Impact of psychological impairment on quality of life and work impairment in severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Psychological impairment, such as anxiety and depression, is common in severe asthma. However, the impact of psychological impairment on asthma-specific quality of life (ASQOL) and work impairment has not been assessed within Southeast-Asia. Furthermore, previous ASQOL questionnaires contained items overlapping with asthma control, making it challenging to isolate the relationship between psychological impairment with ASQOL and asthma control, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between psychological impairment with ASQOL and work impairment in severe asthma. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of severe asthma at Singapore General Hospital. We assessed ASQOL, psychological impairment, work impairment and asthma control using validated questionnaires. An ASQOL questionnaire not containing items evaluating asthma symptoms was selected to reduce overlap with asthma control. Medical records were used to obtain other asthma characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns. RESULTS: Amongst 111 patients, 37% had psychological impairment based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Poorer ASQOL was associated with anxiety (p = .013) after controlling for demographic characteristics, asthma control and comorbidities. Anxiety symptoms were associated with greater health concerns while depression symptoms were associated with sleep difficulty and physical limitations. Having depressive symptoms was associated with an additional 16% impairment of total work hours (p = .038). Psychological impairment was not associated with spirometry results or healthcare utilization. Ethnicity significantly predicted both ASQOL and work impairment. CONCLUSIONS: In severe asthma, patients with psychological impairment have poorer ASQOL and greater work impairment than those without psychological impairment. There is an urgent need to mitigate this problem.

Managing asthma in the COVID-19 pandemic and current recommendations from professional bodies: a review.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a summary of the management of asthma in the current COVID-19 pandemic by examining and comparing the recommendations from various professional bodies. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Websites of known respiratory professional bodies were searched for COVID-19 guidance related to asthma. Subject matter experts were also consulted for useful resources. Resources that were targeted at healthcare professionals were included, while those targeting patients and the general public were excluded. RESULTS: There is currently little data to suggest that asthma protects from or increases the risk of COVID-19, nor is there any data to support strong recommendations for or against specific asthma treatments. Physicians should continue to manage asthma according to existing accepted asthma guidelines and recommendations. All prescribed medications, especially inhaled corticosteroids, should be continued, and, where indicated, oral corticosteroids and biologic therapies should still be used. Nebulizers and spirometry should be avoided where possible to reduce the risk of viral transmission. A detailed history should be taken to differentiate asthma exacerbations from COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Understanding similarities and differences among the recommendations of the various professional bodies will aid in medical decision-making in managing asthma in the COVID-19 pandemic. Health professionals should also consider the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients and the unique characteristics of their local healthcare systems.

Patient characterization and predictors of aspirin desensitization response.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may limit the use of aspirin in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Aspirin desensitization, which is a resource-intensive process, can offer such patients access to aspirin through the induction of temporary tolerance to aspirin. However, there is limited information on aspirin desensitization response in patients undergoing aspirin desensitization for cardiac indications in Asia. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients who have undergone aspirin desensitization, evaluate their responses to the procedure, and identify risk factor(s) associated with failure of aspirin desensitization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients who underwent aspirin desensitization in Singapore General Hospital between 1 June 2014 and 31 October 2017. Chi-square or Fisher exact test were used to analyze categorical data while independent samples t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for continuous data where appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of aspirin desensitization failure. RESULTS: All 214 patients in our study had cardiovascular indications for aspirin, with angioedema being the most common type of index reaction experienced with NSAIDs (n = 104, 48.6%). One hundred sixty-five patients (77.1%) achieved successful aspirin desensitization. In the selected sample analysis of patients with true NSAID hypersensitivity (n = 163), an index reaction of angioedema to NSAIDs was found to be significantly associated with a higher risk of failing aspirin desensitization (odds ratio, 7.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.94-26.71). CONCLUSION: Majority of the patients who underwent aspirin desensitization in our institution were able to achieve tolerance to aspirin. An index reaction of angioedema to NSAIDs was identified as a risk factor for aspirin desensitization failure. This information can aid in the risk stratification of patients undergoing aspirin desensitization and ensure efficient resource allocation for this procedure.

