Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens: Adequate Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy Can Be Achieved without On-Site Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is the preferred method for biopsying the gastrointestinal tract, and rapid on-site cytological evaluation is considered standard practice. Our institution does not perform on-site evaluation; this study analyzes our overall diagnostic yield, accuracy, and incidence of nondiagnostic cases to determine the validity of this strategy. DESIGN: Data encompassing clinical information, procedural records, and cytological assessment were analyzed for gastrointestinal EUS-FNA procedures (n = 85) performed at Vancouver General Hospital from January 2012 to January 2013. We compared our results with those of studies that had on-site evaluation and studies that did not have on-site evaluation. RESULTS: Eighty-five biopsies were performed in 78 patients, from sites that included the pancreas, the stomach, the duodenum, lymph nodes, and retroperitoneal masses. Malignancies were diagnosed in 45 (53%) biopsies, while 24 (29%) encompassed benign entities. Suspicious and atypical results were recorded in 8 (9%) and 6 (7%) cases, respectively. Only 2 (2%) cases received a cytological diagnosis of 'nondiagnostic'. Our overall accuracy was 72%, our diagnostic yield was 98%, and our nondiagnostic rate was 2%. Our results did not significantly differ from those of studies that did have on-site evaluation. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights that adequate diagnostic accuracy can be achieved without on-site evaluation.

Propofol use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound.

Compared to standard endoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are often lengthier and more complex, thus requiring higher doses of sedatives for patient comfort and compliance. The aim of this review is to provide the reader with information regarding the use, safety profile, and merits of propofol for sedation in advanced endoscopic procedures like ERCP and EUS, based on the current literature.

Impact of magnetic resonance enterography in the management of small bowel Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is a relatively new imaging modality that involves small bowel distension with orally administered fluid. Few studies have assessed its impact on patient management. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether MRE influenced the management of patients with established small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, we identified patients with small bowel CD who underwent MRE between January 2007 and December 2010. The results of the MRE and subsequent changes in patient management within 1 month were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty women and 27 men with CD were included. Seven patients (12%) had a normal MRE. Forty-two of 57 (74%) patients had a change in management, and 41/50 (82%) patients with an abnormal MRE had changes in management (P<0.0008). After MRE, 20/42 (47%) patients had surgery and 22/42 (53%) had changes in medical treatment. Patients with stricturing disease had more surgical intervention (P=0.02), and patients with active disease on MRE had more medical intervention (P=0.0001). Patients with two or more abnormalities on MRE had more surgery compared with medical therapy (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with small bowel CD had a change in management as a result of the MRE. Because of its high clinical impact on patient management, MRE should become one of the preferred methods of small bowel evaluation in CD. Specific MRE findings may help to stratify treatment options, however, further work is required to validate this.

Inter-endoscopist agreement in diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how interpretation of abnormalities at the oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ) when making a diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus (BO) varies between endoscopists and to examine the impact of the endoscopy experience on these decisions. DESIGN/SETTING: Members of the Irish Society of Gastroenterology who regularly perform gastroscopy were invited to participate in a web based image assessment study. INTERVENTIONS: Questions were posed to ascertain level of endoscopy experience, and participants were asked to indicate the presence or absence of BO in 12 endoscopic images of the OGJ. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was overall level of agreement in responses and relationship to endoscopy experience. RESULTS: The responses of 65 clinicians regularly performing gastroscopy were analysed. In 3/12 images, showing typical long segment BO, there was a strong consensus on the endoscopic diagnosis (>95% agreement). However, agreement was fair to poor (κ for multiple raters, 0.31) on the presence or absence of short BO segments at endoscopy. Minimal differences were observed between experienced endoscopists (individuals with >10 years' endoscopy experience) and less experienced counterparts in the threshold for BO diagnosis. Inter-endoscopist agreement overall was not significantly better within the more experienced group. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates low interobserver agreement in endoscopic diagnosis of (short segment) BO, even among experienced endoscopists. Given the costs associated with endoscopic surveillance of BO, prompt efforts to promote consensus diagnosis and improve agreement are required as an important quality improvement measure in this area.