieving optimal exposure. RESULTS: This review article provides an examination of the technical exposure, potential applications, and the advantages and disadvantages inherent to each cranial nerve model. CONCLUSION: Specifically in the context of cranial nerve injury, numerous studies have utilized different surgical techniques to expose and investigate the cranial nerves in the rat.

11.
Aesthet Surg J ; 2024 Mar 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38494872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Different types of abdominoplasties have been developed to address individual patient characteristics. However, complication rates and risk factors for complications between different types of abdominoplasties has yet to be reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rates and risks associated with each type of abdominoplasty. METHODS: Using the CosmetAssure database, patients undergoing an abdominoplasty from 2015 to 2022 were identified. Demographic factors and major complications were recorded and analyzed using a chi-square test or ANOVA. A logistic regression was performed to identify the risk associated with each type of abdominoplasty for developing complications. RESULTS: A total of 55,596 patients underwent an abdominoplasty procedure by any method. The overall complication rate was 2.1%. There was a significant difference in the overall complication rate between all seven types of abdominoplasties (p<0.05), with Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty having the highest complication rate. The year of surgery, being underweight or morbidly obese, diabetes, and being male placed patients at a significantly higher risk for developing a post-operative complication. Over 15,000 patients (27.2%) had concurrent procedures related to breast surgery, other body contouring, liposuction, or facial surgery. When accounting for various risk factors in a regression model, there was no significant added risk for major complications after a combination procedure with an abdominoplasty compared to abdominoplasty alone. CONCLUSIONS: Among the different types of abdominoplasties, a Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty has the highest complication rate. Concurrent cosmetic procedures in addition to an abdominoplasty showed no added risk for major complications compared to abdominoplasty alone.

12.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(6): 612-622, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284419

RESUMEN

The most common reconstruction technique following mastectomy is a 2-stage technique that involves tissue expansion followed by definitive implant-based reconstruction (IBR). Tissue expanders (TEs) have classically used saline for initial fill; however, TEs with an initial gas fill (GTE)-including the CO2-based AeroForm (AirXpanders, San Francisco, CA) TE and TEs initially filled with atmospheric air-have been increasingly used in the past decade. We aimed to compare the outcomes in breast reconstruction for tissue expanders initially filled with saline vs gas. PubMed was queried for studies comparing gas- and saline-filled tissue expanders (STEs) used in IBR. A meta-analysis was performed on major postoperative outcomes and the required expansion and definitive reconstruction time. Eleven studies were selected and included in the analysis. No significant differences existed between tissue expansion with GTEs vs STEs for 11 of the 13 postoperative outcomes investigated. Out of the complications investigated, only the risk of infection/cellulitis/abscess formation was significantly lower in the GTE cohort (odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.82; P = .0009). The time to definitive reconstruction was also significantly lower in the GTE cohort (mean difference [MD], 45.85 days; 95% CI, -57.80 to -33.90; P < .00001). The total time to full expansion approached significance in the GTE cohort (MD, -20.33 days; 95% CI, -41.71 to 1.04; P = .06). A cost analysis considering TE cost and infection risk determined that GTE use saved a predicted $2055.34 in overall healthcare costs. Surgical outcomes for both fill types were predominantly similar; however, GTEs were associated with a significantly decreased risk of postoperative infection compared to saline-filled TEs. GTEs could also reduce healthcare expenditures and require less time until definitive reconstruction after placement.


