Cerebral white matter diffusion properties and free-water with obstructive sleep apnea severity in older adults.

Characterizing the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the aging brain could be key in our understanding of neurodegeneration in this population. Our objective was to assess white matter properties in newly diagnosed and untreated adults with mild to severe OSA. Sixty-five adults aged 55 to 85 were recruited and divided into three groups: control (apnea-hypopnea index ≤5/hr; n = 18; 65.2 ± 7.2 years old), mild (>5 to ≤15 hr; n = 27; 64.2 ± 5.3 years old) and moderate to severe OSA (>15/hr; n = 20; 65.2 ± 5.5 years old). Diffusion tensor imaging metrics (fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity) were compared between groups with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics within the white matter skeleton created by the technique. Groups were also compared for white matter hyperintensities volume and the free-water (FW) fraction. Compared with controls, mild OSA participants showed widespread areas of lower diffusivity (p < .05 corrected) and lower FW fraction (p < .05). Participants with moderate to severe OSA showed lower AD in the corpus callosum compared with controls (p < .05 corrected). No between-group differences were observed for FA or white matter hyperintensities. Lower white matter diffusivity metrics is especially marked in mild OSA, suggesting that even the milder form may lead to detrimental outcomes. In moderate to severe OSA, competing pathological responses might have led to partial normalization of diffusion metrics.

Detection of mild cognitive impairment in middle-aged and older adults with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Obstructive sleep apnoea increases the risk for mild cognitive impairment and dementia. The present study aimed to characterise the ability of two cognitive screening tests, the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, to detect mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 55-85 years with and without obstructive sleep apnoea.We included 42 subjects with mild and 67 subjects with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnoea. We compared them to 22 control subjects. Mild cognitive impairment was diagnosed by a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. We used receiver operating characteristic curves to assess the ability of the two screening tests to detect mild cognitive impairment.The two screening tests showed similar discriminative ability in control subjects. However, among the mild and the moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnoea groups, the Mini-Mental State Examination was not able to correctly identify subjects with mild cognitive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment's discriminant ability was acceptable in both sleep apnoea groups and was comparable to what was observed in controls.The Mini-Mental State Examination should not be used to screen for cognitive impairment in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment could be used in clinical settings. However, clinicians should refer patients for neuropsychological assessment when neurodegenerative processes are suspected.

Disconnection Between Self-Reported and Objective Cognitive Impairment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Recent studies show that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a possible contributor to abnormal cognitive decline in older adults. These new observations create the need to identify older adults with OSA who are at risk of the developing dementia if not treated. This study's goal was to verify whether self-reported cognitive complaints could become a useful tool to screen for objective cognitive deficits in late middle-aged and older adults with OSA. METHODS: Fifty-seven participants with OSA with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/h (3% or arousal) and aged between 55 and 85 years were compared to 54 participants in a mild/non-OSA group on their ability to evaluate their objective cognitive functioning. They underwent overnight polysomnography followed by a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. We recruited a similar proportion of participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in both groups (OSA: 36.8%; mild/non-OSA: 35.2%). They filled out questionnaires assessing mood, sleep, and cognition. Group (OSA versus mild/non-OSA) × cognitive status (MCI versus non-MCI) analyses of variance were performed on cognitive complaint questionnaires. RESULTS: We found that among participants without objective cognitive deficits, participants in the OSA group reported more cognitive complaints compared to those in the mild/non-OSA group. Among participants with objective cognitive deficits, those in the OSA group reported less cognitive complaints compared to those in the mild/non-OSA group. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with OSA and MCI were less aware of their deficits compared to those in the mild/non-OSA group, possibly reflecting a distinctive OSA-associated cognitive impairment. Our results underscore the importance of referring patients with OSA for a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment when an abnormal cognitive decline is suspected.