Integrating immunotherapy in the (neo)adjuvant setting of early breast cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Breast cancer is a relative latecomer in the success story of immuno-oncology. In this review, we focus on the preclinical and clinical lines of evidence to justify the evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for the curative-intent treatment of breast cancer, the latest and ongoing trials of (neo)adjuvant immunotherapy, and practical considerations in clinical practice associated with this new treatment paradigm. RECENT FINDINGS: Insights from the immunobiology of breast cancer have paved the way for the new frontier of immunotherapy in this malignancy, starting from advanced stages and moving onto curable cases. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte quantification and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry are forerunners of predictive biomarkers for sensitivity to ICI in breast cancers. Preliminary results from phase III trials of combinatorial immunochemotherapy to treat early high-risk or locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer are encouraging for pathological complete response. Additional efficacy and patient-reported outcomes of (neo)adjuvant immunochemotherapy trials are awaited. SUMMARY: The prospect of integrating ICI in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer is promising. Questions regarding patient selection, the choice of ICI agent and combination partner in escalation strategies, sequencing and duration of treatments, cost-effectiveness and mechanisms of resistance remain to be answered by future research.

Early Outcomes of a National Cancer Center's Strategy Against COVID-19 Executed Through a Disease Outbreak Response Taskforce.

PURPOSE: We present the strategy of a comprehensive cancer center organized to make operations pandemic proof and achieve continuity of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Disease Outbreak Response (DORS) measures implemented at our center and its satellite clinics included strict infection prevention, manpower preservation, prudent resource allocation, and adaptation of standard-of-care treatments. Critical day-to-day clinical operations, number of persons screened before entry, staff temperature monitoring, and personal protection equipment stockpile were reviewed as a dashboard at daily DORS taskforce huddles. Polymerase chain reaction swab tests performed for patients and staff who met defined criteria for testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were tracked. Descriptive statistics of outpatient attendances and treatment caseloads from February 3 to May 23, 2020, were compared with the corresponding period in 2019. RESULTS: We performed COVID-19 swabs for 80 patients and 93 staff, detecting three cancer patients with community-acquired COVID-19 infections with no nosocomial transmission. Patients who required chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery and patients who are on maintenance treatment continued to receive timely treatment without disruption. The number of intravenous chemotherapy treatments was maintained at 97.8% compared with 2019, whereas that of weekly radiotherapy treatments remained stable since December 2019. All cancer-related surgeries proceeded without delay, with a 0.3% increase in workload. Surveillance follow-ups were conducted via teleconsultation, accounting for a 30.7% decrease in total face-to-face clinic consultations. CONCLUSION: Through the coordinated efforts of a DORS taskforce, it is possible to avoid nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmissions among patients and staff without compromising on care delivery at a national cancer center.

Novel therapeutic avenues in triple-negative breast cancer: PI3K/AKT inhibition, androgen receptor blockade, and beyond.

Multiomic analyses have shed light upon the molecular heterogeneity and complexity of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). With increasing recognition that TNBC is not a single disease entity but encompasses different disease subtypes, a one-size-fits-all treatment paradigm has become obsolete. In this context, the inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) and androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathways have emerged as potential therapeutic strategies against selected tumors. In this paper, we reviewed the preclinical rationale, predictive biomarkers, efficacy, and safety data from early phase trials, and the future directions for these two biomarker-directed treatment approaches in TNBC.

What is the role of immunotherapy in breast cancer?

The immune system plays a complex role in the recognition/prevention, early eradication as well as progression of cancer. Recently, we have witnessed great momentum in the field of immuno-oncology. Checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy have now entered the clinic, with impressive and durable clinical responses seen across a broad array of tumor types. There are several lines of evidence supporting the development of an immune targeted approach in breast cancer. Emerging data of early clinical trials evaluating monotherapy checkpoint inhibition have shown modest activity in breast cancer, in particular high grade and aggressive subtypes such as triple negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and luminal B breast cancers. A considerable amount of effort is currently underway in exploring the use of combinatory strategies where therapies with distinct and potentially complementary mechanisms of actions may further enhance the immune response broadening out the group of breast cancer patients who would benefit from this strategy of cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss approaches to targeting the immune system in breast cancer adopted through understanding why the host immune system has failed in natural tumor suppression as well as the processes evolved by the tumor to circumvent an active immune system.

Are There Any Clinically Relevant Subgroups of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in 2018?

The working immunohistochemical definition of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is admittedly reductionist and has only limited usefulness for informing oncologists about therapeutic decisions beyond chemotherapy. Early molecular taxonomies of TNBC based heavily on gene expression profiling, which is not readily available in the clinic today, do not necessarily encompass other molecular targets already incorporated into rationally designed clinical trials. We state that it is possible to delineate five subgroups of TNBC relevant to present-day clinical practice and cover the evidence that lends credence to emerging biomarker-directed treatment strategies for each subgroup.

Clinical Development of c-MET Inhibition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death. In patients with advanced or unresectable HCC, there are few treatment options. Conventional chemotherapy has limited benefits. Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, improves survival, but options for patients intolerant of or progressing on sorafenib are limited. There has been much interest in recent years in molecular therapeutic targets and drug development for HCC. One of the more promising molecular targets in HCC is the cellular-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (c-MET) factor receptor. Encouraging phase II data on two c-MET inhibitors, tivantinib and cabozantinib, has led to phase III trials. This review describes the c-MET/hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) signalling pathway and its relevance to HCC, and discusses the preclinical and clinical trial data for inhibitors of this pathway in HCC.