Asunto(s)
Mastectomía , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular , Expansión de Tejido , Humanos , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/métodos , Expansión de Tejido/métodos , Expansión de Tejido/instrumentación , Expansión de Tejido/efectos adversos , Solución Salina/administración & dosificación , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/instrumentación , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos
13.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(4): 383-393, 2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37757895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma first linked with breast implants in 2011. The correlation between BIA-ALCL and textured devices has led to increased use of smooth devices. However, much of the data surrounding smooth and textured devices investigates breast implants specifically and not tissue expanders. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes for smooth tissue expanders (STEs) and textured tissue expanders (TTEs). METHODS: A search was performed on PubMed, including articles from 2016 to 2023 (n = 419). Studies comparing TTEs and STEs and reported complications were included. A random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 1709 patients in the STE cohort and 1716 patients in the TTE cohort. The mean duration of tissue expansion with STEs was 221.25 days, while TTEs had a mean time of tissue expansion of 220.43 days.Our meta-analysis found no differences in all surgical outcomes except for explantation risk. STE use was associated with increased odds of explantation by over 50% compared to TTE use (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.02; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, STEs and TTEs had similar complication profiles. However, STEs had 1.5 times higher odds of explantation. The incidence of BIA-ALCL is low, and only a single case of BIA-ALCL has been reported with TTEs. This indicates that TTEs are safe and may lower the risk of early complications requiring explantation. Further studies are warranted to further define the relationship between tissue expanders and BIA-ALCL.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Mama/cirugía , Incidencia , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía
14.
Ann Plast Surg ; 91(4): 409-412, 2023 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713147

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Improving patient education materials may improve patient outcomes. This study aims to explore the possibility of generating patient education materials with the assistance of a large language model, Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT). In addition, we compare the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT-generated materials versus expert-generated materials. METHODS: Patient education materials in implant-based breast reconstruction were generated by experts and ChatGPT independently. Readability and accuracy of the materials are the main outcomes. Readability of the materials was compared using Flesch-Kincaid score. Accuracy of the materials generated by ChatGPT was evaluated by 2 independent reviewers. Content errors are categorized into information errors, statistical errors, and multiple errors (errors more than 2 types). RESULTS: The content generated by experts had higher readability. The Flesch-Kincaid score is at the 7.5 grade for expert-generated materials, whereas the content generated by ChatGPT is at the 10.5 grade (despite ChatGPT being asked to generate content at the seventh grade level). The accuracy of ChatGPT-generated content is 50%, with most errors being information errors. ChatGPT often provides information about breast reduction or breast augmentation, despite being asked specifically about breast reconstruction. Despite its limitation, ChatGPT significantly reduced the time required to generate patient education materials. Although it takes experts 1 month to generate patient education materials, ChatGPT generates materials within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT can be a powerful starting tool to generate patient education materials. However, its readability and accuracy still require improvements.


Asunto(s)
Comprensión , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Lenguaje
15.
Ann Plast Surg ; 90(5): 506-515, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975095

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are mixed results in surgical complications regarding the usage of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of surgical complications between the subpectoral and prepectoral reconstructive method. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for literature published up until December 2022. Studies that compared subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction and reported at least one postoperative complication were included. The following 8 major outcomes were included: revision and reoperation, capsular contracture, explantation, seroma, hematoma, infection, skin necrosis, and animation deformity. Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare outcomes of the 2 techniques. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare whether practice differences in different countries may have an impact on outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were identified in our literature search. Two thousand three hundred sixty patients were included, representing a total of 3135 breasts. Our analysis demonstrated that prepectoral reconstruction had significantly lower odds of developing postoperative hematoma [odds ratio (OR), 0.62; P = 0.05], seroma (OR, 0.67; P = 0.01), infection (OR, 0.64; P = 0.03), revision and reoperation (OR, 0.44; P < 0.00001), and animation deformity (OR, 0.01; P < 0.00001), compared with the subpectoral method. Subgroup analysis showed that differences between 3 countries (United States, Korea, Italy) are low (all subgroup heterogeneity test P > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: While both subpectoral and prepectoral are safe methods for breast reconstruction, the prepectoral technique may lead to lower odds of developing multiple major postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Femenino , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/métodos , Seroma , Mama/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(5): 1410-1415, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36804875

