RESUMEN
With the advent of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), the diagnostic foundations of dentistry have been forever changed and advanced into a new era of 3-dimensional (3D) possibilities. In the case of implant planning, which was among the first applications of this technology, the exact 3D location of the implant could be preplanned and even guided during surgery. This was a major advancement in implant planning above and beyond traditional radiographic images, such as panoramic, bitewing, and periapical films, all of which are subject to magnification errors and dimensional distortion. However, with CBCT imaging, the images are captured in their true anatomic size and shape, and therefore offer the most accurate treatment planning potential. For these reasons, CBCT imaging was quickly harnessed for multiple imaging applications in various fields of dentistry, from diagnostics to surgical planning, and from orthodontics to endodontics; it has permeated all fields of our profession. The scope of this article will highlight the salient features of how CBCT imaging is being used for orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic applications.
Asunto(s)
Cefalometría/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Imagenología Tridimensional , Humanos , Modelos DentalesAsunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Ortodoncia Correctiva , Artefactos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/tendencias , Predicción , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Fotografía Dental/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Interfaz Usuario-ComputadorRESUMEN
Cone beam computed tomography has become an essential tool in the diagnosis and planning for implant dentistry. New hardware and software developments have emerged to help implant surgeons to successfully adopt and use different systems in patients requiring prosthetically driven implant dentistry. However, there is the need to develop an adequate planning protocol that includes appropriate acquisition/data manipulation, appropriate use of software tools for interpretation, and appropriate application of such systems during implant surgery. This article examines essential characteristics of the entire implant-guided surgery planning process and points out potential sources of error that could affect clinical accuracy outcomes.