Evaluating the educational environment in a residency programme in Singapore: can we help reduce burnout rates?

INTRODUCTION: The educational environment (EE) reflects the quality of a residency programme and has an association with burnout. Studying the EE allows for interventions to target specific weaknesses. We aimed to measure the EE of an internal medicine residency programme in Singapore, compare the perceptions between genders, residency grades and levels of work experience, and identify specific areas of weaknesses for intervention in hopes of reducing residency burnout rates in Singapore. METHODS: This study took place between October and December 2017. We adopted a mixed methods approach, quantitatively using the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM), and qualitative exploration using semi-structured focus group discussion. RESULTS: A total of 136 (88.9%) out of 153 residents responded. Our total PHEEM scores (112.23 ± 16.71), along with the scores for all three subscales, were higher than those of institutions in previous studies. There were no differences in overall PHEEM and subscale scores between genders, residency grades or levels of work experience. However, there were differences for individual questions, which were explored in the focus group discussion. Senior residents juggling heavier workloads, responsibilities and examinations appeared to be most prone to burnout. We identified three recurring themes that contributed to a poor EE in our programme: excessive workload, poor faculty relationships and differing unmet needs. CONCLUSION: Although our programme had a good EE, there were also areas of weaknesses revealed by specific questions, possibly contributing to burnout. We hope to implement interventions to these areas and subsequently assess for longitudinal changes in EE and burnout rates.

Using the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure to Identify Areas for Improvement in a Singaporean Residency Program.

BACKGROUND: Attributes of the clinical learning environment (CLE) are a measure of quality in postgraduate medical education, and assessing the CLE is a component of the New Accreditation System being introduced in Singapore by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education International. There is a dearth of published studies of CLE quality in Singapore. OBJECTIVE: Our study had 3 aims: (1) to measure the CLE in 1 Singaporean residency program; (2) to compare trainee perceptions by sex, training level, and experience; and (3) to identify areas for improvement. METHODS: Between October and December 2017, we conducted a mixed assessment of the CLE in an internal medicine program in Singapore, using the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) and qualitative exploration using a focus group. RESULTS: Of 153 IM residents, 136 (89%) provided PHEEM responses and 8 participated in the focus group. Total PHEEM scores and scores for the 3 subscales were higher than published data on the use of the PHEEM in international settings. Exploration of selected PHEEM responses via a focus group identified attributes associated with negative perceptions of the CLE: excessive workload, inadequate faculty presence in the CLE, and unmet trainee needs. It also suggested senior residents' clinical workloads, greater responsibilities, and pending examinations may contribute to their less positive perceptions of the CLE. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis using the PHEEM showed overall positive perceptions of the CLE, along with areas for improvement amenable to interventions. Our approach has relevance to an accreditation model with ongoing evaluation of the CLE.

Understanding COPD-overlap syndromes.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease accounts for a large burden of lung disease. It can 'overlap' with other respiratory diseases including bronchiectasis, fibrosis and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). While COPD alone confers morbidity and mortality, common features with contrasting clinical outcomes can occur in COPD 'overlap syndromes'. Areas covered: Given the large degree of heterogeneity in COPD, individual variation to treatment is adopted based on its observed phenotype, which in turn overlaps with features of other respiratory disease states such as asthma. This is coined asthma-COPD overlap syndrome ('ACOS'). Other examples of such overlapping clinical states include bronchiectasis-COPD ('BCOS'), fibrosis-COPD ('FCOS') and OSA-COPD ('OCOS'). The objective of this review is to highlight similarities and differences between the COPD-overlap syndromes in terms of risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and potential treatment differences. Expert commentary: As a consequence of COPD overlap syndromes, a transition from the traditional 'one size fits all' treatment approach is necessary. Greater treatment stratification according to clinical phenotype using a precision medicine approach is now required. In this light, it is important to recognize and differentiate COPD overlap syndromes as distinct disease states compared to individual diseases such as asthma, COPD, fibrosis or bronchiectasis.

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

We report a 68-year-old female who presented with chronic cough and progressive dyspnoea. Computed tomography of the thorax and subsequent bronchoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), which was treated with whole lung lavage. This case is reported in view of the low incidence of PAP.