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: LeFort I osteotomy (LF1) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) have unique operative challenges and inherent anatomic considerations that predispose to certain adverse outcomes, yet their respective complication profiles continue to be debated given conflicting results from single-center investigations. The purpose of this study is to perform a multi-institutional analysis of complications, socioeconomic trends, and financial charges associated with orthognathic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of orthognathic procedures performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Patients younger than 12 years of age were excluded. Medical complications, surgical complications, and admission costs were compared across procedures. Socioeconomic determinants and trends across regions of the country were also analyzed. RESULTS: During the study interval, 6640 patients underwent orthognathic surgery, including LF1 (59.2%, n=3928), BSSO (14.4%, n=959), and double-jaw surgery (26.4%, n = 1753). Patients undergoing LF1 were more likely to experience overall complications ( P <0.001), infections ( P <0.001), and blood transfusions ( P <0.001) than those undergoing BSSO. High-volume hospitals were more likely to perform double-jaw procedures than other hospitals ( P <0.001), yet high-volume hospitals were less likely to have surgical complications ( P =0.014). Patient admission charges related to orthognathic operations at high-volume hospitals were less than other hospitals ( P <0.001). Household income was higher for orthognathic procedures performed at high-volume hospitals ( P <0.001). White patients were 1.5 times more likely to choose a farther, higher volume hospital for orthognathic surgery than the one locally available ( P =0.041). CONCLUSIONS: LeFort I osteotomy procedures had higher infection and transfusion rates than BSSO procedures. High-volume hospitals were more likely to perform double-jaw procedures, yet high-volume hospitals had fewer complications and decreased admission charges. Future study will be needed to further elucidate case-mix index details and socioeconomic determinants of health contributing to these disparities.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Ortognática , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/métodos , Hospitalización , Pacientes
17.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(11): 1285-1292, 2023 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184120

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The location of tissue expanders in implant-based breast reconstruction remains controversial due to variation in surgical techniques and devices. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of early and late complication rates between prepectoral and subpectoral placement of tissue expanders. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult female patients who had undergone 2-stage implant-based breast reconstruction between 2013 and 2019 in our institution. Early complication was defined as complications that occurred within 30 days after surgery. Time-to-event analyses were performed and Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 854 patients were included; 76% of patients underwent a subpectoral tissue expander placement. After the first-stage procedure, the early complication rate was 34% and the late complication rate was 36.4%. After the second-stage procedure, the early complication rate was 16.3% and the late complication rate was 16.1%. Location of the tissue expander did not predict either overall early or late complication rates, regardless of the stages of reconstruction, after adjusting for confounders. Tissue expanders placed in prepectoral plane were associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) for developing early and late infection after the first stage of reconstruction (HR, 2.1 and 2.4, respectively) as well as late infection after the second stage of reconstruction (HR, 5.3; all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Location of tissue expanders did not predict risk of complication. However, the prepectoral group was associated with an increased risk of developing infection.

18.
Ann Plast Surg ; 88(5): 574-580, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34270470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neuromata developed after major extremity amputation can cause pain, limit the use of prosthetics, and negatively affect the quality of life. The frequency of postamputation neuroma varies widely. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of patients who developed symptomatic neuromata after lower-limb amputation through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed on 4 major databases. Studies that reported the incidence of symptomatic neuroma in lower-limb amputees were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled incidence of neuromata. RESULTS: Thirteen studies consisting of 1329 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The reported incidence of patients who developed symptomatic neuromata ranged between 4% and 49%. The median duration of follow-up was 8.6 years (interquartile range, 2.0-17.4 years). The pooled percentage (95% confidence interval [CI]) of lower-limb amputees who developed symptomatic neuromata was 19% (12%-29%). In studies with a duration of follow-up at least 3 years, the pooled percentage (95% CI) of lower-limb amputees who developed symptomatic neuromata was 30% (22%-40%). In studies with a follow-up period of fewer than 3 years, the pooled percentage (95% CI) of neuroma incidence was 3% (2%-6%). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the overall incidence of patients who developed symptomatic neuromata was 19% or approximately 1 in 5 lower-limb amputees. Symptomatic neuromata are more commonly diagnosed when the follow-up period is longer than 3 years. These findings suggest that neuroma after amputation might be underestimated in studies with a short duration of follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Neuroma , Miembro Fantasma , Amputación Quirúrgica , Muñones de Amputación , Humanos , Incidencia , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Neuroma/epidemiología , Neuroma/etiología , Neuroma/cirugía , Miembro Fantasma/diagnóstico , Miembro Fantasma/epidemiología , Miembro Fantasma/etiología , Calidad de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA